|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Growth
Development
What is Hypothesis?
We have heard of many hypotheses which have led to great inventions in science. Assumptions that are made on the basis of some evidence are known as hypotheses. In this article, let us learn in detail about the hypothesis and the type of hypothesis with examples.
A hypothesis is an assumption that is made based on some evidence. This is the initial point of any investigation that translates the research questions into predictions. It includes components like variables, population and the relation between the variables. A research hypothesis is a hypothesis that is used to test the relationship between two or more variables.
Characteristics of Hypothesis
Following are the characteristics of the hypothesis:
- The hypothesis should be clear and precise to consider it to be reliable.
- If the hypothesis is a relational hypothesis, then it should be stating the relationship between variables.
- The hypothesis must be specific and should have scope for conducting more tests.
- The way of explanation of the hypothesis must be very simple and it should also be understood that the simplicity of the hypothesis is not related to its significance.
Sources of Hypothesis
Following are the sources of hypothesis:
- The resemblance between the phenomenon.
- Observations from past studies, present-day experiences and from the competitors.
- Scientific theories.
- General patterns that influence the thinking process of people.
Types of Hypothesis
There are six forms of hypothesis and they are:
- Simple hypothesis
- Complex hypothesis
- Directional hypothesis
- Non-directional hypothesis
- Null hypothesis
- Associative and casual hypothesis
Simple Hypothesis
It shows a relationship between one dependent variable and a single independent variable. For example – If you eat more vegetables, you will lose weight faster. Here, eating more vegetables is an independent variable, while losing weight is the dependent variable.
Complex Hypothesis
It shows the relationship between two or more dependent variables and two or more independent variables. Eating more vegetables and fruits leads to weight loss, glowing skin, and reduces the risk of many diseases such as heart disease.
Directional Hypothesis
It shows how a researcher is intellectual and committed to a particular outcome. The relationship between the variables can also predict its nature. For example- children aged four years eating proper food over a five-year period are having higher IQ levels than children not having a proper meal. This shows the effect and direction of the effect.
Non-directional Hypothesis
It is used when there is no theory involved. It is a statement that a relationship exists between two variables, without predicting the exact nature (direction) of the relationship.
Null Hypothesis
It provides a statement which is contrary to the hypothesis. It’s a negative statement, and there is no relationship between independent and dependent variables. The symbol is denoted by “H O ”.
Associative and Causal Hypothesis
Associative hypothesis occurs when there is a change in one variable resulting in a change in the other variable. Whereas, the causal hypothesis proposes a cause and effect interaction between two or more variables.
Examples of Hypothesis
Following are the examples of hypotheses based on their types:
- Consumption of sugary drinks every day leads to obesity is an example of a simple hypothesis.
- All lilies have the same number of petals is an example of a null hypothesis.
- If a person gets 7 hours of sleep, then he will feel less fatigue than if he sleeps less. It is an example of a directional hypothesis.
Functions of Hypothesis
Following are the functions performed by the hypothesis:
- Hypothesis helps in making an observation and experiments possible.
- It becomes the start point for the investigation.
- Hypothesis helps in verifying the observations.
- It helps in directing the inquiries in the right direction.
How will Hypothesis help in the Scientific Method?
Researchers use hypotheses to put down their thoughts directing how the experiment would take place. Following are the steps that are involved in the scientific method:
- Formation of question
- Doing background research
- Creation of hypothesis
- Designing an experiment
- Collection of data
- Result analysis
- Summarizing the experiment
- Communicating the results
Frequently Asked Questions – FAQs
What is hypothesis.
A hypothesis is an assumption made based on some evidence.
Give an example of simple hypothesis?
What are the types of hypothesis.
Types of hypothesis are:
- Associative and Casual hypothesis
State true or false: Hypothesis is the initial point of any investigation that translates the research questions into a prediction.
Define complex hypothesis..
A complex hypothesis shows the relationship between two or more dependent variables and two or more independent variables.
Put your understanding of this concept to test by answering a few MCQs. Click ‘Start Quiz’ to begin!
Select the correct answer and click on the “Finish” button Check your score and answers at the end of the quiz
Visit BYJU’S for all Physics related queries and study materials
Your result is as below
Request OTP on Voice Call
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Post My Comment
Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs
Register with byju's & watch live videos.
