Show that you understand the current state of research on your topic.
The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.
One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.
Download our research proposal template
Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.
Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:
The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.
Your introduction should:
To guide your introduction , include information about:
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
See an example
As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.
In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:
Following the literature review, restate your main objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.
? or ? , , or research design? | |
, )? ? | |
, , , )? | |
? |
To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.
For example, your results might have implications for:
Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .
Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.
Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.
Download our research schedule template
Research phase | Objectives | Deadline |
---|---|---|
1. Background research and literature review | 20th January | |
2. Research design planning | and data analysis methods | 13th February |
3. Data collection and preparation | with selected participants and code interviews | 24th March |
4. Data analysis | of interview transcripts | 22nd April |
5. Writing | 17th June | |
6. Revision | final work | 28th July |
If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.
Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:
To determine your budget, think about:
If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Methodology
Statistics
Research bias
Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .
Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.
I will compare …
A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.
Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.
A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.
A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.
A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.
All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.
Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.
Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.
The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. & George, T. (2024, September 05). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 12, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-proposal/
Other students also liked, how to write a problem statement | guide & examples, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".
I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Writing the proposal of a research work in the present era is a challenging task due to the constantly evolving trends in the qualitative research design and the need to incorporate medical advances into the methodology. The proposal is a detailed plan or ‘blueprint’ for the intended study, and once it is completed, the research project should flow smoothly. Even today, many of the proposals at post-graduate evaluation committees and application proposals for funding are substandard. A search was conducted with keywords such as research proposal, writing proposal and qualitative using search engines, namely, PubMed and Google Scholar, and an attempt has been made to provide broad guidelines for writing a scientifically appropriate research proposal.
A clean, well-thought-out proposal forms the backbone for the research itself and hence becomes the most important step in the process of conduct of research.[ 1 ] The objective of preparing a research proposal would be to obtain approvals from various committees including ethics committee [details under ‘Research methodology II’ section [ Table 1 ] in this issue of IJA) and to request for grants. However, there are very few universally accepted guidelines for preparation of a good quality research proposal. A search was performed with keywords such as research proposal, funding, qualitative and writing proposals using search engines, namely, PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus.
Five ‘C’s while writing a literature review
A proposal needs to show how your work fits into what is already known about the topic and what new paradigm will it add to the literature, while specifying the question that the research will answer, establishing its significance, and the implications of the answer.[ 2 ] The proposal must be capable of convincing the evaluation committee about the credibility, achievability, practicality and reproducibility (repeatability) of the research design.[ 3 ] Four categories of audience with different expectations may be present in the evaluation committees, namely academic colleagues, policy-makers, practitioners and lay audiences who evaluate the research proposal. Tips for preparation of a good research proposal include; ‘be practical, be persuasive, make broader links, aim for crystal clarity and plan before you write’. A researcher must be balanced, with a realistic understanding of what can be achieved. Being persuasive implies that researcher must be able to convince other researchers, research funding agencies, educational institutions and supervisors that the research is worth getting approval. The aim of the researcher should be clearly stated in simple language that describes the research in a way that non-specialists can comprehend, without use of jargons. The proposal must not only demonstrate that it is based on an intelligent understanding of the existing literature but also show that the writer has thought about the time needed to conduct each stage of the research.[ 4 , 5 ]
The contents or formats of a research proposal vary depending on the requirements of evaluation committee and are generally provided by the evaluation committee or the institution.
In general, a cover page should contain the (i) title of the proposal, (ii) name and affiliation of the researcher (principal investigator) and co-investigators, (iii) institutional affiliation (degree of the investigator and the name of institution where the study will be performed), details of contact such as phone numbers, E-mail id's and lines for signatures of investigators.
The main contents of the proposal may be presented under the following headings: (i) introduction, (ii) review of literature, (iii) aims and objectives, (iv) research design and methods, (v) ethical considerations, (vi) budget, (vii) appendices and (viii) citations.[ 4 ]
It is also sometimes termed as ‘need for study’ or ‘abstract’. Introduction is an initial pitch of an idea; it sets the scene and puts the research in context.[ 6 ] The introduction should be designed to create interest in the reader about the topic and proposal. It should convey to the reader, what you want to do, what necessitates the study and your passion for the topic.[ 7 ] Some questions that can be used to assess the significance of the study are: (i) Who has an interest in the domain of inquiry? (ii) What do we already know about the topic? (iii) What has not been answered adequately in previous research and practice? (iv) How will this research add to knowledge, practice and policy in this area? Some of the evaluation committees, expect the last two questions, elaborated under a separate heading of ‘background and significance’.[ 8 ] Introduction should also contain the hypothesis behind the research design. If hypothesis cannot be constructed, the line of inquiry to be used in the research must be indicated.
It refers to all sources of scientific evidence pertaining to the topic in interest. In the present era of digitalisation and easy accessibility, there is an enormous amount of relevant data available, making it a challenge for the researcher to include all of it in his/her review.[ 9 ] It is crucial to structure this section intelligently so that the reader can grasp the argument related to your study in relation to that of other researchers, while still demonstrating to your readers that your work is original and innovative. It is preferable to summarise each article in a paragraph, highlighting the details pertinent to the topic of interest. The progression of review can move from the more general to the more focused studies, or a historical progression can be used to develop the story, without making it exhaustive.[ 1 ] Literature should include supporting data, disagreements and controversies. Five ‘C's may be kept in mind while writing a literature review[ 10 ] [ Table 1 ].
The research purpose (or goal or aim) gives a broad indication of what the researcher wishes to achieve in the research. The hypothesis to be tested can be the aim of the study. The objectives related to parameters or tools used to achieve the aim are generally categorised as primary and secondary objectives.
The objective here is to convince the reader that the overall research design and methods of analysis will correctly address the research problem and to impress upon the reader that the methodology/sources chosen are appropriate for the specific topic. It should be unmistakably tied to the specific aims of your study.
In this section, the methods and sources used to conduct the research must be discussed, including specific references to sites, databases, key texts or authors that will be indispensable to the project. There should be specific mention about the methodological approaches to be undertaken to gather information, about the techniques to be used to analyse it and about the tests of external validity to which researcher is committed.[ 10 , 11 ]
The components of this section include the following:[ 4 ]
Population refers to all the elements (individuals, objects or substances) that meet certain criteria for inclusion in a given universe,[ 12 ] and sample refers to subset of population which meets the inclusion criteria for enrolment into the study. The inclusion and exclusion criteria should be clearly defined. The details pertaining to sample size are discussed in the article “Sample size calculation: Basic priniciples” published in this issue of IJA.
The researcher is expected to give a detailed account of the methodology adopted for collection of data, which include the time frame required for the research. The methodology should be tested for its validity and ensure that, in pursuit of achieving the results, the participant's life is not jeopardised. The author should anticipate and acknowledge any potential barrier and pitfall in carrying out the research design and explain plans to address them, thereby avoiding lacunae due to incomplete data collection. If the researcher is planning to acquire data through interviews or questionnaires, copy of the questions used for the same should be attached as an annexure with the proposal.
This addresses the strength of the research with respect to its neutrality, consistency and applicability. Rigor must be reflected throughout the proposal.
It refers to the robustness of a research method against bias. The author should convey the measures taken to avoid bias, viz. blinding and randomisation, in an elaborate way, thus ensuring that the result obtained from the adopted method is purely as chance and not influenced by other confounding variables.
Consistency considers whether the findings will be consistent if the inquiry was replicated with the same participants and in a similar context. This can be achieved by adopting standard and universally accepted methods and scales.
