game theory research paper

SAP is an open access publisher of journals covering a wide range of academic disciplines.

Scientific & Academic Publishing

• Conferences
• Manuscript Submission

Journal of Game Theory

The Journal of Game Theory publishes original research, survey papers and short notes in game theory and its applications providing rigorous analysis and significant contributions from a methodological, conceptual or mathematical point of view. It welcomes game-oriented papers from all fields of study, including: biology; computer science, economics, engineering; management science, operations research, political science, psychology.

• Aims & Scope
• Editorial Board

Special Issues

• Special Issue Guidelines
• Special Issue-Call for Papers
• Published Special Issues

Journal Information

• Current Issue
• Most Downloaded Articles
• Journal Subscription
• Article Processing Charges
• Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
• Plagiarism Policy

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Topic Information

Participating journals, topic editors.

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

Game Theory and Applications

Dear Colleagues,

Game theory, which is the study of strategic decision making, was first developed as a branch of microeconomics. Since the seminal work of John Von Neumann, John Nash, and others, it has been recognised that there is an optimal strategy in the context of complex interactions (games) between two or more parties (players) that can lead to a predictable outcome (payoff). In practical situations, this outcome can often be quantitative and amenable to arithmetic operations (cost, number of infected people, number of vaccinated people, etc.), but it can be qualitative in nature (such as risk, readiness level, health state, etc.). A typical game defined in game theory has two or more players, a set of strategies available to these players, and a corresponding set of pay-off values (sometimes called utility values) for each player (which are, in the case of two-player games, often presented as a pay-off matrix). Game theory can be classified into two broad domains: non-cooperative game theory and cooperative game theory. Game Theory has become one of the conventional theoretical frameworks to model important decision-making processes in many aspects of life. In recent years, game theory has been adopted in diverse fields of study, such as evolutionary biology, sociology, psychology, political science and computer science. Game theory is used to study many phenomena and behavioural patterns in human societies and socio-economical systems, such as the emergence of and means of sustaining cooperation in communities and organisations, modelling of unethical or criminal behaviour, or the decision-making processes involved in vaccination against epidemics. Game Theory provides insight into peculiar behavioural interactions such as cooperative interactions within groups of animals, the bargaining and exchange in a marriage, or the incentivisation of Scottish salmon farmers. Game theory has gained such wide applicability due to the prevalence of strategic decision-making scenarios across different disciplines. The applications of game theory have become so diverse that it now spans many major disciplines. As such, it is eminently suitable to be defined as a ‘Topic’, which covers several MDPI journals. Therefore, we are proposing that ‘Game Theory and Applications’ is made a ‘Topic’ across the following four MDPI journals: [ Algorithms , Games , Information , Mathematics ]. As the topic editor, on behalf of my colleagues in the Topic board, I seek articles that could enrich this Topic collection. Papers can be one of the following types: [Articles, Reviews, etc.].

Dr. Mahendra Piraveenan Dr. Samit Bhattacharrya Topic Editors

•  game theory
•  evolutionary game theory
•  cooperative game theory
•  non-cooperative game theory
•  Nash equilibrium
•  quantal response equilibrium
•  bounded rationality
•  vaccination uptake modelling
•  coordination games
•  differential games
•  prisoners’ dilemma
•  zero-sum games

• Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
• Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
• Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
• Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
• Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (20 papers)

Further Information

Mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Submit your Manuscript

Submit your abstract.

An Introduction to Applicable Game Theory

This paper offers an introduction to game theory for applied economists. I try to give simple definitions and intuitive examples of the basic kinds of games and their solution concepts. There are four kinds of games: static or dynamic, and complete or incomplete information. ( Complete information means there is no private information.) The corresponding solution concepts are: Nash equilibrium in static games of complete information; backwards induction (or subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium) in dynamic games of complete information; Bayesian Nash equilibrium in static games with incomplete information; and perfect Bayesian (or sequential) equilibrium in dynamic games with incomplete information. The main theme of the paper is that these solution concepts are closely linked. As we consider progressively richer games, we progressively strengthen the solution concept, to rule out implausible equilibria in the richer games that would survive if we applied solution concepts available for simpler games. In each case, the stronger solution concept differs from the weaker concept only for the richer games, not for the simpler games.

• Acknowledgements and Disclosures

MARC RIS BibTeΧ

Download Citation Data

Published Versions

Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.11, pp.127-149. Winter, 1997.

More from NBER

In addition to working papers , the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter , the NBER Digest , the Bulletin on Retirement and Disability , the Bulletin on Health , and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship  — as well as online conference reports , video lectures , and interviews .

Game Theory Research Paper Topics

This comprehensive guide to game theory research paper topics is designed to assist students and researchers in the field of economics. Selecting a compelling and relevant research topic is a crucial step in the academic journey, and this guide aims to facilitate this process. We provide an extensive list of topics, divided into ten categories, each with ten unique ideas. Additionally, we offer expert advice on how to select a topic from this multitude and how to write a research paper in game theory. Lastly, we introduce iResearchNet’s professional writing services, tailored to support your academic journey and ensure success in your research endeavors.

100 Game Theory Research Paper Topics

Choosing a research paper topic is a critical step in the research process. The topic you select will guide your study and influence the complexity and relevance of your work. In the field of game theory, there are numerous intriguing topics that can be explored. To assist you in this process, we have compiled a comprehensive list of game theory research paper topics. These topics are divided into ten categories, each offering a different perspective on game theory.

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% off with 24start discount code.