Crafting Effective Hypothesis Statements: Examples & Best
Information
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
Article Menu
- Subscribe SciFeed
- Recommended Articles
- Google Scholar
- on Google Scholar
- Table of Contents
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
JSmol Viewer
The “leafing intensity premium” hypothesis and the scaling relationships of the functional traits of bamboo species.
1. Introduction
2. materials and methods, 2.1. sampling site and data acquisition, 2.2. data analysis, 4. discussion, 4.1. scaling relationship between tlm and tnlm, 4.2. scaling relationships between mlm and leafing intensity, 4.3. different metrics of leafing intensity, 5. conclusions, supplementary materials, author contributions, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.
- Wright, I.J.; Reich, P.B.; Westoby, M.; Ackerly, D.D.; Baruch, Z.; Bongers, F.; Cavender-Bares, J.; Chapin, T.; Cornelissen, J.H.; Diemer, M.; et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 2004 , 428 , 821–827. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Chitwood, D.H.; Sinha, N.R. Evolutionary and environmental forces sculpting leaf development. Curr. Biol. 2016 , 26 , 297–306. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Koch, G.W.; Sillett, S.C.; Jennings, G.M.; Davis, S.D. The limits to tree height. Nature 2004 , 428 , 851–854. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Tsukaya, H. Mechanism of leaf-shape determination. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006 , 57 , 477–496. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Tozer, W.C.; Rice, B.; Westoby, M. Evolutionary divergence of leaf width and its correlates. Am. J. Bot. 2015 , 102 , 367–378. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Niinemets, Ü.; Portsmuth, A.; Tena, D.; Tobias, M.; Matesanz, S.; Valladares, F. Do we underestimate the importance of leaf size in plant economics? Disproportional scaling of support costs within the spectrum of leaf physiognomy. Ann. Bot. 2007 , 100 , 283–303. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Milla, R.; Reich, P.B. The scaling of leaf area and mass: The cost of light interception increases with leaf size. Proc. R. Soc. B 2007 , 274 , 2109–2115. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Brown, V.K.; Lawton, J.H. Herbivory and the evolution of leaf size and shape. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1991 , 333 , 265–272. [ Google Scholar ]
- Moles, A.T.; Westoby, M. Do small leaves expand faster than large leaves, and do shorter expansion times reduce herbivore damage? Oikos 2000 , 90 , 517–524. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Parkhurst, D.F.; Loucks, O.L. Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. J. Ecol. 1972 , 60 , 505–537. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Givnish, T.J. Comparative studies of leaf form: Assessing the relative roles of selective pressures and phylogenetic constraints. New Phytol. 1987 , 106 , 131–160. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Bragg, J.G.; Westoby, M. Leaf size and foraging for light in a sclerophyll woodland. Funct. Ecol. 2002 , 16 , 633–639. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Milla, R.; Reich, P.B. Multi-trait interactions, not phylogeny, fine-tune leaf size reduction with increasing altitude. Ann. Bot. 2011 , 107 , 455–465. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Kleiman, D.; Aarssen, L.W. The leaf size/number trade-off in trees. J. Ecol. 2007 , 95 , 376–382. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Yang, D.; Li, G.; Sun, S. The generality of leaf size versus number trade-off in temperate woody species. Ann. Bot. 2008 , 102 , 623–629. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Milla, R. The leafing intensity premium hypothesis tested across clades, growth forms and altitudes. J. Ecol. 2009 , 97 , 972–983. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Whitman, T.; Aarssen, L.W. The leaf size/number trade-off in herbaceous angiosperms. J. Plant Ecol. 2010 , 3 , 49–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Fajardo, A. Are trait-scaling relationships invariant across contrasting elevations in the widely distributed treeline species Nothofagus pumilio ? Am. J. Bot. 2016 , 103 , 821–829. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Yan, E.; Wang, X.; Chang, S.; He, F. Scaling relationships among twig size, leaf size and leafing intensity in a successional series of subtropical forests. Tree Physiol. 2013 , 33 , 609–617. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Huang, Y.; Lechowicz, M.J.; Price, C.A.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, D. The underlying basis for the trade-off between leaf size and leafing intensity. Funct. Ecol. 2016 , 30 , 199–205. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Fan, Z.; Sterck, F.; Zhang, S.; Fu, P.; Hao, G. Tradeoff between stem hydraulic efficiency and mechanical strength affects leaf–stem allometry in 28 Ficus tree species. Front. Plant Sci. 2017 , 8 , 274360. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Poorter, H.; Niklas, K.J.; Reich, P.B.; Oleksyn, J.; Poot, P.; Mommer, L. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol. 2012 , 193 , 30–50. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Liu, R.; Yang, X.; Gao, R.; Hou, X.; Huo, L.; Huang, Z.; Cornelissen, J.H. Allometry rather than abiotic drivers explains biomass allocation among leaves, stems and roots of Artemisia across a large environmental gradient in China. J. Ecol. 2021 , 109 , 1026–1040. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Ogden, J. The reproductive strategy of higher plants: II. The reproductive strategy of Tussilago farfara L. J. Ecol. 1974 , 62 , 291–324. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Liu, X.; Ma, K. Plant functional traits—Concepts, applications and future directions. Sci. Sin. 2015 , 45 , 325–339. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Niklas, K.J. Plant Allometry: The Scaling of Form and Process ; The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1994. [ Google Scholar ]
- Niklas, K.J.; Cobb, E.D.; Niinemets, Ü.; Reich, P.B.; Sellin, A.; Shipley, B.; Wright, I.J. “Diminishing returns” in the scaling of functional leaf traits across and within species groups. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2007 , 104 , 8891–8896. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Sumida, A.; Miyaura, T.; Torii, H. Relationships of tree height and diameter at breast height revisited: Analyses of stem growth using 20-year data of an even-aged Chamaecyparis obtusa stand. Tree Physiol. 2013 , 33 , 106–118. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Li, Y.; Shi, P.; Niinemets, Ü.; Song, Y.; Yu, K.; Schrader, J.; Niklas, K.J. Diminishing returns among lamina fresh and dry mass, surface area, and petiole fresh mass among nine Lauraceae species. Am. J. Bot. 2022 , 109 , 377–392. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Wang, J.; Shi, P.; Yao, W.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Tan, R.; Niklas, K.J. The scaling relationship between perianth fresh mass and area: Proof of concept using Magnolia × soulangeana Soul.-Bod. Trees Struct. Funct. 2024 , 38 , 241–249. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Tian, H.; Gao, P.; Wen, G. Comparative study of cold resistance characteristics in seven Indocalamus spp. J. Zhejiang For. Coll. 2006 , 23 , 641–646. [ Google Scholar ]
- Bai, K.; Jiang, D.; Cao, K.; Liao, D.; Wan, X. The physiological advantage of an ecological filter species, Indocalamus longiauritus , over co-occurring Fagus lucida and Castanopsis lamontii seedlings. Ecol. Res. 2011 , 26 , 15–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Yan, E.; Milla, R.; Aarssen, L.W.; Wang, X. Functional relationships of leafing intensity to plant height, growth form and leaf habit. Acta Oecol. 2012 , 41 , 20–29. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Yuan, Z.; Guan, Q.; Li, J.; Han, M.; Jin, X.; Chen, X. Effect of various vegetation restoration types on soil physio-chemical properties. J. Northeast For. Univ. 2022 , 1 , 52–57. [ Google Scholar ]
- Quinn, G.P.; Keough, M.J. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
- Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap ; Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [ Google Scholar ]
- Sandhu, H.S.; Shi, P.; Kuang, X.; Xue, F.; Ge, F. Applications of the bootstrap to insect physiology. Fla. Entomol. 2011 , 94 , 1036–1041. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing ; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2022; Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Niklas, K.J.; Enquist, B.J. On the vegetative biomass partitioning of seed plant leaves, stems, and roots. Am. Nat. 2002 , 159 , 482–497. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Cheng, D.; Niklas, K.J. Above- and below-ground biomass relationships across 1534 forested communities. Ann. Bot. 2007 , 99 , 95–102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Zhu, J.; Meng, T.; Ni, J.; Su, H.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, Y.; Xiao, C. Within-leaf allometric relationships of mature forests in different bioclimatic zones vary with plant functional types. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2011 , 35 , 687–698. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Kramer, P.J.; Boyer, J.S. Water Relations of Plants and Soils ; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995. [ Google Scholar ]
