All Trademarks, Service Marks & Trade Names
| | Gallery of Our WorkBible restoration, clamshell boxes, custom binding, conservation, designer binding, hot foil stamping, periodical binding, restoration, services & pricing, special projects, in the news, privacy notice. - Center for Excellence in Writing >
- For UB Students >
- Graduate Students >
Dissertation Buddies ProgramGraduate students working on dissertation projects are welcome and encouraged to use our individual consultation service to discuss their writing process or get feedback on drafts. You also may want to consider our new Dissertation Buddies program, which allows you to work up to once weekly with the same consultant who can also act as an accountability partner and someone with whom you can discuss the “soft skills” of dissertation writing such as time management, focus, goal setting, overcoming obstacles, working with your advisor, and so on. Your dissertation buddy will be a fellow dissertation writer who has received special training in productivity strategies, but the program is designed to be one of mutual support for forward progress. In addition to your weekly appointment with your dissertation buddy, you are welcome to schedule additional appointments (up to 3 per week) with other consultants to work on drafts. How do I sign up?Sign up here! What is the commitment?It is totally up to you. The program is designed for a weekly appointment, but if you prefer every other week or even monthly, we can set that up. You can withdraw from the appointment at any time by just emailing [email protected]. You can also send us an email if you feel that your buddy is not the best match, and we can facilitate a switch. If you decide to leave the Dissertation Buddies program, you will always have access to the support of consultation services when you need them. What is the matching process like?A variety of our PhD consultants are working on their dissertations and have expressed interest in the Dissertation Buddies program. The consultants who are available for this program are indicated on our Consultant’s page . Perhaps you have already formed a good partnership with a particular consultant and would like to choose them to be your buddy. Or you might request a particular consultant based upon their biographical description. You may want to select multiple possible consultants or leave it open because you and the consultant will need to have compatible schedules. How is this different than regular appointments with a consultant?This program is different from our regular consultation service in that it - is regular and ongoing, so the consultant will gain a familiarity with your work that may help with the feedback process.
- has a broader scope. In addition to getting feedback on your writing, you can discuss other aspects of dissertation writing such as how you are managing your time, achieving focus, working with your advisor, dealing with writing anxiety, and so on.
- serves as a form of accountability. You and your partner can share specific goals for the next meeting and then report back.
- is mutually beneficial. The consultant, who is also writing their dissertation, will benefit from having someone to talk with about the dissertation journey, and you will be their accountability partner!
Anything else I should know?- Because this is a new program, we will really appreciate your feedback at the end of the academic year.
- You can reach out to [email protected] with any questions or concerns.
“Born to Birth”? - Surrogacy Workers in Saint Petersburg- Published 20 June 2013
- Sociology, Law
4 CitationsReproductive migrations: surrogacy workers and stratified reproduction in st petersburg. - Highly Influenced
- 13 Excerpts
Emerging “repronubs” and “repropreneurs”: Transnational surrogacy in Ghana, Kazakhstan, and LaosThe routledge handbook of anthropology and reproduction, changing fertility landscapes: exploring the reproductive routes and choices of fertility patients from china for assisted reproduction in russia, related papers. Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers Saint Petersburg Sailing CenterLocation & HoursSuggest an edit 250 2nd Ave SE Saint Petersburg, FL 33701 Downtown St. Petersburg Amenities and MoreAsk the community. Ask a question Yelp users haven’t asked any questions yet about Saint Petersburg Sailing Center . People also searched forPaddle Boat Sailing Lessons Water Sports Boat Launch Recommended Reviews- Join our Mailing List
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
Is ‘weird-checking’ the new fact-checking?Aug 12, 2024 Examining social psychological principles that explain why Democrats’ strategy of calling ideas “weird” works.This blog post was co-authored by Madeline Jalbert , a postdoctoral scholar at the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, and Ira Hyman , a psychology professor at Western Washington University. - Democrats have recently started to call some Republican attitudes and behaviors “weird” — a strategy we refer to as weird-checking . The approach shares many similarities with social norm interventions that social psychologists have found to be effective.
