1. | Extenuating Circumstances are designed for emergencies. If your circumstances are not sudden, unexpected and beyond your control, UCL has a wide range of other options to support your studies – please see for more details. |
2. | These Extenuating Circumstances regulations apply to all UCL Undergraduate and Taught Postgraduate students, and to UCL Postgraduate Research students taking taught components/ modules. |
3. | Please refer to for detailed information on the arrangements for Affiliate students, Intercollegiate students, Study Abroad, Placements, Joint Degrees, and Short Courses. |
4. | ECs apply to summative assessments only (i.e. formal assessments where your results count towards your degree). You do not need to submit EC claims for formative assessments. |
5. | You only need to apply for ECs if your summative assessment is affected. If you miss a class or teaching event, please refer to the for more details. |
Step 1: |
| Make sure that you know what you need to submit and the deadline for submitting claims. |
|
---|---|---|---|
Step 2: |
| UCL’s ‘Grounds for ECs’ explain what will normally be considered. If your circumstances are not covered, you may still be eligible to use a Delayed Assessment Permit. | See |
Step 3: |
| (Navigate to the tab and click on |
|
Step 4: |
| You will be asked to submit evidence. | See |
Step 5: |
| All EC claims should be submitted as soon as possible, and . | |
Step 6: |
| Your department will decide whether your claim meets the criteria and which mitigation is suitable for your circumstances. Your department may also need to seek approval from your faculty or from the Vice-Provost (Education and Student Experience) for some types of mitigation. | See |
Step 7: |
| You should receive a response as soon as possible and no more than ten working days after submitting your application (unless you are submitting your evidence late). There may be good reasons why a decision cannot be made within this timeframe – for example if your case needs to be escalated to your Faculty EC Panel. If this is the case, the panel will let you know, within ten working days of receiving your application, that more time is needed to process your claim. | See |
1. | Please note the following important information before making an application |
2. | The EC application form will ask you which type of mitigation you would prefer. This will be used to determine how your request is processed but does not determine the outcome of your request. The type of mitigation offered is at the discretion of UCL, and will take the following factors into consideration: |
a) | The severity of your personal circumstances, and | |
b) | Academic need (e.g. type of assessment, discipline, timing of the assessment), and | |
c) | The requirements of any Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Bodies, which may not permit some forms of mitigation, and | |
d) | Fairness to all students in your year and over time, and | |
e) | Protecting the academic standards of the degrees awarded by UCL. |
3. | At various stages of this procedure you will find regulations which allow UCL to make an exception. Exceptions will only be considered if there are compelling reasons for doing so; they are not a student entitlement. You should expect that the normal procedures will apply to you. |
4. | Your ‘Home’ Department and Faculty are responsible for assessing your claim. If you are taking an interdepartmental module, your Home Department/ Faculty should consult with your Teaching Department to ensure that the mitigation is possible and appropriate. |
5. | If you are working in a group with other students, the EC Panel may consider the impact of your ECs on other students in the group, for example if the EC prevents the group from meeting the deadline or from completing the required work. |
6. | An EC claim can cover more than one assessment – make sure you specify all of the affected assessments on your application. |
7. | ECs are designed to cover short-term problems which are sudden and unexpected. If you submit multiple requests for the same condition or for the same assessment, and your Department/ Faculty considers that you are having a longer-term difficulty, you may be referred to UCL Student Support and Wellbeing for a , or to the for additional support. The normal course of action is for the EC Panel to accept the EC claim in hand, but let you know that further EC claims for the same condition are unlikely to be approved. |
8. | If you need long-term or ongoing support UCL has a wide range of options including and . However, there may still be occasions where you need to use the EC procedures for additional help. includes more information. |