Applicability refers to the degree to which the findings can be applied to different contexts and groups.[ 13 ]
This section deals with the reduction and reconstruction of data and its analysis including sample size calculation. The researcher is expected to explain the steps adopted for coding and sorting the data obtained. Various tests to be used to analyse the data for its robustness, significance should be clearly stated. Author should also mention the names of statistician and suitable software which will be used in due course of data analysis and their contribution to data analysis and sample calculation.[ 9 ]
Medical research introduces special moral and ethical problems that are not usually encountered by other researchers during data collection, and hence, the researcher should take special care in ensuring that ethical standards are met. Ethical considerations refer to the protection of the participants' rights (right to self-determination, right to privacy, right to autonomy and confidentiality, right to fair treatment and right to protection from discomfort and harm), obtaining informed consent and the institutional review process (ethical approval). The researcher needs to provide adequate information on each of these aspects.
Informed consent needs to be obtained from the participants (details discussed in further chapters), as well as the research site and the relevant authorities.
When the researcher prepares a research budget, he/she should predict and cost all aspects of the research and then add an additional allowance for unpredictable disasters, delays and rising costs. All items in the budget should be justified.
Appendices are documents that support the proposal and application. The appendices will be specific for each proposal but documents that are usually required include informed consent form, supporting documents, questionnaires, measurement tools and patient information of the study in layman's language.
As with any scholarly research paper, you must cite the sources you used in composing your proposal. Although the words ‘references and bibliography’ are different, they are used interchangeably. It refers to all references cited in the research proposal.
Successful, qualitative research proposals should communicate the researcher's knowledge of the field and method and convey the emergent nature of the qualitative design. The proposal should follow a discernible logic from the introduction to presentation of the appendices.
Conflicts of interest.
There are no conflicts of interest.
Research for Organizing
A Toolkit for Participatory Action Research from TakeRoot Justice
Download the Entire Chapter as a PDF
This section is designed to assist you with the planning phase of your Participatory Action Research (PAR) project. The section includes activities that will enable your group to make informed decisions about starting a research project, developing research goals and questions, choosing a research method, and creating a plan and timeline to guide your research. It also includes tools that will help your team to design and plan your overall research project.
Download Activity 2.1
Purpose of Activity:
The purpose of this activity is to have participants discuss the goals and purpose of the research project. After you’ve discussed what the research is trying to accomplish and why your organization is doing it, the participants will come up with research questions that will guide the research process.
By the End of Activity Participants Will:
Before this Activity Participants Will Need to:
Be introduced to the basics of Participatory Action Research (PAR)
Decide that PAR is right for your organization
Tools Needed:
Copies of Tool 2.1: Guiding Questions for Developing Research Goals and Questions
Materials Needed:
Butcher paper
Research Goals
Research Question
Intended Audience:
Community Members
Time Needed:
Part I: What and Why of PAR (20 minutes)
Facilitator Instructions:
1. Provide a brief summary of your campaign to set the context for the discussion 2. Explain that today we will have a discussion about using participatory action research in our campaign. We are going to try to begin to develop goals and questions that can guide our research. 3. Write “What?” at the top of a piece of butcher paper, and go through the questions below with the participants. Record responses on butcher paper, and keep the paper for later. (If you have 7 or more participants you can break out into small groups).
…is the social or policy change you want to bring about at the end of the day?
…are the overarching questions you want to answer through your research?
…information do you need to better understand and document the issues you are addressing?
…primary question do you want to answer with your research?
4. Once you’ve answered each “What?” question sufficiently, write “Why?” on a new sheet of butcher paper. Go through each of the questions below with participants. Record responses.
…is research useful or important for your organization? Will it be used…
…internally, to inform and assess needs in the community?
…externally, to mobilize and educate community members or elected officials around an issue?
Part II: Developing Research Goals (20 minutes)
Part III: Developing Research Questions (20 minutes)
Download Activity 2.2
This activity is designed to help organizers and members understand the various options for how they can conduct research and choose the research method(s) they will use.
Develop research goals and research questions
Copies of Tool 2.2: Guiding Questions for Choosing a Research Method
Copies of Tool 2.3: PAR Menu of Methods
Post-it notes
Quantitative Data
Qualitative Data
Focus Groups
Community Mapping
Community Visioning
Secondary Data
Media Review
Literature Review
Community Members or Organizers
Part I: Nailing Down your Research Goals and Questions (15 minutes)
Part II: Brainstorm as a Big Group (25 minutes)
…can you document or better understand the issue? Do you need “hard” numbers (quantitative data) and/or stories of personal experience (qualitative data) or both?
…are you going to give legs to your research? What action strategies could you employ to make the research and report as impactful as possible?
…are the stakeholders in the issue? Who has interest? Who is affected?
…needs to have their voice be heard?
…are you trying to influence? Who has power over the issue?
…is your target audience (community members, elected officials, media)?
…will collect your data?
…can you find the people you need to talk to get your data?
…can you find existing information that is relevant to your research?
…can you go for support and assistance (non-profits, universities, government agencies)?
Part II: Understanding the Research Methods (35 minutes)
Part III: Decide Your Research Method (20 Minutes)
Download Activity 2.3
This activity is designed to enable your research team to sit together and plan out the remaining steps of your research project. Through the activity, participants will devise a timeline that will map out all of the necessary steps in your project, and will specify who is going to be responsible for each step of the project. By the end of the activity you will have created a research timeline that you can use to guide the rest of your project.
By the End of this Activity You Will:
Have been introduced to the basics of Participatory Action Research (PAR)
Have created the research goals and questions for your project
Have decided on your research method
Tool 2.4: Research Timeline Template
Data Report Back
Policy Recommendation
Members and Organizers that will be active in research process
Part I: Creating Your Research Plan and Timeline (15 minutes)
1. Before the meeting prepare the room.
What | When | Who |
---|---|---|
What is the research task that needs to be done? | By when does it need to be complete? | Who will be the point person/organization to make sure this task get done? |
1) Develop Research Goals | ||
2) Develop Research Question(s) | ||
3) Choose Research Method(s)(i.e. survey, focus group, interviews, etc.) | ||
4) Create Research Plan | ||
5) Design Research Instruments | ||
6) Select Your Sample | ||
7) Collect Your Data (based on research methods you chose) | ||
8) Enter Your Data | ||
9) Analyze Your Data | ||
10) Data Report Back | ||
11) Develop Policy Recommendations | ||
12) Package the Report for the Public/Develop Communications Plan | ||
13) Release the Report |
2. Introduce the activity; today we are going to create our research plan. By the end of the meeting we will have completed a timeline of the research steps and will have split up who will do what. 3. Describe the butcher paper sheets you have created. Describe that you will be using these sheets to create your timeline. 4. Go through each of the PAR steps that you will use for your project and fill out the what, when and who of each step with participants. 5. After you’ve completed the table, take a moment to congratulate everyone as you have now finished the planning stages of your research project! 6. Keep all of the Butcher Paper sheets you created and use them to type up your Research Plan (see Tool 2.4 and T2.5: Template for Research Work Plan and Research Timeline Template).
Download Tool 2.1
Descarga Herramienta 2.1 En Espanol
WHAT…
…is the social or policy change you want to bring about at the end of the day?________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
…are your organizing goals, and how can this research be helpful achieving these goals? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
…information do you need to better understand and document the issues you are addressing? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
…is research useful or important for your organization? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
… internally, to inform and assess needs in the community? YES NO
Explain:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
… externally, to mobilize and educate community members around an issue?
YES NO
…to support a specific policy campaign or influence policy and public debate around an issue?
YES NO
Download Tool 2.2
Descarga Herramienta 2.2 En Espanol
… can you document or better understand the issue? Do you need “hard” numbers (quantitative data) or stories of personal experience (qualitative data)?