- Our own attitudes and behaviors are heavily guided by perceived social norms — what we think others believe and do. Unfortunately, people frequently have incorrect views of which ideas are widely shared. Extreme and minority views are often overrepresented in the media, making them appear to be more common and acceptable than they are.
- Weird-checking communicates what others actually believe and can disrupt these inflated perceptions of consensus . It can also orient us to more carefully consider whether the attitude or behavior is consistent with societal values and expectations. This strategy can be used to address problematic attitudes and behaviors that can not be addressed through traditional fact-checking methods
That’s just weird . Over the last few weeks, you have probably seen Democrats referring to some Republican ideas and policy proposals as weird. Thanks to Tim Walz, the Minnesota Governor and Democratic vice presidential nominee, weird has become a central part of the political discourse. The news media is currently flooded with discussion of this new strategy and its success, with a few examples of recent headlines including “Democrats Embrace ‘Weird’ Messaging on Trump” (from The New York Times ), “Why the ‘Weird’ Label is Working for Kamala Harris’” (from the BBC ), and “‘Weird’ is Democrat’s Most Effective Insult” (from The Washington Post ). This approach represents a shift away from Democrat’s standard fact-checking attempts (see this recent TechDirt piece by Mike Masnick for a discussion). We’ve started to refer to this strategy as “weird-checking” — like fact-checking, but checking if something is weird instead of checking if it’s true. Why does weird-checking work? One key reason for its success can be explained by its appeal to social norms, which play a powerful role in whether we accept or reject an idea or action. As individuals, we look to what others believe and endorse to inform our own attitudes and behaviors (e.g., Schwarz & Jalbert, 2021 ). The phenomenon of checking our ideas and actions against what others believe and do is referred to as “social proof” (Cialdini, 2009) — if something has broad acceptance, there must be something to it (Festinger, 1954) . When we see that others endorse a message, we’re also more likely to endorse it (Cialdini, 2009) . Unfortunately, we may not know what other people think. This is because our perceptions of what others believe and do are often constructed through our own experiences rather than from information about actual rates (Tankard & Paluck, 2016) . For example, we typically assess the popularity of an opinion by relying on cues like how familiar it feels or how many times we recall seeing it in the news or on social media. We’re less likely to use information obtained through an opinion poll. Indeed, media exposure is our primary source of information on many issues (Shehata & Strömbäck, 2021; Su et al., 2015) . Media is not, however, constructed to be representative of the actual distribution of beliefs and opinions that exist in the world. Instead, the news disproportionately shares extreme and uncommon views (e.g., Koehler, 2016) , and our social media algorithms often prioritize sensational content that grabs and maintains our engagement (e.g., Bucher & Helmond, 2018; Dujeancourt & Garz, 2023) . Media exposure can shift our perception of norms (Gunther et al., 2006; Paluck, 2009) , and disproportionate exposure to reports of minority attitudes and behaviors may make those attitudes and behaviors seem more common and acceptable than they actually are. Some of our work has found that the mere repetition of information increases perceptions that the information has consensus — an “illusory consensus” effect (Jalbert & Pillai, 2024) . Other researchers have found that repeated exposure to reports of immoral behaviors makes them seem more common and, in turn, more acceptable (Pillai et al., 2023) . These processes may help explain why people have a tendency to overestimate the extremity of views of those who do not share their political orientation or underestimate how many others actually share their own policy-related opinion (e.g., Levendusky & Malhotra, 2016; Yang et al., 2016) . For example, most people believe that climate change is a substantial problem that their government should address but substantially underestimate the percentage of people who agree with them (Andre et al., 2024; Sparkman et al., 2022) . In addition to the effects of being exposed to information, other aspects of the messages may also lead people to (often incorrectly) believe those ideas have widespread consensus. Politicians frequently bake information about broad consensus into their messages. A recurring part of Trump’s rhetoric includes referring to the “many people” who say or believe the message he wants to promote. For example, in a press conference last Thursday, Trump (incorrectly) claimed that “They wanted to get rid of Roe v. Wade and that’s Democrats, Republicans, and Independents, and everybody. Liberals, conservatives, everybody wanted it back in the states” (Montanaro, 2024) . As another example, U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) argued on May 8, “We all know, intuitively, that a lot of illegals are voting in federal elections.” In this case, Johnson was not only repeating false information (Swenson, 2024) but was also claiming that this was something widely known and accepted. Combined with the influences of disproportionate and repeated news coverage, these political messages can easily mislead people on which positions are widely held. Weird-checking as a social norms interventionA recent survey by Data for Progress asked US voters to judge how weird they found recent claims made and actions taken by members of the Republican party. Most voters found several of them — including claiming that Kamala Harris only recently became a Black person and supporting the monitoring of pregnant women to prevent them from traveling for reproductive healthcare — to be “very weird” (Springs, 2024) . When left