Validity
Among the selected 141 articles, 28 (19.86%) were published in the Journal of Cleaner Production , 20 (14.18%) were published in Food Policy , and 5 (3.55%) were published in Quality-Access to Success . The rest of the journal names are visualized in Figure 2 .
The most popular journals publishing the 141 included articles. Others denotes journals that were cited once or twice.
After the 141 articles have been extracted, they were analyzed and summarized individually by listing all the discussed food security drivers, as well as the recommended policies for the improvement of food security and sustainable food production. Then, we synthesized the extracted information from all sources in order to identify the gaps, list the similarities between all the resources, and extract significant insights regarding the main drivers of food security and the recommended policies [ 26 ].
Analysis of the retrieved literature revealed 34 different drivers of food security, as visualized in Figure 3 . Detailed information, along with a full citation list for all the drivers, is provided in Appendix A .
Summary of the major drivers of food security.
Most papers discussed food loss and waste (FLW) and emphasized its impact on food security [ 6 , 19 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 ]. Around one-third of the food produced globally (1.3 million tons) is wasted or lost [ 96 ]. Basher, Raboy [ 43 ] has argued that, if we could save just one-fourth of the wasted food, it would be enough to feed all the world’s undernourished people, contributing positively to FS. The previous finding supports our research findings that FLW is the primary driver of FS. To reduce FLW, Halloran, Clement [ 6 ] has argued that effective communication, more efficient food packaging, and a better consumer understanding of food packaging could lead to solutions. To decrease food loss, Garcia-Herrero, Hoehn [ 62 ] has suggested improving food labelling, enhancing consumer planning, and developing technological advances in packaging and shelf life for perishable products. Morone, Falcone [ 83 ] has suggested the repetition of large-scale research to help define a set of policies encouraging the transition to a new model for consumption that promotes sustainably procured food and dramatically reduces the amount of waste (more details are provided in Section 3.2 ).
Additionally, several authors have considered food security policy (FSP) as a driver of food security in its different forms [ 56 , 63 , 65 , 69 , 70 , 74 , 79 , 85 , 94 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 ]. The primary goal of establishing food security policies that consider the factors influencing individuals and groups is to reduce poverty and eliminate hunger. One example is safety-net programs or public food assistance programs (FAPs). The main goal of providing safety-net programs is to increase food consumption among poor people and improve food security [ 102 ].
Many papers have discussed the importance of technological advancement as an enabler of food security [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 63 , 69 , 71 , 74 , 77 , 85 , 90 , 94 , 95 , 109 , 116 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 ]. The use of technology to promote behavioral changes has increasingly become a vital instrument to reduce food waste and indirectly improve food security [ 130 ]. Mobile applications offer households helpful guidance on increasing shelf life and experimenting with dishes using leftovers [ 58 ]. Shukla, Singh [ 130 ] has elaborated that, at present, farmers have access to mobile applications that provide them with reasonably and timely priced information.
Some authors have discussed sustainable agricultural development and practices as enablers of food security [ 56 , 57 , 59 , 64 , 71 , 73 , 94 , 97 , 105 , 109 , 111 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 124 , 130 , 132 , 134 , 136 , 137 , 139 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 ]. Some authors have discussed local production enhancement as a driver of food security to enhance the self-reliance of countries [ 57 , 69 , 85 , 87 , 89 , 94 , 98 , 103 , 105 , 109 , 112 , 117 , 120 , 134 , 137 , 144 , 148 , 149 ]. For example, Ahmed, Begum [ 98 ] has emphasized how, following the GCC ban, Qatar took several successful steps to foster local production, support domestic businesses, and promote the consumption of locally produced food by its citizens. Some authors have argued that building the capacities of small farmers is essential to achieving FS. Education policies are critical for educating farmers, building their capacities, and increasing their human capital; moreover, educational programs should also include food preparation and health education programs in order to ensure the safety of consumed food [ 101 ].
The government’s role in managing a country’s agriculture can also be seen as a driver of food security [ 67 , 75 , 84 , 86 , 100 , 109 , 116 , 117 , 119 , 121 , 137 , 138 , 147 , 150 , 151 , 152 ], as it is responsible for various aspects such as designing, testing, and implementing the right policies to ensure the welfare of its citizens, while providing the necessary assistance to small-scale farmers and ensuring their safety and security in all aspects of life. Governments in developing nations must focus on R&D, agriculture infrastructure (e.g., technologies for irrigation and soil preservation), expansion services, early warning systems, or subsidized farm income in order to alter the production function of the population [ 101 ].
Many authors have discussed the importance of food safety policies as an enabler of food security [ 61 , 64 , 69 , 103 , 105 , 111 , 112 , 129 , 149 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 ]. Food safety policies include food and water safety at several points throughout the supply chain where food-borne diseases might develop [ 69 ]. Environmental policies are also seen as a fundamental enabler of food security [ 59 , 73 , 121 , 124 , 130 , 135 , 139 , 147 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 ]. Regardless of the various approaches discussed by the authors, they all agreed that environmental protection would help to ensure food availability for current and future generations. According to some authors, trade policies [ 69 , 94 , 95 , 103 , 111 , 112 , 114 , 123 , 129 , 141 , 146 , 161 , 164 ] and import policies [ 69 , 95 , 100 , 103 , 120 , 124 , 126 , 129 , 146 ] are enablers of food security. Regulating international trade can help to ensure food security. Lowering trade barriers, for example, has been proposed as a way to mitigate the adverse effects of market regulation caused by climate change [ 141 ].
Many authors have recognized policies that promote consumer education on sustainable consumption and increase consumer awareness and knowledge of the environmental impact of their purchases as a driver of food security [ 52 , 60 , 67 , 69 , 86 , 133 , 144 , 151 , 163 , 165 , 166 , 167 ]. Others have stressed proper communication among all stakeholders as a driver of food security [ 6 , 56 , 68 , 69 , 84 , 92 , 129 , 130 , 156 , 157 , 168 ]. Some authors have considered risk management as an enabler of food security [ 94 , 117 , 118 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 145 , 154 , 155 , 157 ]. For example, the aims of building a disaster risk reduction framework in the Pacific include boosting resilience, protecting investments (e.g., in infrastructure, operations, and FS), and decreasing poverty and hunger [ 169 ].
Some authors have proposed the effective gleaning process as a driver of food security [ 70 , 72 , 74 , 80 , 84 , 92 , 142 , 170 ]. Gleaning is the collection of the remaining crops in agricultural fields after their commercial harvest, or just in crop fields where their harvest is not cost-effective. Some old cultures have fostered gleaning as an early form of social assistance [ 80 ]. Some authors have considered the management of government food reserves to be a food security driver [ 64 , 104 , 112 , 117 , 118 , 124 , 136 ]. Despite the high cost of storing food, any country must maintain adequate food reserves to serve the country in case of a crisis scenario [ 171 ]. Some authors have considered integrative policies (i.e., food–water–energy, food–energy, or water–food) as a driver of food security due to their impact on environmental improvement through natural resource handling efficiency [ 56 , 73 , 133 , 139 , 172 , 173 ]. Some authors have considered establishing dietary standard policies as an enabler of food security [ 69 , 151 , 163 , 174 ]. The government should impose policies on healthy food consumption to prevent obesity, such as prohibiting trans-fats. Moreover, they should restrict trans-fat usage in food outlets, establish institutional food standards, implement menu labelling regulations for chain restaurants, and ensure that disadvantaged people have better access to healthy meals [ 151 ].
Authors have highlighted various additional arguments or policies that are considered drivers for FS such as establishing public programs to influence diets in a healthy manner, reducing yield volatility [ 85 , 94 , 105 , 119 , 124 , 126 , 175 ], the country’s natural resources [ 85 , 105 , 119 , 124 , 137 , 145 , 162 , 163 , 176 ], geopolitical and political stability [ 69 , 98 , 104 , 117 , 123 , 124 , 142 ], agricultural infrastructure [ 64 , 114 , 116 , 118 , 142 , 146 , 175 ], food distribution infrastructure [ 71 , 75 , 76 , 112 , 177 , 178 ], economic integration [ 109 , 112 , 123 , 179 , 180 ], collaboration among all supply chain stakeholders [ 75 , 130 , 134 , 157 ], proper measurement of food security dimensions [ 123 , 181 , 182 , 183 ], urban agriculture policies [ 56 , 147 , 148 ], adjustments in dietary structure [ 59 , 86 , 163 ], establishing employment programs for poor household representatives [ 110 , 152 ], customer engagement in designing public policies [ 158 ], and trust in public institutions [ 166 ].
Analysis of the 141 retrieved papers revealed 17 major recommended policies, as visualized in Figure 4 . We also determined sub-policies under each category which were grouped based on common characteristics, relevance, and how they were categorized in the papers. The complete list of sub-policy categories and related references is provided in Appendix B .
The main 17 recommended policies and statistics.