9. | If you are unable to make an application for yourself, your next of kin (e.g. parent, partner) may submit a request on your behalf. A member of staff can assist you or your next of kin in completing an application, but they are not permitted to submit a request without your consent. |
10. | Any sensitive information will only be accessible to members of staff who are directly involved in making a decision on your claim (see ). |
11. | If you are concerned about disclosing particularly sensitive circumstances to your department, you can indicate on your application that you would like your claim to be considered by your Faculty EC Panel. |
12. | Please note that, if you submit after the published deadline as a result of an extension or deferral, the one-month will apply from the day that you submit your work, and not from the original deadline. |
13. | If you submit a fraudulent EC claim or evidence you will be subject to . If you are struggling with your studies, please seek help – includes details of a wide range of support services. |
14. | Throughout this procedure, deadlines are stated in ‘working days’. This means every calendar day except weekends, UK Bank Holidays and UCL College Closure Days. Any other vacation periods or reading weeks count as working days. |
The following guidance sets out the types of circumstances which will normally be considered. The examples under different categories should help you understand whether you can make a claim. UCL also uses this guidance to ensure that students in different departments and faculties are treated fairly. |
|
| ||
---|---|---|---|
|
| ||
Circumstances which will normally be considered: | Circumstances that may be considered where there is a substantial impact on you: | Circumstances that will not normally be considered under the EC procedure. Reasons marked (*) indicate type of circumstances you may wish to use a DAP for, if eligible: | |
Bereavement |
| ||
Short-term medical conditions | |||
Long-term medical conditions | |||
Pregnancy and maternity | |||
Parenting and caring | |||
Major incidents | |||
Crime | |||
Family and personal difficulties | |||
Financial difficulties | |||
Housing difficulties | |||
Work and other commitments | |||
Academic work | |||
Court appearance |
| ||
Other |
|
1. | The ‘Mitigation Options’ table indicates the types of mitigation that are available through these Extenuating Circumstances procedures. |
2. | The EC application form will ask you which type of mitigation you would prefer. This will be used to determine how your request is processed but does not determine the outcome of your request. |
3. | You should expect to receive a Category 1 or 2 mitigation. These mainly centre around giving you additional time to complete an assessment. This is usually in the form of either an extension or a ‘deferral’: |
a) | A deferral is the opportunity to take an assessment as if for the first time and without penalty. Deferrals normally take place at the ‘next normal occasion’ which is typically the Late Summer Assessment Period. The regulations for deferrals can be found in . |
4. | In exceptional circumstances, if the Departmental EC Panel agrees that the options in Category 1 or 2 will not provide sufficient mitigation for you, your case may be escalated to the Faculty EC Panel to consider a Category 3 mitigation. |
5. | In extraordinary circumstances, if the Departmental or Faculty EC Panel agrees that the options in Category 3 will not provide sufficient mitigation for you, your Faculty may make a recommendation to the Director of Education Services or Director of Student Operations as appropriate on behalf of the Vice-Provost (Education and Student Experience) to consider a Category 4 mitigation. |
MITIGATIONS OPTIONS
|
|
| ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam (including in person and online) | 1. without Tuition to the next normal occasion (typically the Late Summer Assessment Period). | Departmental Extenuating Circumstances Panel | Evidence is required. | |
2. Extension of 2 hours per 24-hour period (e.g. a 48-hour paper would be extended by 4 hours). | ||||
3. without Tuition to the next normal occasion (timing determined by the department). | ||||
4. without Tuition (timing determined by the department). | ||||
5. Extension of up to 2 weeks (10 working days). | ||||
6. Extension of up to 1 week (5 working days). |
|
|
| ||
---|---|---|---|---|
7. Suspension of the . | Departmental Extenuating Circumstances Panel | Evidence required | ||
8. Coursework extension longer than 1 week. | ||||
9. Dissertation/ research project extension longer than 2 weeks. | ||||
10. without Tuition: Not at the next normal occasion. | ||||
11. without Tuition for assessments immediately prior to a period of . | ||||
12. with Tuition. | ||||
13. with Tuition for lectures, seminars, tutorials, supervision or other teaching events immediately prior to a period of . | ||||
