Nurses’ communication skills
*** p < 0.001; CR: critical ratio.
The structural model for relationships among clinical nurses’ communication skills, problem-solving ability, understanding of patients’ condition, and nurse’s perception of professionalism that would be suitable for predicting the influencing relationships was verified. Since the fitness index of the modified model was shown to be higher than that of the initial model, the final model for this study was set as shown in Figure 2 .
Final model. * χ 2 = 124.074 (df = 61, p <0.001), GFI(Goodness of Fit Index)= 0.90, RMSEA(Root Mean Square Error Approximation)=0.07, NFI(Normed Fit Index)=0.87, IFI(Incremental Fit Index)= 0.93, TLI(Tucker-Lewis Index)= 0.91, CFI(Comparative Fit Index)= 0.92.
The standardization factors and CR values of the final model were examined to determine whether there were direct relationships between communication skills, problem-solving ability, understanding of patients’ conditions, and nurse’s perception of professionalism. The results are shown
For the relationship between communication ski in Table 5 .lls and problem-solving ability, the standardization factor was 0.85 and the CR value was 7.37; communication skills showed a statistically significant effect. Consequently. The relationship between communication skills and understanding of patients’ conditions also showed a statistically significant effect. Consequently, Hypothesis 1 was supported.
The relationships between the human effects of the measurement model.
Directions | Estimate ( ) | Standardization Factor (β) | Standard Error | CR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nurses’ communication skills | → | Problem-solving ability | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.10 | 7.37 *** |
Nurses’ communication skills | → | Understanding of patients’ conditions | 0.84 | 0.61 | 0.13 | 6.35 *** |
Nurses’ communication skills | → | Nurse’s perception of professionalism | 0.32 | 0.54 | 0.15 | 2.02 * |
Problem-solving ability | → | Nurse’s perception of professionalism | −0.05 | −0.11 | 0.14 | −0.39 |
Understandingof patients’ conditions | → | Nurse’s perception of professionalism | 0.32 | 0.56 | 0.10 | 2.14 * |
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001; CR: critical ratio.
For the relationship between communication skills and nurse’s perception of professionalism, the standardization factor was 0.54, and the CR value was 2.02. Communication skills showed a statistically significant effect. Consequently. For the relationship between problem-solving ability and nurse’s perception of professionalism, the standardization factor was −0.056, and the CR value was −0.39. Problem-solving ability had no statistically significant effect. Consequently.
The relationship between nurses’ understanding of patients’ conditions and nurse’s perception of professionalism had a statistically significant effect. Consequently Figure 2 shows the influencing relationships between the study variables of the final study model, considering non-standardization and standardization factors of the relationships between the study variables.
To grasp the significance of the mediating effect in the final study model, the direct and indirect effects of each variable were examined. To examine the mediating effect of the problem-solving ability and understanding of patients’ conditions variables, the bootstrapping method provided by the AMOS 23.0 program included in IBM was utilized. The results are shown in Table 6 .
Mediating effect analysis.
Directions | Direct Effects | Indirect Effects | Gross Effects | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nurses’ communication skills | → | Understanding of patients’ conditions | 0.61 *** | - | 0.61 *** | ||
Understanding of patients’ conditions | → | Nurse’s perception of professionalism | 0.56 * | - | 0.56 * | ||
Nurses’ communication skills | → | Understanding of patients’ conditions | → | Nurse’s perception of professionalism | 0.54 * | 0.34 * | 0.88 * |
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001
The indirect effect of communication skills on nurse’s perception of professionalism through nurses’ understanding of patients’ conditions was statistically significant. That is, clinical nurses’ communication skills have an indirect positive effect on their nurse’s perception of professionalism, with nurses’ understanding of patients’ conditions acting as a parameter. We also found that the effect of communication skills on nurse’s perception of professionalism was statistically significant. Therefore, communication skills have a partially mediated effect on nurse’s perception of professionalism, with understanding of patients’ conditions acting as a parameter. However, communication skills were found to have no indirect positive effect on nurse’s perception of professionalism when problem-solving ability was set as a parameter.