Most authors recommended establishing FSP, in general, as a primary solution for food insecurity in developing and developed countries [ 56 , 57 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 69 , 81 , 85 , 87 , 89 , 91 , 94 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 126 , 127 , 130 , 131 , 133 , 134 , 137 , 142 , 144 , 145 , 148 , 149 , 151 , 152 , 175 , 177 , 180 , 182 , 184 , 185 ]. Many authors have suggested food consumption policies that offer safety-net programs or public food assistance programs (FAPs) such as food price subsidies, cash-based programs, structural pricing adjustments, or micro-credits as enablers of FS. The main goal of providing safety-net programs is to increase food consumption among poor people and improve food security [ 102 ]. Given the solid bidirectional causal link between poverty and malnutrition, FAPs have been recognized as critical components of the overall poverty reduction strategy. Food aid policies and initiatives can fill the gaps left by the for-profit food system and the informal (non-profit) social safety nets, ensuring food security for disadvantaged individuals, families, and communities [ 108 ]. Several authors have recommended establishing policies to enhance the performance and asset bases of small-scale farmers, such as loans, subsidies, access to information, and knowledge-sharing, to address food insecurity. Governments should adopt direct interventions such as structural price adjustments and targeted food subsidies to enhance the food access of farmers by lowering market prices and stabilizing consumption during high food price inflation [ 116 ]. Others have recommended establishing government input subsidy programs (input subsidy policies) that provide farmers with subsidies for investment into high-yielding technology (e.g., automation, fertilizers, high-yield seed). They all claimed this as an effective policy instrument for agricultural development, but each focused on a different mechanism. Shukla, Singh [ 130 ], for example, has discussed public distribution programs; Sinyolo [ 131 ] has emphasized policies aimed at increasing the amount of land planted with enhanced maize varieties among smallholder farmers; Wiebelt, Breisinger [ 124 ] has suggested investments in water-saving technologies, while Tokhayeva, Almukhambetova [ 137 ] have proposed the development of an agricultural innovation system. Others have recommended rural development policies to reduce yield volatility and improve the agricultural infrastructure (e.g., irrigation and water-saving technologies). Governments in developing nations must focus on R&D, agricultural infrastructure (technologies for irrigation and soil preservation), expansion services, and early warning systems [ 101 ]. Technological advancement, in general, is seen as a vital element in reducing yield volatility [ 85 ]. Capacity-building policies (e.g., educational, training, and technical support) have received considerable attention in the literature as a fundamental component of urban farming initiatives, and as attempts to promote self-reliance and networking. Capacity building in many areas connected to urban agriculture is essential for equipping residents with knowledge and expertise [ 148 ]. To enhance FS, some researchers have suggested policies supporting locally produced food, diversified agricultural production policies, policies that impact farm-level commodity pricing, food stock policies, establishing policies to increase the income of farmers, buffer stock policies, and resource allocation policies (for a complete list of references, see Appendix B ).
Many authors have proposed different policy recommendations to reduce food waste and, thus, food insecurity [ 6 , 19 , 51 , 52 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 103 , 130 , 138 , 144 , 150 , 160 , 167 , 168 , 170 , 177 ]. Many have agreed on the importance of policies that promote information and education campaigns that spread awareness at household and public levels by improving meal planning and management in consumers. However, each author suggested a different approach. For example, Schanes, Dobernig [ 58 ] have discussed face-to-face door-stepping campaigns (online and in traditional newspaper leaflets), word-of-mouth, and television shows or movies. However, Septianto, Kemper [ 66 ] have highlighted the importance of social marketing campaign design and framing (having vs. not having) in conveying the intended message to consumers. Tucho and Okoth [ 73 ] have asserted the advantages of producing bio-wastes and bio-fertilizers from food waste and human excreta (in a food–energy–sanitation nexus approach), and also advocated for educating families on how to do so at the household level. Xu, Zhang [ 86 ] has argued that governments should help society to develop a logical perspective on food consumption and aggressively promote the habit of eating simple meals, particularly in social catering. Von Kameke and Fischer [ 52 ] and Zorpas, Lasaridi [ 60 ] have emphasized the importance of teaching customers about efficient meal planning to reduce food waste. Von Kameke and Fischer [ 52 ] have proposed using the Nudging tool rather than campaigning. Xu, Zhang [ 86 ] have suggested initiating suitable policy instruments to nudge individuals to adopt sustainable consumption habits, with important implications for decreasing food waste and increasing food security in China. Smart (innovative) food packaging and labelling policies have received significant attention in the literature, as they are critical in reducing food waste and, thus, improving FS. The nature, size, and labelling of the packaging impact the lifetime of the food. Smart packaging innovations and new technologies are steadily penetrating markets, thus increasing the shelf-life of foods through enhanced protection, communication, convenience, and control [ 58 ].
Food banks, food sharing, and food rescue policies have also received significant attention in the global literature, as they help reduce food waste and improve FS. Food banking is a critical long-term rescue policy for re-distributing surplus food to those in need and reducing poverty and food insecurity [ 80 , 92 ]. Several authors have recommended positive sanctions such as financial rewards, tax credits, federal and state funding, vouchers, or reduced taxes to decrease food waste and improve FS. Positive sanctions consist mainly of financial incentives to encourage restaurants and grocery retailers to donate their leftover food [ 60 ]. Addressing liability concerns might be one incentive, as the research participants have highlighted this as a universal barrier and that this issue, in particular, must be handled [ 51 ]. Negative sanction policies have received considerable attention in the literature as a tool for reducing food waste and improving FS. These include fines and fees imposed on companies and individuals accountable for food waste [ 58 ]. Taxes and fines are a potential way to manage and motivate restaurants and retailers to donate their leftover food to charities and community centers [ 65 ].
The establishment of policies that regulate the sharing of information and knowledge among supply chain stakeholders has received some attention in the literature in terms of reducing food waste and improving food security. Comprehensive food waste legislation has been discussed as a potential enabler of food security. A possible regulatory tool would be to revise and remove unnecessary food safety requirements that result in excessive food waste levels [ 58 ]. According to Halloran, Clement [ 6 ], food waste increased due to European food safety regulations and standardization. Food waste recycling policies have been used as a method to reduce food waste. Food waste can be utilized for value generation at any point of the food supply chain process through efficient techniques, then reincorporated into the cycle [ 77 ]. Food waste has a long history as a source of ecologically friendly animal feed [ 61 ].
A few authors have highlighted the impact of technological advancement (e.g., mobile applications) as a strategy to reduce food waste. Some authors have proposed implementing gleaning operation policies that provide tax incentives and government assistance to gleaners in order to decrease food waste. Some authors have proposed implementing peak storage reduction policies, such as stock-holding incentives. Nudging tools (which nudge people toward forming sustainable consumption behaviors) have been mentioned by a few authors.
Food safety policies received significant attention in the retrieved literature [ 61 , 64 , 69 , 70 , 103 , 105 , 111 , 112 , 120 , 125 , 129 , 130 , 137 , 138 , 149 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 ]; however, they have been discussed in various different forms. Few authors have discussed food quality and food hygiene compliance certifications. Compliance with sanitary standards is required to maintain the best practices for preventing food-borne diseases and food security threats [ 155 ]. Other authors have discussed the importance of food safety standards. Meanwhile, few authors have emphasized the importance of food safety throughout the supply chain, but each proposed a different strategy to achieve it. For example, some authors have suggested using an effective IT system [ 130 ], RFID [ 138 ], or developing food safety training policies [ 155 ].
Many authors have advocated for the implementation of trade policies to address food insecurity in developing and developed countries [ 94 , 95 , 101 , 103 , 111 , 112 , 119 , 123 , 129 , 136 , 141 , 146 , 148 , 149 , 152 , 157 , 161 , 164 , 178 , 180 ], but in different contexts. For example, some have suggested establishing infrastructure development policies that target agricultural logistic infrastructure, or improving the speed and quality of shipping logistics. In contrast, some authors have agreed on the importance of state trading and private trade-supporting policies. Others have suggested the removal of tariff and non-tariff barriers, while a few authors recommended reliable marine connection and transportation logistics policies.
Environmental policies are a fundamental enabler of food security [ 59 , 73 , 94 , 120 , 121 , 124 , 130 , 135 , 139 , 141 , 145 , 147 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 166 ]. However, authors have focused on many different aspects of these policies. Some authors, for example, have emphasized the importance of establishing policies to mitigate the effects of climate change. Others were too specific, suggesting greenhouse gas reduction policies, and proposed penalizing non-compliance. Due to the strong links between climate change, poverty, and food insecurity, some authors have proposed establishing coordinating policies among the three. Other authors have stressed the consideration of policies that encourage the optimization of fertilizer use.
Many authors have considered food import policies as a solution to food insecurity [ 94 , 95 , 100 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 109 , 112 , 116 , 117 , 119 , 120 , 124 , 126 , 134 , 146 ]; however, most authors provided different opinions regarding the most effective policy to implement. For example, some authors have stressed the importance of policies that provide direct government financial assistance to local agriculture, or the importance of policies that sustain local agricultural product prices compared to imported products. Some have recommended providing temporary tax benefits for agricultural investment, while others recommended import ban (substitution) policies. A few authors have recommended direct budget subsidies, subsidized loan interest rates, and strategies for the diversification of imported food origin.
Many authors have discussed the importance of establishing a common agricultural policy (CAP) to address sustainable agriculture [ 56 , 57 , 64 , 89 , 109 , 111 , 118 , 119 , 132 , 142 , 143 , 149 , 161 , 172 , 184 , 186 ]. Others have stressed the importance of food surplus policies in enhancing a country’s food security status [ 51 , 58 , 70 , 72 , 75 , 76 , 79 , 82 , 84 , 90 , 91 ]. Some authors have suggested strategies to regulate a company’s liability regarding the donation of surplus food. A few authors have proposed food policies that subsidize the purchase of surplus food—also known as “ugly food”—by controlling for prices and surplus item characteristics. Some authors have suggested establishing food loss policies. However, few authors have specified the need for policies promoting food loss quantification.
Many authors have discussed the policies that promote traceability across the whole supply chain as an enabler for food security [ 56 , 69 , 103 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 137 , 138 , 168 , 178 ]. However, the different authors discussed different technologies such as investment into information technology such as RFID, effective IT systems, ICT systems, and blockchain technology. Government policies should promote investments into traceability systems that focus on rapid withdrawal in unsafe food scenarios such as product recall regulations, fines imposed on hazardous product distributors, and food-borne food risk monitoring [ 129 ]. Many authors have discussed various risk management strategies to improve a country’s food security [ 94 , 117 , 118 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 145 , 154 , 155 , 157 ]. However, each considered a different approach to overcome the risk. Specifically, they have discussed food scandal policies, the COVID-19 pandemic, programmed risk identification, proactive policy measures to handle flood crises, early warning systems for natural disasters, or risk management throughout the food supply chain. Some authors have highlighted water quality policies such as efficient water-use policies, improving water resources policies, using water-efficient crops, investments into water-saving technologies, and food and water safety throughout the supply chain.