• The role of Nash Equilibrium in game theory
• The concept of Dominant Strategy and its applications
• The Prisoner’s Dilemma and its implications
• The concept of Subgame Perfect Equilibrium
• Zero-sum games and their significance
• The role of Mixed Strategy in game theory
• The concept of Pareto Efficiency in game theory
• Evolutionary game theory and its applications
• The concept of Bayesian games
• The role of Repeated Games in game theory
• The role of game theory in strategic decision making
• The impact of game theory on negotiation strategies
• Game theory and decision making under uncertainty
• The role of game theory in conflict resolution
• The impact of game theory on cooperative decision making
• Game theory and decision making in competitive environments
• The role of game theory in risk management
• Game theory and decision making in auctions
• The impact of game theory on voting strategies
• Game theory and decision making in social dilemmas
• The use of game theory in understanding market competition
• The impact of game theory on economic policy making
• The role of game theory in understanding oligopolies
• Game theory and its role in understanding bargaining situations
• The influence of game theory on economic behavior
• The role of game theory in understanding public goods and free-riding
• The impact of game theory on understanding market failures
• Game theory and its role in understanding strategic trade policy
• The influence of game theory on understanding labor negotiations
• The role of game theory in understanding financial markets
• The role of game theory in strategic business decisions
• Game theory and its impact on pricing strategies
• The use of game theory in understanding competitive strategies
• Game theory and its role in merger and acquisition decisions
• The influence of game theory on supply chain management
• The role of game theory in understanding corporate governance
• The impact of game theory on marketing strategies
• Game theory and its role in understanding business negotiations
• The influence of game theory on organizational behavior
• The role of game theory in understanding innovation and R&D strategies
• The role of game theory in understanding voting behavior
• Game theory and its impact on political negotiations
• The use of game theory in understanding international relations
• Game theory and its role in understanding political coalitions
• The influence of game theory on policy making
• The role of game theory in understanding electoral competition
• The impact of game theory on understanding conflict and war
• Game theory and its role in understanding public policy decisions
• The influence of game theory on understanding political power dynamics
• The role of game theory in understanding political cooperation and conflict
• The role of game theory in algorithm design
• Game theory and its impact on network design and performance
• The use of game theory in understanding cybersecurity
• Game theory and its role in artificial intelligence
• The influence of game theory on distributed computing
• The role of game theory in understanding internet economics
• The impact of game theory on understanding data privacy
• Game theory and its role in understanding machine learning
• The influence of game theory on understanding software engineering
• The role of game theory in understanding social networks
• The role of game theory in understanding evolutionary biology
• Game theory and its impact on understanding animal behavior
• The use of game theory in understanding population dynamics
• Game theory and its role in understanding cooperation and conflict in nature
• The influence of game theory on understanding ecological interactions
• The role of game theory in understanding disease spread and control
• The impact of game theory on understanding conservation strategies
• Game theory and its role in understanding genetic algorithms
• The influence of game theory on understanding ecosystem management
• The role of game theory in understanding biodiversity
• The role of game theory in understanding social behavior
• Game theory and its impact on understanding social norms
• The use of game theory in understanding social networks
• Game theory and its role in understanding social conflict and cooperation
• The influence of game theory on understanding social influence and persuasion
• The role of game theory in understanding social decision making
• The impact of game theory on understanding social dilemmas
• Game theory and its role in understanding social justice and fairness
• The influence of game theory on understanding social change and stability
• The role of game theory in understanding social identity and group behavior
• The role of game theory in understanding mathematical optimization
• Game theory and its impact on understanding mathematical modeling
• The use of game theory in understanding mathematical logic
• Game theory and its role in understanding mathematical decision theory
• The influence of game theory on understanding mathematical probability
• The role of game theory in understanding mathematical statistics
• The impact of game theory on understanding mathematical operations research
• Game theory and its role in understanding mathematical graph theory
• The influence of game theory on understanding mathematical combinatorics
• The role of game theory in understanding mathematical dynamical systems
• The role of game theory in understanding behavioral economics
• Game theory and its impact on understanding quantum computing
• The use of game theory in understanding complex systems
• Game theory and its role in understanding network science
• The influence of game theory on understanding artificial intelligence 6. The role of game theory in understanding climate change strategies
• The impact of game theory on understanding sustainable development
• Game theory and its role in understanding social media dynamics
• The influence of game theory on understanding future economic models
• The role of game theory in understanding future political strategies

This comprehensive list of game theory research paper topics provides a wide range of options for your research. Each category offers unique insights into the different aspects of game theory, from fundamental concepts to future directions. Remember, the best research paper topic is one that not only interests you but also has sufficient resources for you to explore. We hope this list inspires you and aids you in your journey to write a compelling research paper in game theory.

Introduction to Game Theory

Game theory, a fascinating and influential field of study, is a theoretical framework for understanding social situations among competing players. In some respects, game theory is the science of strategy, or at least the optimal decision-making of independent and competing actors in a strategic setting.

The key pioneers of game theory were mathematicians John von Neumann and John Nash, as well as economist Oskar Morgenstern. Game theory was originally developed to understand economic behavior and is still widely used in economics today. However, its applications have expanded to various other fields, including computer science, political science, and biology.

In essence, game theory models the rational behavior of individuals who are aware that their actions affect each other. It involves designing mathematical models to study interactions in structured scenarios (games) and predict the outcome of these interactions. Games in this context are situations where outcomes depend on the actions of multiple players. Each player has a set of possible actions and makes a decision based on their preferences and the expected actions of other players.

Game theory has two main branches: cooperative and non-cooperative game theory. In cooperative games, binding agreements among players are possible, while in non-cooperative games, binding agreements are not. Non-cooperative game theory, which focuses on predicting individual behavior, is more widely used.