14. Exclude component from : Maximum 10% weighting. |
|
|
| ||
---|---|---|---|---|
15. Extension longer than 12 weeks. | Faculty Extenuating Circumstances Panel | Evidence required | ||
16. Alternative Method of Assessment allowing the student to demonstrate achievement of the same learning outcomes (subject to consultation with the Programme Leader and approval by the External Examiner). | ||||
17. Exclude component from : 11 to 50% weighting. | ||||
18. Exclude module from : Maximum 30 credits. | ||||
19. Exclude module from : Maximum 30 credits. | ||||
20. Exclude module from and : Maximum 30 credits. | ||||
21. to Part-Time study (UG and PGT students), or Flexible-Modular study (PGT students only) where possible in the curriculum. |
|
|
| ||
---|---|---|---|---|
22. Exclude component from : More than 50% weighting. | Director of Education Services or Director of Student Operations as appropriate on behalf of the Vice-Provost (Education and Student Experience) | Evidence required | ||
23. Exclude module from : More than 30 credits. | ||||
24. Exclude module from Classification calculation: More than 30 credits. | ||||
25. Exclude module from and : More than 30 credits. | ||||
26. Any or mitigation not included in this list. |
1. | Your EC claim needs to be supported by written evidence from an appropriate, independent and verifiable authority such as a doctor or registered medical practitioner. Further information about the types of evidence which you might be able to use is available in . |
2. | Your evidence will need to cover the full period for which you are requesting mitigation. |
3. | UCL understands that it can be distressing to be asked for ‘evidence’ in the case of very sensitive circumstances such as the death of a close relative, harassment, discrimination or sexual assault. We also understand that it can be very difficult to provide evidence of particularly traumatic events such as war or terrorism. If there are compelling reasons for making an exception, the Department should escalate the claim to the Faculty EC Panel which is authorised to use its discretion to either suspend the need for formal evidence or accept alternative forms of evidence. |
4. | If the EC Panel does not have enough evidence to make a decision, you may be asked to provide new or additional evidence. You will need to provide the additional evidence within four weeks of being contacted. If you do not submit the requested evidence, your claim will normally be rejected. |
1. | If you cannot obtain the necessary evidence in time to submit your EC claim, you must still submit your application on time and indicate that your evidence is to follow. |
2. | You must submit your late evidence no more than four weeks after submitting your EC application. A decision cannot be made until your evidence is received. This may affect the type of mitigation that is available to you. |
3. | Extenuating Circumstances claims should be submitted as soon as possible, and normally no more than one week after the first affected assessment. Extenuating Circumstances claims cannot be considered through these procedures once your formal results have been published. However, you have the right to appeal your results via the . |
1. | You cannot contest the outcome of an EC request on the grounds of academic or professional judgement. However, you may request a review of an EC decision if you feel that there has been a significant procedural error in the handling of your request. |
2. | Requests for review must be submitted within two weeks of the mitigation decision. |
3. | Decisions made by Departmental EC Panels should be reviewed by the Chair of the Faculty EC Panel. |
4. | Decisions made by Faculty EC Panels should be reviewed by an Assessor appointed by the Director of Education Services or Director of Student Operations as appropriate (typically an FECP Chair from another Faculty). |
5. | The FECP Chair or Assessor should consider the request and make one of the following decisions: |
a) | To uphold the original decision, or | |
b) | To retain the original decision but amend specific details such as length of extension, Deferral deadline etc., or | |
c) | To make a new decision. |
6. | The FECP Chair or Assessor should communicate their decision to you in writing within one week of receiving the request. |
1. | You cannot appeal against an academic or professional judgement that has been reached through due process by an Extenuating Circumstances Panel. However, if you are dissatisfied with your progression, award or classification outcome, you may be able to appeal within specified grounds via the , where consideration can be given to whether UCL applied its Regulations and Procedures correctly and whether any decision was reasonable and proportionate. |
3.11.1 approval process .