Some authors have discussed the management of government food reserves as an enabler of food security [ 64 , 104 , 112 , 117 , 118 , 124 , 136 ], and others have discussed integrative and coherent policies between food, water, and energy (as a nexus) [ 56 , 73 , 133 , 139 , 172 , 173 ]. Meanwhile, other authors have discussed policies that promote consumer education on sustainable consumption, improving consumer status awareness and knowledge regarding the ecological impact of their purchases [ 60 , 69 , 133 , 144 , 163 , 165 ]. Few authors have addressed the importance of dietary standard policies [ 69 , 151 , 163 , 174 ], urban agriculture policies [ 56 , 147 , 148 ], and food-aid policies [ 118 , 150 ].
Some policies were suggested in one paper only such as devising the right population policy in China [ 85 ], flexible retail modernization policies [ 158 ], policies that facilitate short-term migration [ 187 ], policies to stimulate equitable economic growth through manufacturing and services [ 95 ], and sound research governance policies [ 140 ].
In this section, we discuss the polices and drivers in the greater areas, then compare them based on specific contexts. This approach serves to provide better understanding, thus informing decision-makers about the importance of choosing the right policies through considering many food security dimensions. By looking deeply at the extracted food security drivers and policies and the way in which they can be applied to each country’s context, we take an example from the MENA region. The MENA region includes a diverse range of nations, including low-income and less-developed (e.g., Sudan, Syria, and Yemen), low–middle-income (e.g., Algeria, Egypt, Iran, Morocco, and Tunisia), upper middle-income (e.g., Jordan, Lebanon, and Libya), and high-income (e.g., the UAE, Qatar, Oman, Bahrain, Israel, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia) countries [ 126 ]. As food availability is a serious problem in the MENA region low-income countries (Syria and Yemen), due to war and violent conflicts [ 188 ], policies aimed at increasing food availability continue to pique the interest of policy-makers. In these countries, where citizens are incapable of fulfilling their basic food needs [ 189 ], the existence of food security policies in different forms is crucial for achieving food security [ 53 , 97 , 98 , 124 , 184 ], more than FLW policies. Policy-makers should focus on ensuring the availability of either locally produced or imported food, which requires appropriate trade policies to deal with food shortages and improve the availability dimension in these countries. Trade policies should focus on creating infrastructure development policies that target agricultural logistic infrastructure, improve the speed and quality of shipping logistics, and establish reliable marine connections and transportation logistics policies that remove tariff and non-tariff barriers.
Policy-makers should establish import policies that sustain local agricultural product prices compared to imported products, provide direct government financial assistance to local agriculture, and provide temporary tax benefits for agricultural investment.
Additionally, the governments should improve food access in the MENA region low-income countries by reducing or stabilizing consumer and producer food prices. To enhance food access, FSPs (e.g., education policies in general and capacity-building policies) may help to improve individual human capital. Governments also must provide supplemental feeding programs, typically targeting vulnerable groups in need of special diets, such as pregnant women and children [ 101 ].
Moreover, the government should improve credit access through the following means: policies that enhance the performance and asset base of small-scale farmers; the existence of policies that impact farm-level commodity pricing, thus retaining farmers and increasing local production; the existence of government input subsidy programs for individuals, and the existence of policies supporting locally produced food. These are all possible policies to improve the MENA region FS. Governments and global health organizations should promote food utilization in MENA low-income countries through the development of policies that monitor overall food quality, such as access to clean water and micronutrient fortification, or through individual educational programs on safe food preparation [ 155 ]. Finally, enhancing food quality can optimize the individual nutrient absorption [ 101 ].
In contrast, discussions of food security in the MENA region high-income countries have indicated that food availability, access, and utilization are generally higher and not a problem. However, food stability is low, which requires the attention of policy-makers to improve FS. Food stability impacts the other food security pillars (access, availability, and utilization). Moreover, it requires the economic, political, and social sustainability of food systems, which are vulnerable to environmental conditions, land distribution, available resources, conflicts, and political situations [ 190 ]. Food stability necessitates increased efforts and expenditures to achieve food security in the sustainable development goals, especially in light of increased academic and governmental interest in incorporating sustainability values into policies.
As food waste is prevalent in these countries, FLW policies are more critical than FSP, which is in alignment with our findings regarding food security drivers. FLW makes it difficult for the poor in developing countries to access food by significantly depleting natural resources such as land, water, and fossil fuels while raising the greenhouse gas emissions related to food production [ 115 ]. Addressing food loss and waste in these countries can hugely influence the reduction of wasted food and indirectly enhance food security. The number of food-insecure individuals may be reduced in developing regions by up to 63 million by reducing food loss, which will directly reduce the over-consumption of cultivated areas, water, and greenhouse gas emissions related to food production [ 115 ]. According to Abiad and Meho [ 189 ], food waste produced at the household level differs across MENA-region countries. For example, it ranges from 68 to 150 kg/individual/year in Oman, 62–76 kg/individual/year in Iraq, 194–230 kg/individual/year in Palestine, and 177–400 kg/individual/year in the UAE. It is critical to take more aggressive but scientifically sound initiatives to minimize FLW, which will require the participation of everyone involved in the food supply chain such as policy-makers, food producers and suppliers, and the final consumers [ 191 , 192 ]. Food waste reflects an inefficient usage of valuable agricultural input resources and contributes to unnecessary environmental depletion [ 191 , 193 ]. Furthermore, food loss is widely recognized as a major obstacle to environmental sustainability and food security in developing nations [ 194 ]. Preventing FLW can result in a much more environmentally sustainable agricultural production and consumption process by increasing the efficiency and productivity of resources, especially water, cropland, and nutrients [ 115 , 191 , 192 , 195 ]. Preventing FLW is crucial in areas where water scarcity is a prevalent concern, as irrigated agriculture makes up a sizeable portion of total food production, and yield potential may not be fully achieved under nutrient or water shortages [ 191 , 196 , 197 ]. According to the study of Chen, Chaudhary [ 197 ], food waste per capita in high-income countries is enough to feed one individual a healthy balanced diet for 18 days. Chen, Chaudhary [ 197 ] also found that high-income countries have embedded environmental effects that are ten times greater than those of low-income countries, and they tend to waste six times more food by weight than low-income countries. Consequently, implementing proper FLW policies in high-income countries can help to alleviate the food insecurity problem while maintaining the economic, social, and environmental sustainability of future food production.
Implementing effective food storage techniques and capacities is considered a key component of a comprehensive national food security plan to promote both food utilization and food stability; furthermore, proper food storage at the household level maintains food products for a more prolonged period [ 198 ]. Encouragement of economic integration between MENA region countries is very applicable considering the heterogeneity of these countries. For example, countries with limited arable land and high income, such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia, can invest in countries with a lower middle income, such as Egypt, and use its land to benefit both countries. On the other hand, Boratynska and Huseynov [ 101 ] have proposed food technology innovation as a sustainable driver of food security and a promising solution to the problem of food insecurity in developing countries. Due to the higher food production demand to support the expanding urban population while having limited water and land availability, higher investments in technology and innovation are needed to ensure that food systems are more resilient [ 190 ]. Boratynska and Huseynov [ 101 ] have argued that, in general, using innovative technologies to produce healthy food products is frequently a concern. However, improving the probability that innovative food technology will enable the production of a diverse range of food products with enhanced texture and flavor while also providing a variety of health advantages to the final consumer is essential. Jalava, Guillaume [ 193 ] have argued that, along with reducing FLW, shifting people’s diets from animal- to plant-based foods can help to slow environmental degradation.
The MENA region example described above can be adapted to different regions based on their food security situation, and relevant policies can be devised to improve food security more sustainably.
Food security is a complicated and multi-faceted issue that cannot be restricted to a single variable, necessitating the deeper integration of many disciplinary viewpoints. It is essential to admit the complexity of designing the right policy to improve food security that matches each country’s context [ 46 ] while considering the three pillars of sustainability. Furthermore, it is of utmost importance to implement climate-friendly agricultural production methods to combat food insecurity and climate change [ 12 ]. Mapping the determinants of food security contributes to better understanding of the issue and aids in developing appropriate food security policies to enhance environmental, social, and economic sustainability.
This research contributes to the body of knowledge by summarizing the main recommended policies and drivers of food security detailed in 141 research articles, following a systematic literature review methodology. We identified 34 food security drivers and outlined 17 recommended policies to improve food security and contribute to sustainable food production. Regarding the drivers, one of the foremost priorities to drive food security is reducing FLW globally, followed by food security policies, technological advancement, sustainable agricultural development, and so on (see Appendix A ). Regarding the recommended policies, most studies have detailed the contents and impacts of food security policies, food waste policies, food safety policies, trade policies, environmental policies, import policies, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), food surplus policies, and so on (see Appendix B ).
We assessed the obtained results in comparison to the latest version of the GFSI. Using the GFSI (2021) indicators as a proxy resulted in the identification of gaps and specific policy implications of the results. The idea was to identify which of the policies and drivers have been already implemented and which have not (or, at least, have not been very successfully implemented). We used the GFSI as it is a very well-established benchmarking tool used globally by 113 countries to measure the food security level. We examined the indicators mentioned under each of the four dimensions of food security, and listed associations with the identified policies and drivers found in the literature. Accordingly, we suggest the addition of two dimensions to the current index:
The first dimension relates to measuring the sustainability dimensions that each participating country adopts in its food production process. We noticed that many authors stressed the importance of the existence of clear environmental policies that drive long-term food security. However, the current GFSI lacks indicators measuring this dimension. The reviewed literature suggested environmental indicators considering optimized fertilizer use, carbon taxes, aquaculture environment, bio-energy, green and blue infrastructure, gas emissions reduction policies, policies to reduce the impacts of climate change, and heavy metal soil contamination monitoring.
The second dimension is related to consumer voice representation within the GFSI. The reviewed literature suggested implementing policy measures that promote consumer education on sustainable consumption and improve the consumer status, consciousness, and knowledge regarding the ecological impact of their purchases. Any sustainability initiative should be supported and implemented by the final consumer.