In this study, we developed and analyzed a hypothetical model regarding clinical nurses’ communication skills, problem-solving ability, and understanding of patients’ conditions, and how these factors influence their nurse’s perception of professionalism.
Communication skills were found to have statistically significant effects on their relationship with nurses’ problem-solving ability, understanding of patients’ conditions, and nurse’s perception of professionalism. Nurses’ communication skills not only affected their problem-solving ability but also their understanding of patients’ conditions and nurse’s perception of professionalism. Good communication among nurses can reduce uncomfortable situations and improve interactions with patients, which can consequently enhance problem-solving [ 28 ]. Supporting our findings, Ancel [ 17 ] reported that communication skills afford the maintenance of amicable cooperative relationships with patients across diverse medical classes, thereby enhancing the efficiency of nursing-related problem-solving.
Nurses’ communication is also closely related to their understanding of patients’ conditions, particularly regarding the treatment processes. Nurses frequently experience difficulties as a result of poor communication with not only patients and their family members but also other medical personnel. Further, poor delivery of explanations and questions affects nurses’ understanding of patients’ situations and problems, and patients can also feel concern regarding whether nurses accurately understand their problems [ 29 ]. Nurses frequently experience psychological abuse when communicating with patients and develop stress or discomfort [ 30 ]; this can lead to distrustful relationships with and inhibited understanding of patients [ 31 , 32 ]. Vermeir et al. [ 18 ] reported that scientific approaches are required to understand patients in-depth. To accurately understand both oneself and others, the most important method is successful communication. Such findings support the present study’s indication that nurses’ communication is a basic means of solving nursing problems, with both actions being interrelated.
Our finding that nurses’ communication skills are structurally related to their nurse’s perception of professionalism supports the findings of many previous studies. Regarding nurse’s perception of professionalism, Adams et al. [ 33 ] as well as Lee and Kim [ 34 ] explained that a good perception leads to higher-level capabilities, fostering high-level nursing of patients and the development of autonomous vocation. The above studies reported that, since nurses’ communication skills are related to their nurse’s perception of professionalism, communication skills should be considered a predictor of success. Further, McGlynn et al. [ 35 ] recommended positively reinforcing communication skills to improve nurse’s perception of professionalism. This supports the findings of the present study, indicating that communication and nursing professional perception are interrelated.
Thus, communication skills are important for nursing patients. They enable nurses to accurately understand patients’ problems, serve (by forming patient trust) an important function in the process of administering nursing interventions, and positively affect nurses’ perception of their profession. As such, each concept is important. However, nurses working in the clinic are critically aware of their professionalism. In order to reinforce this, communication skills are required, and the emphasis is placed on strengthening the nurses’ ability to solve problems as well as assess and understand patients. As a result, communication skills play an important role in helping nurses understand patients’ problems accurately, build patient trust in nursing interventions, and create structural relationships that have a positive impact on the perception of nursing occupations. Therefore, efforts to improve nurses’ communication skills not only improve their problem-solving abilities and understanding of patients’ conditions but also improve their nurse’s perception of professionalism. To maintain the professionalism of nurses, “competency development programs” would be helpful, thereby emphasizing the need for their application in nursing colleges and clinical practice.
We found clinical nurses’ problem-solving ability to have no positive effect on their perception of professionalism. This contrasts with previous studies, which reported that problem-solving ability is helpful for such perception of professionalism [ 36 ]. We also found that problem-solving ability does not affect nursing professional perception through a mediating effect.