Game theory has a wide range of applications. In economics, it is used to model competition and cooperation between firms, to analyze bargaining situations, and to understand and design auctions. In political science, it is used to model strategic voting, while in computer science, it is used in the design of algorithms.

Research papers in game theory allow students to delve deeper into specific areas, contributing to their personal knowledge and the broader academic community. These papers can explore a wide range of game theory research paper topics, from understanding the role of game theory in economic decisions to examining its applications in computer science or political science.

The importance of game theory extends beyond academia. It has real-world implications in various sectors, including economics, politics, and computer science. By understanding the strategic interactions modeled by game theory, we can design better policies, make better business decisions, and develop more efficient algorithms.

How to Choose a Game Theory Topic

Choosing a research topic is a critical step in the research process. The topic you select will guide your study, influence the complexity and relevance of your work, and determine how engaged you are throughout the process. There are numerous intriguing game theory research paper topics that can be explored. Here are some expert tips to assist you in this process:

• Understanding Your Interests: The first step in choosing a research topic is to understand your interests. What areas of game theory fascinate you the most? Are you interested in how game theory influences economic behavior, or are you more intrigued by its role in computer science or political science? Reflecting on these questions can help you narrow down your options and choose a topic that truly engages you. Remember, research is a time-consuming process, and your interest in the topic will keep you motivated.
• Evaluating the Scope of the Topic: Once you have identified your areas of interest, the next step is to evaluate the scope of potential game theory research paper topics. A good research topic should be neither too broad nor too narrow. If it’s too broad, you may struggle to cover all aspects of the topic effectively. If it’s too narrow, you may have difficulty finding enough information to support your research. Try to choose a topic that is specific enough to be manageable but broad enough to have sufficient resources.
• Assessing Available Resources and Data: Before finalizing a topic, it’s important to assess the available resources and data. Are there enough academic sources, such as books, journal articles, and reports, that you can use for your research? Is there accessible data that you can analyze if your research requires it? A preliminary review of literature and data can save you from choosing a topic with limited resources.
• Considering the Relevance and Applicability of the Topic: Another important factor to consider is the relevance and applicability of the topic. Is the topic relevant to current issues in game theory? Can the findings of your research be applied in real-world settings? Choosing a relevant and applicable topic can increase the impact of your research and make it more interesting for your audience.
• Seeking Advice: Don’t hesitate to seek advice from your professors, peers, or other experts in the field. They can provide valuable insights, suggest resources, and help you refine your topic. Discussing your ideas with others can also help you see different perspectives and identify potential issues that you may not have considered.
• Flexibility: Finally, be flexible. Research is a dynamic process, and it’s okay to modify your topic as you delve deeper into your study. You may discover new aspects of the topic that are more interesting or find that some aspects are too challenging to explore due to constraints. Being flexible allows you to adapt your research to these changes and ensure that your study is both feasible and engaging.

Remember, choosing a research topic is not a decision to be taken lightly. It requires careful consideration and planning. However, with these expert tips, you can navigate this process more effectively and choose a game theory research paper topic that not only meets your academic requirements but also fuels your passion for learning.

How to Write a Game Theory Research Paper

Writing a research paper in game theory, like any other academic paper, requires careful planning, thorough research, and meticulous writing. Here are some expert tips to guide you through this process:

• Understanding the Structure of a Research Paper: A typical research paper includes an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. The introduction presents your research question and its significance. The literature review provides an overview of existing research related to your topic. The methodology explains how you conducted your research. The results section presents your findings, and the discussion interprets these findings in the context of your research question. Finally, the conclusion summarizes your research and suggests areas for future research.
• Developing a Strong Thesis Statement: Your thesis statement is the central argument of your research paper. It should be clear, concise, and debatable. A strong thesis statement guides your research and helps your readers understand the purpose of your paper.
• Conducting Thorough Research: Before you start writing, conduct a thorough review of the literature related to your topic. This will help you understand the current state of research in your area, identify gaps in the literature, and position your research within this context. Use academic databases to find relevant books, journal articles, and other resources. Remember to evaluate the credibility of your sources and take detailed notes to help you when writing.
• Writing and Revising Drafts: Start writing your research paper by creating an outline based on the structure of a research paper. This will help you organize your thoughts and ensure that you cover all necessary sections. Write a first draft without worrying too much about perfection. Focus on getting your ideas down first. Then, revise your draft to improve clarity, coherence, and argumentation. Make sure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and supports your thesis statement.
• Proper Citation and Avoiding Plagiarism: Always cite your sources properly to give credit to the authors whose work you are building upon and to avoid plagiarism. Familiarize yourself with the citation style required by your institution or discipline, such as APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, or Harvard. There are many citation tools available online that can help you with this.
• Seeking Feedback: Don’t hesitate to seek feedback on your drafts from your professors, peers, or writing centers at your institution. They can provide valuable insights and help you improve your paper.
• Proofreading: Finally, proofread your paper to check for any grammatical errors, typos, or inconsistencies in formatting. A well-written, error-free paper makes a good impression on your readers and enhances the credibility of your research.
• Incorporating Game Theory Concepts: When writing a game theory research paper, it’s crucial to accurately incorporate game theory concepts. Make sure you understand these concepts thoroughly and can explain them clearly in your paper. Use diagrams and examples where appropriate to illustrate these concepts.
• Analyzing and Interpreting Game Theory Models: Game theory research often involves analyzing and interpreting game theory models. Be sure to explain your analysis process and interpret the results in a way that is understandable to your readers. Discuss the implications of your findings for the broader field of game theory.
• Discussing Real-World Applications: Game theory is a practical field with many real-world applications. Discuss how your research relates to these applications. This can make your research more interesting and relevant to your readers.