Additional gaps in the policies and drivers of food security were identified and allocated under the relevant indicators in the GFSI based on the four dimensions of food security. Under the affordability dimension, we found a lack of policies in the reviewed literature addressing the Inequality-adjusted income index. Regarding the Change in average food costs indicator, we observed that the policies that exist in the literature concern the farmer level only (e.g., policies that impact farm-level commodity pricing and policies supporting locally produced food), and not all of the citizens at the national level. Additionally, policies that promote traceability across the whole supply chain were missing. There were no policies in the reviewed literature under the food quality and safety dimension representing the following: the dietary diversity indicator; micronutrient availability (e.g., dietary availability of vitamin A, iron, and zinc); regulation of the protein quality indicator; the food safety indicator (specifically the two sub-indicators of food safety mechanisms and access to drinking water), and illustration of the national nutrition plan or strategy indicator. Therefore, future research should pay more attention to and emphasize the importance of such policies, particularly in developed countries seeking to improve their food security status and score high on the GFSI.
Moreover, the reviewed literature suggested “developing food safety training policies” to improve food safety and FS; however, no indicators or sub-indicators within the GFSI represent such training policies. The GFSI developers should pay more attention to safety training practices and include them in the index’s future development. Under the availability dimension, the reviewed literature suggested establishing a food loss policy that promotes the quantification of food loss under the food loss indicator. This indicator should be enhanced through well-articulated policies that address the problem of food loss and attempt to mitigate its impact. However, while there were various policies concerning food waste or surplus, there were no indicators within the GFSI that represented food loss. As food loss and waste was identified as the primary driver of food security in this study, we recommend expanding the GFSI to include food loss quantification and reduction policies under the availability dimension. Finally, under the political commitment to adaptation dimension, some policies were identified in the reviewed literature in two sub-indicators: early warning measures/climate-smart agriculture (e.g., proactive policy measures to handle flood crises, programmed risk identification, and early warning systems for natural disasters) and disaster risk management (e.g., food scandals, COVID-19, and risk management throughout the food supply chain). However, under the other two relevant sub-indicators—commitment to managing exposure and national agricultural adaptation policy—there were no identified policies.
The key contributions of this study to the existing literature are threefold. First, we identified the (34) main food security drivers and the (17) most-recommended policies to improve food security and enhance the future food production sustainability. Several studies have partially covered this area, but none have employed a systematic literature review of 141 papers covering such an scope in this topic. The gravity of food security worldwide is well established; hence the contribution of this work. Second, we provide a reflection of policies/drivers on the latest version of the GFSI, resulting in more tangible policy implications (see Section 5.1 ). Third, through a systematic literature review, we identified elements not listed under the GFSI that could be considered in its future revision. Examples include environmental policies/indicators such as optimized fertilizer use, carbon taxes, aquaculture environment, bio-energy, green and blue infrastructure, gas emission reduction, policies to reduce the impact of climate change, and heavy metal soil contamination monitoring; consumer representation, as the reviewed literature suggested policy measures that promote consumer education on sustainable consumption, as well as improving consumer status, consciousness, and knowledge regarding the ecological impact of their purchases; and traceability throughout the entire supply chain.
In this study, we identified the major drivers and the recommended policies to improve food security and enhance the future food production sustainability based on the reviewed literature. However, we recommend conducting a Delphi research study in consultation with policy-makers and industry experts. A Delphi study can be used to validate the findings of this systematic literature review based on a specific country’s context. This research was conducted using only 141 articles from two databases; therefore, we suggest replicating this research using different databases, which will allow for the inclusion of more related papers. Moreover, this research included only peer-reviewed articles, which may be considered, based on the guidelines of Keele [ 185 ], as a source of publication bias. Future research may consider including gray literature and conference proceedings. This research did not include the three sustainability pillars within its research string; therefore, we recommend considering the inclusion of the three pillars in future research. Future research should also investigate the use of alternative protein food technology innovation, such as plant-based protein, cultured meat, and insect-based protein, as a sustainable solution to the food security problem. Additionally, understanding the factors influencing acceptance of various technologies by the final consumer is particularly important given some regional characteristics such as harsh arid environments and the scarcity of arable land, freshwater, and natural resources.
Food loss and waste | 47/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Food waste management | 29/47 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Food waste policies | 23/47 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ]. |
Food loss reduction policies | 10/47 | [ , , , , , , , , , ]. |
Food surplus policies | 11/47 | [ , , , , , , , , , , ]. |
Food waste quantification | 11/47 | [ , , , , , , , , , , ] |
food loss quantification | 5/47 | [ , , , , ] |
Food security policies | 37/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Environmental policies | 13/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Public food assistance programs and policies | 24/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Risk management | 10/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , ] |
Food scandals policies | 2/10 | [ , ] |
Early warning systems for natural disasters | 3/10 | [ , , ] |
Risk management throughout the food supply chain | 3/10 | [ , , ] |
Proactive policy measures to handle the flood crises | 2/10 | [ , ] |
Providing food aids (micronutrient supplementation) during disasters | 1/10 | [ ] |
COVID-19 pandemic | 1/10 | [ ] |
The programmed risk identification | 1/10 | [ ] |
Import policies | 9/141 | [ , , , , , , , , ] |
Trade policies | 13/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Economic integration | 5/141 | [ , , , , ] |
Agricultural sustainable development and practices | 27/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Technology advancement | 36/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Sustainable technology advancement | 27/36 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
High-yield seed varieties | 8/36 | [ , , , , , , , ] |
Investment in R&D (e.g., precision farming) | 4/36 | [ , , , ] |
Information technology and IT advancement | 3/36 | [ , , ] |
The use of mobile applications | 3/36 | [ , , ] |
The use of nanotechnology in agriculture | 2/36 | [ , ] |
The use of biotechnology in agriculture | 2/36 | [ , ] |
The use of genetically modified (GM) crop. | 2/36 | [ , ] |
Local production enhancement | 18/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Farm production diversity | 9/141 | [ , , , , , , , , ] |
Building farmers capacities (small scale farmers) | 18/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Employment programs for poor households’ representatives | 2/141 | [ , ] |
Public programs to influence diets in a healthy manner | 9/141 | [ , , , , , , , , ] |
Geopolitical and political stability | 7/141 | [ , , , , , , ] |
Food safety and food safety policies | 16/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Reduction of yield volatility | 7/141 | [ , , , , , , ] |
Agriculture infrastructure | 7/141 | [ , , , , , , ] |
The integrative policies (nexus) | 6/141 | [ , , , , , ] |
The proper measurement of food security dimensions | 4/141 | [ , , , ] |
The country’s natural resources (cultivated agriculture area) | 9/141 | [ , , , , , , , , ] |
The proper communication among all stakeholders | 11/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Management of government food reserves | 7/141 | [ , , , , , , ] |
Collaboration among all supply chain stakeholders | 4/141 | [ , , , ] |
Promotion of the consumer’s education about sustainable consumption and healthy diet | 12/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Effective gleaning process (increasing the food bank’s processing resources) | 8/141 | [ , , , , , , , ] |
Food distribution infrastructure | 6/141 | [ , , , , , ] |
Adjustment in the diet structure | 3/141 | [ , , ] |
Dietary standard policies | 4/141 | [ , , , ] |
Urban agriculture policies | 3/141 | [ , , ] |
The government role | 16/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Government capital investment in agriculture | 7/16 | [ , , , , , , ] |
Government and public administration’s commitment in enhancing the operational process of food distribution | 3/16 | [ , , ] |
Government regulation for food businesses and households that produce food waste | 2/16 | [ , ] |
Government support for the research that enhances the country food security level | 1/16 | [ ] |
Government vision and commitment to adopt RFID technology | 1/16 | [ ] |
Government commitment in policy development to prevent obesity | 1/16 | [ ] |
Government knowledge of the correlation between market price and sustain the food prices during crises | 1/16 | [ ] |
Customer engagement in designing the public policies | 1/141 | [ ] |
Trust in the public institutions | 1/141 | [ ] |
Food security policies | 59/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Food consumption polices that offer safety net | 24/59 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Policies to enhance small-scale farmer performance and assets base such as loans, subsidies, access to information and knowledge sharing | 16/59 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Government input subsidy programs (input subsidy policy) that provide farmers with subsidies to investment in high-yielding technology (e.g., automation, fertilizers, high-yield seed) | 14/59 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Rural development policies to reduce yield volatility and improve the agriculture infrastructure (e.g., irrigation and water-saving technologies) | 14/59 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Capacity building policies (educational, training and technical support) | 14/59 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Policies supporting locally produced food | 12/59 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Education policies in general | 8/59 | [ , , , , , , , ] |
Diversified agriculture production policies | 6/59 | [ , , , , , ] |
Policies that impact the farm-level commodity pricing | 5/59 | [ , , , , ] |
Food stock policies which help in predicting global food production information | 4/59 | [ , , , ] |
Establishing policies to increase farmer income | 4/59 | [ , , , ] |
Buffer stock policies | 1/59 | [ ] |
Resource allocation policies (income taxes) | 1/59 | [ ] |
Trade policies | 20/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Establishing infrastructure development policies that target agriculture logistic infrastructure and improve the speed and quality of shipping logistics | 8/20 | [ , , , , , , , ] |
State trading and private trade supporting policies | 7/20 | [ , , , , , , ] |