unchecked, the disproportionate and repeated coverage of these behaviors may make them especially susceptible to falsely inflated perceptions of consensus. Without looking at this poll, people may not know that the majority of other people also find these behaviors to be abnormal. By weird-checking unpopular beliefs, including these, Democrats are helping communicate more accurate perceptions of the true state of consensus. Communicating information around consensus is a powerful intervention, well-established by social psychologists to be effective in promoting belief correction and behavior change across a variety of domains. For example, communicating doctors’ consensus around COVID-19 vaccines can increase vaccination rates (Bartoš et al., 2022) , and sharing social norms around engaging in energy and water conservation habits can increase those behaviors (Goldstein et al., 2008; Nolan et al., 2008; Schultz et al., 2007) . Communicating consensus information can also be used to reduce undesirable behaviors like littering (Kallgren et al., 2000) and drinking and driving (Perkins et al., 2010) . And, more recently, sharing consensus information has been found to help reduce belief in misinformation (Ecker et al., 2023) . Communication around consensus also does not have to be explicit to change our minds. In some of our work, we’ve investigated how false information shared online is evaluated when it appears with social truth queries: questions posed by another user drawing attention to whether information is true (e.g., “How do you know this is true?”, “Is there evidence for that?”, “Do other people believe that?”). We have consistently found that the presence of these truth queries reduces belief in and intent to share false information. These truth queries are thought to be effective in part because the mere act of asking a question disrupts assumptions that the information has consensus and changes how we process it (Jalbert et al., 2023) . Similarly, calling something weird may lead people to use a different frame than they normally would to guide how that information is interpreted and understood (see Starbird, 2023 , for a relevant discussion). An additional note is that these efforts may be effective even when they don’t convince everyone that a particular attitude or behavior is weird. Because people have a strong motivation to affiliate and receive the approval of others (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004) , just knowing that others consider a sentiment weird may make someone less likely to publicly endorse or share it. We also want to note an important limitation to our discussion of weird-checking so far. We have been focused on the effects of calling attitudes and behaviors weird. However, politicians have also been referring to the people who promote these attitudes and engage in these behaviors as weird too. Doing so may lead people to reconsider those politicians in the same fashion — e.g., are these people reasonable? How similar are they to what people expect of someone who holds their position? How many others generally agree with their beliefs and values? Why weird-checking may sometimes be better than fact-checkingWhy might weird-checking be helping Democrats change the narrative in places where typical fact-checking efforts have been unsuccessful? In many situations, fact-checks can be effective in getting people to update their beliefs (Walter & Murphy, 2018) . However, fact-checking has its shortcomings. One particularly important one is that attitudes and the acceptability of behaviors can’t be fact-checked. You can’t fact-check, for example, whether someone should support the monitoring of pregnant women to restrict their travel. But you can weird-check this view. In addition, the truth of a message is often nuanced and complicated, making it difficult to communicate and digest. Fact-checks ask us to focus on the specific details of an attitude held or action taken by one person. Weird-checking may allow us to bypass engaging these details (an often frustrating and not-so-fruitful task that distracts from the overarching takeaway) and instead do a more general gut check of whether the attitude or behavior is consistent with our values and norms and those our society endorses. Why weird-checking worksWhy does weird-checking work? Calling an attitude or behavior weird communicates information about social norms and consensus, factors that play a critical role in guiding our own beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Extreme and minority views are often overrepresented in the media, and repeated exposure to them may make them appear to be more common and acceptable than they actually are. Referring to an attitude or behavior as weird disrupts inflated perceptions of consensus, provides information about the views of others, and orients us to more carefully consider whether the attitude or behavior is consistent with societal values and expectations. You don’t have to use the word weird to get this effect. You could use a more traditional approach like sharing opinion poll information. Or you could try out another phrasing like unusual, strange, bizarre, or out-of-touch. But weird works. AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Drew Gorenz, Michael Grass, Angela Harwood, and Rachel Moran-Prestridge for their thoughtful input and suggestions on this piece. Illustration at top based on icons via The Noun Project . - Andre, P., Boneva, T., Chopra, F., & Falk, A. (2024). Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action. Nature Climate Change , 14 (3), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01925-3
- Bartoš, V., Bauer, M., Cahlíková, J., & Chytilová, J. (2022). Communicating doctors’ consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04805-y
- Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell, The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (pp. 233–253). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n14
- Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice . Boston: Pearson Education.
- Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology , 55 (1), 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
- Dujeancourt, E., & Garz, M. (2023). The effects of algorithmic content selection on user engagement with news on Twitter. The Information Society , 39 (5), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2023.2230471
- Ecker, U. K., Sanderson, J. A., McIlhiney, P., Rowsell, J. J., Quekett, H. L., Brown, G. D., & Lewandowsky, S. (2023). Combining refutations and social norms increases belief change. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 76 (6), 1275–1297. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221111750
- Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations , 7 (2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
- Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research , 35 (3), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910
- Gunther, A. C., Bolt, D., Borzekowski, D. L. G., Liebhart, J. L., & Dillard, J. P. (2006). Presumed influence on peer norms: How mass media indirectly affect adolescent smoking. Journal of Communication , 56 (1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00002.x
- Jalbert, M., & Pillai, R. M. (2024). An illusory consensus effect: The mere repetition of information increases estimates that others would believe or already know it . PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/65trk
- Jalbert, M., Wack, M., Arya, P., & Williams, L. (2023). Social truth queries: Development of a new user-driven intervention for countering online misinformation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition . https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000142
- Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: When Norms Do and Do not Affect Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 26 (8), 1002–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610009
- Koehler, D. J. (2016). Can journalistic “false balance” distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 22 (1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000073
- Levendusky, M. S., & Malhotra, N. (2016). (Mis)perceptions of partisan polarization in the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly , 80 (S1), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv045
- Montanaro, D. (2024, August 11). 162 lies and distortions in a news conference. NPR fact-checks former President Trump. NPR . https://www.npr.org/2024/08/11/nx-s1-5070566/trump-news-conference
- Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 34 (7), 913–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316691
- Paluck, E. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 96 (3), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011989
- Perkins, H. W., Linkenbach, J. W., Lewis, M. A., & Neighbors, C. (2010). Effectiveness of social norms media marketing in reducing drinking and driving: A statewide campaign. Addictive Behaviors , 35 (10), 866–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.05.004
- Pillai, R. M., Fazio, L. K., & Effron, D. A. (2023). Repeatedly encountered descriptions of wrongdoing seem more true but less unethical: Evidence in a naturalistic setting. Psychological Science , 34 (8), 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231180578
- Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science , 18 (5), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
- Schwarz, N., & Jalbert, M. (2021). When (fake) news feels true: Intuitions of truth and the acceptance and correction of misinformation (p. 25). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003121756-2
- Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2021). Learning political news from social media: Network media logic and current affairs news learning in a high-choice media environment. Communication Research , 48 (1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217749354
- Sparkman, G., Geiger, N., & Weber, E. U. (2022). Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half. Nature Communications , 13 (1), 4779. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32412-y
- Springs, A. (2024, August 5). Voters Think Recent GOP Actions and Quotes Are Very Weird . Data For Progress. https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2024/8/5/voters-think-recent-gop-actions-and-quotes-are-very-weird
- Starbird, K. (2023, December 6). Facts, frames, and (mis)interpretations: Understanding rumors as collective sensemaking. Center for an Informed Public . https://www.cip.uw.edu/2023/12/06/rumors-collective-sensemaking-kate-starbird/
- Su, L. Y.-F., Akin, H., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2015). Science news consumption patterns and their implications for public understanding of science. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly , 92 (3), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015586415
- Swenson, A. (2024, May 18). Noncitizen voting, already illegal in federal elections, becomes a centerpiece of 2024 GOP messaging . AP News. https://apnews.com/article/voting-immigrants-noncitizen-trump-republicans-2024-1c65429c152c2a10514b5156eacf9ca7