Quantitative Qualitative Both
________________________________________________________
… are you going to give legs to your research? What action strategies could you employ to make the research and report as effective as possible? ________________________________________________________
… are the stakeholders in the issue? Who has interest, who is affected? ________________________________________________________
…needs their voice to be heard? ________________________________________________________
…are you trying to influence? Who has power over the issue? ________________________________________________________
…is your target audience (community members, elected officials, media)? ________________________________________________________
…will collect your data? ________________________________________________________
… can you go to for information and other existing data? ________________________________________________________
…can you go for support and assistance (non-profits, universities, government agencies)? ________________________________________________________
… is the right time to do research? ________________________________________________________
…In your campaign? ________________________________________________________
…In the political context? ________________________________________________________
…In your organization? …In the political context? ________________________________________________________
Download Tool 2.3
Descarga Herramienta 2.3 En Espanol
Download Tool 2.4 as a Word Doc
Why is This Tool Useful?
Descarga Herramienta 2.4 En Espanol
This tool will help to document your research plan and methodology. It is also useful in developing a workplan, timeline and accountability mechanism for your project to make sure that each member of your research team is doing the work they have committed to doing and are keeping up with deadlines. This can also be helpful in putting together proposals for funding or other support because you will have all the information about your project in one place. Below is a template for a research plan. Sections can be shifted and deleted as needed.
Name of Organization(s):
Name of Research Project:
This section should include some background information about the social issue that your research will address and/ or the campaign that your research will support.
Overview of project
This section should provide a brief overview of the research project including what issue you are addressing and why, what information you plan to collect, whom you are collecting the information from and how you are collecting information (See Tools 2.1 and 2.2).
Goals of project
This section should include a bulleted list of what you hope to achieve through doing this research project. Some examples include:
Research Questions
This should include a bulleted list of the overarching questions you hope to answer through your research. Research questions are different from survey or interview questions because they are broad and can help to guide the more specific questions you will ask in your surveys, interviews, focus groups, canvassing Tool, etc. Some examples include:
Methodology/Research Components
This section should include all the methods you will use to answer your research questions along with a short description for each method. Below are some examples, but you should feel free to chose other methods (see Tool 2.3)
Project Output
This section should include a few sentences about what you will create at the end of this project. This could be a report, a 1 or 2 page summary of your findings, a map, a video, etc.
How the PAR Project Will Support Community Organizing
This section should explain how your research will support and be integrated into your organizing campaign. Will your research help with leadership development? Help to build your base? Help to garner media attention about a policy issue you are fighting for?
This table should include all of the different tasks that you will need to complete for the research project, along with who will be responsible for completing the task and by what date. The tasks will differ depending on which methods you chose but Tool 2.5 will provide a template as a place to start.
Download Tool 2.5 as a Word Doc
Download Tool 2.5 as a PDF
What | When | Who |
---|---|---|
What is the research task that needs to be done? | By when does it need to be complete? | Who will be the point person/organization to make sure this task get done?* |
Develop Research Goals | ||
Develop Research Question(s) | ||
Choose Research Method | ||
Create Research Plan | ||
Design Research Instruments | ||
Pilot Research Instruments | ||
Finalize and Translate Research Instruments | ||
Select Your Sample | ||
Collect Your Data (based on research methods you chose) | ||
Enter Your Data | ||
Analyze Your Data | ||
Data Report Back | ||
Develop Policy Recommendations | ||
Package the Report for the Public | ||
Develop Communications Strategy and Plan | ||
Release the Report |
Download Tool 2.6 as a PDF
Download Tool 2.6 as a Word Doc
Tool 2.6: Sample Advisory Board Invitation Template
Why is this tool useful?
Developing a Research Advisory Board can be a great way to bring together a team of resource allies to support and add capacity to your Participatory Action Research. Academics, lawyers or policy analysts that specialize in the issue you are researching are all good examples of potential advisors. We recommend bringing advisors together as a group early in the process and being clear about the role they will play and what they can expect from the process. Below is a sample letter you can send to invite advisors to an initial meeting. We also have a sample agenda for a Research Advisory Board meet (see Tool 2.7).
[INSERT YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LOGO OR PUT ON ORGANIZATIONAL LETTERHEAD]
Dear ________________,
I hope you are well! I am writing to you to ask you to be a part of an exciting new research project of the [YOUR ORGANIZATION’S NAME] by serving on our advisory board.
As you may know… [INSERT BRIEF SUMMARY ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION’S OVERARCHING GOALS AND AIMS]
As part of this work, we are planning to conduct a participatory action research project focusing on [RESEARCH TOPIC].
Because of your familiarity with [ORGANIZATION NAME] and your expertise with these issues or strategies, I am reaching out to you in the hopes that you will serve on a Research Advisory Team to provide feedback on our research. As an advisor, I am requesting that you participate in one or more of the following:
Please let me know by [INSERT DATE] if you are willing to participate on this Research Advisory Team. We will be scheduling for a meeting for [INSERT DATE]. Please don’t hesitate to call (XXX) XXX- XXXX or email [ INSERT EMAIL HERE ] if you would like additional information or have further questions. We hope you will join us in this important work!
[INSERT NAME]
[INSERT POSITION]
Download Tool 2.7 as a PDF
Download Tool 2.7 as a Word Doc
Developing a Research Advisory Board can be a great way to bring together a team of resource allies to support and add capacity to your Participatory Action Research. Academics, lawyers or policy analysts that specialize in the issue you are researching are all good examples of potential advisors. Once the Research Advisory Board (see Tool 2.6) is assembled, it is a good idea to bring the Board together as early in the research process as possible. The research plan should be more or less complete by this point (see Tool 2.4), and advisors can give valuable feedback on research goals and questions, methodology, project output and the timeline. The advisors should also walk away with a concrete understanding of their role in the work and what you will be asking of them in participating in the research process. It is also a good idea to make sure the research timeline is mostly complete (see Tool 2.5) because this will make planning next steps with the board easier. Below is a sample meeting agenda for the Research Advisory Board, which can be used to ensure that the meeting is productive and provides crucial feedback on the project.
Research Advisory Board Meeting
I. Welcome and introductions | (10 min) |
II. Who we are—overview of the organization | (5 min) |
III. Why we are here today | (5 min) |
IV. Review of research plan | (20 min) |
V. Advisory roles | (5 min) |
VI. Discussion | (30 min) |
VII. Next steps | (5 min) |
Download The Case Study
Download the Report
Background on the Organization and Issue
The Center for Frontline Retail (CFR) is a worker-led organization committed to improving the lives of retail workers through community organizing, industry analysis, and leadership development. CFR works to simultaneously elevate workers’ voices and raise standards in the retail sector. CFR’s prior research has shown that retail workers face discrimination and harassment in the workplace, along with unfair scheduling practices.
Through discussions with their members, CFR identified a lack of training opportunities for workers, impacting their ability to advance in the sector. . CFR also noticed that women and people of color are disproportionately affected by the lack of training from employers and as a result lack opportunities for career advancement.
In order to document the lack of training and advancement opportunities for retail workers, and the disproportionate effect of this on women and people of color, CFR partnered with the Community Development Project on a participatory action research project in order to voice the concerns of retail workers and highlight CFR’s training model as a pathway for advancement. This project ultimately resulted in a report that describes workers’ desire for, and barriers to, training and advancement opportunities in the retail industry, outlines policies that would set aside money to train retail workers, and puts the CFR training model forward to train and educate entry level workers, as well as higher level training to grow within the retail industry.
Below is a description of the Center for Frontline Retail Research Project, based on the Participatory Action Research guiding framework (see Tools 2.1 and 2.2 ).
Were the Organizing Goals connected to this research?
Overall questions did CFR want to answer through their research?
Is this research useful or important for CFR?
Are the Stakeholders in this Issue?
Was CFR trying to influence?