Remember, writing a research paper is a process that requires time, effort, and patience. Don’t rush through it. Take your time to understand your topic, conduct thorough research, and write carefully. With these expert tips, you can write a compelling game theory research paper that contributes to your academic success and the broader field of game theory.

iResearchNet’s Research Paper Writing Services

In the academic journey, students often encounter challenges that may hinder their ability to produce high-quality research papers. Whether it’s a lack of time, limited understanding of the topic, or difficulties in writing, these challenges can make the process stressful and overwhelming. This is where iResearchNet’s professional writing services come in. We are committed to supporting students in their academic journey by providing top-notch writing services tailored to their unique needs.

• Expert Degree-Holding Writers: At iResearchNet, we understand the importance of quality in academic writing. That’s why we have a team of expert writers who hold degrees in various fields, including economics. Our writers are not only knowledgeable in their respective fields but also experienced in academic writing. They understand the nuances of writing research papers and are adept at producing well-structured, coherent, and insightful papers.
• Custom Written Works: We believe that every research paper is unique and should be treated as such. Our writers work closely with you to understand your specific requirements and expectations. They then craft a custom research paper that meets these requirements and reflects your understanding and perspective.
• In-Depth Research: Good research is the backbone of a compelling research paper. Our writers conduct thorough research using reliable and relevant sources to ensure that your paper is informative and credible. They are skilled at analyzing and synthesizing information, presenting complex ideas clearly, and developing strong arguments.
• Custom Formatting: Formatting is an essential aspect of academic writing that contributes to the readability and professionalism of your paper. Our writers are familiar with various formatting styles, including APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, and Harvard, and can format your paper according to your preferred style.
• Top Quality: Quality is at the heart of our services. We strive to deliver research papers that are not only well-written and well-researched but also original and plagiarism-free. Our writers adhere to high writing standards, and our quality assurance team reviews each paper to ensure it meets these standards.
• Customized Solutions: We understand that each student has unique needs and circumstances. Whether you need a research paper on a complex game theory topic, assistance with a specific section of your paper, or editing and proofreading services, we can provide a solution that fits your needs.
• Flexible Pricing: We believe that professional writing services should be accessible to all students. That’s why we offer flexible pricing options that cater to different budgets. We are transparent about our pricing, and there are no hidden charges.
• Short Deadlines up to 3 hours: We understand that time is of the essence when it comes to academic assignments. Whether you need a research paper in a week or a few hours, our writers are up to the task. They are skilled at working under pressure and can deliver high-quality papers within short deadlines.
• Timely Delivery: We respect your deadlines and are committed to delivering your paper on time. Our writers start working on your paper as soon as your order is confirmed, and we keep you updated on the progress of your paper.
• 24/7 Support: We believe in providing continuous support to our clients. Our customer support team is available 24/7 to answer your questions, address your concerns, and assist you with your order.
• Absolute Privacy: We respect your privacy and are committed to protecting your personal and financial information. We have robust privacy policies and security measures in place to ensure that your information is safe.
• Easy Order Tracking: We provide an easy and transparent order tracking system that allows you to monitor the progress of your paper and communicate with your writer.
• Money Back Guarantee: Your satisfaction is our top priority. If you are not satisfied with our service, we offer a money-back guarantee.

At iResearchNet, we are committed to helping you succeed in your academic journey. We understand the challenges of writing a research paper and are here to support you every step of the way. Whether you need help choosing a topic, conducting research, writing your paper, or editing and proofreading your work, our expert writers are ready to assist you. With our professional writing services, you can focus on learning and leave the stress of writing to us. So why wait? Order a custom game theory research paper from iResearchNet today and experience the difference.

Empower Your Academic Journey: Choose iResearchNet Today!

Embarking on the journey of writing a research paper can be a daunting task, especially when it comes to complex fields like game theory. But remember, you don’t have to face this challenge alone. iResearchNet is here to provide you with the support you need to produce a high-quality, insightful, and impactful research paper.

Our team of expert degree-holding writers is ready to assist you in creating a custom-written research paper that not only meets but exceeds academic standards. Whether you’re struggling with topic selection, research, writing, or formatting, we’ve got you covered. Our comprehensive services are designed to cater to your unique needs and ensure your academic success.

Don’t let the stress of writing a research paper hinder your learning experience. Take advantage of our professional writing services and focus on what truly matters – your learning and growth. With iResearchNet, you can be confident that you’re submitting a top-quality research paper that reflects your understanding and hard work.

So, are you ready to empower your academic journey? Order a custom economics research paper on any of the game theory research paper topics from iResearchNet today. Let us help you navigate your academic journey and secure your success. Remember, your academic achievement is our top priority, and we’re committed to helping you reach your goals. Order now and experience the iResearchNet difference!