- Tankard, M. E., & Paluck, E. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review , 10 (1), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022
- Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs , 85 (3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
- Yang, J., Rojas, H., Wojcieszak, M., Aalberg, T., Coen, S., Curran, J., Hayashi, K., Iyengar, S., Jones, P. K., Mazzoleni, G., Papathanassopoulos, S., Rhee, J. W., Rowe, D., Soroka, S., & Tiffen, R. (2016). Why are “others” so polarized? Perceived political polarization and media use in 10 countries. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 21 (5), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12166
Share this:- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Join the CIP, KNKX and KUOW for ‘Stand with the Facts: Protecting Election Integrity’ on September 11Aug 6, 2024 You're invited to join KNKX, KUOW, and the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public (CIP) for Stand with the Facts: Protecting Election Integrity with special guest, NPR correspondent Shannon Bond — September 11, 7:30 p.m. in Town Hall Seattle’s Great Hall. Rumors questioning the legality and legitimacy of the presumptive Democratic presidential nomineeJul 31, 2024 In this unprecedented moment of American electoral history, we will continue to see narratives that question the legality and legitimacy of a nomination process, even once some of those answers have been made clear legally and procedurally. At ICA, CIP postdoctoral scholar Yiwei Xu receives top paper and outstanding dissertation awardsJul 23, 2024 CIP postdoctoral scholar Yiwei Xu with the International Communication Association's Information Systems Division Top Paper Award and the Annie Lang Outstanding Dissertation Award. Structural Analyses of a GABARAP~ATG3 Conjugate Uncover a Novel Non-covalent Ubl-E2 Backside Interaction- Find this author on Google Scholar
- Find this author on PubMed
- Search for this author on this site
- ORCID record for Takanori Otomo
- For correspondence: [email protected]
- Info/History
- Supplementary material
- Preview PDF
Members of the ATG8 family of ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) are conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) in the autophagosomal membrane, where they recruit degradation substrates and facilitate membrane biogenesis. Despite this well-characterized function, the mechanisms underlying the lipidation process, including the action of the E2 enzyme ATG3, remain incompletely understood. Here, we report the crystal structure of human ATG3 conjugated to the mammalian ATG8 protein GABARAP via an isopeptide bond, mimicking the Ubl~E2 thioester intermediate. In this structure, the GABARAP~ATG3 conjugate adopts an open configuration with minimal contacts between the two proteins. Notably, the crystal lattice reveals non-covalent contacts between GABARAP and the backside of ATG3 E2 catalytic center, resulting in the formation of a helical filament of the GABARAP~ATG3 conjugate. While similar filament formations have been observed with canonical Ub~E2 conjugates, the E2 backside-binding interface of GABARAP is distinct from those of Ub/Ubl proteins and overlaps with the binding site for LC3 interacting region (LIR) peptides. NMR analysis confirms the presence of this non-covalent interaction in solution, and mutagenesis experiments demonstrate the involvement of the E2 backside in PE conjugation. These findings highlight the critical role of the E2 backside in the lipidation process and suggest evolutionary adaptations in the unique E2 enzyme ATG3. Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. View the discussion thread. Supplementary Material Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Citation Manager Formats- EndNote (tagged)
- EndNote 8 (xml)
- RefWorks Tagged
- Ref Manager
- Tweet Widget
- Facebook Like
- Google Plus One
Subject Area- Biochemistry
- Animal Behavior and Cognition (5524)
- Biochemistry (12566)
- Bioengineering (9427)
- Bioinformatics (30806)
- Biophysics (15841)
- Cancer Biology (12913)
- Cell Biology (18521)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9998)
- Ecology (14968)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (19149)
- Genetics (12729)
- Genomics (17530)
- Immunology (12674)
- Microbiology (29716)
- Molecular Biology (12365)
- Neuroscience (64700)
- Paleontology (479)
- Pathology (2000)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3452)
- Physiology (5324)
- Plant Biology (11090)
- Scientific Communication and Education (1728)
- Synthetic Biology (3063)
- Systems Biology (7682)
- Zoology (1728)