- Niklas, K.J.; Spatz, H.C. Plant Physics ; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
- Huang, W.; Ratkowsky, D.A.; Hui, C.; Wang, P.; Su, J.; Shi, P. Leaf fresh weight versus dry weight: Which is better for describing the scaling relationship between leaf biomass and leaf area for broad-leaved plants? Forests 2019 , 10 , 256. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Huang, W.; Su, X.; Ratkowsky, D.A.; Niklas, K.J.; Gielis, J.; Shi, P. The scaling relationships of leaf biomass vs. leaf surface area of 12 bamboo species. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019 , 20 , e00793. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Guo, X.; Shi, P.; Niinemets, Ü.; Hölscher, D.; Wang, R.; Liu, M.; Li, Y.; Dong, L.; Niklas, K.J. “Diminishing returns” for leaves of five age-groups of Phyllostachys edulis culms. Am. J. Bot. 2021 , 108 , 1662–1672. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Guo, X.; Niklas, K.J.; Li, Y.; Xue, J.; Shi, P.; Schrader, J. Diminishing returns: A comparison between fresh mass vs. area and dry mass vs. area in deciduous species. Front. Plant Sci. 2022 , 13 , 832300. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Westoby, M.; Falster, D.S.; Moles, A.T.; Vesk, P.A.; Wright, I.J. Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002 , 33 , 125–159. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Gardiner, B.; Berry, P.; Moulia, B. Review: Wind impacts on plant growth, mechanics and damage. Plant Sci. 2016 , 245 , 94–118. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Scott, S.L.; Aarssen, L.W. Within-species leaf size–number trade-offs in herbaceous angiosperms. Botany 2012 , 90 , 223–235. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Strauss, S.Y.; Agrawal, A.A. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999 , 14 , 179–185. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Hanley, M.E.; Lamont, B.B.; Fairbanks, M.M.; Rafferty, C.M. Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007 , 8 , 157–178. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Click here to enlarge figure
Latin Name | Leaf Length (cm) | Total Number of Leaves | Total Leaf Fresh Mass (g) | Culm Fresh Mass (g) | Culm Height (cm) |
---|
Indocalamus barbatus | 14.7 ± 4.2 | 21.4 ± 13.6 | 6.83 ± 4.00 | 18.7 ± 8.7 | 88.8 ± 26.6 |
Indocalamus pedalis | 18.4 ± 5.6 | 11.0 ± 6.2 | 6.53 ± 3.90 | 18.1 ± 9.80 | 71.6 ± 23.2 |
Indocalamus pumilus | 14.0 ± 4.1 | 23.4 ± 13.2 | 7.80 ± 4.42 | 19.7 ± 13.2 | 68.1 ± 35.4 |
Indocalamus victorialis | 17.0 ± 4.3 | 14.2 ± 9.8 | 10.6 ± 6.42 | 29.2 ± 14.5 | 76.5 ± 23.5 |
| The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Share and Cite
Yao, W.; Shi, P.; Wang, J.; Mu, Y.; Cao, J.; Niklas, K.J. The “Leafing Intensity Premium” Hypothesis and the Scaling Relationships of the Functional Traits of Bamboo Species. Plants 2024 , 13 , 2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13162340
Yao W, Shi P, Wang J, Mu Y, Cao J, Niklas KJ. The “Leafing Intensity Premium” Hypothesis and the Scaling Relationships of the Functional Traits of Bamboo Species. Plants . 2024; 13(16):2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13162340
Yao, Weihao, Peijian Shi, Jinfeng Wang, Youying Mu, Jiajie Cao, and Karl J. Niklas. 2024. "The “Leafing Intensity Premium” Hypothesis and the Scaling Relationships of the Functional Traits of Bamboo Species" Plants 13, no. 16: 2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13162340
Article Metrics
Article access statistics, supplementary material.
ZIP-Document (ZIP, 25 KiB)
Further Information
Mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
IMAGES
COMMENTS
What Are the Five Key Elements to a Good Hypothesis. A good hypothesis should include the following five key elements: Clarity: The hypothesis should be clear and specific, leaving no room for interpretation. Testability: It should be possible to test the hypothesis through experimentation or data collection.
An excellent hypothesis should be empirically tested. It should be presented and formulated only after thorough investigation and verification. As a result, testability is the most important characteristic of a good hypothesis. Relevant to the Issue A hypothesis would be considered good if it is applicable to a certain problem. A hypothesis ...
A good hypothesis clearly defines the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Testability is crucial for a hypothesis to be scientifically valid. Clarity and precision are essential to avoid misunderstandings. Ethical considerations should always be taken into account. A well-structured hypothesis can drive scientific ...
A good hypothesis should be clear and precise, avoiding vague language and ambiguity. It must be testable and falsifiable, meaning it can be supported or refuted through experimentation. Grounding in existing knowledge is crucial; a hypothesis should be based on prior research or established theories.
Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis. There are three general characteristics of a good hypothesis. First, a good hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable. We must be able to test the hypothesis using the methods of science and if you'll recall Popper's falsifiability criterion, it must be possible to gather evidence that will disconfirm ...
Developing a hypothesis (with example) Step 1. Ask a question. Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project. Example: Research question.
Here are some good research hypothesis examples: "The use of a specific type of therapy will lead to a reduction in symptoms of depression in individuals with a history of major depressive disorder.". "Providing educational interventions on healthy eating habits will result in weight loss in overweight individuals.".
Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs. Generating a testable working hypothesis is the first step towards conducting original research. Such research may prove or disprove the proposed hypothesis. Case reports, case series, online surveys and other observational studies, clinical trials, and narrative reviews help to generate ...
Characteristics of a Good Research Hypothesis. As the hypothesis is specific, there is a testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. You may consider drawing hypothesis from previously published research based on the theory. A good research hypothesis involves more effort than just a guess.
A hypothesis is an educated guess or prediction of what will happen. In science, a hypothesis proposes a relationship between factors called variables. A good hypothesis relates an independent variable and a dependent variable. The effect on the dependent variable depends on or is determined by what happens when you change the independent variable.
An effective hypothesis in research is clearly and concisely written, and any terms or definitions clarified and defined. Specific language must also be used to avoid any generalities or assumptions. Use the following points as a checklist to evaluate the effectiveness of your research hypothesis: Predicts the relationship and outcome.
A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process. Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test ...
Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis. There are three general characteristics of a good hypothesis. First, a good hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable. We must be able to test the hypothesis using the methods of science and if you'll recall Popper's falsifiability criterion, it must be possible to gather evidence that will disconfirm ...
What makes a good hypothesis? No matter what you're testing, a good hypothesis is written according to the same guidelines. In particular, keep these five characteristics in mind: Cause and effect. Hypotheses always include a cause-and-effect relationship where one variable causes another to change (or not change if you're using a null ...
A good hypothesis defines the variables in easy-to-measure terms, like who the participants are, what changes during the testing, and what the effect of the changes will be. ... Like Newton's hypothesis, the one offered by Einstein has all of the characteristics of a good hypothesis." "Like all scientific ideas and explanations," says Dave ...
Hypothesis Essential #1: Specificity & Clarity. A good research hypothesis needs to be extremely clear and articulate about both what's being assessed (who or what variables are involved) and the expected outcome (for example, a difference between groups, a relationship between variables, etc.).. Let's stick with our sleepy students example and look at how this statement could be more ...
Characteristics of Hypothesis. Not all the hypotheses are good and useful from the point of view of research. It is only a few hypotheses satisfying certain criteria that are good, useful and directive in the research work undertaken. The characteristics of such a useful hypothesis can be listed as below: Conceptual Clarity; Need of empirical ...
A 'Good Hypothesis' in computer science is a well-formed, observable, testable, and clearly defined prediction of how a system will behave under specific conditions or how variables will interact. It serves as the foundation for designing experiments and must have characteristics such as observability, testability, clarity, and predictiveness ...
Following are the characteristics of the hypothesis: The hypothesis should be clear and precise to consider it to be reliable. If the hypothesis is a relational hypothesis, then it should be stating the relationship between variables. The hypothesis must be specific and should have scope for conducting more tests.
Hypothesis Statements - Overview and Template This document contains definitions, examples, and a template to complete for your assignment. Hypothesis Statements Overview A hypothesis is a prediction about the relationship between two variables. Hypotheses statements often start as an educated guess about how one variable affects a second variable. A hypothesis statement must be testable (i.e ...
There was good reason for all the speculation about alien communication. The signal's specifics hinted at something unnatural - possibly even extraterrestrial. In 1959, physicists Philip Morrison...
The "leafing intensity premium" hypothesis proposes that leaf size results from natural selection acting on different leafing intensities, i.e., the number of leaves per unit shoot volume or mass. The scaling relationships among various above-ground functional traits in the context of this hypothesis are important for understanding plant growth and ecology.