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER

Game Theory and the Evolution of Cooperation

• Published: 12 June 2021
• Volume 10 , pages 379–399, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

• Bo-Yu Zhang 1 &
• Shan Pei 1  

1783 Accesses

3 Citations

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Evolution is based on the competition between individuals and therefore rewards only selfish behavior. How cooperation or altruism behavior could prevail in social dilemma then becomes a problematic issue. Game theory offers a powerful mathematical approach for studying social behavior. It has been widely used to explain the evolution of cooperation. In this paper, we first introduce related static and dynamic game methods. Then we review two types of mechanisms that can promote cooperation in groups of genetically unrelated individuals, (i) direct reciprocity in repeated games, and (ii) incentive mechanisms such as reward and punishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Evolution of cooperation in stochastic games

Generalized Social Dilemmas: The Evolution of Cooperation in Populations with Variable Group Size

A Note on Altruism in Asymmetric Games: An Indirect Evolutionary Approach

Pennisi, E.: How did cooperative behavior evolve? Science 309 (5731), 93–93 (2005)

Google Scholar  

Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

MATH   Google Scholar  

Nowak, M.A.: Evolutionary Dynamics. Belknap Press, Cambridge (2006)

Sigmund, K.: The Calculus of Selfishness. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010)

Nash, J.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36 , 48–49 (1950)

MathSciNet   MATH   Google Scholar  

Harsanyi, J.C., Selten, R.: A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

Maynard Smith, J.: Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

Maynard Smith, J.M., Price, G.R.: The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246 (5427), 15–18 (1973)

McKelvey, R.D., Palfrey, T.A.: Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econ. Behav. 10 , 6–38 (1995)

Goeree, J.K., Holt, C.A., Palfrey, T.A.: Regular quantal response equilibrium. Exp. Econ. 8 , 347–367 (2005)

McKelvey, R.D., Palfrey, T.A.: Quantal response equilibria for extensive form games. Exp. Econ. 1 , 9–41 (1998)

Sandholm, W.H.: Population Games and Evolutionary Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)

Turocy, T.L.: A dynamic homotopy interpretation of the logistic quantal response equilibrium correspondence. Games Econ. Behav. 51 , 243–263 (2005)

Zhang, B., Fan, S., Li, C., Zheng, X., Bao, J., Cressman, R., Tao, Y.: Opting out against defection leads to stable coexistence with cooperation. Sci. Rep. 6 , 35902 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35902

Zhang, B.: Quantal response methods for equilibrium selection in normal form game. J. Math. Econ. 64 , 113–123 (2016)

Zhang, B., Hofbauer, J.: Quantal response methods for equilibrium selection in 2×2 coordination games. Games Econ. Behav. 97 , 19–31 (2016)

Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K.: Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

Taylor, P., Jonker, L.: Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Math. Biosci. 50 , 145–156 (1978)

Börgers, T., Sarin, R.: Learning through reinforcement and replicator dynamics[J]. J. Econ. Theory 77 (1), 1–14 (1997)

Schlag, K.H.: Why imitate, and if so, how? A boundedly rational approach to multi-armed bandits. J. Econ. Theory 78 (1), 130–156 (1998)

Weibull, J.W.: Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT press, Cambridge (1995)

Samuelson, L.: Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection. MIT press, Boston (1997)

Binmore, K., Samuelson, L.: Muddling through: noisy equilibrium selection. J. Econ. Theory 74 (2), 235–265 (1997)

Cressman, R.: The Stability Concept of Evolutionary Game Theory: A Dynamic Approach. Springer, Berlin (1992)

Hofbauer, J., Schuster, P., Sigmund, K.: A note on evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 81 (3), 609–612 (1979)

MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Zeeman, E.C.: Population Dynamics from Game Theory/Global Theory of Dynamical Systems, pp. 471–497. Springer, Berlin (1980)

Cressman, R., Ansell, C., Binmore, K.: Evolutionary Dynamics and Extensive form Games, vol. 5. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

Maynard Smith, J., Hofbauer, J.: The “battle of the sexes”: a genetic model with limit cycle behavior. Theor. Popul. Biol. 32 (1), 1–14 (1987)

Schuster, P., Sigmund, K.: Coyness, philandering and stable strategies. Anim. Behav. 29 (1), 186–192 (1981)

Selten, R.: A note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetric animal conflicts. J. Theor. Biol. 84 , 93–101 (1980)

Zhang, B., Hofbauer, J.: Equilibrium selection via replicator dynamics. Int. J. Game Theory 44 , 433–448 (2015)

Eshel, I.: Evolutionarily stable strategies and viability selection in Mendelian populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22 (2), 204–217 (1982)

Lessard, S.: Evolutionary dynamics in frequency-dependent two-phenotype models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25 (2), 210–234 (1984)

Maynard Smith, J.: Will a sexual population evolve to an ESS? [J]. Am. Nat. 117 (6), 1015–1018 (1981)

Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D.: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211 , 1390–1396 (1981)

Milinski, M.: Tit for tat in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation. Nature 325 , 433–435 (1987)

Adami, C., Hintze, A.: Evolutionary instability of zero-determinant strategies demonstrates that winning is not everything. Nat. Commun. 4 , 2193 (2013)

Hilbe, C., Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: The evolution of extortion in iterated prisoner’s dilemma games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 , 6913–6918 (2013)

Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: The evolution of stochastic strategies in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Acta Appl. Math. 20 , 247–265 (1990)

Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature 355 , 250–253 (1992)

Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Nature 364 , 56–58 (1993)

Press, W.H., Dyson, F.D.: Iterated prisoner’s dilemma contains strategies that dominate any evolutionary opponent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 , 10409–10413 (2012)

Stewart, A.J., Plotkin, J.B.: From extortion to generosity, evolution in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 , 15348–15353 (2013)

Fudenberg, D., Harris, C.: Evolutionary dynamics with aggregate shocks. J. Econ. Theor. 57 , 420–441 (1992)

Imhof, L.A., Fudenberg, D., Nowak, M.A.: Evolutionary cycles of cooperation and defection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 , 10797–10800 (2005)

Kurokawa, S., Ihara, Y.: Emergence of cooperation in public goods games. Proc. R. Soc. B. 276 , 1379–1384 (2009)