1 | The Faculty Extenuating Circumstances Panel is responsible for all EC decisions made by the departments under its remit. The following bodies are authorised to assess claims: |
Category | Type of Mitigation | Approval Needed | Evidence Needed |
---|---|---|---|
| Evidenced Mitigations | Departmental Extenuating Circumstances Panel | Evidence required |
| Evidenced Mitigations | Departmental Extenuating Circumstances Panel | Evidence required |
| Exceptional Mitigations | Faculty Extenuating Circumstances Panel | Evidence required |
| Extraordinary Mitigations | Director of Education Services or Director of Student Operations as appropriate on behalf of the Vice-Provost (Education and Student Experience) | Evidence required |
2. | While Panels are responsible for all decisions, the administration of claims may be carried out by appropriate academic and/ or professional services staff under the supervision of the Panel Chair and Deputy Chair. Any uncertain or edge cases should be considered by the full Panel. |
3. | When liaising with other departments, faculties, colleges or institutions, the discussion should focus on the type of mitigation. Sensitive personal data, such as details of the EC itself, should only be disclosed where it is essential to supporting the student. Please read for further information. |
4. | When assessing interdepartmental claims, approvers are asked to ensure that they consult with the Teaching Department to check that the mitigation is appropriate. Different disciplines have different practices, for example with regards to publishing assessment solutions or setting new assessment tasks, and these might not align with local assumptions. |
1. | Each UCL Faculty must have a Faculty Extenuating Circumstances Panel (FECP) which operates under the following Terms of Reference: |
a) | To oversee decision-making for all EC claims submitted by students in the Departments under the Faculty’s remit. | |
b) | To provide Departments with advice and guidance, with a particular focus on the types of mitigation that may be appropriate and/ or restricted in a given discipline or area of professional practice. | |
c) | To make decisions on Category 3 claims, and on Category 1 or 2 claims that have been escalated from departments. | |
d) | To consider Category 1 and 2 claims where the student has requested that sensitive information is not shared with their department (see ). | |
e) | To make recommendations on Category 4 claims to the Director of Education Services or Director of Student Operations as appropriate where necessary and appropriate. |
2. | The FECP must be constituted as follows: |
a) | The FECP should be chaired by the Faculty Tutor or equivalent. A Deputy Chair must be nominated to stand in for the Chair where necessary. | |
b) | In addition to the Chair and Deputy Chair, the FECP must include at least two members of senior faculty staff such as Faculty Graduate Tutors, Programme Leaders, Departmental Tutors and senior Professional Services staff. | |
c) | The FECP secretary should be a named member of staff from the Faculty teaching administration team. | |
d) | External Examiners must not be members of the FECP. |
3. | FECPs may ‘meet’ in person, online or by asynchronous messaging. All decisions must be dated and recorded in writing. |
4. | ‘Meetings’ should include a minimum of three members, including either the Chair or Deputy Chair. |
5. | The Chair or Deputy Chair of the FECP are entitled to take Chair’s Action. |
6. | FECP members who have a personal or professional conflict of interest with any student being considered must withdraw from the discussions about that student. |
1. | Each UCL Department must have a Departmental Extenuating Circumstances Panel (DECP) with the following Terms of Reference: |
a) | To make decisions on Category 1 or 2 claims. | |
b) | To escalate claims to Category 3 and 4 where necessary and appropriate. | |
c) | To follow Faculty policies and guidance on the types of mitigation that may be appropriate and/ or restricted in a given discipline or area of professional practice. |
2. | ‘Department’ may cover local variations such as divisions, institutes, short course providers etc. |
3. | The DECP must be constituted as follows: |
a) | The DECP should be chaired by the Departmental Tutor. A Deputy Chair must be nominated to stand in for the Chair where necessary. | |
b) | In addition to the Chair and Deputy Chair, the DECP must include at least two members of senior Departmental staff such as Programme Leaders, Departmental Tutors (or equivalent) and senior Professional Services staff. | |
c) | The DECP secretary should be a named member of staff from the Departmental teaching administration team. | |
d) | External Examiners must not be members of the DECP. |
4. | DECPs may ‘meet’ in person, online or by asynchronous messaging. All decisions must be dated and recorded in writing. |
5. | ‘Meetings’ should include a minimum of three members, including either the Chair or Deputy Chair. |
6. | The Chair or Deputy Chair of the DECP is entitled to take Chair’s Action. |
7. | DECP members who have a personal or professional conflict of interest with any student being considered must withdraw from the discussions about that student. |
1. | Approvers are responsible for: |
a) | Making objective, impartial decisions about the validity of ECs submitted by students under their remit. | |
