research paper on leadership traits

Login to your account

Change password, your password must have 8 characters or more and contain 3 of the following:.

a lower case character,
an upper case character,
a special character

Password Changed Successfully

Your password has been changed

Create a new account

Can't sign in? Forgot your password?

Enter your email address below and we will send you the reset instructions

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password.

Request Username

Can't sign in? Forgot your username?

Enter your email address below and we will send you your username

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username

AOM Member Login
Subscriber/Institutional User or Admin Login

Leadership Styles: A Comprehensive Assessment and Way Forward

Thomas Fischer
Sim B. Sitkin

University of Geneva

Search for more papers by this author

Duke University

We systematically review eight positive (authentic, charismatic, consideration and initiating structure, empowering, ethical, instrumental, servant, and transformational leadership) and two negative leadership styles (abusive supervision and destructive leadership) and identify valence-based conflation as a limitation common to all ten styles. This limitation rests on specifying behaviors as inherently positive or negative and leads to mixing the description of the content of leadership behaviors with the evaluation of their underlying intentions, quality of execution, or behavioral effects. We outline how this conflation leads to amalgamation, construct redundancy, and most problematically, causal indeterminacy, which calls into question the entire evidence base of leadership style research. These weaknesses are not limited to the ten leadership styles but are inherent in the valenced research logic that has been dominant for seventy years. Thus, the common finding that positive leadership styles lead to positive outcomes and negative styles lead to negative outcomes might be an artifact of conflation rather than a reflection of reality. To address these concerns, we suggest distinguishing between intended and displayed leadership styles, as well as their realized effects. We also call for utilizing a configurational approach. These recommended actions would provide a strong foundation for future research on leadership styles.

Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. 2005 . To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance . Journal of Applied Psychology , 90: 945–955. Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. 2020 . Upbeat leadership: A recipe for—or against—“successful” leadership theory . Leadership Quarterly , 31: 945–955. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101439 Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. 2019 . Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies . Leadership Quarterly , 30: 383–395. Google Scholar
Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. 2014 . Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale . Leadership Quarterly , 25: 487–511. Google Scholar
Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. 2017 . Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new “full‐range” theory . International Journal of Management Reviews , 19: 76–96. Google Scholar
Antonakis, J. 2017 . On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications . Leadership Quarterly , 28: 5–21. Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., d’Adda, G., Weber, R., & Zehnder, C. 2021 . Just words? Just speeches? On the economic value of charismatic leadership . Management Science. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4219 Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. 2003 . Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire . Leadership Quarterly , 14: 261–295. Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Jacquart, P., & Shamir, B. 2016 . Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift . Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior , 3: 293–319. Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. 2010 . On making causal claims: A review and recommendations . Leadership Quarterly , 21: 1086–1120. Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. 2017 . The nature of leadership. (3rd ed.): Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. 2013 . The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In B. J. Avolio, & F. J. Yammario (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead 10th anniversary edition , Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group Publishing. Google Scholar
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. 2014 . Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory . Leadership Quarterly , 25: 746–771. Google Scholar
Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. 2000 . The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors . Journal of Organizational Behavior , 21: 249–269. Google Scholar
Ashford, S. J., & Sitkin, S. B. 2019 . From problems to progress: A dialogue on prevailing issues in leadership research . Leadership Quarterly , 30: 454–460. Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. 1999 . Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 72: 441–462. Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. 2005 . Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership . Leadership Quarterly , 16: 315–338. Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. 2004 . Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors . Leadership Quarterly , 15: 801–823. Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. 2009 . Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions . Annual Review of Psychology , 60: 421–449. Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. 1950 . A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction . American Sociological Review , 15: 257–263. Google Scholar
Banks, G., Engemann, K., Williams, C., Gooty, J., McCauley, K., & Medaugh, M. 2017 . A meta-analytic review and future research agenda of charismatic leadership . Leadership Quarterly , 28: 508–529. Google Scholar
Banks, G., Fischer, T., Gooty, J., & Stock, G. 2021a . Ethical leadership: Mapping the terrain for concept cleanup and a future research agenda . Leadership Quarterly , 32. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101471 Google Scholar
Banks, G., Gooty, J., Ross, R., Williams, C., & Harrington, N. 2018 . Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future . Leadership Quarterly , 29: 236–251. Google Scholar
Banks, G., McCauley, K., Gardner, W., & Guler, C. 2016 . A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy . Leadership Quarterly , 27: 634–652. Google Scholar
Banks, G., Woznyj, H. M., & Mansfield, C. A. 2021b . Where is “behavior” in organizational behavior? A call for a revolution in leadership research and beyond . Leadership Quarterly. doi: 10.1177/17427150221132398 Google Scholar
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. 1995 . MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden. Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. 1985 . Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar
Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. 2008 . The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar
Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. 1999 . Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior . Leadership Quarterly , 10: 181–217. Google Scholar
Baur, J. E., Ellen III, B. P., Buckley, M. R., Ferris, G. R., Allison, T. H., McKenny, A. F., & Short, J. C. 2016 . More than one way to articulate a vision: A configurations approach to leader charismatic rhetoric and influence . Leadership Quarterly , 27: 156–171. Google Scholar
Bedeian, A. G., & Hunt, J. G. 2006 . Academic amnesia and vestigial assumptions of our forefathers . Leadership Quarterly , 17: 190–205. Google Scholar
Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. 2016 . A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators . Journal of Business Ethics , 139: 517–536. Google Scholar
Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. 1998 . The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders . American Sociological Review , 63: 379–405. Google Scholar
Blake, R., & Mouton, J. 1964 . The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf. Google Scholar
Blanchard, K. H., Zigarmi, D., & Nelson, R. B. 1993 . Situational Leadership® after 25 years: A retrospective . Journal of Leadership Studies , 1: 21–36. Google Scholar
Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., & Meindl, J. R. 2004 . Charisma under crisis: Presidential leadership, rhetoric, and media responses before and after the September 11th terrorist attacks . Leadership Quarterly , 15: 211–239. Google Scholar
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. 2016 . The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations . Academy of Management Annals , 10: 599–670. Link , Google Scholar
Borman, W. C., & Brush, D. H. 1993 . More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements . Human Performance , 6: 1–21. Google Scholar
Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E. 1966 . Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership . Administrative Science Quarterly , 11: 238–263. Google Scholar
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005 . Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 97: 117–134. Google Scholar
Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership . New York, NY: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P. 2012 . Behavior, performance, and effectiveness in the twenty-first century . In S. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology , vol. 1: 159–194. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. 2015 . The modeling and assessment of work performance . Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior , 2: 47–74. Google Scholar
Cardinal, L., Sitkin, S., & Long, C. 2010 . A configurational theory of control . In S. SitkinL. CardinalK. Bijlsma-Frankema (Eds.), Organizational control. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Carton, A. M. 2022 . The science of leadership: A theoretical model and research agenda . Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior , 9: 61–93. Google Scholar
Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Farh, J.-L. 2011 . Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict . Journal of Applied Psychology , 96: 541–557. Google Scholar
Cheong, M., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Spain, S. M., & Tsai, C.-Y. 2019 . A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership . Leadership Quarterly , 30: 34–58. Google Scholar
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. 2016 . Linking servant leadership to individual performance: Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction . Leadership Quarterly , 27: 124–141. Google Scholar
Collins, M. D., & Jackson, C. J. 2015 . A process model of self-regulation and leadership: How attentional resource capacity and negative emotions influence constructive and destructive leadership . Leadership Quarterly , 26: 386–401. Google Scholar
Correll, S. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. 2003 . Expectation states theory . In Handbook of social psychology : 29–51. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Google Scholar
Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. 1996 . Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions . Academy of Management Journal , 39: 802–835. Link , Google Scholar
Den Hartog, D. N. 2015 . Ethical leadership . Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior , 2: 409–434. Google Scholar
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. 2011a . Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta‐analytic test of their relative validity . Personnel Psychology , 64: 7–52. Google Scholar
DeRue, D. S., Sitkin, S. B., & Podolny, J. M. 2011b . From the guest editors: Teaching leadership—Issues and insights . Academy of Management Learning and Education. doi: 10.5465/amle.2011.0004 Google Scholar
Eden, D., & Leviatan, U. 1975 . Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales . Journal of Applied Psychology , 60: 736–741. Google Scholar
Ehrhart, M. G. 2004 . Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit‐level organizational citizenship behavior . Personnel Psychology , 57: 61–94. Google Scholar
Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. 2007 . Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model . Leadership Quarterly , 18: 207–216. Google Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S. A. 2012 . Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach . Leadership Quarterly , 23: 791–808. Google Scholar
Ernst, B. A. Banks, G. C. Loignon, A. C., Frear, K. A., Williams, C. E., Arciniega, L. M., Gupta, R. Kodydek, G. K., & Subramanian, D. 2021 . Virtual charismatic leadership and signaling theory: A prospective meta-analysis in five countries . Leadership Quarterly. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101541 Google Scholar
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. 2019 . Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research . Leadership Quarterly , 30: 111–132. Google Scholar
Ferris, G. R., Zinko, R., Brouer, R. L., Buckley, M. R., & Harvey, M. G. 2007 . Strategic bullying as a supplementary, balanced perspective on destructive leadership . Leadership Quarterly , 18: 195–206. Google Scholar
Fischer, T., & Dietz, J. 2020 . Measures of authentic, ethical, and servant leadership spuriously predict objective outcomes. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings. Google Scholar
Fischer, T., Tian, A. W., Lee, A., & Hughes, D. J. 2021 . Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink . Leadership Quarterly. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101540 Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C. 2007 . A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations . Academy of Management Review , 32: 1180–1198. Link , Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C., Marx, A., & Cambré, B. 2013 . Configurational theory and methods in organizational research: Introduction. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group Publishing. Google Scholar
Fleishman, E. A. 1953 . The description of supervisory behavior . Journal of Applied Psychology , 37: 1. Google Scholar
Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. 1991 . Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation . Leadership Quarterly , 2: 245–287. Google Scholar
Flynn, F. J., & Staw, B. M. 2004 . Lend me your wallets: The effect of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization . Strategic Management Journal , 25: 309–330. Google Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. 2005 . “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development . Leadership Quarterly , 16: 343–372. Google Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. 2011 . Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda . Leadership Quarterly , 22: 1120–1145. Google Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Karam, E. P., Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. 2021 . Authentic leadership theory: The case for and against . Leadership Quarterly. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101495 Google Scholar
George, B. 2003 . True north: Discover your authentic leadership. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., & Sims, H. P., Jr . 1985 . On avoiding the influence of implicit leadership theories in leader behavior descriptions . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 45: 217–232. Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. 2009 . Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy . Academy of Management Journal , 52: 765–778. Link , Google Scholar
Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., Elms, H., & Lacey, R. 2008 . Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects . Organizational Research Methods , 11: 695–726. Google Scholar
Hansbrough, T. K., Lord, R. G., Schyns, B., Foti, R. J., Liden, R. C., & Acton, B. P. 2021 . Do you remember? Rater memory systems and leadership measurement . Leadership Quarterly , 32. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101455 Google Scholar
Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Zivnuska, S. 2007 . An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship . Leadership Quarterly , 18: 252–263. Google Scholar
Harris, T. B., Li, N., Boswell, W. R., Zhang, X. a., & Xie, Z. 2014 . Getting what’s new from newcomers: Empowering leadership, creativity, and adjustment in the socialization context . Personnel Psychology , 67: 567–604. Google Scholar
Heath, C., & Sitkin, S. B. 2001 . Big‐B versus Big‐O: What is organizational about organizational behavior? Journal of Organizational Behavior , 22: 43–58. Google Scholar
Hill, A., Johnson, S., Greco, L., O’Boyle, E., & Walter, S. 2020 . Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research . Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206320960533 Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. 1999 . Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model . Organization Science , 10: 199–212. Google Scholar
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. 2018 . Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis . Journal of Management , 44: 501–529. Google Scholar
House, R. J. 1971 . A path goal theory of leader effectiveness . Administrative Science Quarterly , 16: 321–339. Google Scholar
House, R. J. 1977. A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge . Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar
House, R. J. 1996 . Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory . Leadership Quarterly , 7: 323–352. Google Scholar
House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. 1975 . Path-goal theory of leadership [Technical report no. 75-67]. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. Google Scholar
Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. 1992 . The ethics of charismatic leadership: Submission or liberation? Academy of Management Executive , 6: 43–54. Abstract , Google Scholar
Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. 2007 . The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies . Leadership Quarterly , 18: 435–446. Google Scholar
Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K. L., & Prennushi, G. 1997 . The effects of human resource management practices on productivity . American Economic Review , 87: 291–313. Google Scholar
Jacquart, P., & Antonakis, J. 2015 . When does charisma matter for top-level leaders? Effect of attributional ambiguity . Academy of Management Journal , 58: 1051–1074. Link , Google Scholar
Jordan, J., Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Finkelstein, S. 2013 . Someone to look up to: Executive–follower ethical reasoning and perceptions of ethical leadership . Journal of Management , 39: 660–683. Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. 2004 . Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity . Journal of Applied Psychology , 89: 755. Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. 2004 . The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research . Journal of Applied Psychology , 89: 36. Google Scholar
Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. 2011 . Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure . Leadership Quarterly , 22: 51–69. Google Scholar
Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. 2003 . The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency . Journal of Applied Psychology , 88: 246. Google Scholar
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. 1978 . The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: Wiley. Google Scholar
Keller, R. T. 2006 . Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance . Journal of Applied Psychology , 91: 202. Google Scholar
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. 1980 . Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way . Journal of Applied Psychology , 65: 440. Google Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. 1999 . Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment . Academy of Management Journal , 42: 58–74. Link , Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. 1990 . Force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar
Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G., & LeBreton, J. M. 2013 . Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda . Journal of Management , 39: 1308–1338. Google Scholar
Ladkin, D., & Taylor, S. S. 2010 . Enacting the “true self”: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership . Leadership Quarterly , 21: 64–74. Google Scholar
Lambert, L. S., Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Holt, D. T., & Barelka, A. J. 2012 . Forgotten but not gone: An examination of fit between leader consideration and initiating structure needed and received . Journal of Applied Psychology , 97: 913. Google Scholar
Lee, A., Willis, S., & Tian, A. W. 2018 . Empowering leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation . Journal of Organizational Behavior , 39: 306–325. Google Scholar
Lemoine, G. J., & Blum, T. C. 2021 . Servant leadership, leader gender, and team gender role: Testing a female advantage in a cascading model of performance . Personnel Psychology , 74: 3–28. Google Scholar
Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. 2019 . Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant Leadership . Academy of Management Annals , 13: 148–187. Link , Google Scholar
Lewin, K. 1997 . Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (Original work published 1948.) Google Scholar
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. 1939 . Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates.” Journal of Social Psychology , 10: 269–299. Google Scholar
Li, N., Chiaburu, D. S., Kirkman, B. L., & Xie, Z. 2013 . Spotlight on the followers: An examination of moderators of relationships between transformational leadership and subordinates’ citizenship and taking charge . Personnel Psychology , 66: 225–260. Google Scholar
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. 2014 . Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance . Academy of Management Journal , 57: 1434–1452. Link , Google Scholar
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. 2015 . Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28 . Leadership Quarterly , 26: 254–269. Google Scholar
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. 2008 . Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment . Leadership Quarterly , 19: 161–177. Google Scholar
Likert, R. 1961 . New patterns of management. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Google Scholar
Lin, S.-H., Scott, B. A., & Matta, F. K. 2019 . The dark side of transformational leader behaviors for leaders themselves: A conservation of resources perspective . Academy of Management Journal , 62: 1556–1582. Link , Google Scholar
Lind, E., & Sitkin, S. 2015 . The six domains leadership. Dubuque, IA: Great River Learning. Google Scholar
Lord, R. G., Binning, J. F., Rush, M. C., & Thomas, J. C. 1978 . The effect of performance cues and leader behavior on questionnaire ratings of leadership behavior . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 21: 27–39. Google Scholar
Lord, R. G., Epitropaki, O., Foti, R. J., & Hansbrough, T. K. 2020 . Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information . Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior , 7: 49–74. Google Scholar
Lorinkova, N. M., & Perry, S. J. 2017. When is empowerment effective? The role of leader-leader exchange in empowering leadership, cynicism, and time theft. Journal of Management , 43: 1631–1654. Google Scholar
Lovelace, J. B., Neely, B. H., Allen, J. B., & Hunter, S. T. 2019 . Charismatic, ideological, & pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership: A critical review and agenda for future research . Leadership Quarterly , 30: 96–110. Google Scholar
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. 2003. Authentic Leadership Development. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship , 241–258. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler Publishers. Google Scholar
Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. 2017 . Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review . Journal of Management , 43: 1940–1965. Google Scholar
Martinko, M., Randolph-Seng, B., Shen, W., Brees, J., Mahoney, K., & Kessler, S. 2018 . An examination of the influence of implicit theories, attribution styles, and performance cues on questionnaire measures of leadership . Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies , 25: 116–133. Google Scholar
Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., & Douglas, S. C. 2007 . The role, function, and contribution of attribution theory to leadership: A review . Leadership Quarterly , 18: 561–585. Google Scholar
Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. 2012 . Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership . Academy of Management Journal , 55: 151–171. Link , Google Scholar
Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. 1985 . The romance of leadership . Administrative Science Quarterly , 30: 78–102. Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster . 2020 .Leadership style. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/style Google Scholar
Meslec, N., Curseu, P. L., Fodor, O. C., & Kenda, R. 2020 . Effects of charismatic leadership and rewards on individual performance . Leadership Quarterly , 31: 101423. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101423 Google Scholar
Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. 1993 . Configurational approaches to organizational analysis . Academy of Management Journal , 36: 1175–1195. Link , Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1986 . Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis . Strategic Management Journal , 7: 233–249. Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1996 . Configurations revisited . Strategic Management Journal , 17: 505–512. Google Scholar
Miller, D. 2018 . Challenging trends in configuration research: Where are the configurations? Strategic Organization , 16: 453–469. Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 1973 . The nature of managerial work. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 1980 . Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design . Management Science , 26: 322–341. Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 2009 . Managing. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. 1985 . Of strategies, deliberate and emergent . Strategic Management Journal , 6: 257–272. Google Scholar
Mirabeau, L., Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. 2018 . Bridging practice and process research to study transient manifestations of strategy . Strategic Management Journal , 39: 582–605. Google Scholar
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. 2017 . Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective . Journal of Management , 43: 255–282. Google Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. 2010 . Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes . Journal of Management , 36: 5–39. Google Scholar
Neider, L. L., & Schriesheim, C. A. 2011 . The authentic leadership inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests . Leadership Quarterly , 22: 1146–1164. Google Scholar
Neubert, M. J., Hunter, E. M., & Tolentino, R. C. 2016 . A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader’s influence? Leadership Quarterly , 27: 896–910. Google Scholar
Neubert, M. J., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. 2008 . Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior . Journal of Applied Psychology , 93: 1220. Google Scholar
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. 2015 . Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity . Journal of Applied Psychology , 100: 948–965. Google Scholar
Ong, W. J., & Johnson, M. D. 2021 . Towards a configural theory of job demands and resources . Academy of Management Journal. doi: 10.5465/amj.2020.0493 Google Scholar
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. 2007 . The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments . Leadership Quarterly , 18: 176–194. Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 1977 . The ambiguity of leadership . Academy of Management Review , 2: 104–112. Link , Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 2015 . Leadership BS: Fixing workplaces and careers one truth at a time. New York, NY: Harper Collins. Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. 1990 . Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors . Leadership Quarterly , 1: 107–142. Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1959 . The logic of scientific discovery. London, U.K.: Hutchinson. Google Scholar
Price, T. L. 2003 . The ethics of authentic transformational leadership . Leadership Quarterly , 14: 67–81. Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. 2008 . Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses . Academy of Management Annals , 2: 475–515. Link , Google Scholar
Sajons, G. B. 2020 . Estimating the causal effect of measured endogenous variables: A tutorial on experimentally randomized instrumental variables . Leadership Quarterly , 31: 101348. Google Scholar
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. 2010 . Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets . Comparative Sociology , 9: 397–418. Google Scholar
Schriesheim, C., & Kerr, S. 1974 . Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales . Psychological Bulletin , 81: 756. Google Scholar
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. 2013 . How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes . Leadership Quarterly , 24: 138–158. Google Scholar
Shamir, B., Arthur, M. B., & House, R. J. 1994 . The rhetoric of charismatic leadership: A theoretical extension, a case study, and implications for research . Leadership Quarterly , 5: 25–42. Google Scholar
Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. 2005 . “What’s your story?” A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development . Leadership Quarterly , 16: 395–417. Google Scholar
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. 1993 . The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory . Organization Science , 4: 577–594. Google Scholar
Shaw, J. B., Erickson, A., & Harvey, M. 2011 . A method for measuring destructive leadership and identifying types of destructive leaders in organizations . Leadership Quarterly , 22: 575–590. Google Scholar
Siangchokyoo, N., Klinger, R. L., & Campion, E. D. 2020 . Follower transformation as the linchpin of transformational leadership theory: A systematic review and future research agenda . Leadership Quarterly , 31: 101341. Google Scholar
Sparrowe, R. T. 2005 . Authentic leadership and the narrative self . Leadership Quarterly , 16: 419–439. Google Scholar
Stogdill, R. M. 1950 . Leadership, membership and organization . Psychological Bulletin , 47: 1. Google Scholar
Stogdill, R. M. 1962 . Manual for the LBDQ-Form XII. Columbus, OH: Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University. Google Scholar
Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., Mayer, D. M., De Cremer, D., & Euwema, M. C. 2013 . Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership . Leadership Quarterly , 24: 680–695. Google Scholar
Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. 2005 . The origins of vision: Effects of reflection, models, and analysis . Leadership Quarterly , 16: 121–148. Google Scholar
Sun, P. Y. 2013 . The servant identity: Influences on the cognition and behavior of servant leaders . Leadership Quarterly , 24: 544–557. Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, R., & Schmidt, W. H. 1973 . How to choose a leadership pattern . Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1973/05/how-to-choose-a-leadership-pattern . Google Scholar
Tengblad, S. 2003 . Classic, but not seminal: Revisiting the pioneering study of managerial work . Scandinavian Journal of Management , 19: 85–101. Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J. 2000 . Consequences of abusive supervision . Academy of Management Journal , 43: 178–190. Link , Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J. 2007 . Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda . Journal of Management , 33: 261–289. Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A., & Duffy, M. K. 2008 . Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organization deviance . Journal of Applied Psychology , 93: 721. Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. 2017 . Abusive supervision . Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior , 4: 123–152. Google Scholar
Thoroughgood, C. N., Padilla, A., Hunter, S. T., & Tate, B. W. 2012 . The susceptible circle: A taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership . Leadership Quarterly , 23: 897–917. Google Scholar
Tierney, P., & Tepper, B. J. 2007 . Introduction to The Leadership Quarterly special issue: Destructive leadership . Leadership Quarter , 18: 171–173. Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. 2000 . Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership . California Management Review , 42: 128–142. Google Scholar
Tur, B., Harstad, J., & Antonakis, J. 2021 . Effect of charismatic signaling in social media settings: Evidence from TED and Twitter . Leadership Quarterly , 33. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101476 Google Scholar
Van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. 2013 . A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Academy of Management Annals , 7: 1–60. Link , Google Scholar
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. 1988 . The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
Waldkirch, M., Kammerlander, N., & Wiedeler, C. 2021 . Configurations for corporate venture innovation: Investigating the role of the dominant coalition . Journal of Business Venturing , 36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106137 Google Scholar
Walter, F., & Bruch, H. 2009 . An affective events model of charismatic leadership behavior: A review, theoretical integration, and research agenda . Journal of Management , 35: 1428–1452. Google Scholar
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. 2008 . Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure . Journal of Management , 34: 89–126. Google Scholar
Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. 2010 . Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation . Journal of Applied Psychology , 95: 517. Google Scholar
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. 2005 . Leader–member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior . Academy of Management Journal , 48: 420–432. Link , Google Scholar
Weber, M. 2002 . Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie (5th ed.). Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck. (Original work published 1922.) Google Scholar
Willmott, H. 1984 . Images and ideals of managerial work: A critical examination of conceptual and empirical accounts . Journal of Management Studies , 2: 349–368. Google Scholar
Wofford, J., & Liska, L. Z. 1993 . Path-goal theories of leadership: A meta-analysis . Journal of Management , 19: 857–876. Google Scholar
Yu, L., Duffy, M. K., & Tepper, B. J. 2018 . Consequences of downward envy: A model of self-esteem threat, abusive supervision, and supervisory leader self-improvement . Academy of Management Journal , 61: 2296–2318. Link , Google Scholar
Yukl, G. 1999 . An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories . Leadership Quarterly , 10: 285–305. Google Scholar
Yukl, G. 2012 . Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention . Academy of Management Perspectives , 26: 66–85. Link , Google Scholar
Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. 1990 . Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts . Journal of Applied Psychology , 75: 132. Google Scholar
Yukl, G., & Gardner, W. L. 2019 . Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). London, U.K.: Pearson Education. Google Scholar
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. 2010 . Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement . Academy of Management Journal , 53: 107–128. Link , Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Liao, Z. 2015 . Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review . Asia Pacific Journal of Management , 32: 959–987. Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, S., Yang, L.-Q., & Bednall, T. C. 2019 . Why abusive supervision impacts employee OCB and CWB: A meta-analytic review of competing mediating mechanisms . Journal of Management , 45: 2474–2497. Google Scholar
Toby P. Newstead
David V. Day

Published online 24 January 2023 Published in print 1 January 2023

We thank John Antonakis and Jörg Dietz for their valuable feedback on early versions of the article. Correspondence concerning this article should be directed to Thomas Fischer.

Development and Revelation of Leadership Trait Theory

Conference paper
First Online: 01 January 2013
Cite this conference paper

Yu-fang Chao 4 &
Xue-fei Chang 4

3191 Accesses

1 Citations

This article summarizes recent developments of leadership trait theory, explaining, in detail, the content and characteristics of charismatic leadership theory, implicit leadership theory, effective leadership theory, leadership competency theory and other modern leadership theory. On this basis, this article points out that shifting of research paradigm and comprehension of research level, system of research methods are the key to development and its social importance. At the same time, development of leadership trait theory shows that leadership trait theory still has a large value of theory and application, personality traits can promote or impede the efforts of leaders’ influence on others, and leadership traits can be formed and developed and acquiesced in practice. This is good for our comprehensive, in-depth understanding of leadership trait theory, promoting study on leadership trait theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

Get 10 units per month
Download Article/Chapter or eBook
1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
Cancel anytime
Available as PDF
Read on any device
Instant download
Own it forever
Available as EPUB and PDF

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Wise and Virtuous Leadership: The Contribution of Confucian Values to Business Leadership

Heterogeneity of Leadership Styles as Behavioral Units: The Role of Personality in Searching for Leadership Profiles

http://www.icxo.com/

Bass BM (1990) Bass and stogdill’s Handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications, 3rd edn. Free press, New York

Google Scholar

Bennis WG (1989) Leadership theory and administrative behavior: the problem of authority. Administrative science quarterly vol 4, pp 259–260

Chan KY, Rounds J, Drasgow F (2000) The relation between vocational Interests and the motivation to lead. J Vocat Behav 57(2):226–245

Article Google Scholar

Fiedler FE (1996) Research on leadership selection and training: one view of the future. Adm Sci Q 41:241–250

Hamid JA, Krauss SE (2005) Are our undergraduates motivated to lead? Scenario in Malaysian higher institution of learning. Int J Educ Adm Policy 1(1):1–32

Howell JM (1988) Two faces of charisma: socialized and Personalized Leadership in oganizations. In: Conger JA, Kanungo RN (eds) Charismatic leadership: the elusive factor in oganizational effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

Hughes RL, Ginnett RC, Curphy GJ (1996) Leadership, 5th edn. Enhancing the Lessons of Experience, the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc

Kirkpatrick SA, Locke EA (1996) Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. J Appl Psychol 81:36–51

Lord R, Maher K (1990) Perceptions of leadership and their implications in organizations. In: Carroll JS (ed) Applied social psychology and organizational settings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, pp 129–154

McClelland DC, Boyatzis RE (1982) Leadership motive patten and motive pattern and long-term success in management. J Appl Psychol 67:737–743

Murphy SE (2011) Early development and leadership: Building the next generation of leaders. In: Murphy SE, Reichard RJ (eds) Providing a foundation for leadership development. Psychology Press/Routledge, New York, pp 3–37

Stodgill RM (1948) Personal factors with leadership: a survey of the literature. J Psychol 28:35–71

Stodgill RM (1974) Handbook of leadership: a survey of the literature. Free Press, New York

Yuke G (1998) Leadership in organizations, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New York

Zaccaro SJ, Kemp C, Bader P (2004) Leader traits and attributes. In: Antonakis J, Cianciolo A, Sternberg RJ (eds) The nature of leadership. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, pp 101–124

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Business, Shandong Polytechnic University, Jinan, China

Yu-fang Chao & Xue-fei Chang

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-fang Chao .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Industrial Engineering Institution of CM, Tianjin, People's Republic of China

College of Management and Economics Industrial Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China

Runliang Dou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Chao, Yf., Chang, Xf. (2013). Development and Revelation of Leadership Trait Theory. In: Qi, E., Shen, J., Dou, R. (eds) The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38442-4_66

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38442-4_66

Published : 04 June 2013

Publisher Name : Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Print ISBN : 978-3-642-38441-7

Online ISBN : 978-3-642-38442-4

eBook Packages : Business and Economics Business and Management (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

We're Hiring!
Help Center

Leadership: A Comprehensive Review of Literature, Research and Theoretical Framework

2020, Leadership: A Comprehensive Review of Literature, Research and Theoretical Framework. In: Journal of Economics and Business, Vol.3, No.1, 44-64.

This paper provides a comprehensive literature review on the research and theoretical framework of leadership. The author illuminates the historical foundation of leadership theories and then clarifies modern leadership approaches. After a brief introduction on leadership and its definition, the paper mentions the trait theories, summarizes the still predominant behavioral approaches, gives insights about the contingency theories and finally touches the latest contemporary leadership theories. The overall aim of the paper is to give a brief understanding of how effective leadership can be achieved throughout the organization by exploring many different theories of leadership, and to present leadership as a basic way of achieving individual and organizational goals. The paper is hoped to be an important resource for the academics and researchers who would like to study on the leadership field.

Related Papers

Sonali Sharma

Shanlax International Journal of Commerce

vivek deshwal

Journal of Leadership and Management; 2391-6087

Betina Wolfgang Rennison

The theoretical field of leadership is enormous-there is a need for an overview. This article maps out a selection of the more fundamental perspectives on leadership found in the management literature. It presents six perspectives: personal, functional, institutional, situational, relational and positional perspectives. By mapping out these perspectives and thus creating a theoretical cartography, the article sheds light on the complex contours of the leadership terrain. That is essential, not least because one of the most important leadership skills today is not merely to master a particular management theory or method but to be able to step in and out of various perspectives and competently juggle the many possible interpretations through which leadership is formed and transformed.

Fila Bertrand, Ph.D.

Leadership and the numerous concepts on leadership styles have been subjects of both study and debate for years. Every leader approaches challenges differently, and his or her personality traits and life experiences greatly influence his or her leadership style and the organizations they lead. Furthermore, leadership is a notion resulting from the interaction between a leader and followers, and not a position or title within the organization. This essay examines some of the contemporary theories of leadership, the leadership qualities and traits necessary to be successful in today's competitive environment, the impact of leadership to the organization, and the importance of moral leadership in today's world.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH AND KNOWLEDGE

Vivian A . Ariguzo , Michael okoro

Diverse views have emerged on leadership definitions, theories, and classification in academic discourse. The debate and conscious efforts made to clarify leadership actively has generated socio-cultural and organizational research on its styles and behaviours. This study seeks to identify the theoretical views of various academic scholars on some of the main theories that emerged during the 20 th century include: the Thomas Carlyle's Great Man theory, Gordon Allport's Trait theory, Fred Fiedler's Contingency theory, Hersey and Blanchard Situational Theory, Max Weber's Transactional theory, MacGregor Burns' Transformational theory, Robert Houses' Path-goal theory, and Vroom and Yetton's Participative theory. Empirical discourse that revealed findings of academic scholars have enshrined the import of leadership in organizations. Various academic literature that already have been subject to validity and reliability tests were reviewed and used to arrive at the findings. The study postulated the Mystical-man theory after a rich discourse and recommended it as the ideal theory for all Christian leaders to adopt as it is assumed to provide above average performance at all times, irrespective of followership behaviour.

Neil D . Walshe

The three topics of this volume—leadership, change, and organization development (OD)—can be viewed as three separate and distinct organizational topics or they can be understood as three distinct lenses viewing a common psycho-organizational process. We begin the volume with a comprehensive treatment of leadership primarily because we view leadership as the fulcrum or crucible for any significant change in human behavior at the individual, team, or organizational level. Leaders must apply their understanding of how to effect change at behavioral, procedural, and structural levels in enacting leadership efforts. In many cases, these efforts are quite purposeful, planned, and conscious. In others, leadership behavior may stem from less-conscious understandings and forces. The chapters in Part I: Leadership provide a comprehensive view of what we know and what we don’t know about leadership. Alimo-Metcalfe (Chapter 2) provides a comprehensive view of theories and measures of leadershi...

Transylvanian review of administrative sciences

Cornelia Macarie

The paper endeavors to offer an overview of the major theories on leadership and the way in which it influences the management of contemporary organizations. Numerous scholars highlight that there are numerous overlaps between the concepts of management and leadership. This is the reason why the first section of the paper focuses on providing an extensive overview of the literature regarding the meaning of the two aforementioned concepts. The second section addresses more in depth the concept of leadership and managerial leadership and focuses on the ideal profile of the leader. The last section of the paper critically discusses various types of leadership and more specifically modern approaches to the concept and practices of leadership.

An organization constitute of a diverse group of individuals, working together towards a specified common goal. A robust organizational framework is based upon specified values, believes and positive culture accompanied by effective leaders and managers that are expected to understand their roles and responsibilities towards both the employees and the management of the organization. Culture is recognized as "the glue" that binds a group of people together (Martin and Meyerson, 1988). Therefore, organizational culture entails intelligent and great leaders who value and believe in nurturing employees and appreciate their active participation in the progression of the company (Balain & Sparrow 2009). With that said, management is also one of the crucial organisational activities that is necessary to ensure the coordination of individual efforts as well as the organization's resources and activities. Lastly, leadership in itself is a vital bond that connects effective management and splendid organizational culture. However, for a long time, there has been a disconnect and inconsistency on what entails leadership and management. We identify with scholars who questioned the overlying issues regarding the significant concepts of leadership and management (Schedlitzki & Edwards,2014). It is therefore paramount to understand how leadership and management play critical roles in shaping up contemporary organizations, fundamentally appreciating the applicability that arises with the various leadership styles and management theories while apprehending their link to organization culture.

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development

Prof. Dr. Satya Subrahmanyam

This research article was motivated by the premise that no corporate grows further without effective corporate leaders. The purpose of this theoretical debate is to examine the wider context of corporate leadership theories and its effectiveness towards improving corporate leadership in the corporate world. Evolution of corporate leadership theories is a comprehensive study of leadership trends over the years and in various contexts and theoretical foundations. This research article presents the history of dominant corporate leadership theories and research, beginning with Great Man thesis and Trait theory to Decision process theory to various leadership characteristics. This article also offers a convenient way to utilize theoretical knowledge to the practical corporate situation.

Public Administration Review

Montgomery Van Wart

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Artur Victoria

Human Resource and Leadership Journal

John Githui

Open Journal of Leadership

Emmanuel Mango

Haftu Equar , John Antonakis

Douglas Zubka

International Journal of Research

Africa Development and Resources Research Institute ADRRI

Business Ethics and Leadership

Sivanathan Sivaruban

John Antonakis

Choice Reviews Online

Strategy & Leadership

Robert Allio

ijbssnet.com

Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail

International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)

bhawna somani

FOREX Publication

Public Policy and Administration Research

Prof. David Minja

Afsaneh Nahavandi

Sinu Ezhumalai

Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture

Central Asian Studies

The International Journal of Business & Management

Ogbonna Goodluck

Dr. Kamran Yeganegi ( PH.D.)

Amsalu Emiru

Ritika Sinha

Carlos Aguila

Procedia of Economics and Business Administraion

Elena Doval

Leadership styles, work engagement and outcomes among information and communications technology professionals: A cross-national study

Habtamu kebu gemeda.

a Adama Science & Technology University, School of Humanity & Social Sciences, Ethiopia

b Pusan National University, Keumjeong-Gu, Jangjeon-Dong, San 30, Busan, 609-735, South Korea

The present study examined relationships among leadership styles, work engagement and work outcomes designated by task performance and innovative work behavior among information and communication technology professionals in two countries: Ethiopia and South Korea. In total, 147 participants from Ethiopia and 291 from South Korea were made to fill in the self-reporting questionnaire intended to assess leadership styles, work engagement, task performance, and innovative work behavior. To test the proposed hypotheses, multiple linear regression analysis was utilized. The results showed that transformational leadership style had a significant positive relationship with employees' work engagement and innovative work behavior, while transactional leadership style had a significant positive relationship with employees' task performance. However, laissez-faire leadership style had a significant negative relationship with task performance. Work engagement had significant positive relationships with the indicators of work outcomes. Besides, work engagement partially mediated the relationship between leadership styles and work outcomes. The observed associations and mediation were consistent across the two national samples considered, indicating the soundness of the assumptions across countries. The findings provide insights into how leadership styles correspond with employees’ work outcomes.

Leadership; Workplace; innovation; Performance; industry; Organization; Human Resources; work engagement; transformation; transaction, Technology Management; Organizational Theory; Human Resource Management; Behavioral Psychology; Organizational Psychology

1. Introduction

Leadership is crucial for effective functioning of any organization. The fundamental of leadership is its persuading power on human resources, organizations' source of competitive advantage, and the resultant outcomes. In swaying followers and harnessing organization member's selves to their work roles, leaders must enhance employees' motivation as having engaged employees is critical for organization to achieve its goal ( Batista-Taran et al., 2009 ). Studies, (e.g., Bakker and Bal, 2010 ; Harter et al., 2002 ; Xathopoulou et al., 2009 ) recorded the noteworthiness of employees' work engagement for organizational achievement measured in terms of monetary returns, productivity, client satisfaction, and a number of individual-level alluring employees' characteristics such as taking initiative and being proactive.

Literature (e.g. Bakker and Demerouti, 2008 ; Kim, 2014 ; Park et al., 2013 ; Saks, 2006 ; Salanova et al., 2011 ; Salanova and Schaufeli, 2008 ; Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004 ; Song et al., 2012 ; Xathopoulo et al., 2007 ) studied employee engagement within the framework of its antecedents and consequences using mainly the job demand-resources model, social exchange theory, social cognitive theory, and leadership theory. In the plethora of studies examining the correlates of employee engagement, particularly in Western and some Asian contexts, the most discussed antecedents included job resources, personal resources, perceived supports, learning organizations, and transformational leadership, while the personal-level outcomes considered were performance, turnover intention, organizational citizenship behavior, health, proactive behavior, innovative behavior, and knowledge creation practices. In spite of significant empirical studies on associates of work engagement, little research have been found that explored the potential link between leadership behaviors and employee engagement in the wider human resources literature ( Carasco-Saul et al., 2015 ).

Thus, the current study focused on examining relationships among leadership styles, employee work engagement and work outcomes. Leadership was targeted because previous research (e.g. Xu and Thomas, 2011 ; Carasco-Saul et al., 2015 ) also elucidated scarcity of findings that connect leadership styles and employees work engagement. Further, the dominant capacity of leadership over other work variables and its vulnerability to modifications were taken into consideration in its selection as correlates of work engagement and outcomes. For workoutcomes, employees' job performance and innovative work behavior were considered because of their pertinence to organizational existence and progress. Job performance is the term that academics and practitioners use most commonly and widely. Nonetheless, an aggregate definition of success across jobs and roles is very difficult to conceptualize since employees are engaged in a large number of tasks including even those not listed out in their formal job description ( Demerouti and Cropanzano, 2010 ). On the basis of review of previous studies, Kim (2014) outlined various ways of conceptualizing job performance ranging from overall performance to organizational citizenship behaviour. In the present study, as indicator of employees' job performance, in-role performance is conceptualized as accomplishment of core tasks and activities specified in employee contract document connected to officially defined organizational outcomes (( Demerouti and Cropanzano, 2010 ). In addition to performing main tasks officially listed out, considering the current competitive work environment, employees are pressed to go extra mile beyond those formally recognized in their job description such as being innovative in their workplace. As Ramoorthy et al. (2005) suggested, to succeed organizations are pressuring employees to innovate their methods and operations. Janssen (2000) was of the view that to have a continuous flow of innovation and to achieve goals, individual employees need to be skilled to innovate. What is more, employees’ innovative work behavior is comprehended as a specific form of extra-role performance related to discretionary employee actions in connection to generating idea, promoting, and realizing it.

In spite of evidences on the relationship between styles of leadership and work outcomes such as job performance and innovative work behavior (e.g., Khan et al., 2012 ; Solomon, 2016 ), studies explored the meditational role of work engagement in the link between leadership and work outcomes were insignificant. In connection to work engagement mediation between leadership behaviour and work outcomes, findings of the study are directing to quality of leader-subordinate relationships ( Agarwal et al., 2012 ), transformational leadership ( Salanova et al., 2011 ) and employees affective commitment to their immediate supervisor ( Chughtai, 2013 ) as antecedent factors.

Thus, specifically, in the present study the researchers proposed and tested a model in which work engagement partly mediates relationship between leadership styles (focusing on the pattern of behavior of leaders’ exhibited) and work outcomes labelled by task performance and innovative work behavior. Hence, the conceptual model used in the study is depicted in Figure 1 .

Research model.

Besides, the study also examined the associations among variables of the study and the mediation of work engagement in link between leaders’ style and work outcomes in two independent samples of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) professionals from Ethiopia and South Korea to test for soundness of suggested assumptions across the nations.

2. An overview of the study context

The participants of the study were professional ICT staffs working for for-profit companies engaged in ICT businesses in the two countries: Ethiopia and South Korea. Ethiopia is situated in the Horn of Africa; it has the second biggest populace in the continent, with more than 102 million occupants; however it has the most minimal per capita income ( Ethiopia, 2018 ). Be that as it may, Ethiopia's economy has developed at a remarkable rate over the previous decade. As the International Monetary Fund (2016) revealed, the nation has had a great record of achievement of development and poverty decrease lately and it is portrayed as one of the fastest developing economies on the planet.

With respect to Ethiopia's work culture, on the continuum of Hofstede's dimensions of culture—power distance, collectivism vs. individualism, femininity vs. masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance—it is characterized by a large power distance, tight social ties and collective action, masculine characteristics, and high uncertainty avoidance ( Beyene et al., 2016 ). Thus, in Ethiopian work culture, it appeared that power centralization is prevalent. Subordinates inclined to be told what to do and managers are expected to be influential and powerful. However, as Wasbeek (2004) indicated, individualism, masculinity, and a long-term orientation have been budding, specifically among the young and educated employees in Ethiopia.

South Korea, on the other hand, is an East Asian country on the southern portion of the Korean Peninsula and is home to more than 51 million people. South Korea is the fourth biggest economy in Asia and the eleventh biggest on the planet ( South Korea, 2018 ).

When South Korean culture is examined, regarding power distance, it is a slightly hierarchical society with a collectivist nature and feminine as South Koreans are low on masculine/feminine dimension. Regarding uncertainty avoidance, South Korea might be taken as one of the most uncertainty avoiding countries, where people show a convincing enthusiastic prerequisite for rules, value time, and have an internal tendency to be involved and buckle down. Besides, South Korea's score on long-term orientation is at 100, showing that it is a highly pragmatic and long-term-oriented society ( Compare Countries—Hofstede Insights, n.d. ).

Nevertheless, as Yim (2002) indicated, Korean customary culture has in slight change, and to some level giving way to Western influx. Rapid socioeconomic transformation and the apparently indiscriminate inflow of Western culture were accounted for the change.

3. Previous research and hypotheses

3.1. leadership styles and work-related outcomes.

Leadership is the most commonly discussed topic in the organizational sciences. Lines of research may be delineated along three major approaches: trait, behavioral and inspirational. Trait theorists seek to identify a set of universal leadership traits whereas behaviorists focused on behaviors exhibited by specific leaders. Inspirational approach deliberated on leader as one who moves adherents through their words, thoughts and conduct ( Robbins et al., 2009 ). As Carasco-Saul et al. (2015) suggested in the 1970s and 1980s, the charismatic leadership concept emerged, emphasizing that a charisma leader, a leader who inspires, attracts and influences followers by their personal qualities are considered effective. A typical characteristic of charismatic leadership is that it has the ability to motivate subordinates to concede to goals by imparting a vision, displaying charming behavior, and being a powerful model.

As part of neo-charismatic movement, full range leadership theory, which is also referred to as the Full Range Leadership Theory of Bass and Avolio's distinguished three groups of leaders in behaviors/styles: transformational, transactional and laissez-faire ( Avolio et al., 1999 ; Bass and Riggio, 2006 ; Judge and Piccolo, 2004 ; Solomon, 2016 ). The theory defines a complete range of influencing styles from influential transformational leadership to laissez-faire style.

Based on a review of various studies, Vincent-Hoper et al. (2012) portrayed transformational leaders as managers who advance and propel their followers by anticipating and communicating appealing visions, common goals, and shared values, as well as by setting an illustration of the requested behavior. Facets of transformational leadership are: idealized influence (idealized attribution and idealized behavior), inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration ( Bass and Avolio, 1994 ; Bass and Riggo, 2006 ).

Transactional leadership contains among other things, an exchange process (between leader & follower) that results in adherent compliance to leader demands, but it is not expected to create zeal and commitment to an errand objective ( Trottier et al., 2008 ). The transactional leadership style constituted a constructive style labeled “contingent reward” and a corrective style labeled “management-by-exception.”

The last style is laissez-faire, which is characterized by non-involvement, showing indifference, being absent when needed, overlooking achievements and problems as well. It is a style of leadership in which leaders offer very little direction and allow group members to make decisions on their own ( Bass and Riggio, 2006 ; Koech & Namusonge, 2012 ; Solomon, 2016 ).

Several studies (e.g., Judge and Piccolo, 2004 ; Pourbarkhordari et al., 2016 ; Solomon, 2016 ) examined the influence of leadership styles on a number of employee work outcomes critical to an organization's productivity and effectiveness, such as job satisfaction, commitment, performance, and motivation. Judge and Piccolo (2004) carried out a comprehensive meta-analytic review of studies that employed a complete range of leadership from influential transformational to influential laissez-faire style to test their relative validity in predicting a number of leadership criteria: follower job satisfaction, follower satisfaction with the leader, follower motivation, leader job performance, group or organizational performance, and leader effectiveness. The researchers found out an overall positive relationship for transformational leadership and transactional leadership (contingent rewards), but a negative overall relationship between laissez-faire style and the criteria considered.

Other researches in broad leadership literature (e.g, Bass and Avolio, 1994 ; Hayward et al., 2003 ; Kotter, 1988 ; Meyer and Botha, 2000 ) elucidated that transformational leadership style is the most successful in enhancing employee performance and other characteristics. In the studies, transformational leadership is positively related with a range of workplace desirable behaviour such as individual employee's performance, satisfaction and organizational performance. For instance, in South African pharmaceutical industry, Hayward et al., 2003 ) found a significant positive linear relationship between transformational leadership and employee performance but not for transactional leadership and employee performance. In Ethiopian education sector, Solomon (2016) reported positive association of both transformational and transactional styles of leadership with employees' performance while the relations of laissez-fair style with employees' performance failed to reach significance level. Khan et al. (2012) examined leadership styles (transformational, transactional & laissez-fair) assessed with Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, as indicator variables in predicting innovative work behaviour and found out that both transformational and transactional leadership styles had positive relationship while laissez-faire had negative relationship with innovative work behaviour.

In general, it appears that transformational leadership style seems prominent in enhancing employees' work performance and other characteristics such as innovative behavior. The qualities of transformational leaders such as providing intellectual stimulation, inspiring followers through setting appealing vision and setting higher expectations maintains it effectiveness in organizational settings. Moreover, the motivational aspect and the fact that leaders serve as role model make this style to have profound influence on employees’ work outcomes. Because of the goal oriented nature of Transactional leaders focusing on expectations and recognizing achievement characteristics may positively initiate workers to exert higher levels of effort and performance Ejere and Abasilim (2013) ; Bass and Riggio (2006) . Based on the above discussion, the followings were hypothesized:

Transformational leadership style is positively related to (a) innovative work behavior and (b) task performance.

Transactional leadership style is positively related to (a) innovative work behavior and (b) task performance.

Laissez-faire style of leadership is negatively related to (a) innovative work behavior and (b) task performance.

Transformational leadership style is positively related to work engagement.

Transactional leadership style is positively related to work engagement.

Laissez-faire leadership style is negatively related to work engagement.

3.2. Mediating role of work engagement

Kahn (1990) presented an early interpretation of engagement, which conceptualized it as personal involvement in the workplace reflecting a condition in which workers "bring in" their personal selves during job performance, expend personal energy and feel an emotional connection to their jobs. According to Kahn, engaged employees dedicate themselves physically, cognitively, and emotionally during role performances, while disengaged ones withdraw and guard themselves in all aspects (physically, cognitively & emotionally)in the course of role performances.

Based on Kahn's work, researchers—particularly those from the occupational health psychology fields further illuminate the concept of engagement. Early works based themselves on burnout model to clarify the concept of employee engagement ( Maslach and Leiter, 1997 ; Maslach et al., 2001 ). To Maslach and Leiter, for instance, elements of engagement are energy, involvement, and efficacy, which are in stark contrast to the three burnout dimensions: exhaustion, cynicism, and lack of accomplishment, respectively. In the same burnout framework, an alternative view that considered work engagement as a unique concept stands by its own and negatively related to burnout appeared. As a concept by its own right work engagement, consequently, defined as a positive, fulfilling, work related state of mind characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption ( Schaufeli, Salanova, González-Romá and Bakker, 2002 ). Here, Vigor refers to a high amount of drive and mental toughness while working, a willingness to invest effort in one's work, and sustain the determination even in the face of challenges. Dedication refers to a robust engagement in one's work and experiencing a sense of purpose and being enthusiastic, and absorption refers to fully and happily absorbed in one's work, such that time passes without notice while on work.

Despite some criticisms on confounding nature of some sub-constructs, the Schaufeli et al., 2002a , Schaufeli et al., 2002b model is hailed as a representative conceptualization of engagement and has been widely used in many fields ( Jeung, 2011 ).

The distinctive essence of work engagement was described in various works using constructs, such as employee engagement, job engagement, and role engagement in line with Kahn's conceptualization ( Rich, Lepine & Crawford, 2010 ; Rothbard, 2001 ; Saks, 2006 ). Among the different terms for engagement, work engagement and employee engagement are frequently and sometimes interchangeably used in literature. However the two terms vary in range in that work engagement focuses on the relationship between an individual employee and his or her work, while employee engagement applies to the relationships between the employee and the work and between the employee and the organization ( Schaufeli and Bakker, 2010 ). In the current study, since the focus was on the specific relationship between an individual employee and his her work, the term “work engagement” and conceptualization of Schaufeli et al., 2002a , Schaufeli et al., 2002b which connotes work engagement as ‘ a positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind that is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption ’ was utilized.

Regarding the links among leadership styles, work engagement, and employee outcome behaviors, a closer look at the related literature showed that the quality of leader–subordinate relationships (LMX), empowering leadership, and transformational leadership behavior were the most frequently discussed topics ( Agarwal et al., 2012 ; Park et al., 2013 ; Zhang and Bartol, 2010 ). For instance, Agarwal et al. (2012) pointed out that the excellence of leader-member exchange influences engagement, and work engagement in turn correlates positively with innovative work behavior and negatively with intention to quit. The researchers asserted the meditational role of work engagement in the relationship between LMX as predictor and innovative work behavior and intention to quit as outcomes.

Park et al. (2013) also investigated the mediating effect of work engagement on the relationship between learning organizations and innovative behavior in the Korean context. The researchers found that a culture of learning organizations characterized by a positive learning environment, specific learning processes and procedures, and premeditated leadership behaviors through work engagement had direct and indirect impacts on the innovative work behaviors of employees.

In connection to transformational leadership and its link with various individual/organizational outcome behaviors, the mediating role of work engagement has been documented in various studies. Work engagement was found to mediate the link between transformational leadership and employees’ subjective occupational success designated by career satisfaction, social and career successes ( Vincent-Höper et al., 2012 ), staff nurse extra-role performance ( Salanova et al., 2011 ), organizational performance ( Evelyn and Hazel, 2015 ), and organizational knowledge creation practices ( Song et al., 2012 ). Thus, the researchers hypothesized:

Work engagement is positively related to (a) innovative work behavior and (b) task performance.

Work engagement partly mediates the relationship between leadership styles and work outcomes (task performance & innovative work behavior).

3.3. Cross-national aspects of leadership styles and work engagement

Despite some authors' claims that leadership styles are common across cultures, results are inconsistent with the degree to which leadership styles reign and their impact across cultures on followers. Shahin and Wright (2004) investigated the appropriateness of Bass and Avolio's leadership model in non-western country such as Egypt. They found that only certain factors that were considered as ideal leadership styles corresponded with U.S. factors, suggesting the influence of culture in labeling best leadership. Contrary to this finding, Walumbwa et al. (2007) made comparison based on data from China, India, Kenya, and the U.S. and found a robust manifestation of transformational and/or transactional leadership in these countries.

Ardichvili and Kuchinke (2002) carried out a comparative study on leadership styles and cultural values of managerial and non-managerial employees across culture by taking into account 10 business organizations in Russia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Germany, and the U.S., countries that differ widely in socio-economic and political orientation. The researchers elucidated that cross-cultural human resource development matters cannot be seen in terms of simplified dichotomies of East and West or developed versus developing economies.

In terms of the influences of leadership styles on work outcomes, it appeared that transformational-related behavior of leaders had a universally positive impact on followers’ behaviors ( Dorfman et al., 1997 ; Walumbwa et al., 2005 ). For instance, Walumbwa et al. (2005) examined influence of transformational leadership on two work-related attitudes: organizational commitment and job satisfaction based on data from Kenya and the U.S. and obtained its strong positive effect on both indicators and in both countries. Dunn et al. (2012) also reported similar results on the association of transformational leadership with organizational commitment based on data collected from two countries: the U.S. and Israel.

With regard to work engagement as a psychological construct, cross-cultural investigations are scant. However, existing evidence reveals invariance in the construct—at least, in Western countries. For instance, Schaufeli et al., 2002a , Schaufeli et al., 2002b observed the invariance of the UWES, consisting of vigor, dedication, and absorption, on a sample of students from three countries: Spain, Portugal, and the Netherlands. Salanova and Schaufeli (2008) also reported the mediation model of work engagement in the link between job resources and managers’ proactive behavior at work in two independent samples drawn from Spain and the Netherland reflecting the consistence of the assertion across culture. In the current study, hence it was hypothesized that:

The proposed relationships among study variables and thus the interceding of work engagement between leadership styles and work outcomes are consistent for the two national samples.

4. Materials and method

The study partly used a cross-sectional method of online survey research. As pointed out by Nasbary (2000) , using an electronic format for a survey study does not pose any threat to the validity or reliability of the survey results, but rather has advantages such as low cost and rapid delivery.

4.1. Participants’ selection procedure

The target population for the study comprised of full-time professional ICT staff (with at least a college education) from for-profit companies engaged in ICT-related activities in Ethiopia and South Korea. Professionals in the ICT field were chosen mainly because of their crucial role in modern economic development in the least developed and advanced countries. Furthermore, the online survey was easily accessible due to their frequent contact to the internet. Additionally, selecting single industry enabled researchers to minimize errors emanating from industry-type. To collect data, Amharic (for Ethiopians) and Korean (for Koreans) versions of questionnaires were utilized for the study. In South Koreaa a survey company administered the questionnaire using random sampling approach in March–April, 2018. Using the company database, the questionnaire was sent to 500 staff, of which 300 replied. In Ethiopia, however, considering network quality and poor habit of using web, a hard-copy questionnaire was administered to 200 professionals selected by availability sampling in which 151 usable data were obtained. During data screening, nine extreme outliers (below or above 1.5 interquartile ranges of Q 1 & Q 3 respectively . ) from South Korea and four from Ethiopia were removed. Thus, the analyses were based on 291 (Males = 229 [78.7%], Females = 62 [21.3%]) participants from South Korea and 147 (Males = 98 [66.7%], Females = 49 [33.3%]) from Ethiopia.

The School Scientific Committee for Research and Publication (School of Humanities & Social Sciences, Adama Science & Technology University) approved the proposal of the study. The purpose of the research was also clearly explained for the participants to obtain their consent for participation.

For the South Korean participants, the average age was 37 years, with 58 being the highest age and 24 the lowest. The average tenure was seven years. Qualification wise, 16 (5.5%) had a diploma, 226 (77.7%) a bachelor’ degree, 43 (14.8%) a master's degree, and six (2.1%) were PhD holders. With respect to work position, 182 (62.5%) worked as staff, while 95 (32.6%) and 14 (4.8%) South Korean participants worked as team leaders and department heads respectively. A total of 176 (59.5%) worked for companies engaged in software development, followed by 86 (29.1%) who worked in telecom services. For the Ethiopian participants, the average age was 32, with 21 being the lowest age and 55 the highest. Average work experience was 5.6 years. In terms of educational qualifications, four (2.1%) had a diploma, 110 (74.8%) a first degree, 31 (21.1%) a second degree, and 2 (1.4%) of them were third degree holders. With regard to their work position, 129 (87.8%) worked as staff, while 12 (8.2%) and 6 (4.8%) of the Ethiopian participants worked as team leaders and department heads respectively. Most of (80%) the Ethiopian participants work for a telecom service company.

4.2. Measures

The study variables were measured using extensively used and validated instruments.

4.2.1. Leadership style

To measure the three leadership styles, participants ' impressions of the leadership behavior of their immediate supervisor were retrieved using the short form of the Multi-Factor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5X), a measure built based on the full range leadership model of Avolio and Bass ( Avolio et al., 1999 ) and commonly used and evaluated in different cultures ( Trottier et al., 2008 ; Solomon, 2016 ). The short form of the MLQ 5X consists of 36 items measuring nine outcomes of leadership: idealized influence (attributed), idealized influence (behavioral), inspirational motivation, individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, contingent rewards, management-by-exception (active), management-by-exception (passive), and laissez-faire. The response are rated using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 “not at all” to 4 “frequently, if not always.”

4.2.2. Work engagement

The UWES which was initially designed by Schaufeli et al., 2002a , Schaufeli et al., 2002b and subsequently reviewed by Schaufeli et al. (2006) , has been used to measure the level of work engagement of the individual employees The scale was validated in many studies ( Schaufeli and Bakker, 2010 ) and utilized in non-Western countries such as South Korea ( Kim, 2014 ; Song et al., 2012 ). The short form of UWES is called the UWES-9; it has nine items, three for each dimension: vigor, dedication, and absorption. It is a self-report scale. All items of the UWES-9 were presented with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (“never”) to 6 (“always”). Through analyzing data from various countries via CFA and test-retest reliability, Schaufeli et al. (2006) reported that the Cronbach's alpha for the UWES-9 ranged between 0 .85 and 0.92. Besides, other studies also confirmed its acceptable applicability in terms of the items' homogeneity and the construct factor structure (e.g., Park et al., 2013 ; Seppala et al., 2009 ).

4.2.3. Innovative work behavior

Innovative work behavior was measured using Janssen (2000) 9-item test with a 7-point Likert scale ranging from (1) “never” to (7) “always.” The instrument measures three aspects of innovative work behavior: breeding a new idea, gaining support from others for its implementation, and turning an idea into an application. The respondents were asked how often creative tasks relevant to these three fields were performed. To create measure of innovative work behavior, scores of the three aspects were summed up. With respect to its internal consistency, Agarwal et al. (2012) , reported Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.92.

4.2.4. Task performance

In order to assess in-role task performance, a three-item self-report scale which is utilized widely in recent studies (e.g., Kim, 2014 ), has been used. Responses were recorded on seven-point Likert scale ranging from (1) “strongly disagree” to (7) “strongly agree.” Drawing on review of different studies that had employed the scale, Kim (2014) reported its reliability ranging from 0.77 to 0.87.

All the scales that became part of the questionnaire used in this analysis were in English. Hence, to suit the current study, forward-then-backward translation procedures (English to Amharic and English to Korean) were performed on all instruments by independent bilingual professionals. This procedure ensures linguistic equivalence between the original language of the instrument and the language used for its administration ( McGorry, 2000 ).

4.3. Data analysis

In order to examine the data, descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's product momentum correlation, and linear multiple regression analysis were employed. To assess the amount of variability explained by the predictors, coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) and to determine the magnitude of the path effects, standardized path coefficient estimates were considered. For the sake of comparison, analyses were made for the two national samples separately.

Prior to the analyses, basic assumptions of multivariate data analysis such as normality, linearity, and multicollinearity were tested. Data from the two national samples showed approximately normal distributions. The assumption of linearity was also met. With respect to multicollinearity, the high bivariate correlation between transformational leadership style and transactional leadership style, particularly for South Korean participants, resulted in a relatively high variance inflation factor (VIF) of 5.33 for the variable transactional leadership worrisome as per the suggestion by Hair et al. (2010) .

5.1. Descriptive analyses

Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations for the variables included in the study are presented in Table 1 . The bivariate correlations are indicated by a Pearson's product momentum correlation coefficient ( r) . Among the background factors, weak negative correlations between sex and work engagement ( r = - 0.18, p < 0.01) and sex and task performance ( r = -0.17, p < 0.01) were obtained for the South Korean sample, while for Ethiopia they failed to reach significance. Work position was weakly negatively correlated with work engagement ( r = -0.22, p < 0.01 for South Korea and r = -0.16, p < 0.05 for Ethiopia) and innovative work behavior ( r = -0.19, p < 0.01 for South Korea and r = -0 .24, p < 0.01 for Ethiopia). Transformational and transactional leadership styles were positively correlated with work engagement and indicators of work outcomes in both countries, with the exception of the relationship between the transactional leadership style and work engagement in Ethiopia, which failed to reach significance. Laissez-faire leadership was weakly positively correlated with work engagement ( r = 0.13, p < 0.05) and innovative work behavior ( r = 0.17, p < 0.01) in South Korea, while in Ethiopia it was negatively correlated with work engagement ( r = -0.21, p < 0.05) and innovative work behavior ( r = -0.16, p < 0.05). Its correlation with task performance failed to reach the significance level in both countries. Work engagement was moderately positively related with measures of outcome indicators —innovative work behavior ( r = 0.57, p < 0.01, and r = 0.66, p < 0.01) and task performance ( r = 0.46 , p < 0.01, and r = 0.54, p < 0.01) for Ethiopia and South Korea, respectively. With respect to internal consistency, all measures for both samples demonstrated traditionally acceptable internal reliability levels ( α ranged from 0.77 to 0.95).

Table 1

Bivariate correlation, mean (M), standard deviation (SD), and internal consistencies (Cronbach'sα) of the study variables for the South Korean (n = 291) and Ethiopian (n = 147) samples.

	M	SD	α value		Gender	Education	Work position	Work Experience	TRF	TRA	LAF	WE	IWB	TP
M				31.6	1.33	2.21	2.84	5.63	2.59	2.42	1.94	4.82	3.75	4.92
SD				5.75	0.47	0.50	0.47	3.73	0.77	0.66	1.04	1.05	1.21	0.96
α value									0.94	0.86	0.77	0.93	0.95	0.88
Age	36.56	5.50		1	-0.24∗∗	0.27∗∗	-0.09	0.49∗∗	-0.23∗∗	-0.18∗	0.02	-0.12	-0.12	-0.11
Gender	1.21	0.41		-0.30∗∗	1	-0.10	0.22∗∗	-0.17∗	0.18∗	0.10	-0.04	0.13	-0.04	0.01
Education	2.13	0.52		0.11∗	-0.05	1	-0.23∗∗	0.29∗∗	-0.08	-0.03	0.13	0.06	0.07	0.09
Work position	2.58	0.58		-.43∗∗	0.09	-0.19	1	-0.05	-0.13	-0.17∗	-0.15	-0.16∗	-0.24∗∗	-0.13
Work Experience	6.96	4.79		0.63∗∗	-0.17∗∗	0.02	-0.38∗∗	1	-0.23∗∗	-0.18∗	-0.10	-0.21∗∗	-0.05	-0.09
TRF	3.19	0.70	0.95	-0.002	-0.09	-0.03	-0.10	-0.01	1	0.51∗∗	-0.26∗∗	0.52∗∗	0.53∗∗	0.41∗∗
TRA	3.13	0.61	0.84	0.03	-0.14∗	-0.01	-0.22∗∗	-0.10	0.84∗∗	1	0.25∗∗	0.16	0.31∗∗	0.36∗∗
LAF	2.73	0.88	0.79	0.07	-0.01	0.07	-0.16∗∗	0.068	0.06	0.35∗∗	1	-0.21∗	-0.16∗	-0.14
WE	4.62	1.02	0.93	0.11	-0.18∗∗	0.05	-0.22∗∗	0.11	0.59∗∗	0.57∗∗	0.13∗	1	0.57∗∗	0.46∗∗
IWB	4.42	1.10	0.94	0.10	-0.17∗∗	0.02	-0.19∗∗	0.06	0.71∗∗	0.68∗∗	0.17∗∗	0.66∗∗	1	0.53∗∗
WP	4.87	1.03	0.86	0.13∗	-0.04	-0.03	-0.10	0.10	0.42∗∗	0.41∗∗	-0.04	0.54∗∗	0.57∗∗	1

Notes: ∗p < .05, ∗∗p < .01 (two tailed).

The coding scheme was as follows: Gender: 1 = male, 2 = female; Education: 1 = diploma, 2 = BSc, 3 = MSc, 4 = PhD; work position: 1 = director/division head/assistant head, 2 = team leader, 3 = staff.

TRF - transformational, TRA - transactional, LAF - laissez-faire, WE - work engagement, IWB - innovative work behavior, TP - task performance.

Values below the diagonals are correlation coefficients for the South Korean sample, while those above the diagonals are values for the Ethiopian sample, along with internal consistency measures (Cronbach's alpha values).

5.2. Influence of leadership styles on work-related behaviors

To ascertain the proposed hypotheses related to the relationships between leadership styles and the measures of work outcomes and work engagement, a series of multiple linear regression analyses was performed, in which each indicator of work outcomes and work engagement was regressed on styles of leadership consecutively for the two countries separately. In the analyses, the background variables of the participants were controlled to remove their effects. As shown in Table 2 , the outputs indicated that the three leadership styles taken together explained a significant amount of the variability in innovative work behavior (Δ R 2 = 0.26, F (8,138) = 8.82 , p < 0.01 for Ethiopia; Δ R 2 = 0.48, F (8,182) = 47.1, p < 0.01 for South Korea), task performance (Δ R 2 = 0.20, F (8,138) = 5.55, p < .0.05 for Ethiopia; Δ R 2 = 0.21, F (8,182) = 10.46, p < 0.01 for South Korea), and work engagement (Δ R 2 = 0.24, F (8,138) = 8.82, p < 0.01 for Ethiopia; Δ R 2 = 0.32, F (8,182) = 23.2, p < 0.01 for South Korea). However, when the path coefficient estimates were taken into account, the path effects of the transformational leadership style on innovative work behavior ( β = 0.47, p < 0.01 for Ethiopia; β = 0. 54, p < 0. 01 for South Korea) and work engagement ( β = 0.52, p < 0.01 for Ethiopia; β = 0.45, p < 0.01 for South Korea) were significant, while its effect on task performance failed to reach the significance level in both countries. The effect of the transactional leadership style was significant only for task performance ( β = 0.29, p < 0. 01 for Ethiopia; β = 0.35, p < 0.01 for South Korea), not for innovative work behavior. Similarly, laissez-faire leadership's negative effect also reached significance level for task performance only ( β = -0.19, p < 0.05 for Ethiopia; β = - 0.17, p < 0.01 for South Korea).

Table 2

Regression results for predicting innovative work behavior, task performance, and work engagement from leadership styles.

	IWB		TP		WE
	ETH	KOR	ETH	KOR	ETH	KOR
Step 1
Age	-0.12	-0.01	-0.12	0.10	-0.04	-0.06
Gender	-0.01	-0.16	0.01	-0.004	0.13	-0.17∗∗
Education	0.05	-0.01	0.11	-0.05	0.10	0.03
Work position	-0.24	-0.20	-0.12	-0.06	-0.18∗	-0.22∗∗
Work experience	-0.02	-0.04	-0.06	-0.02	-0.20∗	0.04
R	0.07	0.06∗	0.04	0.02	0.10∗∗	0.08∗∗
Step 2
TRF	0.47∗∗	0.54∗∗	0.20	0.15	0.52∗∗	0.45∗∗
TRA	0.08	0.18	0.29∗∗	0.35∗∗	-0.14	0.15
LAF	-0.10	0.06	-0.19∗	-0.17∗∗	-0.09	0.03
ΔR	0.26∗∗	0.48∗∗	0.20∗∗	0.21∗∗	0.24∗∗	0.32∗∗
R total	0.34∗∗	0.54∗∗	0.24∗∗	0.23∗∗	0.34∗∗	0.40∗∗
F value for total	8.82∗∗	41.71∗∗	5.55∗∗	10.46∗∗	8.82∗∗	23.82∗∗

Notes: ∗p < .05, ∗∗p < .01 (two tailed). ETH - Ethiopia, KOR - South Korea.

The results in Table 2 provided support for H1 (a), H2 (b), H3 (b), and H4 but not for H5 and H6 .

To test the hypothesis related to the relationship between work engagement and the measures of work outcomes: innovative work behavior and task performance were regressed on work engagement consecutively and separately for the two countries. The results in Table 3 showed that a significant proportion of the variance in innovative work behavior (Δ R 2 = 0.28, F (6,140) = 13.10, p < 0.01 for Ethiopia; Δ R 2 = 0.38, F (6,140) = 38.04, p < 0.01 for South Korea) and task performance (Δ R 2 = 0.18, F (6,140) = 6.74, p < 0.01 for Ethiopia; Δ R 2 = 0. 29, F (6,284) = 21.95, p < 0 .01 for South Korea) were explained by work engagement. The standardized path coefficients of work engagement on innovative work behavior ( β = 0.56, p < 0.01 and β = 0.64, p < 0.01) and on task performance ( β = 0. 45, p < 0.01 and β = 0.56, p < 0.01) for Ethiopia and South Korea, respectively, indicated positive and significant relationships of work engagement with innovative work behavior and task performance and thus provided support for H7 .

Table 3

Regression results for predicting innovative work behavior and task performance from work engagement.

	IWB		TP
	ETH	KOR	ETH	KOR
Step 1
Age	-0.12	-0.01	-0.12	0.10
Gender	-0.01	-0.16	0.01	-0.004
Education	0.05	-0.09	0.11	-0.05
Work position	-0.24	-0.20	-0.12	-0.06
Work experience	-0.02	-0.04	-0.06	0.02
R	0.07	0.06∗∗	0.04	0.02
Step 2
WE	0.56∗∗	0.64∗∗	0.45∗∗	0.56∗∗
ΔR	0.28∗∗	0.38∗∗	0.18∗∗	0.29∗∗
R total	0.36∗∗	0.45∗∗	0.22∗∗	0.32∗∗
F value for total	13.10∗∗	38.04∗∗	6.74∗∗	21.95∗∗

Note: ∗p < .05, ∗∗p < .01 (two tailed).

5.3. Mediational role of work engagement

In testing the hypothesis related to the partial mediational role of work engagement in the link between leadership styles and indicators of outcome behavior, as per Baron and Kenny's (1986) suggestion, certain conditions need to be met for mediation establishment. First, the predictor variable(s) had to be related to the mediator variable. Second, the mediator had to be related to the predicted variable(s). Third, a significant relationship between the predictor variable(s) and predicted variable(s) was to be reduced for partial mediation to operate when controlling for the mediator variable. As described earlier, the first two conditions were partly met. Thus, for the mediation test, the two indicators of work outcomes were regressed over leadership styles consecutively while controlling for background factors and work engagement. As the results in Table 4 showed, the amount of variance in innovative work behavior explained by leadership styles was reduced from 26% to 9% ( Δ R 2 = 0. 09, F (9,137) = 12.56, p < 0.01) for Ethiopia and from 48% to 16% (Δ R 2 = 0.16, F (9,281) = 48.62, p < 0.01) for South Korea, while for task performance reduction was from 20% to 10% (Δ R 2 = .10, F (9,137) = 7.63, p < 0.01) for Ethiopia and from 21% to 4% (Δ R 2 = 0.04, F (9,281) = 17.44, p < 0.01) for South Korea. Thus, H8 is supported.

Table 4

Regression results for predicting work outcomes (innovative work behavior and task performance) from leadership styles while controlling work engagement.

	IWB		TP
	ETH	KOR	ETH	KOR
Step 1
Age	-0.09	0.03	-0.10	0.14
Gender	-0.09	-0.05	-0.05	0.09
Education	-0.004	-0.03	0.07	-0.06
Work position	-0.14	-0.06	-0.03	0.07
Work experience	0.09	-0.07	0.03	-0.005
WE	0.56∗∗	0.64∗∗	0.45∗∗	0.56∗∗
R	0.36∗∗	0.45∗∗	0.22∗∗	0.32∗∗
Step 2
TRF	0.25∗	0.39∗∗	0.01	-0.06
TRA	0.14	0.13	0.34∗∗	0.28∗
LAF	-0.06	0.05	-0.16	-0.18∗∗
ΔR	0.09∗∗	0.16∗∗	0.10∗∗	0.04∗∗
R total	0.45∗∗	0.61∗∗	0.33∗∗	.36∗∗
F value for total	12.56∗∗	48.62∗∗	7.63∗∗	17.44∗∗

With respect to hypothesis 9, (nature of relationships & mediation model across the two national samples), the separately presented results elucidated that the relationships among styles of leadership, work engagement and work outcomes were more or less consistent across Ethiopia and South Korea samples. Work engagement also partly mediated the relationship between leadership styles and work outcomes in both samples. Hence, H9 is supported.

6. Discussion

The present study investigated relationships among leadership styles, employee work engagement and some indicators of work outcomes and tested a mediation model of work engagement in the link between styles of leadership and work outcomes among ICT professionals. The model viewed leadership styles (the behavior of leaders varying from powerful transformation to "non-leadership") as antecedent to work engagement and innovative work behavior and task performance were taken as work outcomes. It also investigated the nature of relationships among variables and cross-national validity of the proposed model in two independent samples from Ethiopia and South Korea, countries that differ in their social, cultural, economic, and technological levels. The obtained results were as follows:

First, the transformational leadership style had significant positive relationships with employees' work engagement and innovative work behavior, while the transactional leadership style had a significant positive relationship with employee task performance. Laissez-faire leadership had a significant negative relationship with task performance. These associations were consistent across the two national samples. The assumed positive links of transformational leadership style with task performance and transactional leadership style with employees’ innovative work behavior, and the negative relationship of the laissez-faire style with innovative behavior were not supported in both national samples. The relationships obtained have shown that leaders who stimulate and inspire followers by articulating visions, goals, and shared values and engaged in building capacity via coaching and challenging employees promote innovative behavior, while leaders who emphasize compliance of followers through supervision may have influence on task performance.

Second, as expected, work engagement had significant positive relationships with the indicators of work outcomes (innovative work behavior and task performance) among ICT professionals in both countries. This suggests that, employees who psychologically identify with their work or “bring in” their personal selves to work, devoting and experiencing an emotional connection to their work, appear to be innovative and put discretionary effort into performance of tasks.

Third, work engagement partially mediated the relationships between leadership styles and indicators of outcomes. Specifically, the relationship between transformational leadership and professionals’ innovative work behavior was partially mediated by work engagement in both countries. This implies that transformational leaders influence innovative behavior of staff directly and indirectly through influencing their level of work engagement.

Work outcomes such as task performance and innovative work behavior are influenced by a number of factors of which leadership is an important one. Consistent to current study results, previous studies (e.g. Khan et al., 2012 ; Ejere and Abasilim, 2013 ; Judge and Piccolo, 2004 ; Solomon, 2016 ) underscored the significant contributions of transactional and transformational styles of leadership for employees’ performance.

Specifically, the association of transformational leadership style with innovative work behavior and transactional leadership style with task performance observed in the current study may be explained in terms of peculiar characteristics of these styles. With respect to innovative work behaviour, transformational leadership style is considered as a suitable style of leadership as in this style followers are encouraged to commence new ideas and challenge old ways of doing things ( Bass and Avolio, 2000 ). For innovative behaviour transformational leaders' behaviour such as being role model by engaging in needed change, stimulating followers to challenge the status quo and be inspirational while leading others are all vital qualities. In addition, transformative leadership style demanding alignment of the needs and desires of followers with the organization's one ( Bass, 1999 ), may encourage employees to go additional mile necessary for creative behaviour. On the other hand, transactional leadership can be argued to be significant for task performance of employees' as it is focused more on immediate outcomes, monitor performance and correct mistakes. Additionally, transactional leaders make clear expectations and give feedback about meeting expectations may push employees to focus on tasks listed in job description.

The findings related to linkages among leadership styles, work engagement and work outcomes obtained in the current study are also consistent with some earlier studies (e.g., Bakker and Bal, 2010 ; Salanova et al., 2011 ; Song et al., 2012 ). Bakker and Bal (2010) reported on weekly work engagement as a predictor of performance among starting teachers. With respect to leadership styles, Song et al. (2012) affirmed the significant impact of transformational leadership on employee work engagement and organizational knowledge creation practices, and partial mediation of employee work engagement in the link between those two constructs. Salanova et al. (2011) also reported a relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement where, contrary to the findings of the current study, work engagement fully mediated the relationship between transformational leadership and nurses’ extra-role performance.

The observed mediation of work engagement across independent samples found in the current study is also consistent with some previous studies ( Dorfman et al., 1997 ; Walumbwa et al., 2005 ; Salanova and Schaufeli, 2008 ). While the consistency of the mediation model observed here across the two independent national samples does not justify either its utility or its contribution, it may add confidence in the generalizability of the findings.

6.1. Implications

The results of this study have some theoretical and practical implications in HR-related fields for researchers and practitioners. The study provides insights into the ongoing investigations of correlates of employees' work engagement. In particular, the study may shed light on the nature of associations among leadership styles, work engagement, and critical work outcomes such as task performance and innovative work behavior among ICT professionals. It may also disentangle the role of transformational leadership, particularly when it comes to employees personally committing themselves to role performance and innovation efforts. Besides, the study elucidated the cross-national aspect of the relationships among the variables it considered. Despite a number of background differences, it appeared that styles of leadership had more or less similar links with work engagement and outcome behaviors among participants from Ethiopia and South Korea. Specifically, the invariance in the mediating role of work engagement in the link between transformational leadership and employees’ discretionary actions with respect to idea generation, promotion, and realization among ICT professionals working in different countries solidify the existing understanding of the importance of this leadership style.

Practically, the results of the study highlight the need to improve leadership by applying a transformational style, as it is essential for organizations to have ICT workforces that perform their roles and are willing to demonstrate discretionary efforts. Thus, practitioners in the field should develop strategies and training programs targeting transformational leadership skills such as being supportive and intellectually stimulating, and conveying a vision to employees so that leaders can influence their staff. In particular, to strengthen the ICT sector's human resources in Ethiopia so that it can contribute significantly to the development of the country, more attention should be given to leadership development.

Furthermore, practitioners could closely scrutinize employees' work engagement by assessing it using well-established scales such as the UWES or a locally developed one. For ICT companies to be competitive, collecting information on the work engagement level of staff should be part of employees' opinion surveys, and identifying practices and policies that promote their staff's work engagement behavior is imperative.

6.2. Limitations and future research

Notwithstanding its important theoretical and practical contributions, there are some drawbacks to this study. The cross-sectional research design used primarily did not allow researchers to establish causality among variables. This means that the suggested associations among the variables should not be interpreted as causal relationships, but as associations that suggest causal ordering, which needs to be confirmed by longitudinal research. Secondly, the data for the study were gathered using a self-report questionnaire with its own inherent pros and cons, particularly when it comes to the participants’ assessments of their immediate supervisor. Thirdly, as antecedent variables, the study limited to full range of leadership model consists of transformational, transactional and laissez fair styles. That is, there are also other potential aspects of leadership nature that might be relevant that are not included in the current study. Finally, the relatively high VIF of the transactional leadership style could undermine the role of this variable in the web. Thus, for future research, the researchers suggest a longitudinal research design and outcomes measured through methods other than self-reports.

Declarations

Author contribution statement.

Habtamu Kebu Gemeda, Jaesik Lee: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

Agarwal U.A., Datta S., Blake-Beard S., Bhargava S. Linking LMX, innovative work behavior and turnover intentions: the mediating role of work engagement. Career Dev. Int. 2012; 17 (3):208–230. [ Google Scholar ]
Ardichvili A., Kuchinke K.P. Leadership styles and cultural values among managers and subordinates: a comparative study of four countries of the former Soviet Union, Germany, and the US. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 2002; 5 (1):99–117. [ Google Scholar ]
Avolio B.J., Bass B.M., Jung D.I. Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 1999; 72 :441–462. [ Google Scholar ]
Bakker A.B., Bal P.M. Weekly work engagement and performance: a study among starting teachers. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2010; 83 (1):189–206. [ Google Scholar ]
Bakker A.B., Demerouti E. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Dev. Int. 2008; 13 (3):209–223. [ Google Scholar ]
Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986; 51 :1173–1182. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Bass B.M. Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 1999; 8 :9–32. [ Google Scholar ]
Bass B.M., Avolio B.J. Sage Publications Inc; Thousand Oaks: 1994. Improving Organizational Effectiveness: through Transformational Leadership. [ Google Scholar ]
Bass B.M., Avolio B.J. second ed. Mind Garden; Redwood City, CA: 2000. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. [ Google Scholar ]
Bass B.M., Riggio R.E. second ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; London: 2006. Transformational Leadership. [ Google Scholar ]
Batista-Taran L.C., Shuck M.B., Gutierrez C.C., Baralt S. The role of leadership style in employee engagement. In: Plakhotnik M.S., Nielsen S.M., Pane D.M., editors. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual College of Education & GSN Research Conference. Florida International University; Miami: 2009. pp. 15–20. http://coeweb.fiu.edu/research_conference/ Retrieved from. [ Google Scholar ]
Beyene K.T., Shi C.S., Wu W.W. Linking culture, organizational learning orientation and product innovation performance: the case of Ethiopian manufacturing firms. Afr J. Ind. Eng. 2016; 27 (2):88–101. [ Google Scholar ]
Carasco-Saul M., Kim W., Kim T. Leadership and employee engagement proposing research agendas through a review of literature. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2015; 14 (1):38–63. [ Google Scholar ]
Chughtai A.A. Linking affective commitment to supervisor to work outcomes. J. Manag. Psychol. 2013; 28 (6):606–627. [ Google Scholar ]
Compare Countries-Hofstede Insights https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/ n.d., Wikipedia.
Demerouti E., Cropanzano R. From thought to action: employee work engagement and job performance. In: Bakker A.B., Leiter M.P., editors. Vol. 65. 2010. pp. 147–163. (Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research). [ Google Scholar ]
Dorfman P.W., Howell J.P., Hibino S., Lee J.K., Tate U., Bautista A. Leadership in Western and Asian countries: communalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. Leader. Q. 1997; 8 (3):233–274. [ Google Scholar ]
Dunn M.W., Dastoor B., Sims R.L. Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: a cross-cultural perspective. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2012; 4 (1):45–60. [ Google Scholar ]
Ejere E.I., Abasilim U.D. Impact of transactional and transformational leadership styles on organizational Performance: empirical Evidence from Nigeria. J. Commer. 2013; 1 (5):30–41. [ Google Scholar ]
Ethiopia. 2018. Retrieved on 5th March, 2018, from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopia . [ Google Scholar ]
Evelyn D., Hazel G. Effects of transformational leadership on employee engagement: the mediating role of employee engagement. Int. J. Manag. 2015; 6 (2):1–8. [ Google Scholar ]
Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E. seventh ed. Pearson; New York: 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. [ Google Scholar ]
Harter J.K., Schmidt F.L., Hayes T.L. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002; 87 (2):268–279. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Hayward B.A., Davidson A.J., Pascoe J.B., Tasker M.L., Amos T.L., Pearse N.J. Paper Presented at the Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology 6th Annual Conference, 25-27 June 2003, Sandton, Johannesburg. 2003. The relationship between leadership and employee performance in a South African pharmaceutical company. [ Google Scholar ]
International Monitory Fund . 2016. Country Report, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2016/cr16322 Retrieved from. [ Google Scholar ]
Janssen O. Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness, and innovative work behavior. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2000; 73 :287–302. [ Google Scholar ]
Jeung C.W. The concept of employee engagement: a comprehensive review from a positive organizational behavior perspective. Perform. Improv. Q. 2011; 24 :49–69. [ Google Scholar ]
Judge T.A., Piccolo R.F. Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 2004; 89 (5):755–768. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Kahn W.A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 1990; 33 (4):692–724. [ Google Scholar ]
Khan M.J., Aslam N., Riaz M.N. Leadership styles as predictors of innovative work behavior. Pak. J. Clin. Psychol. 2012; 9 (2):17–22. [ Google Scholar ]
Kim W. The Pennsylvania State University; 2014. An Examination of Work Engagement in Selected Major Organizations in Korea: its Role as a Mediator between Antecedents and Consequences. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/9386 Dissertation. Retrieved from. [ Google Scholar ]
Koech P.M., Namusonge G.S. The effect of leadership styles on organizational performance at state corporations in Kenya. Int. J. Bus. Commer. 2012; 2 (1):1–12. [ Google Scholar ]
Kotter J.P. The Free Press; New York: 1988. The Leadership Factor. [ Google Scholar ]
Maslach C., Leitier M.P. first ed. Jossey-Bass; San Francisco, CA: 1997. The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and what to Do about it. [ Google Scholar ]
Maslach C., Schaufeli W.B., Leiter M.P. Job burnout. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001; 52 (1):397–422. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
McGorry S.Y. Measurement in a cross-cultural environment: survey translation issues. Qual. Market Res. 2000; 3 (2):74–81. [ Google Scholar ]
Meyer M., Botha E. Butterworths; Durban: 2000. Organizational Development & Transformation in South Africa. [ Google Scholar ]
Nasbary D.K. Allyn& Bacon; Boston: 2000. Survey Research and the World Wide Web. [ Google Scholar ]
Park Y.K., Song J.H., Yoon S.W., Kim J. Learning organization and innovative behavior: the mediating effect of work engagement. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 2013; 38 :75–94. [ Google Scholar ]
Pourbarkhordari1 A., Zhou E.H., Pourkarimi J. How Individual-focused transformational leadership enhances its influence on job performance through employee work engagement. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2016; 11 (2):249–261. [ Google Scholar ]
Ramoorthy N., Flood J., Slattery T.F., Sardessai R. The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Acad. Manag. J. 2005; 19 :959–971. [ Google Scholar ]
Rich B.L., Lepine J.A., Crawford E.R. Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance. Acad. Manag. J. 2010; 53 (3):617–635. [ Google Scholar ]
Robbins S.P., Judge T.A., Sanghi S. Dorling Kindersley pvt.Ltd; New Delhi: 2009. Organizational Behavior (13 ed ) [ Google Scholar ]
Rothbard N.P. Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Adm. Sci. Q. 2001; 46 (4):655–684. [ Google Scholar ]
Saks A.M. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J. Manag. Psychol. 2006; 21 (7):600–619. [ Google Scholar ]
Salanova M., Lorente L., Chambel M.T., Martinez I.M. Linking transformational leadership to nurses’ extra-role performance: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work engagement. J. Adv. Nurs. 2011; 67 (10):2256–2266. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Salanova M., Schaufeli W.B. A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behavior. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2008; 19 (1):116–131. [ Google Scholar ]
Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 2004; 25 (3):293–315. [ Google Scholar ]
Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B. Defining and measuring work engagement: bringing clarity to the concept. In: Bakker A.B., Leiter M.P., editors. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Psychology Press; New York, NY: 2010. pp. 10–24. [ Google Scholar ]
Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B., Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2006; 66 (1):701–716. [ Google Scholar ]
Schaufeli W.B., Martínez I., Marques-Pinto A., Salanova M., Bakker A.B. Burnout and engagement in university students: a cross-national study. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 2002; 33 :464–481. [ Google Scholar ]
Schaufeli W.B., Salanova M., González-Romá V., Bakker A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 2002; 3 (1):71–92. [ Google Scholar ]
Solomon S. Addis Ababa University; 2016. The Relationship between Leadership Styles and Employees’ Performance in Selected Sub-city Education Offices of Addis Ababa City Administration. Unpublished master thesis submitted to. [ Google Scholar ]
Seppala P., Mauno S., Feldt T., Hakanen J., Kinnunen U., Tolvanen A., Schaufeli W. The construct validity of the Utrecht work engagement scale: multi sample and longitudinal evidence. J. Happiness Stud. 2009; 10 (4):459–481. [ Google Scholar ]
Shahin A.I., Wright P.L. Leadership in the context of culture: an Egyptian perspective. Leader. Organ. Dev. J. 2004; 25 (6):499–511. [ Google Scholar ]
Song J.,H., Kolb J.A., Lee U.H., Kim H.K. Role of transformational leadership in effective organizational knowledge creation practices: mediating effects of employees’ work engagement. Human Dev. Q. 2012; 23 (1):65–101. [ Google Scholar ]
South Korea. 2018. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korea Retrieved on 5th March, 2018, from Wikipedia: [ Google Scholar ]
Trottier T., Van Wart M., Wang X. Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations. Publ. Adm. Rev. 2008; 68 (2):319–333. [ Google Scholar ]
Vincent-Höper S., Muser C., Janneck M. Transformational leadership, work engagement, and occupational success. Career Dev. Int. 2012; 17 :663–682. [ Google Scholar ]
Walumbwa F.O., Lawler J.L., Avolio B.J. Leadership, individual differences, and work-related attitudes: a cross-culture investigation. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 2007; 56 (2):212–230. [ Google Scholar ]
Walumbwa F.O., Orwa B., Wang P., Lawler J.J. Transformational leadership, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction: a comparative study of Kenyan and U.S. financial firms. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 2005; 16 (2):235–256. [ Google Scholar ]
Wasbeek D.J. Dissertation; Robert Kennedy College: 2004. Human Resource Management Practices in Selected Private Companies: A Study to Increase Employee Productivity in Ethiopia. www.bookpump.com/dps/pdf-b/1122446b.pdf Retrieved from. [ Google Scholar ]
Xanthopoulou D., Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., Schaufeli W.B. The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2007; 14 (2):121–141. [ Google Scholar ]
Xanthopoulou D., Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., Schaufeli W.B. Work engagement and financial returns: a diary study on the role of job and personal resources. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2009; 82 (1):183–200. [ Google Scholar ]
Xu J., Thomas H. How can leaders achieve high employee engagement? Leader. Organ. Dev. J. 2011; 32 :399–416. [ Google Scholar ]
Yim H. Cultural identity and cultural policy in South Korea. Int. J. Cult. Pol. 2002; 8 (1):37–48. [ Google Scholar ]
Zhang X.M., Bartol K.M. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad. Manag. J. 2010; 53 :107–128. [ Google Scholar ]

Leadership Theories and Styles: A Literature Review

January 2016

National University of Modern Languages

Qurtuba University of Science and Technology

Gomal University

Discover the world's research

25+ million members
160+ million publication pages
2.3+ billion citations

Sudharto P. Hadi

Petronella Jonck
Marie Grace
Mae R Bucacao

Idowu Mary Mogaji
Henry Dimingu

CHINESE EDUC SOC

D.C. Atwater
CREATIVITY RES J
Robert J. House

Francis J. Yammarino
Gregory H. Dobbins
Stephanie J. Platz

Caroline Burningham

R. K. Greenleaf
Recruit researchers
Join for free
Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

IMAGES

Effective Leadership Traits
Effective Leadership Traits
Reflective Essay About Leadership : Personal Leadership And Self Reflection
How to Write a Leadership Research Paper: Tips from Our Experts
12 Leadership Models That Can Define Your Style
(PDF) Paper Title: Leadership traits admired by the Young Generation

VIDEO

Leadership Style and Conflict Management Unit 1 & 2/ Public Administration/ BA 3rd Year
How to Pass Leadership education exam, easy way to pass Leadership education degree 4th semester
KVS solved paper
The Complete Guide to Leadership: Essential Traits, Skills, and Styles Summarized
KVS solved paper
Economic Growth Pragya ias academy provides excellence in education and career guidance and counseli

COMMENTS

Traits of Effective Leaders: A Literature Review
objective traits of l eadership among individual s who are in those positions. We explore literature on. objective leadership traits such as gender, age, education level, and job satisfaction ...
(PDF) TRAIT APPROACH TO LEADERSHIP
The paper comprises of extensive secondary literature on leaderships traits and critical analysis of the film in order to establish the link between positive leadership, organization and customer ...
(PDF) Characteristics of Effective Leadership
The main objective of this research paper is to acquire an efficient understanding of characteristics of effective leadership. In various types of organizations, when the leaders are carrying out ...
Personality Profiles of Effective Leadership Performance in Assessment
Using a sample of 2,461 executive-level leaders, six personality profiles were identified: Unpredictable Leaders with Low Diligence (7.3%); Conscientious, Backend Leaders (3.6%); Unpredictable Leaders (8.6%); Creative Communicators (20.8%); Power Players (32.4%); and Protocol Followers (27.1%). One profile performed well on all criteria in an ...
Six ways of understanding leadership development: An exploration of
A review of adult development leadership research identified the need for more research with a wider use of contextual factors and how developmental activities are interpreted at different orders of development (McCauley et al., 2006). Thus, the current research focuses on the leader as a person or the concept of leadership, but no study has ...
Transformational leadership effectiveness: an evidence-based primer
Leadership models. Although almost every leadership researcher seems to propose a new or modified definition of the construct, leadership is generally operationalised in two ways: (1) leadership as a formal role or (2) leadership as a social influence (Yukl and Van Fleet Citation 1992).Most of the leadership research focuses on the latter, which it aims to understand through operationalisation ...
Leadership Styles: A Comprehensive Assessment and Way Forward
We systematically review eight positive (authentic, charismatic, consideration and initiating structure, empowering, ethical, instrumental, servant, and transformational leadership) and two negative leadership styles (abusive supervision and destructive leadership) and identify valence-based conflation as a limitation common to all ten styles. This limitation rests on specifying behaviors as ...
Development and Revelation of Leadership Trait Theory
Leadership trait theory is the earliest branch of the theoretical leadership study. In the 1930 of the 20th century, researchers applied psychological research methods on the characteristics study of the leaders, thus forming the leadership trait theory. Study on the trait theory of leadership during this period focused on mental, character ...
Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and observer
With this large number of leadership traits, the lack of an organizing personality framework made it difficult to compare results across studies. House and Aditya (1997) noted, "One problem with early trait research was that there was little empirically substantiated personality theory to guide the search for leadership traits" (p. 410).
The impact of leadership traits and organizational learning on business
This study investigates how different leadership personality traits affect business innovation both directly and indirectly through organizational learning. The current research is important for several reasons. First, previous studies in the fields of leadership have focused on transformational leadership theories (Van et al., 2018; Zagoršek ...
Good, Bad, and Ugly Leadership Patterns: Implications for Followers
Nowhere is this criticism more apparent than in prior work that has examined the effects of specific leader behaviors on follower outcomes (e.g., Harms et al., 2017; Ng & Feldman, 2015; Wang et al., 2019).While much has been written about the individual leadership styles, less is known about whether styles combine to form qualitatively distinct patterns of behavior that characterize the leader ...
The Big Five Personality Traits and Leadership: A ...
The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and leadership styles, specifically authoritative, democratic, facilitative, and situational leadership.
PDF Leadership: Past, Present, and Future
history of leadership trait theory). This was the first major crisis reorientation of leadership research, and it took almost 30 years for this line of research to reemerge. The impetus for the re-emergence of leadership trait theory came from a reanalysis of Mann's data using a relatively new and innovative analytic procedure at the time—
The many faces of leadership: Proposing research agenda through a
Kouzes and Posner (2003) came up with four key leadership traits: honesty, forward-looking, inspiring, and competency. Although trait theories of leadership emphasized more on the traits of the leaders, but never clarified as if these traits are inherited in the leaders or can be learned with time through adequate education or training (Allen ...
Leadership: A Comprehensive Review of Literature, Research and
Table 2: Studies of Leadership Traits and Characteristics Source: Leadership: Theory and Practice, P.G., Northouse. 2004, Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. 46 Asian Institute of Research Journal of Economics and Business Vol.3, No.1, 2020 Researchers who pursue a trait approach to leadership assume that leaders are different from other people, and ...
PDF Traits and Skills Theories as the Nexus between Leadership and ...
Based on a research review on the trait theory of leadership and what is known about the concept of expertise, this paper attempts to find a convergence between leader and expert traits. Results suggest that leaders and experts may share similar characteristics. However, the concept of expertise also encompasses skills theory.
Leadership: Do Traits Matter? on JSTOR
Academy of Management Executive. 1991 Vol. 5 No. 2. Leadership: do traits matter? Shelley A. Kirkpatrick and Edwin A. Locke, University of Maryland. Executive Overview The study of leader traits has a long and controversial history.
Leadership: A Comprehensive Review of Literature, Research and
This paper provides a comprehensive literature review on the research and theoretical framework of leadership. The author illuminates the historical foundation of leadership theories and then ...
The Emergence of Emergent Leadership: A Comprehensive Framework and
A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. ... Paper presented at the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI. ... Taras V. 2018. National culture and leadership research between 2003 and 2014: A review ...
(PDF) Leadership Traits and Attributes
Muczyk and Adler. Muczyk and Adler themselves provided a lengthy list of leadership traits based on their. review of the literature, including "passion to lead", "will to manage", a lar ge ...
Analysis of Leader Effectiveness in Organization and Knowledge Sharing
Submit Paper. SAGE Open. Impact Factor: 2.0 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 2.3 . Journal Homepage. Submit Paper. ... the characteristics of leaders as members of organizations play an important role in leadership effectiveness. ... Hogg M. A. (2005). Research in leadership, self, and identity: A sample of the present and a glimpse of the future. The ...
Leadership styles, work engagement and outcomes among information and
Leadership is the most commonly discussed topic in the organizational sciences. Lines of research may be delineated along three major approaches: trait, behavioral and inspirational. Trait theorists seek to identify a set of universal leadership traits whereas behaviorists focused on behaviors exhibited by specific leaders.
Leadership Theories and Styles: A Literature Review
The trait theory suggests that certain personality traits, such as intelligence, courage, and assertiveness, are inherent and essential to be a good leader (Fleenor, 2006).