Nowak, M.A., Sasaki, A., Taylor, C., Fudenberg, D.: Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations. Nature 428 , 646–650 (2004)

Dong, Y., Li, C., Tao, Y., Zhang, B.: Evolution of conformity in social dilemmas. PLoS ONE 10 , e0137435 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137435

Hilbe, C., Röhl, T., Milinski, M.: Extortion subdues human players but is finally punished in the prisoner’s dilemma. Nat. Commun. 5 , 3976 (2014)

Wang, Z., Zhou, Y., Lien, J.W., Zheng, J., Xu, B.: Extortion can outperform generosity in the iterated prisoners’ dilemma. Nat. Commu. 7 , 11125 (2016)

Le, S., Boyd, R.: Evolutionary dynamics of the continuous iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. J. Theor. Biol. 245 , 258–267 (2007)

Wahl, L., Nowak, M.A.: The continuous Prisoner’s Dilemma: I. linear reactive strategies. J. Theor. Biol. 200 , 307–321 (1999)

Wahl, L., Nowak, M.A.: The continuous Prisoner’s Dilemma: II. Linear reactive strategies with noise. J. Theor. Biol. 200 , 323–338 (1999)

Boyd, R., Richerson, P.J.: The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. J. Theor. Biol. 132 , 337–356 (1988)

Hauert, C., Schuster, H.: Effects of increasing the number of players and memory size in the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma: a numerical approach. Proc. R. Soc. B. 264 , 513–519 (1997)

Pinheiro, F.L., Vasconcelos, V.V., Santos, F.C., Pacheco, J.M.: Evolution of all-or-none strategies in repeated public goods dilemmas. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10 , e1003945 (2014)

Gracia-Lázaro, C., Ferrer, A., Ruiz, G., Tarancón, A., Cuesta, J.A., Sánchez, A., et al.: Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s Dilemma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 , 12922–12926 (2012)

Grujić, J., Fosco, C., Araujo, L., Cuesta, J.A., Sánchez, A.: Social experiments in the mesoscale: humans playing a spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma. PLoS ONE 5 , e13749 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013749

Grujić, J., Gracia-Lázaro, C., Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Traulsen, A., Cuesta, J.A., et al.: A comparative analysis of spatial Prisoners Dilemma experiments: conditional cooperation and payoff irrelevance. Sci. Rep. 4 , 4615 (2014)

Grujić, J., Röhl, T., Semmann, D., Milinski, M., Traulsen, A.: Consistent strategy updating in spatial and nonspatial behavioral experiments does not promote cooperation in social networks. PLoS ONE 7 , e47718 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047718

Traulsen, A., Semmann, D., Sommerfeld, R.D., Krambeck, H.J., Milinski, M.: Human strategy updating in evolutionary games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 , 2962–2966 (2010)

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S.: Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 100 , 541–556 (2010)

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., Fehr, E.: Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ. Lett. 71 , 397–404 (2001)

Keser, C., van Winden, F.: Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scand. J. Econ. 102 , 23–39 (2000)

Kurzban, R., Houser, D.: Experiments investigating cooperative type in humans: a complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 , 1803–1807 (2005)

Wu, J.J., Li, C., Zhang, B., Cressman, R., Tao, Y.: The role of institutional incentives and the exemplar in promoting cooperation. Sci. Rep. 4 , 6421 (2014)

Axelrod, R., Dion, D.: The further evolution of cooperation. Science 242 , 1385–1390 (1988)

Nowak, M.A.: Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314 (5805), 1560–1563 (2006)

Aktipis, C.A.: Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation. J. Theor. Biol. 231 , 249–260 (2004)

Fujiwara-Greve, T., Okuno-Fujiwara, M.: Voluntarily separable repeated prisoner’s dilemma. Rev. Econ. Stud. 76 , 993–1021 (2009)

Hauk, E.: Multiple prisoner’s dilemma games with (out) an outside option: an experimental study. Theory Decis. 54 (3), 207–229 (2003)

Hayashi, N.: From TIT-for-TAT to OUT-for-TAT. Soc. Theory Methods 8 , 19–32 (1993)

Izquierdo, S.S., Izquierdo, L.R., Vega-Redondo, F.: The option to leave: conditional dissociation in the evolution of cooperation. J. Teor. Biol. 267 , 76–84 (2010)

Orbell, J.M., Dawes, R.M.: Social welfare, cooperators’ advantage, and the option of not playing the game. Am. Sociol. Rev. 58 , 787–800 (1993)

Schuessler, R.: Exit threats and cooperation under anonymity. J. Conflict Resolut. 33 , 728–749 (1989)

Zheng, X.D., Li, C., Yu, J.R., Wang, S.C., Fan, S.J., Zhang, B.Y., Tao, Y.: A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the prisoner’s dilemma game. J. Theor. Biol. 420 , 12–17 (2017)

Hauert, C., De Monte, S., Hofauer, J., Sigmund, K.: Volunteering as red queen mechanism for cooperation in public goods games. Science 296 , 1129–1132 (2002)

Semmann, D., Krambeck, H.J., Milinski, M.: Volunteering leads to rock–paper–scissors dynamics in a public goods game. Nature 425 , 390–393 (2003)

Hamilton, W.D.: The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J. Theor. Biol. 7 , 1–52 (1964)

Trivers, R.L.: The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46 , 35–57 (1971)

Clutton-Brock, T.H., Parker, G.A.: Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373 , 209–216 (1995)

Balliet, D., Mulder, L.B., VanLange, P.A.M.: Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 137 , 594–615 (2011)