News CenterRenewable energy policies provide benefits across state lines. Marilyn Brown, Regents’ and Brook Byers Professor of Sustainable Systems in Georgia Tech’s School of Public Policy While the U.S. federal government has clean energy targets, they are not binding. Most economically developed countries have mandatory policies designed to bolster renewable electricity production. Because the U.S. lacks an enforceable federal mandate for renewable electricity, individual states are left to develop their own regulations. Marilyn Brown , Regents’ and Brook Byers Professor of Sustainable Systems in Georgia Tech’s School of Public Policy ; Shan Zhou, an assistant professor at Purdue University and Georgia Tech Ph.D. alumna; and Barry Solomon, a professor emeritus of environmental policy at Michigan Technological University, investigated how clean electricity policies affect not only the states that adopt them, but neighboring states as well. Using data-driven comparisons, the researchers found that the impact of these subnational clean energy policies is far greater — and more nuanced — than previously known. Their research was recently published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . “Analysts are asking if the U.S. should have a federal renewable mandate to put the whole country on the same page, or if individual state policies are sufficient,” Brown said. “To answer that question, it is useful to know if states with renewable energy policies are influencing those without them.” Brown, Solomon, and Zhou examined a common clean energy policy tool: the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS). Adopted by more than half of U.S. states, RPSs are regulations requiring a state’s utility providers to generate a certain percentage of their electricity from renewable resources, such as wind or solar. Many of these standards are mandatory, with utility companies facing fines if they fail to reach targets within a given time. To investigate the influence of these policies across state lines, the researchers first created a dataset that included 31 years (1991-2021) of annual renewable electricity generation data for 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. They then used the dataset to generate pairs of states linking each state to its geographic neighbors or electricity trading partners, allowing them to examine the influence of the RPS policy adopted by one of the pair on the renewable energy generation of the other — a total of 1,519 paired comparisons. “By only looking at the pairs, we can see if an RPS in one state directly affects renewable electricity generation in another state, and, if that’s the case, whether it is because they are geographic neighbors or if it’s because they are participating in the same wholesale electricity market,” Zhou said. Looking into the electricity market is important, because states often purchase electricity from other states through wholesale markets rather than exclusively producing their own power, and the purchased power can be generated from renewables. Utilities in some states may be allowed to meet their own RPS requirements by purchasing renewable energy credits based on the renewable electricity generated in other states. In their analyses, the team also considered the concept of “policy stringency.” A stringency measure evaluates a state’s renewable electricity targets relative to the amount currently produced in the state. For example, if a state requires electric utilities to generate 30% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2030 and the state already has 25%, it isn’t a very stringent policy. On the other hand, if a state has a 30% target and only uses 10% renewables currently, it has a more ambitious and stringent RPS. Though policy experts have used the metric in related work for over a decade, the research team improved the design. “Our stringency variable includes interim targets as well as the existing share of renewable energy generation,” Solomon said. The team found that the amount of renewable electricity generation in a state is not only influenced by whether that state has its own RPS, but also by the RPS policies of neighboring states. “We also learned that the stronger a neighboring state’s RPS policy is, the more likely a given state is to generate more renewable electricity,” Brown said. “It’s all a very interactive web with many co-benefits.” The authors were surprised to find that a given state’s electricity trading partners did not hold the most influence over renewable generation, but rather the geographical proximity to RPS states. They suggest that past RPS policy research focusing on within-state impacts likely underestimated an RPS’s full impact. While the researchers have not yet identified all factors that can cause spillover effects, they plan to investigate this further. “The spillover effect is very significant and should not be overlooked by future research, especially for states without RPSs,” Zhou said. “For states without policies, their renewable electricity generation is very heavily influenced by their neighbors.” Citation : Shan Zhou, Barry D. Solomon, and Marilyn A. Brown, “The spillover effect of mandatory renewable portfolio standards.” PNAS (June 2024). DOI : https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313193121 Additional MediaShan Zhou, assistant professor at Purdue University and Georgia Tech Ph.D. alumna Catherine Barzler, Senior Research Writer/Editor [email protected] |
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Thesis Order Form 2024. With over 30 years of experience, we specialise in providing high-quality thesis and dissertation binding services for universities and colleges in the United States. Our experienced team of binders can craft beautiful, professional-grade bindings for your thesis or dissertation. With our easy online thesis uploading ...