Removal of tariff and non-tariff barrier | 7/20 | [ , , , , , , ] |
Trade infrastructure development policies | 4/20 | [ , , , ] |
Reliable marine connection and transportation logistics policies | 2/20 | [ , ] |
Food waste polices | 49/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Information and education campaigns that spread awareness at households and public level | 21/49 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Food waste reduction policies | 17/49 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Smart (innovative) food packaging and labelling policies | 9/50 | [ , , , , , , , , ] |
Food banks, food sharing or food rescue policies | 8/49 | [ , , , , , , , ] |
Positive sanctions such as financial rewards, Tax credits, federal and state funding, vouchers, fewer taxes | 8/49 | [ , , , , , , , ] |
Information and knowledge sharing among supply chain stakeholders | 6/49 | [ , , , , , ] |
Comprehensive food waste legislation | 6/49 | [ , , , , , ] |
Negative sanction policies by imposing fines and taxes such as disposal taxes | 6/49 | [ , , , , , ] |
Food waste recycling polices | 5/49 | [ , , , , ] |
Technology advancement (mobile applications) | 2/49 | [ , ] |
Gleaning operations policies (provide tax incentives and governmental support) | 2/49 | [ , ] |
Nudging tool (nudge people in forming sustainable consumption behaviour) | 2/49 | [ , ] |
Policies for peak storage reduction such as incentives for stock holding | 2/49 | [ , ] |
Food waste management policy | 1/49 | [ ] |
Food upcycling with regards to market segmentation based on age | 1/49 | [ ] |
Food loss policy | 10/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , ] |
Policies promoting the quantification of food loss | 3/10 | [ , , ] |
Food surplus policies | 11/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Policies to regulate company’s liability of donating surplus food | 5/11 | [ , , , , ] |
Food policies that subsidize purchases of surplus food “ugly food” by controlling for prices and the attributes of surplus items | 2/11 | [ , ] |
Food safety policies | 22/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Food safety standards | 7/22 | [ , , , , , , ] |
Safety throughout the food supply chain | 3/22 | [ , , ] |
Developing food safety training policies | 1/22 | [ ] |
Mandatory state registration for major types of food additives | 1/22 | [ ] |
Food quality and food hygiene compliance certifications | 5/22 | [ , , , , ] |
The integrative and coherent policies between food, water, and energy system nexus. | 4/141 | [ , , , ] |
Water–food (WF) nexus approach. | 1/141 | [ ] |
Food–energy–sanitation nexus approach | 1/141 | [ ] |
Water quality policies | 8/141 | [ , , , , , , , ] |
Common agricultural policy (CAP) that addresses sustainable agriculture | 16/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Green and blue infrastructure (GBI) policies | 1/16 | [ ] |
Common agricultural policy (CAP) hinders the sustainable intensification | 1/141 | [ ] |
The policies that promote consumer education on sustainable consumption and improving consumer status consciousness and knowledge of their purchases ecological impact | 6/141 | [ , , , , , ] |
Environmental policies | 18/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Gas emission policies, such as greenhouse gas reduction policies | 2/141 | [ , ] |
Policies to reduce climate change impact | 4/141 | [ , , , ] |
The coordination of policies between climate change, poverty and food insecurity due to their strong interlinking | 4/141 | [ , , , ] |
Efficiency in agriculture water use, irrigation systems | 3/141 | [ , , ] |
The investments in water-saving technologies | 2/141 | [ , ] |
Policies to minimize the impacts of anthropogenic activities on urban soils and enhance the urban agriculture practices | 2/141 | [ , ] |
Soil contamination of heavy metals (cadmium) | 1/141 | [ ] |
Optimization of the fertilizer use policy | 6/141 | [ , , , , , ] |
Carbon tax policy (promotes green economy) | 2/141 | [ , ] |
Aquaculture environmental policies | 1/141 | [ ] |
Bio-energy policies | 2/141 | [ , ] |
Management of government food reserves | 7/141 | [ , , , , , , ] |
Policies that promote traceability across the whole supply chain | 10/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , ] |
Import policies | 16/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] |
Direct governmental financial assistance to local agricultural assistance | 8/16 | [ , , , , , , , ] |
Sustaining local agricultural product prices compared to the imported products | 7/16 | [ , , , , , , ] |
Providing temporary tax benefits for agriculture investment | 4/16 | [ , , , ] |
Import ban (substitution) policies | 4/16 | [ , , , ] |
Direct budget subsidies | 2/16 | [ , ] |
Subsidizing loan interest rates | 2/16 | [ , ] |
Diversification of imported food origins strategy | 1/16 | [ ] |
Risk management policies | 10/141 | [ , , , , , , , , , ] |
Food scandals | 2/10 | [ , ] |
COVID-19 | 1/10 | [ ] |
Programmed risk identification | 1/10 | [ ] |
Proactive policy measures to handle the flood crises | 2/10 | [ , ] |
Early warning systems for natural disasters | 3/10 | [ , , ] |
Risk management throughout the food supply chain | 3/10 | [ , , ] |
Dietary standard policies | 4/141 | [ , , , ] |
Urban agriculture policies | 3/141 | [ , , ] |
Food aid policies | 2/141 | [ , ] |
Policies discussed by one author only | ||
Devising the right population policy in China | 1/141 | [ ] |
Flexible retail modernization policies | 1/141 | [ ] |
Policies that facilitate short-term migration | 1/141 | [ ] |
Policy to stimulate equitable economic growth through manufacturing and services | 1/141 | [ ] |
Sound research governance policies: to address the expected and unexpected complications of new technologies (nanotechnology) | 1/141 | [ ] |
This research was funded by the UAE Ministry of Education, Resilient Agrifood Dynamism through evidence-based policies-READY project, grant number 1733833.
Conceptualization, S.W., F.A., B.S. and I.M.; methodology, S.W., F.A., B.S. and I.M.; validation, S.W., F.A., B.S. and I.M.; formal analysis, S.W.; investigation, S.W., F.A., B.S. and I.M.; resources, I.M. and B.S.; data curation, S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W.; writing—review and editing, F.A.; visualization, S.W.; supervision, F.A., B.S. and I.M.; project administration, B.S. and I.M.; funding acquisition, B.S. and I.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
#ShowYourStripes graphic by Professor Ed Hawkins (University of Reading) https://showyourstripes.info/
What is the state of global food security today, and what is the role of climate change?
The number of people suffering acute food insecurity increased from 135 million in 2019 to 345 million in 82 countries by June 2022, as the war in Ukraine, supply chain disruptions, and the continued economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic pushed food prices to all-time highs.
Global food insecurity had already been rising, due in large part to climate phenomena. Global warming is influencing weather patterns, causing heat waves, heavy rainfall, and droughts. Rising food commodity prices in 2021 were a major factor in pushing approximately 30 million additional people in low-income countries toward food insecurity.
At the same time, the way that food is often produced today is a big part of the problem. It’s recently been estimated that the global food system is responsible for about a third of greenhouse gas emissions—second only to the energy sector; it is the number one source of methane and biodiversity loss.
Who is most affected by climate impacts on food security?
About 80% of the global population most at risk from crop failures and hunger from climate change are in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia, where farming families are disproportionally poor and vulnerable. A severe drought caused by an El Nino weather pattern or climate change can push millions more people into poverty. This is true even in places like the Philippines and Vietnam, which have relatively high incomes, but where farmers often live at the edge of poverty and food price increases have an outsized impact on poor urban consumers.
How might climate change affect farming and food security in the future?
Up to a certain point, rising temperatures and CO2 can be beneficial for crops. But rising temperatures also accelerate evapotranspiration from plants and soils, and there must also be enough water for crops to thrive.
For areas of the world that are already water-constrained, climate change will increasingly cause adverse impacts on agricultural production through diminishing water supplies, increases in extreme events like floods and severe storms, heat stress, and increased prevalence of pests and diseases.
Above a certain point of warming -- and particularly above an increase of 2 degrees Celsius in average global temperatures – it becomes increasingly more difficult to adapt and increasingly more expensive. In countries where temperatures are already extremely high, such as the Sahel belt of Africa or South Asia, rising temperatures could have a more immediate effect on crops such as wheat that are less heat tolerant.
How can agriculture adapt to climate change?
It’s possible to reduce emissions and become more resilient, but doing so often requires major social, economic, and technological change. There are a few key strategies:
Use water more efficiently and effectively, combined with policies to manage demand . Building more irrigation infrastructure may not be a solution if future water supply proves to be inadequate to supply the irrigation systems—which our research has shown may indeed be the case for some countries. Other options include better management of water demand as well as the use of advanced water accounting systems and technologies to assess the amount of water available, including soil moisture sensors and satellite evapotranspiration measurements . Such measures can facilitate techniques such as alternate wetting and drying of rice paddies, which saves water and reduces methane emissions at the same time.
Switch to less-thirsty crops . For example, rice farmers could switch to crops that require less water such as maize or legumes. Doing so would also help reduce methane emissions, because rice is a major source of agri-food emissions. But a culture that has been growing and consuming rice for thousands of years may not so easily switch to another less thirsty, less emitting crop.
Improve soil health . This is hugely important. Increasing organic carbon in soil helps it better retain water and allows plants to access water more readily, increasing resilience to drought. It also provides more nutrients without requiring as much chemical fertilizer -- which is a major source of emissions. Farmers can restore carbon that has been lost by not tilling soil and by using cover crops, particularly with large roots, in the rotation cycle rather than leaving fields fallow. Such nature-based solutions to environmental challenges could deliver 37% of climate change mitigation necessary to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. But getting farmers to adopt these practices will take time, awareness-raising and training. In places where farm plots are small and farmers can’t afford to let fields lie fallow or even rotate with leguminous crops, improving soil health could pose a challenge.
What is the World Bank doing to help countries build food security in the face of climate change?
The World Bank Group’s Climate Change Action Plan (2021-2025) is stepping up support for climate-smart agriculture across the agriculture and food value chains and via policy and technological interventions to enhance productivity, improve resilience, and reduce GHG emissions. The Bank also helps countries tackle food loss and waste and manage flood and drought risks. For example, in Niger, a Bank-supported project aims to benefit 500,000 farmers and pastoralists in 44 communes through the distribution of improved, drought-tolerant seeds, more efficient irrigation, and expanded use of forestry for farming and conservation agriculture techniques. To date, the project has helped 336,518 farmers more sustainably manage their land and brought 79,938 hectares under more sustainable farming practices.