Guala, F.: Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Behav. Brain Sci. 35 , 1–15 (2012)

Perc, M., Jordan, J.J., Rand, D.G., Wang, Z., Boccaletti, S., Szolnoki, A.: Statistical physics of human cooperation. Phys. Rep. 687 , 1–51 (2017)

Hilbe, C., Sigmund, K.: Incentives and opportunism: from the carrot to the stick. Proc. R. Soc. B 277 , 2427–2433 (2010)

Sigmund, K., Hauert, C., Nowak, M.A.: Reward and punishment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98 (10), 757–10762 (2001)

Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Richerson, P.J.: The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 , 3531–3535 (2003)

dos Santos, M.: The evolution of anti-social rewarding and its countermeasures in public goods games. Proc. R. Soc. B 282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1994

Fowler, J.H.: Altruistic punishment and the origin of cooperation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 , 7047–7049 (2005)

Gao, L., Wang, Z., Pansini, R., Li, Y.T., Wang, R.W.: Collective punishment is more effective than collective reward for promoting cooperation. Sci. Rep. 5 , 17752 (2015)

Hauert, C., Traulsen, A., Brandt, H., Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: Via freedom to coercion: the emergence of costly punishment. Sci. 316 , 1905–1907 (2007)

Hilbe, C., Traulsen, A.: Emergence of responsible sanctions without second order free riders, antisocial punishment or spite. Sci. Rep. 2 , 458 (2012)

Okada, I., Yamamoto, H., Toriumi, F., Sasaki, T.: The effect of incentives and meta-incentives on the evolution of cooperation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11 , e1004232 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004232

Szolnoki, A., Perc, M.: Antisocial pool rewarding does not deter public cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. B. 282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1975

Traulsen, A., Hauert, C., De Silva, H., Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: Exploration dynamics in evolutionary games. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106 , 709–712 (2009)

Andreoni, J., Harbaugh, W.T., Vesterlund, L.: The carrot or the stick: rewards, punishments and cooperation. Am. Econ. Rev. 93 , 893–902 (2003)

Cinyabuguma, M., Page, T., Putterman, L.: Can second-order punishment deter perverse punishment. Exp. Econ. 9 , 265–279 (2006)

Denant-Boemont, L., Masclet, D., Noussair, C.: Punishment, counterpunishment and sanction enforcement in a social dilemma experiment. Econ. Theory 33 , 145–167 (2007)

Dreber, A., Rand, D.G., Fudenberg, D., Nowak, M.A.: Winners don’t punish. Nature 452 , 348–351 (2008)

Egas, M., Riedl, A.: The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. B 275 , 871–878 (2008)

Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U.: The nature of human altruism. Nature 425 , 785–791 (2003)

Fehr, E., Gachter, S.: Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 90 , 980–994 (2000)

Fehr, E., Rockenbach, B.: Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature 422 , 137–140 (2003)

Gächter, S., Renner, E., Sefton, M.: The long-run benefits of punishment. Science 322 , 1510–1510 (2008)

Gurerk, O., Irlenbusch, B., Rockenbach, B.: The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Sci. 312 , 108–111 (2006)

Herrmann, B., Thoni, C., Gächter, S.: Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319 , 1362–1367 (2008)

Nikiforakis, N.: Punishment and counter punishment in public good games: can we really govern ourselves? J. Public. Econ. 92 , 91–112 (2008)

Rand, D.G., Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Fudenberg, D., Nowak, M.A.: Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science 325 , 1272–1275 (2009)

Rand, D.G., Nowak, M.A.: The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. Nat. Commun. 2 , 434 (2011)

Sefton, M., Schupp, R., Walker, M.: The effect of rewards and sanctions in provision of public goods. Econ. Inq. 45 , 671–690 (2007)

Walker, J.M., Halloran, M.: Rewards and sanctions and the provision of public goods in one-shot settings. Exp. Econ. 7 , 235–247 (2004)

Wu, J.J., Zhang, B., Zhou, Z.X., He, Q.Q., Zheng, X.D., Cressman, R., Tao, Y.: Costly punishment does not always increase cooperation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106 , 17448–17451 (2009)

Sutter, M., Haigner, S., Kocher, M.G.: Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77 , 1540–1566 (2010)

Chen, X., Sasaki, T., Brännström, A., Dieckmann, U.: First carrot, then stick: how the adaptive hybridization of incentives promotes cooperation. J. R. Soc. Interface 12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0935

Cressman, R., Song, J.W., Zhang, B., Tao, Y.: Cooperation and evolutionary dynamics in the public goods game with institutional incentives. J. Theor. Biol. 299 , 144–151 (2012)

Oya, G., Ohstuki, H.: Stable polymorphism of cooperators and punishers in a public goods game. J. Theor. Biol. 419 , 243–253 (2017)

Perc, M.: Sustainable institutionalized punishment requires elimination of second-order free-riders. Sci. Rep. 2 , 344 (2012)

Sasaki, T., Brännström, A., Dieckmann, U., Sigmund, K.: The take-it-or-leave-it option allows small penalties to overcome social dilemmas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 , 1165–1169 (2012)

Sasaki, T., Uchida, S., Chen, X.: Voluntary rewards mediate the evolution of pool punishment for maintaining public goods in large populations. Sci. Rep. 5 , 8917 (2015)

Schoenmakers, S., Hilbe, C., Blasius, B., Traulsen, A.: Sanctions as honest signals—the evolution of pool punishment by public sanctioning institutions. J. Theor. Biol. 356 , 36–46 (2014)