Did CFR gather information (what methods did they use)?
Did Research support CFR’s organizing efforts?
Read the report here . Read coverage of the report release in Crains NY and the Associated Press .
This chapter focuses on describing how to go about designing a research project. First, we will learn about framing the research study as a project . Then, we will be introduced to the research design canvas . While the details are specific to socio-technical grounded theory (STGT) studies, the research design canvas or template can be used for research project design in general. Next, we will learn about the 10 elements of the research design canvas, including the forming of the research team , identifying the domain and actors , selecting the phenomenon and topic to investigate, carefully assessing research ethics and considering the research values , formulating the guiding research questions , acknowledging the team’s research philosophy , deciding on the initial research protocols including data, techniques, and tools, and listing the desirable research impact . The chapter concludes by describing a pilot study to apply and refine the above elements of the research project design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches . Sage publications.
Google Scholar
Dittrich, D., Kenneally, E., et al. (2012). The menlo report: Ethical principles guiding information and communication technology research. Technical report , US Department of Homeland Security.
El-Emam, K. (2001). Ethics and open source. Empirical Software Engineering, 6 (4), 291.
Article Google Scholar
El-Migid, M.-A. A., Cai, D., Niven, T., Vo, J., Madampe, K., Grundy, J., & Hoda, R. (2022). Emotimonitor: A trello power-up to capture and monitor emotions of agile teams. Journal of Systems and Software, 186 , 111206. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412122100279X
Garousi, V., Felderer, M., & Mäntylä, M. V. (2019). Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 106 , 101–121.
Gold, N. E., & Krinke, J. (2020). Ethical mining: A case study on MSR mining challenges. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (pp. 265–276).
Hassan, A. E. (2008). The road ahead for mining software repositories. 2008 Frontiers of Software Maintenance (pp. 48–57). IEEE.
Hoda, R. (2022). Socio-technical grounded theory for software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48 (10), 3808–3832.
Hoda, R., & Noble, J. (2017). Becoming agile: a grounded theory of agile transitions in practice. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (pp. 141–151). IEEE.
Hussain, W., Perera, H., Whittle, J., Nurwidyantoro, A., Hoda, R., Shams, R. A., & Oliver, G. (2020). Human values in software engineering: Contrasting case studies of practice. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48 (5), 1818–1833.
Hussain, W., Shahin, M., Hoda, R., Whittle, J., Perera, H., Nurwidyantoro, A., Shams, R. A., & Oliver, G. (2022). How can human values be addressed in agile methods? a case study on safe. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48 (12), 5158–5175.
Institute, P. M. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK ® guide).
Madampe, K., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J. (2021). A faceted taxonomy of requirements changes in agile contexts. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(10), 3737–3752.
Madampe, K., Hoda, R., & Singh, P. (2020). Towards understanding emotional response to requirements changes in agile teams. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (pp. 37–40).
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Vol. 1). Wiley.
Pant, A., Hoda, R., Tantithamthavorn, C., & Turhan, B. (2024). Ethics in AI through the developer’s view: A grounded theory literature review and guidelines. Empirical Software Engineering, 29 (3), 67.
Perera, H., Hussain, W., Whittle, J., Nurwidyantoro, A., Mougouei, D., Shams, R. A., & Oliver, G. (2020). A study on the prevalence of human values in software engineering publications, 2015-2018. In 2020 IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (pp. 409–420). IEEE.
Perry, D. E., Porter, A. A., & Votta, L. G. (2000). Empirical studies of software engineering: A roadmap. In Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering (pp. 345–355).
Salleh, N., Hoda, R., Su, M. T., Kanij, T., & Grundy, J. (2018). Recruitment, engagement and feedback in empirical software engineering studies in industrial contexts. Information and Software Technology, 98 , 161–172.
Saunders, M., & Tosey, P. (2013). The layers of research design. Rapport (Winter), 58–59.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Elsevier.
Singer, J., & Vinson, N. G. (2001). Why and how research ethics matters to you, yes you!. Empirical Software Engineering, 6 (4), 287–290.
Singer, J., & Vinson, N. G. (2002). Ethical issues in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28 (12), 1171–1180.
Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social media research: A guide to ethics. University of Aberdeen, 1 (16), 1–16. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_487729_smxx.pdf
Wohlin, C., & Aurum, A. (2015). Towards a decision-making structure for selecting a research design in empirical software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 20 , 1427–1455.
Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22 (1), 45–55.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Rashina Hoda
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Reprints and permissions
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Hoda, R. (2024). Research Design Canvas. In: Qualitative Research with Socio-Technical Grounded Theory. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60533-8_4
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60533-8_4
Published : 10 June 2024
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-031-60532-1
Online ISBN : 978-3-031-60533-8
eBook Packages : Computer Science Computer Science (R0)
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
Stanford Research Development Office
Grant proposals are a distinct genre compared to other academic writing. At its heart, a compelling proposal focuses on posing an exciting research question or problem and offering a convincing narrative for how you will use grant funds to answer or solve it.
Strong proposals typically exhibit several key characteristics:
Addressing these key characteristics will help position your proposal for success. The Stanford Research Development Office is here to work with you throughout the process, from developing a compelling narrative to ensuring alignment with funder priorities. Our team offers expert guidance, resources, and support to enhance the competitiveness of your proposal for external funding.
Contact us at [email protected] to learn how we can help you.
Created: 02/06/24
Updated: 09/12/24
Affiliate 💸
Get started free
Literature Search
Discover 6 top research project graphic organizer templates to streamline project planning and boost productivity.
Sep 9, 2024
Researching a topic can feel overwhelming, especially when you need to make sense of what seems like endless information before you can start your paper. A research project graphic organizer can help you confidently tackle the literature search so you can write an efficient research paper that earns a top grade. In this guide, we'll explore the many benefits of graphic organizers for research projects and show you how to make one for your next project. Otio's AI research and writing partner helps you organize your thoughts, create a graphic organizer, and write a stellar research paper. With this tool, you can make excellent study material that breaks down information for a quick overview of what you need to know.
What is a research graphic organizer, purpose of a research project graphic organizer, what are the 7 types of graphic organizers, how to create a research project graphic organizer, supercharge your researching ability with otio — try otio for free today.
A graphic organizer (also referred to as a research matrix) is a valuable tool for compiling detailed notes during the research process. These note-taking systems can take a long time to assemble, so they’re geared toward long-term papers, such as graduate research or capstone projects. That being said, they are well worth the effort as they save time and effort when navigating themes, content, and theories across articles. Furthermore, these organization systems make it easy to quickly compile a bibliography as all the information is stored in one place.
Also known as research project graphic organizers, graphic organizers help students visually sort and outline information before, during, and after reading. Their visual nature helps students reduce cognitive load by creating a simple framework for organizing information. This allows students to focus on understanding the material instead of becoming overwhelmed with the details.
During the pre-reading stage, graphic organizers can be a brainstorming tool to activate prior knowledge and connect what students know with new information. For example, if a student is about to read a biography on Rosa Parks, a graphic organizer can help them sort out what they know about the civil rights movement before reading.
During the reading stage, graphic organizers can help students arrange pertinent information, facilitating learning by highlighting links among concepts. Continuing with Rosa Parks' biography example, as the students read, they can use a graphic organizer to help them sort details about her life, her role in the civil rights movement, and the broader historical context.
In the post-reading stage, graphic organizers can assess comprehension, recall pertinent information, summarize main ideas, and maintain the content learned. After finishing the biography, the students could use a graphic organizer to help them reflect on what they learned about Rosa Parks and the civil rights movement.
Knowledge workers, researchers, and students today suffer from content overload. Too many settle for stitching together complicated bookmarking, read-it-later, and note-taking apps to get through their workflows. Now that anyone can create content with a button, this problem will only worsen. Otio solves this problem by providing researchers with one AI-native workspace.