Website: Climate Explainer Series
Website: Climate Stories: How Countries and Communities Are Shaping A Sustainable Future
Website: Food Security Update
Website: World Bank - Climate Change
Website: World Bank - Agriculture and Food
This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here .
Students are often asked to write an essay on Food Security in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.
Let’s take a look…
What is food security.
Food security means that all people can get enough good food to stay healthy. It’s like having a key to a pantry full of nutritious meals all the time. Everyone should be able to afford food, find it in stores, and know it’s safe to eat.
When people have food security, they are healthier and can do better in school and work. Without it, they get sick more often and can’t focus well. Countries aim for food security so no one goes hungry or gets ill from bad food.
Many things can make food security hard to achieve. Bad weather, wars, and not having enough land can all cause problems. Also, if food is too expensive, some people can’t buy what they need.
To make food security better, countries work on farming methods, help from the government, and keeping food prices fair. It’s important to make sure everyone, even poor people, can get to the food they need.
Why food security is important.
Imagine if you didn’t know if you would have dinner tonight or breakfast tomorrow. That worry is real for some people. Without enough food, kids can’t grow strong, and adults can’t work well. Food security is important because it helps everyone in a community to be healthy and active.
Some things can make it hard for people to get food. Bad weather, like droughts or floods, can destroy crops. Also, if food is too expensive, some families can’t buy what they need. In some places, wars or not having good roads can make it hard to deliver food to stores.
Everyone can help make sure there is food security. Governments can make plans to store food for emergencies and help farmers grow more. Schools can teach kids about growing vegetables and eating healthily. Even planting a small garden at home or sharing food with neighbors can make a difference.
Food security is like a team game where we all work together so no one goes hungry. When everyone has access to good food, our communities become stronger and everyone does better.
Food security is when all people at all times have physical, social, and economic access to enough safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs for an active and healthy life. It’s like having a reliable pantry that is always stocked with good food that everyone can reach.
The four pillars of food security.
Food security stands on four pillars: availability, access, utilization, and stability.
Availability means there is enough food for everyone. This is like having enough seats for every student in a classroom.
Utilization is about having a balanced diet with all the nutrients, and also having clean water and a good place to cook. It’s like having a good cookbook and a clean kitchen.
Stability means always having food available, not just some of the time. It’s like knowing you’ll always have breakfast every morning.
To improve food security, countries can do things like support farmers, reduce food waste, and make sure everyone has enough money to buy food. It’s also important to take care of the earth so that it can keep growing food for everyone.
Even kids can help with food security! You can learn about where your food comes from, help reduce waste by not throwing away food, and even grow a small garden at home or school. By understanding more about food and sharing what you know, you can help make sure there is enough food for everyone.
Food security is a big idea, but it’s made of simple parts: making sure everyone has enough good food all the time. By working together and taking care of each other and the planet, we can make sure no one goes hungry.
If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:
Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Food forest in philadelphia, healthcare & effects from climate change, negotiating the black sea grain initiative, how does the geographical location of a country or continent impact food security, an exploration of a specific and local problem using the 5w&h model, international agricultural development: a comprehensive perspective, maple leaf food inc., what impact will climate change have on food security in sub-saharan africa in the next decade, household food insecurity and hunger, cyber security implications on smart farming, impacts of climate change on food security in developing countries, popular essay topics.
Home — Essay Samples — Science — Food Safety — Global Food Insecurity: Causes And Solutions
About this sample
Words: 2149 |
11 min read
Published: May 17, 2022
Words: 2149 | Pages: 5 | 11 min read
Introduction, section i. background, section ii. technologies that can reduce hunger and improve food security, section iii. specific factors in chosen developing country.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:
Let us write you an essay from scratch
Get high-quality help
Dr. Karlyna PhD
Verified writer
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
2 pages / 1017 words
1 pages / 372 words
2 pages / 779 words
2 pages / 780 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
The "Food, Inc.", documentary film, directed by Robert Kenner provides a comprehensive overview of the food industry in the United States. The film delves into various aspects of the food production process, including the [...]
Food insecurity, a pressing global issue, carries profound implications for individuals and societies alike. In this essay on food insecurity, we will explore the multifaceted nature of this problem, examining its varying [...]
Cinnamon, a spice cherished for its aromatic qualities and versatile uses in both culinary and medicinal contexts, has a less celebrated, more insidious side: the potential to trigger allergic reactions in susceptible [...]
Waking up in morning to the best coffee makes the day a bright and productive one for sure. A creamy and rich froth on top gives heavenly taste to plain cup of coffee. Choosing the best milk frother for almond milk and coffee is [...]
“Want to go have some sushi?” “How about some pho?” “I feel like some Italian.”“Let’s go have Russian.” Everyone turns their head and looks at THAT guy. Who asks for Russian food? Russian cuisine has a deep, rich history that [...]
In recent years, the local food movement has gained a lot of attention for its effort at promoting sustainability from direct-to-consumer sales. Through processing, distribution and consumption, any regional food networks goal [...]
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
Essay on food security.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
According to FAO, “Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food for a healthy and active life.”
This involves four dimensions:
i. Adequacy of food supply or availability;
ii. Stability of supply, without seasonal fluctuations or shortages;
ii. Accessibility to food or affordability; and
iii. Utilisation: quality and safety of food.
These factors include a broad spectrum of socioeconomic issues with great influence on farmers and on the impoverished in particular.
Large shares of the world’s small-scale farmers, particularly in central Asia and in Africa, are constrained by access to markets, while inputs, such as fertilisers and seed, are expensive. With lack of irrigation water, infrastructure and investments, and low availability of micro-finance combined with dependency on few multinational suppliers, crop production is unlikely to increase in those regions where it is needed the most, unless major policy changes and investments take place. These constraints are further compounded by conflicts and corruption.
Agricultural prices are forecast to remain well above the levels of the first half of 2001-10. In addition, a production short of demand, a greater geographical inequity in production and demand, combined with possibly more extreme weather and subsequent speculation in food markets, could generate much greater price volatility than before.
The availability of food within a specific country can be guaranteed in two ways: either by food production in the country itself or by trade.
Increase in productivity can come about by using innovative soil and moisture conservation techniques, e.g., the double plantation techniques adopted by farmers in the Mekong plains of Indo- China and the elaborate terraces and irrigation systems of Bali and South China.
The Green Revolution helped to increase production in cereals in some regions, but the technologies involved had their own limitations.
Developments on the demand side require increase in production in those regions with the highest economic growth or population increase. The majority of these regions will be in emerging economies in Africa and Asia. Nowadays, Africa is especially dependent on food imports. Food production in this region is lagging behind due to limited research investments and the problems for farmers to use the appropriate inputs in their production process.
The world regions are sharply divided in terms of their capacity to use science in promoting agricultural productivity in order to achieve food security and reduce poverty and hunger.
Productivity has risen in many developing countries, mainly as a result of investment in agricultural R&D combined with improved human capital and rural infrastructure. In Africa, the levels of productivity are much lower and their growth has also been slower than in Asia.
One of the major options for significantly raising crop production is increasing the use of mineral fertilisers. The Africa Fertiliser Summit 2006 concluded that the use of fertilisers should be increased to a level of at least 50 kg/ha by 2015.
A major challenge is to find ways of making fertiliser available to smallholders at affordable prices. There is also a need for holistic approaches to soil fertility management that embraces the full range of driving factors and consequences of soil degradation. This would include the integration of mineral and organic sources of nutrients, thereby using locally available sources of inputs and maximising their use efficiency, while reducing dependency upon prices of commercial fertilisers and pesticides. The use of perennials, intercropping and agroforestry systems, such as the use of nitrogen fixating leguminous trees, are ways to increase nutrient availability, and enhance water availability and pest control, in a more sustainable manner.
After 1980, growth in expansion of irrigated area decreased and it is assumed this trend will continue in the near future. One of the reasons is that the areas most suitable for irrigation are already used, leading to higher construction costs in new areas. Current irrigation systems could be improved by investing in water control and delivery, automation, monitoring and staff training.
In most African regions, the major challenge is not the lack of water, but unpredictable and highly variable rainfall patterns with occurrences of dry spells every two years causing crop failure. This high uncertainty and variability influence the risk adverse behaviour of smallholder farmers. Rarely are investments made in soil management and fertility, crop varieties, tillage practices and even labour in order to avoid losses in case of total crop failure.
Managing the extreme rainfall variability over time and space can provide supplemental irrigation water to overcome dry periods and prevent crop failure. In combination with improved soil, this should reduce the risk of total crop failure and enhance the profitability of investments in crop management, for example, fertilisers, labour and crop varieties. Increasing crop canopy coverage reduces evapotranspiration from the soil, improving soil moisture and the provision of water for the crop.
This option has become more and more important with increasing transport possibilities and storing capacities and the growing challenges faced by some countries in their domestic production, including because of limitations in available cropland. International trade in agricultural products has expanded more rapidly than global agricultural GDP.
An increasing share of global agricultural exports originates from developed countries. The EU countries account for most of the global growth.
A large portion of this increase is accounted for by intra-EU trade.
Another perspective of trade is the purchase of land abroad for food production. Responding to recent food crises, a number of countries have started to purchase land abroad for cultivation of – crops needed to support domestic demand.
This is seen as a long-term solution to the high prices of agriculture commodities and increasing demand for Agroforestry products such as palm oil. Among the most active countries owning, leasing or concessioning farmland overseas are China, India, Japan, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and United Arab Emirates. The total area of overseas farmland in different countries was estimated at 5.7 million ha at the end of 2008 or 0.4 per cent of the global cropland area.
A major reason for instability in food supply is high fluctuation in food prices (price volatility). Volatile prices lead to poor investment strategies of producers and immediate impacts on consumers, especially in developing countries where consumers spend a large share of their income on food. Another source of instability is conflicts, which increase food supply risks.
Trade policies that limit market access, increase the volatility of commodity prices, unfairly subsidise developed country exports and constrain the trade policy flexibility of the developing world affect the stability and security as well as overall economic well-being of developing countries.