The present findings indicate that the distinctiveness of the fields of nursing should not be overlooked. In nursing organizations that have a culture of discouraging diversity, when negative results are obtained from attempts to solve nursing problems, confusion regarding the identity of nursing professionals means perception of the profession is not reinforced; in many cases, the opposite perception is formed. Furthermore, for those in lower-level positions, nurse’s perception of professionalism is thought to be low because they cannot voice their opinions and have difficulties such as excessive workloads. Although few previous studies have directly examined this, Vermeir et al. [ 18 ] explained that, as the role expectation for nurses increases, factors for job turnover increase as a result of a sense of confusion regarding the nurses’ role and increases in stress. These findings indicate that factors that degrade nurses’ problem-solving ability induce skepticism regarding nursing and possibly career change, thereby supporting the findings of this study.
However, in the present study, positive results with low levels of relevancy in the structural model but high correlations were found. It is expected that, if nurses’ environmental conditions are improved and their nursing capabilities are developed so that they can solve nursing problems with confidence, their nursing professional perception will improve.
Our findings indicated that the relationship between nurses’ understanding of patients’ conditions and nurse’s perception of professionalism was statistically significant. This supports Nilsson et al. [ 21 ] and Philip et al. [ 29 ], who reported that, in the fields of nursing, when patients accurately understand nurses’ instructions or explanations and health information, they can participate in, independently adjust, and engage in creative decision-making related to self-nursing.
McGlynn et al. [ 35 ] suggested that understanding patient problems is an important element in resolving negative situations; meanwhile, Heo and Lim [ 37 ] indicated that clinical nurses provide high-quality nursing services and develop self-efficacy when they apply professional knowledge and a desire to understand patients’ problems. These study findings accord with our own findings.
The aforementioned findings suggest that the development and application of programs that can enhance nurses’ understanding of patients’ conditions should be emphasized, and that studies of various patient types, the characteristics of patients by age group and hospital areas, as well as the introduction of simulation education programs to improve nurses’ understanding of patients’ conditions should be continuously implemented.
This study aimed to verify the structural relationships between clinical nurses’ communication skills and their problem-solving ability, understanding of patients’ conditions, and nurse’s perception of professionalism. We also aimed to identify, through a structural model, the mediating effects of nurses’ problem-solving ability and understanding of patients’ conditions in the relationship between communication skills and nurse’s perception of professionalism.
The findings of this study are as follows (all significance levels = 0.05). In the relationship between communication skills and problem-solving ability, the value of the standardization factor was 0.85 and the CR value was 7.37, indicating that communication skills had a statistically significant effect. In the relationship between nurses’ communication skills and understanding of patients’ conditions, the value of the standardization factor was 0.61 and the CR value was 6.35, indicating that communication skills had a statistically significant effect. In the relationship between communication skills and nurse’s perception of professionalism, the value of the standardization factor was 0.54 and the CR value was 2.02, indicating that communication skills had a statistically significant effect. However, in the relationship between problem-solving ability and nurse’s perception of professionalism, the value of the standardization factor was −0.05 and the CR value was −0.39, indicating that problem-solving ability has no statistically significant effect. Finally, in the relationship between nurses’ understanding of patients’ conditions and nurse’s perception of professionalism, the value of the standardization factor was 0.56, and the CR value was 2.14, indicating that nurses’ understanding of patients’ conditions has a statistically significant effect.
There are some limitations to this study. First, as we only examined nurses at secondary and tertiary university hospitals, our findings may not be generalizable to all clinical nurses. Replication studies examining a range of levels of medical institutions and associated workers are necessary. Second, the structural relationship between problem-solving ability and the nurse’s perception of professionalism turned out to be insignificant or mediated. Subsequent studies on the various approaches to revisit this structural relationship should be performed. Third, theories should be systematically developed to establish the values of the nursing profession, and additional studies are necessary to explore other variables.
We would like to thank the staff nurses who participated in the survey and took the time to complete the initial assessment.