We can print as many or as few copies of your thesis or dissertation at an affordable price and with the same amount of attention we give to larger book orders. We can offer you a special service regarding foil stamping. If your foil stamping involves basic text and numbers, such as book title, author's name, school and date, Book1One can ...
Soft Cover Value Pricing. Our value pricing for soft cover thesis binding is $40 per book. Includes soft cover, we supply the cover stock. Choose black or white cover. With gold or silver foil stamping on spine and front cover. Printing Services. QBS also provides printing services on a variety of paper stocks. The prices are as follows:
Mail-In your paper document for Binding Only. We can print your document from a PDF file (see sidebar), or you can mail your already printed document for Hard Cover Binding. Simply click your Hard Cover binding style above and follow the instructions. You will be prompted to print your order form. You'll then pack it with your documents and ...
Thesis Binding Center Nepal, Lalitpur, Nepal. 1 like. Thesis Binding Center Nepal is One of The Best and old Thesis Binding Center In Nepal We Provide Services Like Photocopy, Printing , Serial,...
Binding Services. Using HF Group's Thesis On Demand service, you can order thesis and dissertation printing directly, online. Thesis On Demand offers a range of cover and printing options. and you can use our online calculator to get an estimate of your costs before placing your order. A list of FAQs are present on the TOD site to help answer ...
Hard Cover Thesis Binding*$50.00**. Traditional thesis binding with a custom made hard cover using the Buckram fabric color of your choice. The spine is foil-stamped with your name, degree, and the year. *Non-Thesis hardcover binding: $57.00. **Additional front cover printing: $9.00.
The total cost to print and bind a thesis can vary considerably depending on the customizations you choose. As a rough benchmark, a basic print and bind thesis or dissertation is around: $100 USD. $150 AUD. $82 GBP.
Thesis cover. $2.00/set. Thesis clips (small/medium) $.10. Thesis clips (large) . $.25. You can now order your thesis printing & binding online with our new site: printservices.mit.edu You put a great deal of work into your thesis. Now we can help you package your efforts with professional polish and style.
Thesis Binding Center is located in Lalitpur. Thesis Binding Center is working in Shopping other, Business services, Book stores and newsstands activities. You can contact the company at 985-1044706. You can find more information about Thesis Binding Center at thesisbindinginnepal.blogspot.com.
University Park 16802. Phone: 814-865-7544. Hours of Operation: Monday-Friday, 8:00 am-4:30 pm. 15-minute curbside parking is available. Your thesis is the culmination of your higher education journey. Now, let the Multimedia & Print Center help you re-create and preserve your important work with professional copying and binding services.
Dissertation and thesis binding is an optional step in the graduation process. ... Printing Recommendations: double-sided pages, page numbers at the bottom center of the page, and cotton paper in the 8.5 X 11 letter size. If you have questions about binding, please contact Samantha Jakobeit at ...
#BPLT #Thesisbinding #Thesisbindingcenter #ThesisbindingcenternepalThesis Binding Center NepalThesis Binding Just In One Hour, For PhotoCopy, Thesis, Project...
Thesis / Hard Cover Binding Just In 1 Hour With Rs. 80 Only | PhotoCopy / Print - Rs. 2 Both / Single- Side | | Balkumari, Lalitpur Nepal | Call 01-5203983 Thesis Binding Center Nepal Phone Number : +9779851044706
Thermal binding: Here, the binding is done with a transparent cover that highlights the dissertation's title page. It has a professional look, is solid and reliable, and has color options. Comb binding: This kind of binding is recommended for draft versions and costs less than a spiral binding option. It allows pages to be removed or added ...
THESIS AND DISSERTATION BINDING; ORDER. FILE PRINT; INSTRUCTOR COURSE PACKET SUBMISSION; THESIS - DISSERTATION; REPORT - PRESENTATION; POSTER - LARGE FORMAT; PORTFOLIO; ... Create a beautiful binding that displays your years of hard work. Conference Materials. Personalized service to help you with your event printing needs.
Thesis Binding Rs. 80 Only · Thesis Binding Rs. 80 Only | PhotoCopy / Print - Rs 1.5 Both / Single- Side | Loadshedding Same Rate | Balkumari, Lalitpur Nepal | Call 01-5203983 · Experience: Thesis Binding Center · Location: Nepal · 3 connections on LinkedIn. View Thesis Binding Center's profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1 billion members.
Thesis Binding Penang, Penang Island. 638 likes · 6 were here. "Need any printing or book binding service? Come & see us at NC Bon Enterprise! Our service has been designed to simplify you to meets...
Welcome to the Thesis Centre. The bookbinders of choice in Ireland. Est. 1989. Why choose us?. We've offered the highest quality thesis and dissertation binding in Ireland for almost 30 years.All of our books are hand sewn for strength and durability, are crafted in Levant-grain leatherette, come with head and tail bands and are bound with traditional marbled endpapers.
The St Petersburg University Research Repository was created in 2013. It provides an open access to research publications, teaching materials, conference presentations, research data, etcetera, in all SPbU research areas: Graduation projects, dissertations and theses are arranged by subject and educational level.
a griffin ventures llc company ©2007 - 2024 All Rights Reserved All Trademarks, Service Marks & Trade Names
Graduate students working on dissertation projects are welcome and encouraged to use our individual consultation service to discuss their writing process or get feedback on drafts. You also may want to consider our new Dissertation Buddies program, which allows you to work up to once weekly with the same consultant who can also act as an accountability partner and ...
#BPLT #Thesisbinding #Thesisbindingcenter #ThesisbindingcenternepalThesis Binding Center NepalThesis Binding Just In One Hour, For PhotoCopy, Thesis, Project...
Reproductive Migrations: Surrogacy workers and stratified reproduction in St Petersburg. C. Weis. Sociology. 2017. This thesis focuses on the practice of commercial, gestational surrogate motherhood in Russia. Based on anthropological field work in surrogacy-facilitating private clinics in Saint Petersburg and…. Expand.
7 reviews and 10 photos of SAINT PETERSBURG SAILING CENTER "I love, love, love sailing out of this place. It totally rocks! The location is excellent. They have good launch facilities, as well as decent rest rooms and showers (compared with other sailing venues.) And the location is great. Right downtown, in walking distance of the Saturday morning market.
Examining social psychological principles that explain why Democrats' strategy of calling ideas "weird" works. This blog post was co-authored by Madeline Jalbert, a postdoctoral scholar at the University of Washington's Center for an Informed Public, and Ira Hyman, a psychology professor at Western Washington University.. Democrats have recently started to call some Republican ...
Notably, the crystal lattice reveals non-covalent contacts between GABARAP and the backside of ATG3 E2 catalytic center, resulting in the formation of a helical filament of the GABARAP~ATG3 conjugate. ... the E2 backside-binding interface of GABARAP is distinct from those of Ub/Ubl proteins and overlaps with the binding site for LC3 interacting ...
While the U.S. federal government has clean energy targets, they are not binding. Most economically developed countries have mandatory policies designed to bolster renewable electricity production. Because the U.S. lacks an enforceable federal mandate for renewable electricity, individual states are left to develop their own regulations.