A quarter of the world’s governments implemented some export restrictions in the period of high prices in 2007-08 to ensure domestic food security. The impacts of these restrictions varied from panic-buying to the cultivation of smaller areas due to high input costs and the expectation of low product prices. These restrictions even increased price volatility of food products on the world market, thereby decreasing the food security of other countries.
With open markets, developing countries are very vulnerable to fluctuations in global food supply and prices and temporary protection of their own agricultural markets is promoted for these countries.
Conflicts greatly increase the risk of food supply instability. Countries in conflict and post-conflict situations tend to be food insecure, with more than 20 per cent of the population, and in many cases far more, lacking access to adequate food.
Accessibility to food refers not only to physical access but also affordability. Access to markets includes transportation of commodities and its costs and the transmission of price developments to producers. Poor transmission of price incentives to producers results in increasing the gap between consumers and producers especially as diets change.
As urbanisation increases, large urban markets are created and with this the scope of the establishment of big supermarket chains increases. This has implications for the entire food supply chain. Supermarkets have become an emerging force in South Asia, particularly in urban India, since the mid-1990s. The growth and power of international food corporations affect the opportunities of small agricultural producers in developing countries. Market entry is often barred to the majority of producers because of stringent safety and quality standards of food retailers.
Trade and urbanisation affect consumer preferences. The rapid diversification of the urban diet cannot be met by the traditional food supply chain in the hinterland of many developing countries. Consequently, importing food to satisfy the changing food demand could be relatively easier and less costly than acquiring the same food from domestic sources.
In Asia, traditional rice-eating societies are consuming increasing quantities of wheat in the form of bread, cakes, pastry and other products. Countries that traditionally [imported rice for meeting food shortfalls may now be shifting towards increasing levels of Wheat imports. This trend is also evident in the import of other temperate products like vegetables, milk and dairy products and temperate fruit. The overall result is that we are beginning to see a homogenisation of food tastes across the globe, but with regional variations.
Poor connections between urban and rural areas hinder price transmissions towards local markets, broadening the gap between urban demand and rural production in increasing demand for traditional products or for product diversification. The lack of access to markets is most evident in Africa, although large parts of Latin America and Asia are also experiencing long transport hours to reach markets. Consequently, domestic prices do not always follow international prices as an FAO report pointed out in 2006.
The periods of rising real prices were generally associated with real exchange rate devaluations. Relaxation of government controls over prices and market systems also led to gains in producer prices in some cases. In other instances, import liberalisation appears to have contributed to a decline in the real domestic prices of some commodities. Consequently, global shortages of food and feed that lead to global price increases are not followed by production increases at the local level.
Accessibility to food is also determined by the long-term trend in food prices (which is a different issue from price volatility).
In 2007-08 food prices were driven by a combination of rising fuel costs, production of biofuels, and unfavourable weather conditions, with trade restrictions boosting upward price pressures.
As the cost, and subsequent use, of fertiliser is strongly correlated with price, a potentially higher oil price would lower the use of fertiliser or further increase the food price.
Fuel price is one of the main determining factors for fisheries. Rising energy prices have a strong impact on capture as well as aquaculture (for the production and transport of fish feed) and lead to higher costs during the processing, transport (particularly air freight) and distribution of fish products. Small-scale fisheries, which depend on outboard motors and small diesel engines, have especially suffered from the spiralling rise in fuel prices.
While a higher oil price increases demand for biofuels, there is a catch: the agricultural commodities used nowadays or biofuels were previously used for feed and fodder; in the circumstances, demand for agricultural commodities as for factor inputs increases in this case. The overall decline in food prices is not expected to be so marked because of biofuel use.
Most of the quantitative and qualitative indicators of food security at the household level are linked to the poverty issue. As Amartya Sen (1981) points out, the poor do not have adequate means or entitlements to secure food, even when food is locally or regionally available. It is interesting to note that merely increase in income does not necessarily ensure improved nutritional status. Access to gainful employment, suitable technologies and other productive resources are important factors influencing undernutrition.
Though, overall, soaring food prices are blamed for their impacts on human vulnerability, there are two sides to this picture. Increasing food prices do have a positive effect on net food-selling households (FAO, 2008), augmenting their incomes and allowing more possibilities for farmers to afford investments in production inputs.
This underlines the need to minimise short-term price volatility and stimulate slow increases in long- term food prices, in order to enhance investments in the agricultural system and bridge the gap between developed and developing countries as well as between rural food producing and urban food consuming regions. Ideally, these developments should take environmental aspects into account to achieve sustainable agricultural systems that will meet the food demand of all the world citizens and eradicate hunger.
However, increasing yield and food supply without simply continuing the conventional expansion of cropland and rangeland and use of fertilisers and pesticides—at the cost of biodiversity and future generations—will require major investments and implementation of food energy considerations in the entire food production and consumption chain.
As already mentioned in discussing the problems of nutrition patterns, much requires to be accomplished to acquire equitability in this regard.
Apart from quantitative aspect, qualitative aspects of diet such as consumption habits and nutritional needs also affect food security. In the absence of adequate attention to qualitative aspects of food, the ability of the individual to sustain the benefits of development gets affected.
A number of more novel matters will need to be dealt with, such as:
(i) The positive and negative impacts on non-communicable diseases of intensive production systems, not only in terms of health (e.g. nitrite in vegetables, heavy metals in irrigation water and manure, pesticide use), but also in terms of dietary quality (e.g. leaner meats in intensive poultry production);
(ii) The effects of longer food chains, in particular of longer storage and transport routes, such as the higher risk of -deterioration (even if most of this may be bacterial and hence not a factor in chronic diseases), and the use and misuse of conserving agents and contaminants; and
(iii) The effects of changes in varietal composition and diversity of consumption patterns, for example, the loss of traditional crop varieties and, perhaps even more significantly, the declining use of foods from “wild” sources.
In the short term, the volatile prices can be decreased by price regulation and creation of larger cereal stocks to buffer the tight markets of food commodities and the subsequent risks of speculation. Safety nets need to be provided to alleviate impacts of rising prices and food shortage. Subsidies on agricultural commodities and inputs that are aggravating the food crisis need to be reduced/removed and investments made to shift to sustainable food systems and food energy efficiency.
In the middle term, efforts should be made to develop alternatives for feeds for animals and fish. Our ability to change the feed destined for livestock and aquaculture is probably greater than that of changing people’s food choice habits, which are not as easily controlled. Finding alternative feed sources provides a huge potential for increasing the availability of cereal for human consumption.
For other feed sources to become a sustainable alternative to the current use of cereals, their exploitation must not be resource- demanding. This poses a big challenge, since most of the easily available feed sources have already been fully exploited, although some alternatives still exist.
By using discards, waste and other post-harvest losses, the supply of animal and fish feed can be increased and be sustained without expanding current production, simply by increasing energy efficiency and conservation in the food supply chain.
There has been little focus on salvaging food already harvested or produced. An important question centers around the percentage of food discarded or lost during harvesting, processing, transport and distribution as well as at the point of final sale to consumers. Reducing such losses is likely to be among the most sustainable alternatives for increasing food availability.
Discarded fish from’ marine fisheries is the single largest proportion lost of any food source produced or harvested from the wild. The proportion is particularly high for shrimp bottom trawl fisheries. If sustainable, the amount of fish currently discarded at sea could alone sustain more than a 50 per cent increase in aquaculture production. However, many of these species could also be used directly for human consumption.
The potential to use unexploited food waste as alternative sources of feed is also considerable for agricultural products.
Food losses in the field (between planting and harvesting) could be as high as 20-40 per cent of the potential harvest in developing countries due to pests and pathogens. Postharvest losses vary greatly among commodities and production areas and seasons.
Substantial losses and wastage occur during retail and consumption due to product deterioration as well as to discarding of excess perishable products and unconsumed food. Food waste represents a major potential, especially for use as animal feed, which, in turn, could release the use of cereals in animal feed for human consumption.
Recovering energy from agricultural wastes is becoming increasingly feasible at the industrial production level; investments in technology enhancement of existing systems and innovation in new waste management systems is called for to support this expanding green economy.
Farmers need to be supported in developing diversified and resilient eco-agricultural systems. This includes management of extreme rainfall and use of inter-cropping to minimise dependency on external inputs like artificial fertilisers, pesticides and over irrigation.
Increased trade and improved market access can be achieved by improving infrastructure and reducing barriers to trade.
In the long term, awareness needs to be created about the pressures of increasing population growth and consumption patterns on sustainable functioning of the ecosystem. Alternative sources of food have to be explored and developed.
Leave a reply click here to cancel reply..
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Justify and focus planning, clarifying intentions.
The name of my program is Food Security and Sustainable Local Food Systems . This program will provide an opportunity for thirty participants to learn about food security and sustainable food systems. It will be offered on Saturday from 12 PM to 3 PM at the Community Centre .
There is increased realization that sustainable food system needs to take into account not only the economic well-being of the suppliers and consumers but also the environmental impacts as well as human health issues. As such the concepts of food security as well as the sustainability of local food systems have grown in the recent past. Food security epitomizes a situation where an entire community has access to sufficient, safe as well as nutritious foods. A community that has foods security has access to enough food that can sustain an active and healthy lifestyle. The food supply is dependent on a healthy and sustainable foods system. However, recent research indicates that 12.2% of Canadian households experienced food insecurity in 2011.
The workshop will employ a small-group format with the intention of providing for active participation of the audience. The participants will be grouped into groups of five members so as to ensure that the varying understanding about food security and sustainable food systems is accommodated. The use of groups is essential as the participants can learn in an environment that offers comfort and while ensuring enhanced interactions.
Using a workshop format provides that participants are matched based on their understanding levels as well as their ability to decipher information. The use of a workshop to deliver the material for this topic is critical, and it offers more than the opportunity to learn as participants can interact at a personal level and build networks. The systems are fundamental as they enable the participants to implement the lessons in their daily lives.