Let Otio be your AI research and writing partner — try Otio for free today !
• Systematic Review Vs Meta Analysis • Impact Evaluation • How To Critique A Research Article • How To Synthesize Sources • Annotation Techniques • Skimming And Scanning • Types Of Literature Reviews • Literature Review Table • Literature Review Matrix • How To Increase Reading Speed And Comprehension • How To Read Research Papers • How To Summarize A Research Paper • Literature Gap
Venn diagrams help readers grasp the relationships between various concepts. Venn diagrams use two or more overlapping circles to show the similarities and differences between each idea. The areas where the circles overlap display the traits that the ideas have in common, while the individual sections of each circle illustrate the unique characteristics of each concept.
A series of events graphic organizer helps students visualize the order of events in a story or passage. This type of organizer has a simple format that can be adapted for any length. Events are written chronologically to show how they relate to one another. This helps illustrate the continuous movement of the narrative.
A concept map, or spider map, helps students visually display what they know about a topic before, during, and after a reading or research project. This graphic organizer has a central idea in the middle, with other relevant information supporting the topic branching out. The more detailed a concept map gets, the better students understand the relationship between the ideas and how they connect to the main topic.
A story map helps students visually display crucial information related to components of a story before, during, and after reading. This type of graphic organizer helps students break down the character(s), setting, and problem. This enables readers to comprehend the narrative better and summarize the plot.
A network treemap has a main idea at the top with subtopics underneath. As students learn about the different concepts, they can fill in the tree map to show their understanding of how the information is organized. This type of graphic organizer works well for helping students prepare for writing assignments and research projects.
A fishbone graphic organizer helps students visualize the interaction and relationship of a complex event and its effects. The “bones” of the fish represent the different causes of a specific problem, while the “head” of the fish illustrates the main issue. This type of organizer enables students to break down complex information to analyze it and better understand the content.
Problem solution maps help students summarize text, identify the problems within the text, recognize solutions used to solve the problem, and interpret the results. This type of graphic organizer is helpful for expository and narrative texts.
Today’s knowledge workers, researchers, and students are overwhelmed by content overload. There are too many stitch-together complicated bookmarking, read-it-later, and note-taking apps to get through their workflows. With the ability for anyone to create content with the click of a button, this problem will only get worse. Otio solves this problem by providing researchers with one AI-native workspace. It helps them:
Collect many data sources, from bookmarks, tweets, and extensive books to YouTube videos.
Extract key takeaways with detailed AI-generated notes and source-grounded Q&A chat.
Create draft outputs using the sources you’ve collected. Otio helps you to go from the reading list to the first draft faster.
Along with this, Otio also helps you write research papers/essays faster. Here are our top features that researchers love: AI-generated notes on all bookmarks (Youtube videos, PDFs, articles, etc.), Otio enabling you to chat with individual links or entire knowledge bases, just like you chat with ChatGPT and AI-assisted writing.
Let Otio be your AI research and writing partner —try Otio for free today!
Their graphic organizer templates have a simple design to guide students' research when discovering a career of their choice. Students will look up the basics of a possible career, including salary, education requirements, employment outlook, skills, tasks, etc.
EdrawMax offers free editable graphic organizers . EdrawMax Online is a cloud-based software that allows users to create various diagrams, charts, drawings, and graphic organizers. By signing up, you can access a canvas to draw any organizer of your choice by dragging and dropping various shapes and symbols from the included library. You can also use EdrawMax Online to create graphic organizers for research papers. You can choose to create one from scratch or just use a template, albeit the latter option relies on the presence of a template in the template gallery.
Help your students classify ideas and communicate more effectively with these free graphic organizer templates available for download. They can be used to structure writing projects and help in problem-solving, decision-making, studying, planning research, and brainstorming.
Use this research notes graphic organizer to help students as they research for a project or essay. This resource allows students to track where their information is coming from to help avoid plagiarism.
Teach Starter has various templates for research graphic organizers. You can download them as a PDF and print them out as well. Some are paid, and some are free.
Graphic organizers help students systematically arrange and visually display information while researching to help them identify, study, and understand the relationships between the parts and the whole. A research project graphic organizer can help students visualize the components of a research project and what they’ll need to do before, during, and after the research process.
For example, a T-chart can help students break down the differences between two topics before selecting one for a research project. Venn diagrams can also help students identify similarities and differences between two topics. Research project graphic organizers can also be utilized as a planning tool to help students organize their thoughts before they begin writing their research papers.
For instance, a research project graphic organizer can help students identify their research questions, organize their findings, and visually display how their research will address the paper's topics and subtopics.
Artificial intelligence tools can help students create research project graphic organizers. First, students can select the graphic organizer they want to make, such as a T-chart or Venn diagram. Next, they can use prompts to help the AI generate content for their organizers. The results can be used to help fill in the graphic organizers and provide structure to their research.
Knowledge workers, researchers, and students today suffer from content overload. Otio solves this problem by providing researchers with one AI-native workspace .
When conducting a research project, you’ll want to gather various sources. Otio helps you to do this quickly and efficiently. You can import bookmarks, tweets, PDFs, articles, YouTube videos, and even entire books. Importing all this data into Otio creates a centralized repository for your research project, a great way to stay organized and improve your workflow.
Once you have collected your research materials, you can analyze them for relevant information. Otio makes this process easier by generating detailed AI notes for all your research materials. You can even chat with these AI notes just like you would with ChatGPT. This improves information retrieval and helps you to understand your research better.
After you have collected and analyzed your research, you can start creating written outputs. Otio helps you to go from a reading list to a first draft faster. Use the notes generated by Otio to inform your writing, and take advantage of AI-assisted writing features to improve your overall efficiency.
Let Otio be your AI research and writing partner — try Otio for free today !
• Paragraph Graphic Organizer • Sequence Graphic Organizer • Best AI for Research • Sharly AI Alternatives • AI For Summarizing Research Papers • Literature Review Tools • How To Identify Theoretical Framework In An Article • Graduate School Reading • Research Tools • AI For Academic Research • Research Paper Organizer • Best AI Tools For Research • Zotero Alternatives • Zotero Vs Endnote • ChatGPT For Research Papers • ChatGPT Literature Review • Mendeley Alternative • Unriddle AI Alternatives • Literature Matrix Generator • Research Assistant • Research Tools • Research Graphic Organizer • Good Websites for Research • Research Paper Graphic Organizer • Graphic Organizer Examples • Summary Graphic Organizer • Who What When Where Why Graphic Organizer • Research Note Taking Graphic Organizer • Graphic Organizer Research Paper Outline • Research Essay Graphic Organizer • Research Notes Graphic Organizer • Translational Research Graphic Organizer • Research Graphic Organizer Template
Sep 12, 2024
5 Best Research Essay Graphic Organizer Templates
Sep 11, 2024
6 Best Graphic Organizer Research Paper Outline Templates
Join over 80,000 researchers changing the way they read & write
Chrome Extension
© 2024 Frontdoor Labs Ltd.
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Refund Policy
Join over 50,000 researchers changing the way they read & write
Join thousands of other scholars and researchers
Try Otio Free
© 2023 Frontdoor Labs Ltd.
A systematic review of patterns of care for comorbid chronic disease patients with depression, comparative law analysis of tobacco and non-smoked nicotine products, alcohol or cannabis supply frameworks.