b) | Determining the most appropriate mitigation for the individual circumstances. | |
c) | Ensuring that all ECs are supported by appropriate evidence. | |
d) | Ensuring that mitigation is only applied to the affected module(s). | |
e) | Ensuring that mitigation is only applied once for each assessment. | |
f) | Processing ECs in a timely manner. | |
g) | Keeping sensitive student information confidential to those directly involved in making a decision – includes more information. | |
h) | Storing all data relating to ECs securely. |
2. | Claims should meet the criteria in , which are based on sector best practice from the Academic Registrars’ Council and the Office for the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education. The examples provided are not intended to be exhaustive but are designed to manage student expectations about the help available to them and to ensure that, as far as possible, students across different Departments and Faculties are treated fairly. |
3. | If there is a compelling reason for making an exception, may use their discretion to: |
a) | Accept an EC claim more than one week after the first affected assessment (but not after formal results have been published), or | |
b) | Accept alternative forms of evidence |
4. | If there is a compelling reason for making an exception, Faculty EC Panels may use their discretion to: |
a) | Suspend the evidence requirement. |
5. | The ‘Recommended Mitigations’ are designed to promote consistency across UCL and to manage student expectations about the help available to them. If there are compelling reasons for doing so, approvers may offer another form of mitigation which falls within the same Category, or escalate the claim to a higher Category. |
6. | For decisions relating to an Interruption of Study, the approver should determine the student’s eligibility for a deferral; all other details of the interruption, such as the Date of Interruption and Date of Return, fall under the remit of the Interruption of Study Procedures ( ). |
7. | Students should receive a decision within ten working days of their claim being submitted unless: |
a) | The student submits late evidence (see ), or | |
b) | The student is asked to provide new/ additional evidence (see ), or | |
c) | The student has not yet provided any evidence (see ), or | |
d) | There are good reasons why a decision cannot be made within this timeframe, in which case the relevant panel should let the student know that more time is needed to process their claim. |
8. | If the claim is rejected, the decision must clearly articulate the reasons for rejection. |
9. | The mitigation decision should be communicated to the relevant Board of Examiners, Teaching Department or Institution (if applicable), and UCL Education Services. Communications must only include the type of mitigation which has been agreed and should not include details of the EC itself – includes more information. |
1. | The Board of Examiners is responsible for applying the mitigation, confirming module marks, determining whether the student may progress or graduate, and issuing official results. |
2. | Members of the Board of Examiners must only be notified of the mitigation decision and not the details of the EC itself - includes more information. |
3. | In order to respect the sensitive nature of students’ circumstances and to ensure that the academic standards of UCL are upheld, the Board of Examiners must ensure that: |
a) | a) Only approved ECs are considered, and | |
b) | b) New cases are not raised at the meeting of the Board, and | |
c) | c) The nature or severity of the EC is not discussed, and | |
d) | d) Marks are not adjusted in any circumstances, and | |
e) | Students are not raised from a fail to a pass. |
A guide to changes to the regulations are available from the Recent Changes page.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
UCL Institute of Education Library has selected masters dissertations, which are findable in Explore. Those published after 2000 are openly accessible in the library. All others must be requested in advance. Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Library has examples of past MSc and MRes dissertations.
Learn how to access research theses held by UCL Library Services, including UoL and UCL theses, and open access repositories. Find out how to deposit your own thesis in UCL Discovery and make it available worldwide.
Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London). Ahmed, Imad Uddin; (2021) The political economy of energy mix in hydropower dependent developing nations - a case study of Zambia. Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London). Aitchison, L.D; (2021) Bayesian inference in neural circuits and synapses.
Enter your search terms. Advanced search Browse by: Deposit your research. Open Access; About UCL Discovery
Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London). Bear, Holly Alice; (2020) Investigating the expectations and reality of child and adolescent mental health: considering treatment outcomes, outcome expectancy and illness belief models for anxiety and depression and the role of clinicians in management.
Learn from a UCL PhD student how to choose, research and write your dissertation. Find out how to plan, reference, edit and enjoy your project.
Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London). Gutiérrez Menéndez, Luz María; (2019) From the Utopia of Quietness to the Fear of Stillness: A Taxonomic Research Study to Understanding 'Silence' through the medium of radio and its Implications for Media, Education and Psychology. Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London).
Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London). Hanns, Laura Anne; (2018) Psychological health and inflammation in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: describing the relationships between psychological health, laboratory measures of inflammation and disease activity for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London). Ashworth, WB; (2017) A computational model of hepatic energy metabolism: Understanding the role of zonation in the development and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Doctoral thesis , UCL (University College London).
Find out how to prepare for writing your dissertation at UCL, from tutorials, courses, skills training, to online video tutorials. Learn about the writing process, academic integrity, literature searching, referencing, and more.
The MSc Dissertation. From June - early September students undertake a research project, lightly supervised by a member of faculty, and submit a 10,000 word dissertation on or before the deadline in early September. A good dissertation will be a piece of original research, the best dissertations are published.
Published MSc Dissertations. Albalate, D. (2008) Lowering Blood Alcohol Content Levels to Save Lives: The European Experience, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27 (1), pp. 20-39. Manning, Mark (2003), Finance causes growth: can we be so sure?, BE Journal of Macroconomics, 3 (1). Schaffer, Sarah K. (2015) The effect of free personal ...
Browse by UCL Theses. Please select a value to browse from the list below. UCL Discovery is UCL's open access repository, showcasing and providing access to UCL research outputs from all UCL disciplines.
Learn how to prepare your thesis for assessment at UCL, including formatting, submission and binding requirements. Find out about the Covid-19 Impact Form, the UCL Dropbox and the Research Paper Declaration Form.
Information about: how to access copies of research theses that UCL Library Services holds, Open Access thesis depositories and how to deposit electronic theses. Past IGH MSc Dissertations Examples of past MSc dissertations submitted by students in the Institute for Global Health are available via the Great Ormond Street Institute of Child ...
Support for dissertations and research projects This guide is primarily aimed at taught postgraduate students, but may also be of interest to final year undergraduates. It highlights the extensive online library collections and services available to you, and also directs you to other academic support services that may be useful when undertaking ...
A guide to resources and support for undertaking dissertations or research projects. Skip to Main ... material, such as relevant articles or books, you can mine these for all sorts of other useful related sources. For example: ... Research and Writing Skills for Dissertations and Projects is a UCL Moodle course available to all UCL students and ...
UCL Library Services manages the DART-Europe service, the premier European portal for the discovery of open access research theses. At the time of writing, this service provides access to over one million research theses from 564 Universities in 29 European countries. It was founded in 2005 as a partnership of national and university libraries ...
When carrying out a literature search to inform a dissertation or extended piece of research, you will need to think carefully about your search strategy. Have a look at our tutorials and videos to help you develop your literature searching skills:
Thesis or dissertation. To be made up of: Author. Year of submission (in round brackets). Title of thesis (in italics). Degree statement. Degree-awarding body. Available at: URL. (Accessed: date).
UCL DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE Style Sheet for Essays These rules apply to tutorial essays, Research Essays, Course Essays, MA Issues in Modern Culture coursework essays, and MA Issues in Modern Culture dissertations. MA English Linguistics students should refer to the style sheet issued by their Programme Convenor instead.
Recently we wanted to check if we are achieving this central aim of ours, to improve student experience around the dissertation. We were delighted to work with Niamh Healy, a UCL PhD student, as our research assistant. Niamh read all the written student feedback we had received between 2018-19 and 2020-21, looking for patterns or meaning across ...
Ucl Dissertation Sample - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The document discusses the challenges of writing a dissertation for University College London (UCL). Crafting a UCL dissertation requires extensive research, comprehensive analysis, and the ability to synthesize information into an original academic work.
1. 'Extenuating Circumstances' (often know as 'ECs') are events which are sudden, unexpected, significantly disruptive and beyond your control and which may affect your performance at summative assessment, such as a serious illness or the death of a close relative.: 2. You can submit an Extenuating Circumstances claim to access 'mitigation' such as an extension or deferring an ...