The target population is the low-income households from rural Canada. The population has once been hit by food insecurity that has rocked the country in the recent years and as such they are conscious about their foods security. The techniques that will be applied during the workshop will ensure that the sensitivity of the matter is taken into consideration. The techniques will provide simple but effective knowledge that the community can be in a position to implement. The lessons will be tailored to ensure that the community can be in a position to influence policies related to food security and sustainable food systems in the area. To make sure that we spread the news about the program, we have partnered with the local authorities.
I will be directly responsible for the planning of the entire program since I will be heading the planning team. I will be in charge of the logistics and related operation during the workshop. During the planning process, I will be chairing all the meetings. I will be tasked to assign other members their different roles during the planning meetings.
The planning team will include a community representative who is knowledgeable about the local food systems that are accessible to the community. Other members of the planning team will include consultants in food security as well as a representative from the Department of Agriculture, Horticultural and Food Security . The team will also include experts from World Food and Agricultural Organization , who will offer technical support during the workshop. A complete representation of the community will be achieved since the planning team will also include local leaders both from the government and those elected by the people.
The roles of the planning team will include facilitating the workshop as well as managing the logistics of the entire program. Other activities will include the facilitation of interaction between the program participants. The planning team will also prepare as well as coordinate a question and answer session so as to ensure that participation is effective. The planning team will also play the role of linking the community members, policy makers as well as the technical experts to ensure the continuity of the program activities during and after the workshop. The role of the community representative will be raise issues that affect the community regarding food security in the community.
The program will be sponsored by the Department of Agriculture in collaboration with the local office of World Food and Agricultural Organization. The goals of the two organizations are to ensure food security for community members through the development of sustainable methods of food production. The two organizations aim at enabling local communities to achieve food security by applying the environmentally friendly resources that are locally available. The community itself had constituted an awareness committee that guides activities designed to increase their knowledge and participation in the community development program. The committee will also be engaged in the workshop given that the objectives of the committee mirror the workshop goals.
Some of the potential constraints that will have an impact on the planning of the include finances. Despite having other organizations funding the workshop, there is still a limitation in terms of the available resources. As such, the activities that are listed in the workshop have to be regulated to ensure that the available resources are optimized. If the planning committee identifies some activities that are critical and require extra financing, the committee will identify members to conduct fund raising from local and international organizations.
To assess the needs of the community the planning team will utilize the community representatives. More community needs will be obtained by conducting a retrospective evaluation of the government records at the local administration. We will also conduct focused group sessions three weeks ahead of the workshop to understand better community needs. The focused group discussions will include members of the community who have lived in the region for different durations.
The various methods of assessing the community needs have been given preference due to several factors. The methods also build on the bond of the community that is critical to ensuring that the community can maintain the trend of seeking local solutions to the issue of food security. Conducting focus groups discussions on the food security is effective. Focused groups ensure that community members who have lived in there for a long duration can engage in an evaluation of the community alongside those who moved in recently. The methods are cost efficient when it comes to implementation.
Conducting a retrospective evaluation of food security issues concerning the community is critical in that we identify trends that may not be captured through mere observation. The methods chosen have ethical and social ramifications especially the idea of conducting a retrospective evaluation of the issues related to food security in the area. As such it will be necessary that we seek permission from the relevant authorities to have access to the required data.
The data sources that will be used will include existing government records regarding food security and availability of local solutions to the issue. The other source of data will be from the focused group discussions that we will conduct in the community. Interviews with the main stakeholders in the empowerment of the communities in terms of achieving food security will also provide more data.
The three sources will synergize each other in ensuring that we do not miss important data points that could be overlooked when one relies on one method of data collection. The retrogressive evaluation of existing data will enable us to be in a position to verify the facts that revolve around food security in the community. Interviews with the key informants will provide data that is relevant to determining the technicalities involved to ensure that the community has sustainable food sources.
The accuracy of our PCs will be dependent on the methods used for data collection since the methods will have an accurate reflection of the picture in the community. This proposal contains PCs that were identified in line with personal experiences from the community. The fact that first-hand information from the community was used to determine the PCs ensures that there is increased the credibility of the PCs. The DCs will also be determined using first-hand information obtained from the community so as to ensure that there is increased the reliability of the DCs. The DCs will be aligned with the workshop goals to enhance their relevance to the community.
The goal of the program is to ensure that the community learns about food security and sustainable food systems. The workshop will empower the community to employ locally available methods that will improve the food security situation. The program is designed in a manner that will enable the participants to be in a position to identify the needs of the community as well as develop local needs.
The learning objectives of the workshop are:
This assignment offered me the opportunity to reflect on the workshop and program plans. The questions on this assignment helped me justify the importance of the planned program and the related workshop. The questions were instrumental in the justification of the importance of the program and the focus of the learning for the community. Completion of the units helped me gain insights into the ideas and goals of the program.
The assignment enabled me to acquire an insight into program planning and as a result I am aware that the process is not linear as I had thought before. The insights from the two units have influenced each other and have made me take a closer look at the different components that apply in the program creation. The textbook Planning Programs for Adult Learners was an instrumental resource in the development of the goals and objectives of the program. I also used lecture notes and other planning guides that are available on the internet.
IvyPanda. (2020, June 25). Food Security and Sustainable Local Food Systems. https://ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-and-sustainable-local-food-systems/
"Food Security and Sustainable Local Food Systems." IvyPanda , 25 June 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-and-sustainable-local-food-systems/.
IvyPanda . (2020) 'Food Security and Sustainable Local Food Systems'. 25 June.
IvyPanda . 2020. "Food Security and Sustainable Local Food Systems." June 25, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-and-sustainable-local-food-systems/.
1. IvyPanda . "Food Security and Sustainable Local Food Systems." June 25, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-and-sustainable-local-food-systems/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "Food Security and Sustainable Local Food Systems." June 25, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/food-security-and-sustainable-local-food-systems/.
IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:
Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.
Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.
Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:
Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy .
To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.
Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy .
IMAGES
COMMENTS
The World Food Organization describes this security as access to nutritious, safe and sufficient food to cater for the basic human desires. Get a custom essay on Food Security Crisis Resolution
Defining Food Security: A Multidimensional Perspective Food security defined many times by various organizations and… For full essay go to Edubirdie.Com.
The intent of this essay is to give an in-depth meaning of food security, the perspective of food insecurity to the case of the United States, the major lapses of the conventional food systems, and the American communities that frequently remain affected by food insecurity.
The global food security challenge is straightforward: by 2050, the world must feed two billion more people, an increase of a quarter from today's global population. The demand for food will be 56% greater than it was in 2010. The United Nations has set ending hunger, achieving food security and improved nutrition, and promoting sustainable ...
Abstract The present article deals with the theoretical aspects of food insecurity and its concept, causes, effects and possible solutions at the global and national level. Food security can be ...
Essays might explore the strategies to achieve food security, challenges like climate change or political instability hindering food security, and the roles of individuals, communities, and nations in promoting food security. We've gathered an extensive assortment of free essay samples on the topic of Food Security you can find at PapersOwl ...
The definition of food security is when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.
The World Bank has been at the forefront of promoting strategies to address food insecurity because it is a global issue. According to Osabohien et al. (2018), the issue and the inability to ...
Food security refers to the accessibility and availability of enough food that meets the needs and demands of a population for its well-being. Several factors inhibit the ability to attain food security, including the incapability to access food, lack of resources, and lack of nutrition knowledge. There are four distinct categories of food ...
Achieving SDG 2. There is now increased attention on the staggering societal costs of hunger and the need to radically transform our local, national and international food systems into more sustainable, nutritious and efficient systems. The five essays in this special issue discuss a wide range of issues related to food systems and the ethics ...
Food security is a central priority for international policy as one of the world's most significantly urgent targets to achieve. It is considered one of the most pressing issues in many countries, the degree of food security representing the level ...
Learn how climate change is affecting global food security today and what can we expect in the future.
Food insecurity refers to the lack of access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to meet one's dietary needs for an active and healthy life. It is a complex issue that affects individuals, communities, and entire nations, with far-reaching consequences that extend beyond hunger. In this essay, we will explore the causes and consequences of ...
High-quality essay on the topic of "Food Security" for students in schools and colleges.
Food security is a social problem gaining growing significance and requires careful study of how we produce, prepare, and distribute food [2, 6]. The rising use of digital technology to improve the procedures that support these activities has significant consequences for food security as a direct result of these developments.
Get a custom essay on Food Security, Improved Nutrition and Sustainable Agriculture. In the book under evaluation, the authors describe how SDG2 links food security, nutrition, and sustainable agriculture. It is discussed how this goal can be assessed through specific targets and indicators evaluating whether the goal of ending hunger was met.
View our collection of food security essays. Find inspiration for topics, titles, outlines, & craft impactful food security papers. Read our food security papers today!
Introduction The task of this essay is to develop a report to construct a food system that can provide global food security. This analysis will cover three sections. The first section of this essay focuses on the meaning of food security and how population growth plays a role with it. Section two talks about the types of technologies that combat hunger across the globe and improve food ...
Essay on Food Security. According to FAO, "Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food for a healthy and active life.". This involves four dimensions: i. Adequacy of food supply or availability;
This persuasive speech's purpose is to persuade listeners that the food insecurity issue is severe and that everyone can contribute to its solution.
Essay On Food Security. 1362 Words6 Pages. INTRODUCTION. Food security refers to the access by all people at all times to adequate self and nutritious food for healthy and productive life. Food security is related to supply of food and individual access to it. It is defined as including both physical and economic access to food that meets ...
This paper investigates the challenges of health and food security and measurements that are most effective in feeding the rapidly expanding global population.
Abstract. The name of my program is Food Security and Sustainable Local Food Systems. This program will provide an opportunity for thirty participants to learn about food security and sustainable food systems. It will be offered on Saturday from 12 PM to 3 PM at the Community Centre. Get a custom essay on Food Security and Sustainable Local ...