Project duration, hours of engagement | 6 weeks between 13 January and 21 February in 2025 35 |
Location: | Toowoomba: Regional Clinical Unit, Boyce Gardens |
Description: | In recent times, there has been an increase in co-design methods, frameworks, and tools to benefit end-users in health, yet there is no standardised approach. Collating methodologies using different frameworks and processes is important to understand to identify what works best and how or why it works. This systematic review will aim to identify co-design methods, frameworks, and tools that can improve health care service delivery. The review will aim to describe and evaluate the current emperical evidence of codesign methodologies and frameworks implemented by the health workforce that instigated effective codesign engagement to deliver effective health services provision. |
Expected outcomes and deliverables: | The student will gain skills in conducting a systematic review, manuscript writing and publication skills. |
Suitable for: | The project is suitable for someone with prior systematic review and research skills. |
Primary Supervisor: | Dr Bushra Nasir, The supervisor CAN be contacted by students prior to submission of an application. |
Project duration, hours of engagement | 6 weeks between 13 January and 21 February in 2025 36 |
Location: | Toowoomba: Regional Clinical Unit, Boyce Gardens |
Description: | Depression, affecting 10.1% of the population, and chronic diseases, accounting for 89% of deaths pose a significant health concern in Australia.Chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, are 1.3, 1.9 and 1.3 times more prevalent, respectively, in the rural and remote regions compared to their metropolitan counterparts. Additionally, hospitalizations for respiratory conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, are considerably higher in rural areas, presenting 1.6-1.7 and 1.3 times the burden respectively. There is a critical knowledge gap about coexisting chronic physical health diseases in people with depression, especially for those living in rural areas. Due to the continuing increase in rural health disparities, there is a pressing need to understand these co-existing conditions to provide better management and treatment options for rural Australians experiencing depression. We will conduct a systematic review exploring patterns of care for comorbid chronic disease patients with depression, and investigate urban/rural differences. |
Expected outcomes and deliverables: | The student will gain skills in conducting a systematic review, manuscript writing and publication skills. |
Suitable for: | A student with prior systematic review skills and research experience. |
Primary Supervisor: | Dr Bushra Nasir, The supervisor CAN be contacted by students prior to submission of an application. |
Project duration, hours of engagement | 6 weeks between 13 January and 21 February in 2025 30-36 |
Location: | Herston: Edith Cavell Building |
Description: | Tobacco and other nicotine-containing products such as vaping products, alcohol and cannabis, represent the most widely used substances for non-therapeutic purposes. This analysis will compare the key similarities and differences in how tobacco is regulated compared to one or more of these other substances in Australia and internationally. The purpose is to identify a range of options for reforming the regulation of tobacco products in Australia by considering a range of previously implemented regulatory options. |
Expected outcomes and deliverables: | Scholars will gain experience in applied comparative legal analysis. The outcome is intended to lead to a journal article and inform further policy analyses. |
Suitable for: | Students with a background in law or justice studies. |
Primary Supervisor: | Associate Professor Bernadette Richards, The supervisor CAN be contacted by students prior to submission of an application. |
UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering
PAICE aims to inform and evaluate policies – both existing and potential – that contribute towards delivering a healthy net zero future in the UK.
13 September 2024
Policy and Implementation for Climate & Health Equity (PAICE) is a collaborative research effort between University College London (UCL) and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), in partnership with the UK Climate Change Committee (CCC) and the Greater London Authority (GLA). With a transdisciplinary approach underpinning its research, PAICE is:
Through these activities, PAICE will help deliver informed climate action that promotes a healthy and equitable future.
Jump to: Project areas | Associated work | PAICE team
Shared vision.
Davies, M. et al. (2025) The PAICE project: Integrating health and health equity into UK climate change policy, Protocol Paper, Sustainability Science (submitted).
Moore, G. et al. (2025) Evaluating transdisciplinary research: insights from climate and health research' (in progress)
Osrin, D. et al. (2025). Transdisciplinary research for climate and health: a case study in programme theory development (in progress)
Petrou, G. et al. (2025) What are the costs and benefits of energy efficiency and overheating adaptation measures in UK homes? (in progress)
Petrou G. Exploring the impact of sensor placement in quantifying indoor air pollutant exposure in UK homes. Presentated at: 2024 Clean Air Conference; 2-3 October 2024. Birmingham, UK.
Simpson, C. et al . (2024) Resilience of care homes to overheating. Presented at: 4th UK National Climate Impacts Meeting; 5-6 September 2024. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Details of members from across UCL and LSHTM, and how they fit into the project can be found below.
Michael Davies (UCL) Professor of Building Physics and the Environment PAICE Principal Investigator/Lead
Charlie Dearman (LSHTM) Public Health Registrar
Rosemary Green (LSHTM) Professor of Environment, Food and Health
Andy Haines (LSHTM) Professor of Environmental Change and Public Health
Clare Heaviside (UCL) Associate Professor in Climate Change, Health and Cities
Filiz Karakas (LSHTM) Research Fellow
Susan Michie (UCL) Professor of Health Psychology
James Milner (LSHTM) Associate Professor in Climate Change, Environment & Health, PAICE Co-Lead
Gemma Moore (UCL) Associate Professor in Health, Wellbeing and Communities
David Osrin (UCL) Professor of Global Health
Silvia Pastorino (LSHTM) Research Fellow
Giorgos Petrou (UCL) Senior Research Fellow, PAICE Scientific Manager
Irene Pluchinotta (UCL) Lecturer in Systems Thinking for Sustainability
Jana Sabinovska (UCL) PAICE Consortium Manager
Charles Simpson (UCL) Senior Research Fellow
Phil Symonds (UCL) Lecturer in Built Environment Analytics
Catalina Turcu (UCL) Professor of Sustainable Built Environment
Sarah Whitmee (LSHTM) Assistant Professor in the Centre on Climate Change and Planetary Health
Ke Zhou (UCL) Research Fellow
Nici Zimmermann (UCL) Professor of System Dynamics
Michael Davies (UCL) Professor PAICE Principal Investigator/Lead [email protected]
James Milner (LSHTM) Associate Professor PAICE Co-Lead [email protected]
Giorgos Petrou (UCL) Senior Research Fellow PAICE Scientific Manager [email protected]
Jana Sabinovska (UCL) PAICE Consortium Manager [email protected]
PAICE is a collaborative research effort between UCL and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM).
Funding for the PAICE project has been kindly given by the Wellcome Trust , reference: 227123/Z/23/Z
Brown unveils design for signature life sciences research facility in providence.
Renderings for Danoff Laboratories show a state-of-the-art facility for integrated research ranging from molecular-level science, to biotech innovations, to patient therapies and interventions.
Brown's 300,000-square-foot facility for integrated life sciences research will have state-of-the-art laboratories, a street-level education lab and plentiful gathering spaces. Rendering courtesy TenBerke.
PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — Grounded in the concepts of innovation, connection and flexibility, Brown University’s planned facility for integrated life sciences research is designed to convene scientists across multiple fields of study to solve complex, interconnected health and medical challenges.
State-of-the-art laboratory spaces illuminated by natural light, a street-level education lab accessible to the public, and plentiful interior and exterior gathering spaces are among its signature elements, as illustrated in architectural renderings released on Thursday, Sept. 12.
The building will be named the William A. and Ami Kuan Danoff Life Sciences Laboratories — to be referred to commonly as Danoff Laboratories — in recognition of a generous gift from the couple.
The building is being designed by TenBerke , an award-winning firm founded by Yale School of Architecture Dean Deborah Berke, in collaboration with Ballinger , a leader in the design of innovative laboratories. Upon completion, the seven-story, 300,000-square-foot facility will provide labs and workspace for research in aging, immunity, brain science, cancer and biomedical engineering, among other fields. With goals to attract and cultivate future scientists, it will create a dynamic environment for researchers and students alike.
Powered by 100% renewable electricity with emergency backup for resiliency, the all-electric laboratory building will be a first for Brown and stand as one of the first “net zero” lab constructions in New England.