Sigmund, K., De-Silva, H., Traulsen, A., Hauert, C.: Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons. Nature 466 , 861–863 (2010)

Szolnoki, A., Perc, M.: Second-order free-riding on antisocial punishment restores the effectiveness of prosocial punishment. Phys. Rev. X . 7, 041027 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041027

Dong, Y., Sasaki, T., Zhang, B.: The competitive advantage of institutional reward. Proc. R. Soc. B 286 , 20190001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0001

Zhang, B., An, X., Dong, Y.: Conditional cooperator enhances institutional punishment in public goods game. Appl. Math. Comput. 390 , 125600 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125600

Cressman, R., Wu, J.J., Li, C., Tao, Y.: Game experiments on cooperation through reward and punishment. Biol. Theory 8 , 158–166 (2013)

Putterman, L., Tyran, J.L., Kamei, K.: Public goods and voting on formal sanction schemes. J. Public Econ. 95 , 1213–1222 (2011)

Traulsen, A., Röhl, T., Milinski, M.: An economic experiment reveals that humans prefer pool punishment to maintain the commons. Proc. R. Soc. B 279 , 3716–3721 (2012)

Yamagishi, T.: The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51 , 110–116 (1986)

Zhang, B., Li, C., De Silva, H., Bednarik, P., Sigmund, K.: The evolution of sanctioning institutions: an experimental approach to the social contract. Exp. Econ. 17 , 285–303 (2014)

Yang, C.L., Zhang, B., Charness, G., Li, C., Lien, J.: Endogenous rewards promote cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 , 9968–9973 (2018)

Andreoni, J., Gee, L.L.: Gun for hire: delegated enforcement and peer punishment in public goods provision. J. Public Econ. 96 , 1036–1046 (2012)

Dong, Y., Zhang, B., Tao, Y.: The dynamics of human behavior in the public goods game with institutional incentives. Sci. Rep. 6 (1), 1–7 (2016)

Kamijo, Y., Nihonsugi, T., Takeuchi, A., Funaki, Y.: Sustaining cooperation in social dilemmas: comparison of centralized punishment institutions. Games Econ. Behav. 84 , 180–195 (2014)

Qin, X., Wang, S.: Using an exogenous mechanism to examine efficient probabilistic punishment. J. Econ. Psychol. 39 , 1–10 (2013)

Falkinger, J., Fehr, E., Gächter, S., Winter-Ember, R.: A simple mechanism for the efficient provision of public goods: experimental evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 90 (1), 247–264 (2000)

Huang, S., Dong, Y., Zhang, B.: The optimal incentive in promoting cooperation: punish the worst and do not only reward the best.  Singap. Econ. Rev. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590820500071

Article   Google Scholar  

Hilbe, C., Nowak, M.A., Traulsen, A.: Adaptive dynamics of extortion and compliance. PLoS ONE 8 , e77886 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077886

Izquierdo, S.S., Izquierdo, L.R., Vega-Redondo, F.: Leave and let leave: a sufcient condition to explain the evolutionary emergence of cooperation. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 46 , 91–113 (2014)

Zhang, B., Li, C., Tao, Y.: Evolutionary stability and the evolution of cooperation in heterogeneous graphs. Dyn. Games Appl. 6 , 567–579 (2016)

Galbiati, R., Vertova, P.: Obligations and cooperative behaviour in public good games. Games Econ. Behav. 64 (1), 146–170 (2008)

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Laboratory of Mathematics and Complex Systems, Ministry of Education; School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

Bo-Yu Zhang & Shan Pei

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo-Yu Zhang .

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71771026 and 71922004).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Zhang, BY., Pei, S. Game Theory and the Evolution of Cooperation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. China 10 , 379–399 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40305-021-00350-z

Download citation

Received : 14 October 2020

Revised : 09 April 2021

Accepted : 30 April 2021

Published : 12 June 2021

Issue Date : June 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40305-021-00350-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Cooperation
• Game theory
• Direct reciprocity

Mathematics Subject Classification

• Applications of game theory
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

A Brief Introduction to the Basics of Game Theory

21 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2011 Last revised: 17 Nov 2017

Matthew O. Jackson

Stanford University - Department of Economics; Santa Fe Institute

Date Written: December 5, 2011

I provide a (very) brief introduction to game theory. I have developed these notes to provide quick access to some of the basics of game theory; mainly as an aid for students in courses in which I assumed familiarity with game theory but did not require it as a prerequisite.

Keywords: Game Theory

JEL Classification: C72

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Matthew O. Jackson (Contact Author)

Stanford university - department of economics ( email ).

Landau Economics Building 579 Serra Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6072 United States 1-650-723-3544 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.stanford.edu/~jacksonm

Santa Fe Institute

1399 Hyde Park Road Santa Fe, NM 87501 United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, social sciences education ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Behavioral & Experimental Finance (Editor's Choice) eJournal

Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic

Finance Education eJournal

Economics educator: courses, cases & teaching ejournal.

Grab your spot at the free arXiv Accessibility Forum

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory

Title: auto-bidding and auctions in online advertising: a survey.

Abstract: In this survey, we summarize recent developments in research fueled by the growing adoption of automated bidding strategies in online advertising. We explore the challenges and opportunities that have arisen as markets embrace this autobidding and cover a range of topics in this area, including bidding algorithms, equilibrium analysis and efficiency of common auction formats, and optimal auction design.

Submission history

Access paper:.

• HTML (experimental)
• Other Formats

References & Citations

• Google Scholar
• Semantic Scholar

BibTeX formatted citation

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, data and media associated with this article, recommenders and search tools.

• Institution

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .