Subject: Call for Papers: Literary Theory at CEA 2025
Call for Papers, Literary Theory at CEA 2025
March 27-29, 2025 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Sonesta Philadelphia Rittenhouse Square 1800 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103
215.561.7500
The College English Association, a gathering of scholar-teachers in English studies, welcomes proposals for presentations on literary theory for our 54th annual conference. Submit your proposal electronically by November 1, 2024 , through our conference management database housed at the following web address: www.cea-web.org
For this area, we are particularly interested in proposals that relate literary theory to the conference theme of freedom from academics from a wide range of areas across literary studies, creative writing, rhetoric, composition, technical communication, linguistics, and film.
Conference Theme: Freedom
As the location of CEA 2025 , Philadelphia is perfect for the present moment. Here, the spirit of the American Revolution and the ideals that would drive it were born. The Declaration of Independence, penned and ratified in Philadelphia, argued that “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” were “inalienable rights.” As a nation, we continue to wrestle with the words of the Declaration and the men who signed it. However, our commitment to liberty is unwavering, even in the face of multiple challenges to our freedoms, our autonomy, and our choices. At the CEA, we hold close especially the belief in academic freedom.
CEA 2025 welcomes papers and panels that address our discipline from multiple perspectives and across a wide range of areas, including literary studies, creative writing, rhetoric, composition, technical communication, linguistics, and film. And, in the spirit of Philadelphia, we are especially interested in presentations that incorporate topics related to FREEDOM as it relates to literary theory in texts, disciplines, people, cultural studies, media, and pedagogy.
For your proposal you might consider, regarding literary theory:
§ Freedom regarding races, classes, cultures, regions, genders, or sexualities
§ Freedom between disciplines, languages, or generations
§ Cultural or ideological freedom in theoretical, scholarly, or literary works
§ Freedom as construct, form, metaphor, motif, or icon
§ Threats or challenges to freedom explored in theoretical texts and the cultures and
societies they address
§ Freedom regarding theory and practice, reading and writing, writer and audience
§ Academic freedom in teaching and scholarship; faculty and administrators; professors
and students
§ Freedom and materiality
§ Connections between text and images or sound
§ Digital humanities and freedom
General Call for Papers
CEA also welcomes proposals for presentations in any of the areas English departments typically encompass, including literary criticism and scholarship, creative writing, composition, technical communication, linguistics, and film. We also welcome papers on areas that influence our work as academics, including student demographics, student/instructor accountability and assessment, student advising, academic leadership in departments and programs, and the place of the English department in the university.
Submission: August 15-November 1, 2024
Proposals should be between 250 and 500 words in length and should include a title. Please note that only one proposal may be submitted per participant. Notifications of proposal status will be sent in early December. For more information on how to submit, please see the full CFP at www.cea-web.org
Membership All presenters at the CEA 2025 conference must become members of CEA by January 1, 2025. To join CEA, please go to www.cea-web.org
Other questions? Please email Cynthia Leenerts at [email protected] .
Cynthia Leenerts
Associate Prof. of English
East Stroudsburg University
200 Prospect St.
East Stroudsburg, PA 18301
An Indiana court’s ruling to the contrary would generate absurd results if allowed to stand.
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), the U.S. Supreme Court abandoned its mistaken rulings in Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), affirming that American political communities are constitutionally permitted to regulate abortion. Soon after Dobbs , Indiana enacted Senate Enrolled Act No. 1 (what we call the “abortion law”), which prohibits abortion except when a pregnancy seriously endangers a mother’s health or life, a pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, or the unborn child has a “lethal . . . anomaly.”
Several claimants challenged the abortion law as a violation of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. They argued, in other words, that because the abortion law imposes a substantial burden on their religious exercise, rooted in the sincerely held religious belief that abortions are sometimes not only permissible but required, they are entitled to an exemption from the law. A number of legal commentators have advanced similar arguments. And in the spring of 2024, an Indiana appeals court agreed, for the most part, with the challengers’ claims. While acknowledging that the federal and state constitutions permit Indiana to regulate abortion, the court concluded that the challengers were likely to succeed with their claim that the state cannot justify enforcing the abortion law in cases where such enforcement burdens religious exercise.
The court of appeals was wrong, though, and Indiana’s supreme court should reject its reasoning (as we have argued in an amicus brief). Indiana, quite appropriately, protects the fundamental right to religious freedom. That right, however, does not entitle the claimants to an exemption from the state’s duly enacted and constitutionally permissible abortion law.
Under Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act—modeled on the federal religious-liberty statute—a person who shows that government rule or action “substantially burden[s]” his “exercise of religion” is entitled to an exemption unless the government establishes that enforcement is the “least restrictive means” of furthering a “compelling governmental interest.” The lower courts accepted, and we assume as well, that the abortion law could, in at least some cases, burden persons’ religious exercise. In the view of the Indiana challengers, and of the lower Indiana courts, that burden is unjustified under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Why? Because the existence of some exceptions in the abortion law (for example, in cases where continuing the pregnancy endangers a mother’s life) shows that applying it to religious claimants is not essential to advancing a compelling interest. In technical legal terms, so the argument goes, the application of the abortion law to the challengers fails “strict scrutiny.”
But, as we will explain, absurd results would follow from this argument. For starters, it should be clear that Indiana’s abortion law—and other states’ laws regulating abortion—advances a “compelling” government interest. As the Indiana Supreme Court put it in another case, “it is a traditional exercise of the States’ police powers to protect the health and safety of their citizens.” The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the same principle. Indeed, perhaps there is no higher compelling interest than saving a human life. And the Supreme Court made clear in Dobbs that states can determine that human physical life begins at conception, a determination that Indiana has made under its abortion law. It should be a straightforward matter of deductive reasoning that Indiana may thus assert a compelling interest in the protection of prenatal human lives.
Next, Indiana’s law clearly advances that compelling interest. It does what it is designed and permitted to do. After all, it prohibits nearly all abortions. True, it does not govern the disposition of embryos outside the womb or preclude abortions when the mother’s life or health is at risk or in case of rape, incest, or a lethal fetal anomaly. Still, “abortion” is otherwise prohibited “in all instances.” This prohibition covers nearly all abortions that would otherwise be performed, so it saves some human lives.
Enforcement of the abortion law, without exemptions for religious objectors, is “the least restrictive means” for promoting the government’s interest. The claimants do not contest this. The law prohibits only “abortion,” and it defines “abortion” as “the termination of human pregnancy with an intention other than to produce a live birth or to remove a dead fetus.” Protecting each individual life is a compelling interest, and every abortion that Indiana prevents necessarily advances this interest. It is hard to imagine a tighter link between regulation and state interest. It is obvious that a less restrictive law—with even a single added exception—would advance the interest less.
Unsurprisingly, then, those seeking religious exemptions from the abortion law did not (as litigants usually do in “strict scrutiny” cases) identify any less burdensome alternative enforcement that would advance the state’s interest just as well. Nor did the challengers, or the lower courts, point to any application of the abortion law that does not advance that interest.
How could they? Any religion-based exemption would, by definition, undermine the government’s interest in saving prenatal human lives. The religious-freedom accommodation that the challengers seek is, necessarily and directly, in conflict with the government’s compelling interest. In another Indiana case, when a mother claimed a religious right to beat her child, the least restrictive method—and, indeed, the only method—for the state to vindicate its compelling interest in preventing child abuse was to deny the requested accommodation. The same is true in the abortion context. Since the interest in saving prenatal lives is compelling, the law advances it, and any less restrictive law would advance it less, Indiana’s law satisfies strict scrutiny.
Indiana’s court of appeals—like the commentators who have pressed religious-liberty arguments against the enforcement of abortion regulations—insisted that the law is not the least restrictive means just because it has a few closely drawn exceptions. But the question a court must ask under the “least restrictive means” analysis is whether the accommodation requested would undermine the state’s interest. And in this case, any accommodation would.
The cases cited by the Indiana appellate court only reinforce this contrast. In Holt v. Hobbs (2015), for example, an Arkansas prison forbade an inmate to grow a half-inch beard for religious reasons. But the prison’s allowance of beards for health reasons suggested the state interest in ensuring prison security “could be achieved by narrower ordinances that burdened religion to a far lesser degree.” In that case, exemptions for secular conduct revealed that the state’s goal could be achieved in less restrictive ways. Sometimes the same point is proven not simply by a law’s exceptions, but by a state’s lighter regulations of some types of conduct compared with the desired religious conduct. That was the crux of Tandon v. Newsom (2021), where the Supreme Court expressed concern about the double standards at work in the regulation of social gatherings during the Covid-19 pandemic. The regulations’ under-inclusiveness mattered, and ultimately required an exemption for religious gatherings, only because it pointed to a less restrictive way of accomplishing the government’s goals. California’s allowance of larger secular gatherings—if they observed certain precautions—suggested a less restrictive approach to religious groups, namely letting them “gather in larger numbers while using [the same] precautions.”
The situation with abortion regulations is entirely different. Here, it is not a matter of assessing risks and designing precautions. Here, it is just a fact that any accommodation will undermine the government’s asserted—and, after Dobbs , constitutionally permissible—aim. Here, there is no way to protect a prenatal human life other than to prohibit a requested religious accommodation that, by its very design, would end that life. That the abortion law has some exceptions, unrelated to religious exercise, is irrelevant. Neither Holt nor Tandon —the rulings most heavily relied on by academics favoring the appeals court’s decision—provides support for the notion that abortion laws tend to flunk the “least restrictive means” inquiry.
Nor do the exceptions prove that Indiana’s interest in saving prenatal lives is not compelling. Each is easily explained as a way to prevent a weighty harm that a religious carve-out would not prevent. As the U.S. Supreme Court has stressed, even in cases applying “strict scrutiny,” it has “upheld laws . . . that could conceivably have restricted even greater amounts of [protected conduct] in service of their stated interests” when the state could adequately explain why the existing exceptions were not similarly situated to the requested accommodations.
In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (2010), for example, the Supreme Court rejected a free-speech challenge to a law that prohibited “training” and “expert advice or assistance” to terrorist groups, even though that law included exceptions for “independent advocacy” or provision of “religious materials” to those terrorist groups. The challengers in that case argued that these exemptions demonstrated a lack of even-handedness and were fatal to the law under “strict scrutiny.” The Court disagreed, and explained that “the Government, when seeking to prevent imminent harms . . . is not required to conclusively link all the pieces in the puzzle before we grant weight to its empirical conclusions.” Further, the Court noted that the legislature was protecting other weighty concerns with these exceptions and that it should not replace the legislature’s “careful balancing” of “competing interests” with the Court’s own judgment.
In the same way, Indiana’s exceptions to the abortion law are not comparable with the requested religious accommodations: existing exceptions were meant to protect weighty interests that would not equally compel a religious exemption. For instance, protecting access to medically indicated procedures advances Indiana’s weighty interests in maternal life and health. Indiana could well have determined that pregnancies resulting from rape or incest implicate other serious policy concerns; that such pregnancies could bring acute psychological pain; that ending them might be excused, by analogy to the duress defense; or that juries might thus refuse to convict in such cases, and that limited enforcement resources are therefore better spent elsewhere.
The abortion law does not bar in vitro fertilization, but this fact does not compel a religious exemption. Indiana could easily have concluded that some aspects of IVF do less harm to its interest in protecting prenatal life or that regulating IVF would raise knotty enforcement questions best addressed separately. The state could conclude that, say, terminating the lives of embryos, and ending their development toward birth and maturity, is not the same as thawing frozen embryos that were never going to be implanted, and also that requiring the implantation of all embryos created during IVF would implicate constitutional rights against forced medical treatments and interventions.
The Indiana court did not engage these important considerations and distinctions. Instead, its basis for denying that the abortion law’s exceptions could be adequately explained was the mere fact that Indiana was willing to make them. This circular reasoning, if followed, would mean that no laws with exceptions can ever survive strict scrutiny. No doubt the existence of a secular exemption will certainly trigger strict scrutiny. But exemptions are not automatically fatal to strict scrutiny where they do not provide evidence that the government has less restrictive means of protecting the religious right (and accomplishing its compelling interest to boot). The existing exemptions provide no such evidence of less restrictive means. Even setting that argument aside, the exemptions are not comparable.
It is worth noting that the challengers’ argument (and the lower courts’ rulings) lead to absurd results. All laws, after all, need limits. For example, as Eugene Volokh has observed in another context, “even . . . bans on intentional homicide have exceptions—execution of a lawful sentence, killing in war, police killing of a dangerous fleeing felon, killing in self-defense or in defense of another, and disconnecting life-sustaining equipment at a patient’s request.” Criminals can also receive an insanity defense for an otherwise wrongful killing. A per se rule that secular exceptions require religious exemptions would mean that, for instance, religiously motivated killing—honor killing, stoning, exorcisms, child sacrifice—must be permitted because of these exceptions. Yet no court has ever held that religious accommodations are warranted from a homicide law.
Similarly, if the law let a doctor perform an osteotomy (that is, a procedure that requires the breaking of a bone to reshape or realign a bone), a per se rule triggering accommodations based on secular exemptions would mean that a parent could seek a religious accommodation to break a child’s bones for religious reasons. For that matter, the general common-law defense of “necessity” would trigger religious exemptions from all criminal laws. After all, that defense effectively gives each criminal law at least one exception; by the lower court’s logic, a religious exemption would then be required. That cannot be right—which is why no court, prior to this case, has ever said as much.
The right to religious freedom is a foundational human right. However, it does not guarantee, and never has required, exemptions for religious believers from any and all important regulations. Under the U.S. Constitution, legislatures are permitted to regulate abortion, to define human life as beginning at conception, and to assert and pursue their compelling interest in protecting such life. That such regulation might burden the sincere religious objections of some does not entitle them to damage that interest. Denying a religious exemption from the abortion law would satisfy strict scrutiny under Indiana law.
Stephanie H. Barclay is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center. Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame Law School.
Photo by Jeremy Hogan/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
City Journal is a publication of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research (MI), a leading free-market think tank. Are you interested in supporting the magazine? As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, donations in support of MI and City Journal are fully tax-deductible as provided by law (EIN #13-2912529).
Copyright © 2024 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
EIN #13-2912529
Scholarships
Test Series NEW
Strong preparation is essential for Class 10 Board Exams. This is the crucial stage in a student’s academic journey on which many career options depend. Thus it becomes very important to excel in the exam with good scores. To help students with their exam preparation, Allen has provided the CBSE Class 10 Question Papers for English on this page.
CBSE Class 10 Previous Year Question Papers (PYQs) of English are available on its official website. These papers are useful as students get direct exposure to questions that have been asked in the past. PYQ allows students to understand how much time is to be allocated to each section so that none of the questions is left unattempted in the real examination.
Students preparing for Board Exams 2025 are advised to download the Previous Year's Question Papers to excel in their board exams.
CBSE 10th English Previous Question Paper 2024: Students can check and download the PDF of CBSE Class 10 English Question Paper 2024 from this page.
All the sets of CBSE Class 10 English Question Papers will be uploaded here soon in PDF format.
Download the Question Paper for CBSE 10th English 2024 and the Previous Year’s Question Paper for CBSE Class 10 English from the table given below.
CBSE Class 10 English 2024 Paper (Language & Literature) | Download PDF (Available Soon) |
CBSE Class 10 English 2024 Paper (Communicative) | Download PDF (Available Soon) |
CBSE Class 10 English 2023 Paper (Language & Literature) | Download PDF (Available Soon) |
Solving CBSE Class 10th Previous Year Papers for English has numerous advantages for the students. Here are some of the most important benefits:
Section-Wise Weightage of CBSE Class 10 English
|
|
| |
| Reading Skills | Conceptual understanding, decoding, analysing, inferring, interpreting, and vocabulary | 20 |
| Writing Skills with Grammar | Creative expression of an opinion, reasoning, justifying, illustrating, appropriacy of style and tone, using appropriate format and fluency. Applying conventions, using integrated structures with accuracy and fluency | 20 |
| Language through Literature | Recalling, reasoning, appreciating, applying literary conventions illustrating and justifying, etc. Extract relevant information, identify the central theme and sub-theme, understand the writer’s message, and write fluently | 40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discursive passage of 400-450 words | 10 marks | Multiple Choice Questions / Objective Type Questions and Short Answer Questions (to be answered in 30-40 words) | |
Case-based factual passage (with visual input- statistical data, chart etc.) of 200-250 words. | 10 marks | ||
|
|
|
|
English Grammar |
|
| |
Determiners | 10 Marks | Accurate use of spelling, punctuation and grammar in context through various Gap Filling/ Editing/Transformation exercises. | |
Tenses | |||
Modals | |||
Subject-verb concord | |||
Reported speech | |||
-Commands and requests | |||
-Statements | |||
-Questions | |||
Writing Skills |
|
| |
Writing a Formal Letter based on a given situation | 5 marks | Word Limit 100-120 words | |
Writing an Analytical Paragraph on a given Map / Chart / Graph / Cue/ s. | 5 marks | Word Limit 100-120 words | |
|
|
|
|
Reference to the Context | 5+5= 10 Marks |
| |
One extract out of two from Drama / Prose |
| ||
One extract out of two from poetry |
| ||
|
|
| |
Long Answer- 1 (First Flight) | 4×3=12 marks | Any 4 of 5 | |
Long Answer-2 (Footprints Without Feet) | 2×3=6 marks | Any 2 of 3 | |
Very Long Answer -1 (First Flight) | 6 Marks | Any 1 of 2 | |
Very Long Answer-2 (Footprints Without Feet) | 6 Marks | Any 1 of 2 |
These papers are available on the official website of the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). Various educational platforms and study resource websites might also offer these papers for practice.
Solving these papers promotes better exam-taking techniques, comprehension of key concepts, and time management. It helps with self-evaluation and gives students the chance to practice various question formats.
Yes, these papers frequently have answers or answer keys available. Students can access these answers via study guides, instructional websites, and, in some circumstances, official board releases.
CBSE Class 10 Board Exam will be conducted tentatively from February 2025 to March 2025.
Cbse class 10 solved maths previous year papers.
The CBSE Class 10 previous year papers are essential for effective practice and revision.
Class 10 Board examinations determine the level of learning of different subjects that the students have acquired
CBSE is responsible for conducting the exam, so it provides sample papers and previous-year questions as well.
Students may go through or download their 10 standard CBSE syllabus for all subjects, which covers the entire curriculum.
This article aims to provide students with useful information on chapter-wise weightage, and effective preparation tips to help them succeed in the CBSE Class 10 Science exam for 2025.
NCERT CBSE Class 10 Maths Syllabus has been provided to assist students in understanding all the chapters and preparing their study plans.
Join the community, edit social preview.
Remove a code repository from this paper, mark the official implementation from paper authors, add a new evaluation result row.
TASK | DATASET | MODEL | METRIC NAME | METRIC VALUE | GLOBAL RANK | REMOVE |
---|
Add a method, remove a method, edit datasets, freeaugment: data augmentation search across all degrees of freedom.
7 Sep 2024 · Tom Bekor , Niv Nayman , Lihi Zelnik-Manor · Edit social preview
Data augmentation has become an integral part of deep learning, as it is known to improve the generalization capabilities of neural networks. Since the most effective set of image transformations differs between tasks and domains, automatic data augmentation search aims to alleviate the extreme burden of manually finding the optimal image transformations. However, current methods are not able to jointly optimize all degrees of freedom: (1) the number of transformations to be applied, their (2) types, (3) order, and (4) magnitudes. Many existing methods risk picking the same transformation more than once, limit the search to two transformations only, or search for the number of transformations exhaustively or iteratively in a myopic manner. Our approach, FreeAugment, is the first to achieve global optimization of all four degrees of freedom simultaneously, using a fully differentiable method. It efficiently learns the number of transformations and a probability distribution over their permutations, inherently refraining from redundant repetition while sampling. Our experiments demonstrate that this joint learning of all degrees of freedom significantly improves performance, achieving state-of-the-art results on various natural image benchmarks and beyond across other domains. Project page at https://tombekor.github.io/FreeAugment-web
Tasks edit add remove, datasets edit.
Methods edit add remove.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas. Freedom does not mean that you violate others right, it does not mean that you disregard other rights. Moreover, freedom means enchanting the beauty of nature and the environment around us. The Freedom of Speech. Freedom of speech is the most common and prominent right that every ...
Freedom is a concept that has been debated and defined in various ways throughout history. For some, it means the ability to make choices without interference or constraint. For others, it is about liberation from oppression and the pursuit of self-determination. In my essay, I will explore what freedom means to me personally and how it ...
1. Essay on "Freedom" by Pragati Ghosh. "Freedom is non denial of our basic rights as humans. Some freedom is specific to the age group that we fall into. A child is free to be loved and cared by parents and other members of family and play around. So this nurturing may be the idea of freedom to a child.
Freedom of association. Freedom of belief. Freedom of speech. Freedom to express oneself. Freedom of the press. Freedom to choose one's state in life. Freedom of religion. Freedom from bondage and slavery. The list can even continue because every individual's wish and perspective differ.
500+ Words Essay on Freedom. We are all familiar with the word 'freedom', but you will hear different versions from different people if you ask about it. The definition of freedom varies from person to person. According to some people, freedom means doing something as per their wish; for some people, it means taking a stand for themselves.
500 Words Essay on Freedom Understanding Freedom. Freedom, a concept deeply ingrained in human consciousness, is often perceived as the absence of restrictions and the ability to exercise one's rights and powers at will. It is a fundamental right and the cornerstone of modern democratic societies. However, the concept of freedom is ...
500 Words Essay on Importance of Freedom The Concept of Freedom. Freedom, a term often used in political, social, and philosophical discourse, is a concept that has been at the core of human civilization. It is the inherent human right to act, speak, or think without hindrance or restraint. Freedom is a multifaceted construct, encompassing ...
Freedom of Speech. Freedom of speech is the freedom to express our beliefs without hurting others. It is a right that we all must utilise and talk against injustice. Freedom of speech is the right that can be infused even to the commoners. Everyone has the right to express their feelings, beliefs and thoughts.
Freedom Essay Topics. American (Indian, Taiwanese, Scottish) independence. Freedom and homelessness essay. The true value of freedom in modern society. How slavery affects personal freedom. The problem of human rights and freedoms. American citizens' rights and freedoms. The benefits and disadvantages of unlimited freedom.
Freedom is an essential part of an individual's life, permitting them to choose their own path and stand up for their beliefs (Junger, 2021). It empowers them to create their own life experiences, both good and bad, and to learn and grow from them. In most cases, freedom also helps a person to be creative and explore the world around them.
Also Read: English Essay Topics. Also Read: How to Write an Essay in English. Also Read: Speech on Republic Day for Class 12th. Essay on Freedom in 100 Words. Freedom is considered the essence of human existence because it serves as the cornerstone on which societal developments and individual identities are shaped.
A.1 Freedom fighters made our country independent. They gave up their lives so we could have a bright future free from colonization. Q.2 Name some of the Indian freedom fighters. A.2 Some of the famous India freedom fighters were Mahatma Gandhi, Rani Lakshmi Bai, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, and Jawaharlal Nehru.
Throughout history, the concept of freedom has undergone profound transformations, shaped by the evolving sociopolitical, cultural, and technological landscapes. As societies progress, the understanding and pursuit of freedom have adapted to new contexts and challenges. In this essay, we... Freedom. 553 Words | 1 Page.
Freedom, a concept deeply ingrained in the human experience, holds a different meaning for each individual. As I ponder the significance of freedom in my own life, I am reminded of its multifaceted nature and the ways in which it shapes my perspectives, choices, and aspirations. This essay explores what freedom means to me, touching upon personal autonomy, the pursuit of dreams, social justice ...
Freedom can mean the capacity to do something or be someone without restraints or limitations. It can also refer to independence from the influence of others. There are several types of human freedom: physical, political, natural, social, and many more. Free will is defined as the ability to make an independent choice.
This short essay on freedom in English is an excellent way to help kids learn about Indian independence. India had an active freedom movement that started in the late 19th century. The Indian freedom movement was a significant movement to gain independence from the colonial rule. It started in the early 1800s and led to the Independence of ...
Example Conclusion Paragraph for a Persuasive Freedom Essay: ... Economic inequality, English-language films, Sociology, Surveillance . 20 The Multiple Interpretation of Concept of Freedom in "Incidents in The Life of a Slave Girl" 4 pages / 2115 words . Harriet Jacobs' moving text Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl is an incredible ...
Essay on Freedom: The liberty to act according to one's own wishes and choice without being held back by any restrictions or conditions is called freedom. India achieved freedom from British rule on 15th August 1947. Achieving independence from oppression or slavery is also a form of autonomy. Freedom of speech, the expression is granted by ...
Download Important English Essay on the Topic - Freedom of Speech Free PDF from Vedantu. One of the fundamental rights of the citizens of India is 'Freedom of Speech'. This is allowed to the citizens by a lot of countries to empower the citizens to share their own thoughts and views. This freedom of speech essay is for students of class 5 ...
Essay on Freedom Fighters of India in English: Freedom Fighters were those great leaders who sacrificed their lives with fearless courage to bring freedom to the Nation. They faced pains, exploitation, immense torture, and hardships to bring freedom. So, people considered them the epitome of patriotic people.
Freedom of speech is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution. This right is mandatory for an equal and free society where everyone has the freedom to express themselves. The freedom of speech states, ' All citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression.'. The concept of freedom of speech goes back ...
The essay serves as a reminder of the profound impact that storytelling and education can have on individuals and communities. Key Takeaways: - The Freedom Writers essay originated from the diary entries of a group of high school students. - The essay documents the students' personal experiences, struggles, and growth.
Freedom of speech is a fundamental right that has been the subject of much debate and controversy in recent years. From historical origins to modern-day implications, the concept of freedom of speech has far-reaching significance in promoting democracy, preserving individual rights, and shaping societal discourse.This essay will explore the definition, importance, limitations, controversial ...
§ Digital humanities and freedom General Call for Papers. CEA also welcomes proposals for presentations in any of the areas English departments typically encompass, including literary criticism and scholarship, creative writing, composition, technical communication, linguistics, and film. We also welcome papers on areas that influence our work ...
The religious-freedom accommodation that the challengers seek is, necessarily and directly, in conflict with the government's compelling interest. In another Indiana case, when a mother claimed a religious right to beat her child, the least restrictive method—and, indeed, the only method—for the state to vindicate its compelling interest ...
Solving CBSE Class 10th Previous Year Papers for English has numerous advantages for the students. Here are some of the most important benefits: Familiarize students with the CBSE Class 10 exam pattern: Effective time management is one of the hardest things for students to do on the board exam. By practising CBSE's previous year's question ...
However, current methods are not able to jointly optimize all degrees of freedom: (1) the number of transformations to be applied, their (2) types, (3) order, and (4) magnitudes. Many existing methods risk picking the same transformation more than once, limit the search to two transformations only, or search for the number of transformations ...