University President Christina H. Paxson said Danoff Laboratories, which will become the largest academic laboratory building in Rhode Island, is a signature project in Brown’s commitment to advancing research for impact.
“Brown has bold aspirations to develop a biomedical ecosystem where innovations can move seamlessly from research and discovery to solutions with direct, real-life impact for patients and communities,” Paxson said. “Central to this vision is this cutting-edge research facility where Brown’s exceptional faculty, students and staff will work together to tackle some of the most daunting challenges facing human health globally.”
At ground level, the facility will be surrounded by open space and a bright, publicly accessible patio, as well as an area designated for a café with seating. Rendering courtesy TenBerke.
Passersby will be able to peer inside to the lobby of the integrated sciences research facility. Rendering courtesy TenBerke.
Landscaping has been designed with community connections in mind, with paths through and around the building. Rendering courtesy TenBerke.
The full release of the renderings follows an 18-month planning and design process that included engagement with internal University stakeholders, city officials, neighborhood associations and local community members.
As envisioned, the project will expand Brown’s slate of research facilities and serve as a catalyst for growth in Providence’s Jewelry District, a vibrant mixed-use neighborhood that Brown has played a key role in helping to revitalize. The building site is on Richmond Street across from Brown's Warren Alpert Medical School near Ship and Elbow streets. Mobilization of the site for enabling work began in Summer 2024, and pending progress in fundraising and full construction authorization by Brown’s governing board, the University is targeting a 2027 completion date for the building. Suffolk Construction will serve as lead contractor.
Danoff Laboratories will be a visible anchor in the Jewelry District, and the architecture team worked carefully on the design of the building’s exterior to ensure its successful integration in the neighborhood, said Noah Biklen, a Brown Class of 1997 graduate and senior principal of TenBerke who is leading the project design team. In a nod to the façades of nearby factory buildings, the base of the facility will be made from regionally sourced masonry and stone, he said. The seven stories will be stacked in a calibrated grid design of metal and glass, inspired by the tactility, depth and tones of the nearby industrial buildings.
In a rejection of the traditional aesthetic of a fortress-like science lab, Brown’s architects said the facility will offer a welcoming public presence. “We started from the idea that science is a collective endeavor, and therefore a social one,” Biklen said.
Wet labs will be situated inside glass enclosures to amplify natural light and enhance connectedness, with adjacent work spaces. Rendering courtesy Ballinger.
At the corners of each floor, comfortable meeting spaces will invite researchers, faculty and students to convene and collaborate, with dining areas and seating that can be arranged for symposiums or impromptu gatherings. Rendering courtesy Ballinger.
On the ground floor, a flexible auditorium and education lab can be used for teaching as well as hosting public programs. Rendering courtesy TenBerke.
At ground level, it will be surrounded by open space and a bright, south-facing publicly accessible patio, and an area designated for a café with seating. Passersby will be able to peer inside to the lobby, a flexible auditorium and an education lab that can be used for teaching and public programs, including science demonstrations with local students. The first floor will also house spaces for interactions with participants in clinical trials for new medical treatments or other patient-based research — a distinctive element uncommon to most lab buildings, but reflective of Brown’s focus on developing solutions to real-world patient challenges. Corridors will offer ample gallery-like space for display of scientific research or artwork, and landscaping has been designed with community connections in mind, with paths through and around the building.
“We're introducing new ideas of transparency and connection in terms of how a research building engages the street, where there’s a real sense of permeability to the shared public realm,” Biklen said. “We're very excited about how, architecturally, we've been able to create an attractive, sustainable research environment for scientists that will also serve visitors and the broader community for years to come.”
The Danoff Laboratories building is designed to enable groundbreaking discoveries now and serve as a research environment flexible enough to accommodate the way science will be practiced in the future. Five of the building’s seven floors will be fully dedicated to research, with wet labs situated inside glass enclosures to amplify natural light and enhance connectedness. At adjacent dry work spaces, researchers will be able to perform work such as advanced computational analyses, an increasingly significant aspect of scientific research. Movable equipment will accommodate evolving technology, methodologies and approaches.
“These will be extremely flexible laboratories that are able to morph over time as science evolves,” said Terry Steelman, senior principal at Ballinger and one of the architectural leads on the project.
Brown will name its planned facility the William A. and Ami Kuan Danoff Life Sciences Laboratories in recognition of a generous gift from the couple.
The wet labs will be located by the windows, while spaces that require complete enclosure for tissue culture or microscopy are embedded in the middle of the building, with minimal exposure to sun.
Comfortable meeting spaces that invite researchers, faculty and students to convene and collaborate will be situated at the corner of each floor of the L-shaped building, with dining areas and seating that can be arranged for symposiums or impromptu gatherings, Steelman said. Small rooms will also be available for formal meetings.
“As opposed to having one researcher in one area working on their own project and another tucked away working on something else, the type of space we’re envisioning will maximize the potential for interdisciplinary work and the cross-fertilization of ideas,” Steelman said.
Danoff Laboratories will have capacity to provide lab space for 75 principal investigators, with a total of roughly 700 life sciences researchers expected to move into the facility in phases. In addition to faculty, researchers will include students from every academic level along with postdoctoral scholars and Brown research staff.
Four major research programs — cancer, brain science, immunity/ infectious disease and aging — and cross-cutting areas such as biomedical engineering, artificial intelligence and RNA technology will be embedded throughout the research floors. A physical bridge will connect the building to Brown’s Laboratories for Molecular Medicine at 70 Ship St., which will support research and collaboration continuity. Three of the major research groups (cancer, brain science and immunology) will include faculty and students in both buildings.
“Engineers will join biomedical scientists to drive innovation, entrepreneurship and strategic partnerships, allowing for the translation of discovery to real-world impact in human health,” said Tejal Desai, dean of Brown’s School of Engineering and an accomplished biomedical engineer.
The building site is on Richmond Street across from Brown's Warren Alpert Medical School near Ship and Elbow streets. Rendering courtesy TenBerke.
The facility's seven stories will be stacked in a calibrated grid of metal and glass, a design inspired by the industrial character of the neighborhood's historical buildings. Rendering courtesy TenBerke.
Diane Lipscombe, a professor of neuroscience who directs Brown’s Carney Institute for Brain Science , said Danoff Laboratories will enable the University to combine research in areas such as neuroscience, pathology, genetics, biomedical engineering and computational brain science, increasing the potential for discoveries.
“Brown researchers continue to deepen scientific understanding of how the brain works and expand knowledge about diseases like ALS, autism, Alzheimer’s disease, neurodevelopmental disorders, epilepsy, addiction and depression, and this new state-of-the-art research facility will accelerate our work toward new therapeutics, interventions and diagnostic tools,” Lipscombe said.
Because of its proximity to other life science spaces, the new facility will help to co-locate a critical mass of leaders across the biomedical sciences, engineering and medicine to address significant problems in human health, said Dr. Mukesh Jain, dean of medicine and biological sciences at Brown. The facility will be located near Brown’s medical school , its labs at 225 Dyer St. , research buildings for its affiliated health systems, and the under-construction Ancora L&G building that will host the Rhode Island State Health Laboratories and other Brown labs.
“Brown has a long tradition of pioneering scientific collaborations that affect patient outcomes,” Jain said. “This facility is the centerpiece of a comprehensive vision developed with great intentionality to advance discovery and to leverage partnerships with local health systems, the private sector and the state to achieve impact.”
In addition to enabling leading-edge science, Danoff Laboratories will support environmental sustainability goals of the University, city and state, said Stephen Porder, Brown’s associate provost for sustainability. It will become Brown’s first laboratory building powered by 100% renewable electricity (with emergency backup for resiliency) and one of the first all-electric laboratory buildings in the region.
The facility’s impact will eventually extend far beyond its walls, Porder noted, with its equipment decarbonizing other Brown buildings in downtown Providence. By establishing hydraulic connections between the new building and older, neighboring structures, its hyper-efficient electric heating and cooling system will enable substantial reductions in heating and air conditioning usage in the connected buildings, accelerating their paths to a zero-emissions future.
“From a sustainability standpoint, large laboratories are a challenge because they use a very high amount of energy and require constant air circulation,” Porder said. “By confronting this at the earliest stages of this project and bringing innovative planning and design to bear on the problem, we are converting this into a massive opportunity to create a more modern and sustainable facility, without sacrificing scale or ambition.”
Study shows fentanyl’s role in oregon overdose spike after policy decriminalizing drug possession, petranea smith: engaging with the community to help people get vaccinated, brown researcher to study environmental health impacts of wood pellet production.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Step 2: Choose a type of research design. Step 3: Identify your population and sampling method. Step 4: Choose your data collection methods. Step 5: Plan your data collection procedures. Step 6: Decide on your data analysis strategies. Frequently asked questions. Introduction. Step 1. Step 2.
A research design is a strategy for answering your research question using empirical data. Creating a research design means making decisions about: Your overall research objectives and approach. Whether you'll rely on primary research or secondary research. Your sampling methods or criteria for selecting subjects. Your data collection methods.
Step 2: Data Type you Need for Research. Decide on the type of data you need for your research. The type of data you need to collect depends on your research questions or research hypothesis. Two types of research data can be used to answer the research questions: Primary Data Vs. Secondary Data.
Step 4: Create a research design. The research design is a practical framework for answering your research questions. It involves making decisions about the type of data you need, the methods you'll use to collect and analyze it, and the location and timescale of your research. There are often many possible paths you can take to answering ...
Describe the research design and methodology you plan to use. Explain the data collection methods, instruments, and analysis techniques. Justify why the chosen methods are appropriate for your research. 7. Timeline: Create a timeline or schedule that outlines the major milestones and activities of your research project.
The first question asks for a ready-made solution, and is not focused or researchable. The second question is a clearer comparative question, but note that it may not be practically feasible. For a smaller research project or thesis, it could be narrowed down further to focus on the effectiveness of drunk driving laws in just one or two countries.
Research design refers to the overall plan, structure or strategy that guides a research project, from its conception to the final analysis of data. Research designs for quantitative studies include descriptive, correlational, experimental and quasi-experimenta l designs. Research designs for qualitative studies include phenomenological ...
Research design: The research design will be a quasi-experimental design, with a pretest-posttest control group design. ... Helps to ensure that the research project is feasible, relevant, and ethical. Helps to ensure that the data collected is accurate, valid, and reliable, and that the research findings can be interpreted and generalized to ...
The design of a piece of research refers to the practical way in which the research was conducted according to a systematic attempt to generate evidence to answer the research question. The term "research methodology" is often used to mean something similar, however different writers use both terms in slightly different ways: some writers, for ...
Research design methods refer to the systematic approaches and techniques used to plan, structure, and conduct a research study. The choice of research design method depends on the research questions, objectives, and the nature of the study. Here are some key research design methods commonly used in various fields: 1.
Here's an example outline of a research plan you might put together: Project title. Project members involved in the research plan. Purpose of the project (provide a summary of the research plan's intent) Objective 1 (provide a short description for each objective) Objective 2. Objective 3.
List the major components needed to design a quantitative research project Understand how a biostatistician can help your research Define 2 ways of minimizing sample size or maximizing power Understand why having the largest sample possible is not necessarily good.
approach to your research project. Don't try to do a month's work in a week: frame your project so that it fits the time you have. And remember, the more work you hope to do, the more time you'll need. Keep this in mind when you're planning your project. How to start your research project No matter how S.M.A.R.T. your goals, your
What Is Research Design? The term "research design" is usually used in reference to experimental research, and refers to the design of your experiment. However, you will also see the term "research design" used in other types of research. Below is a list of possible research designs you might encounter or adopt for your research:
Planning a research project is essential no matter your academic level or field of study. There is no one 'best' way to design research, but there are certain guidelines that can be helpfully applied across disciplines. Orient yourself to knowledge-creation. Make the shift from being a consumer of information to being a producer of ...
You can do this by: Reading papers on a topic, especially review papers. Talking to experts in the field (like graduate students, postdocs, and PIs in your lab or other labs) Debating topics with your peers and getting feedback on your ideas. Attending scientific conferences or listening to talks.
Select the most appropriate investigative methods (surveys, interviews, experiments) and research tools (periodical indexes, databases, websites). Plan the research project. Retrieve information using a variety of methods (draw on a repertoire of skills). Refine the search strategy as necessary.
research project before, it is probably wise to start the book at the beginning and work through each of the chapters systematically. This should provide a fairly good general introduction to the main aspects of doing a research project. However, each of the chapters in the book can also be read as separate, stand-alone pieces.
During a research project, you will present your own ideas and research on a subject alongside analysing existing knowledge. How to write a research report The next section covers the research project steps necessary to producing a research paper. Developing a research question or statement Research project topics will vary depending on the ...
Research proposal examples. Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We've included a few for you below. Example research proposal #1: "A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management".
A proposal needs to show how your work fits into what is already known about the topic and what new paradigm will it add to the literature, while specifying the question that the research will answer, establishing its significance, and the implications of the answer. [2] The proposal must be capable of convincing the evaluation committee about ...
learning objectives. By the end of this chapter you will have the tools to: • Design a qualitative research project that spells out the goals of conducting research, articulates the functions of the research questions, and enumerates the methods that connect to your research objective. • Connect your research questions to the structure of ...
Facilitator Instructions: 1. Provide a brief summary of your campaign to set the context for the discussion. 2. Explain that today we will have a discussion about using participatory action research in our campaign. We are going to try to begin to develop goals and questions that can guide our research. 3.
This chapter focuses on describing how to go about designing a research project. First, we will learn about framing the research study as a project.Then, we will be introduced to the research design canvas.While the details are specific to socio-technical grounded theory (STGT) studies, the research design canvas or template can be used for research project design in general.
Provide a well-defined and practical plan for carrying out the project, including contingency plans. Clearly outline as applicable the research design, theoretical approach, data collection methods, analysis techniques, and include necessary preliminary data or proof of concept to demonstrate feasibility. Well-defined Goals and Milestones
How To Create A Research Project Graphic Organizer. Graphic organizers help students systematically arrange and visually display information while researching to help them identify, study, and understand the relationships between the parts and the whole. A research project graphic organizer can help students visualize the components of a ...
This special issue, "Project Management Offices and Organizational Design: In Honor of Monique Aubry," explores linkages between project management offices (PMOs) and organizational design. Although research on PMOs has been part of the project studies landscape for some decades now, it started from practical inquiries, continuing into ...
Project duration, hours of engagement. 6 weeks between 13 January and 21 February in 2025. 35. Location: Toowoomba: Regional Clinical Unit, Boyce Gardens: Description: In recent times, there has been an increase in co-design methods, frameworks, and tools to benefit end-users in health, yet there is no standardised approach.
The PAICE programme will use evaluation and reflection to make informed decisions during its design and delivery. Our programme theory (see Shared Vision) will guide our evaluation and help us track progress. By taking an evaluation approach that is embedded into the project and using participatory methods, we aim to improve and adapt our project.
PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — Grounded in the concepts of innovation, connection and flexibility, Brown University's planned facility for integrated life sciences research is designed to convene scientists across multiple fields of study to solve complex, interconnected health and medical challenges. State-of-the-art laboratory spaces illuminated by natural light, a street-level ...