Conceptualization, A.Y.K. and I.O.S.; methodology, A.Y.K.; software, I.O.S.; validation, A.Y.K. and I.O.S.; formal analysis, A.Y.K. and I.O.S.; investigation, A.Y.K.; resources, A.Y.K.; data curation, A.Y.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Y.K.; writing—review and editing, A.Y.K. and I.O.S.; visualization, A.Y.K. and I.O.S.; supervision, I.O.S.; project administration, I.O.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
‘I hope the next Darzi report will be a positive story about NHS progress’
STEVE FORD, EDITOR
13 September, 2001 By NT Contributor
VOL: 97, ISSUE: 37, PAGE NO: 36
Jacqueline Wheeler, DMS, MSc, RGN, is a lecturer at Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College
Problems - some people like them, some do not think they have any, while others shy away from them as if they were the plague. Opportunities, in the form of problems, are part of your life.
The most difficult decision is deciding to tackle a problem and implement a solution, especially as it is sometimes easier to ignore its existence. Problem-solving takes time and effort, but once a problem has been addressed the nurse can feel satisfied that the issue has been resolved and is therefore less likely to re-emerge.
Nurses make clinical decisions using two different approaches. The first is the rationalist approach, which involves an analysis of a situation so that subsequent actions are rational, logical and based on knowledge and judgement. The second approach is based on a phenomenological perspective, where a fluid, flexible and dynamic approach to decision-making is required, such as when dealing with an acutely ill patient.
Problems come in different guises and the solver can perceive them either as a challenge or a threat. One of the most common types of problem is when the unexpected happens. As a nurse you plan and implement care for a patient based on your knowledge and experience, only to find that the patient’s reaction is totally different from that expected but without any apparent reason.
Another type of problem is an assignment where others set a goal or task. Throughout your working life you will be required to undertake duties on behalf of other people. For some this is difficult as they feel unable to control their workload. Others see it as an opportunity to develop new skills or take on additional responsibilities. Opportunities can be perceived as problems by those who fear failure.
A third type of problem is when a dilemma arises. This is when it is difficult to choose the best solution to a problem because the nurse is confronted with something that challenges his or her personal and/or professional values.
The sooner a problem is identified and solutions devised, the better for all involved. So try to anticipate or identify problems when they occur through continuously monitoring staff performance and patient outcomes.
Listening to and observing junior staff will help you to detect work or organisational concerns, because when there are problems staff are likely to behave in an unusual or inconsistent manner.
Remember that people view things differently, so what you perceive as a problem may not be one to anyone else. So before you begin thinking about what to do - whether to keep it under surveillance, contain it or find a solution - you should undertake an initial analysis. This will help you to understand the problem more clearly.
An analysis will also enable you to prioritise its importance in relation to other problems as problems do not occur one at a time.
Routine problems often need little clarification, so an initial analysis is recommended for non-routine problems only. Even then, not all problems justify the same degree of analysis. But where it is appropriate, an initial analysis will provide a basis from which to generate solutions.
Perception is also important when dealing with patients’ problems. For example, if a patient gives up reading because he or she cannot hold the book (objective), the nurse may assume it is because the patient has lost interest (subjective, one’s own view).
It is essential for the problem-solver to remember that, where possible, solutions must come from those connected with the problem. If it is to be resolved, agreement must be owned by those involved as they are probably the best and only people who can resolve their differences. The manager should never feel that he or she must be on hand to deal with all disputes.
To solve a problem you need to generate solutions. However, the obvious solution may not necessarily be the best. To generate solutions, a mixture of creative and analytical thinking is needed (Bransford, 1993).
Creativity is about escaping from preconceived ideas that block the way to finding an innovative solution to a problem. An effective tool for assisting in this process is the technique of lateral thinking, which is based largely on the work of Edward de Bono, who regards thinking as a skill.
There are several ways to encourage creative decision-making. One method that works best for specific or simple problems is brainstorming. If the ground rules of confidentiality and being non-judgemental are applied, it will produce a free flow of ideas generated without fear of criticism (Rawlinson, 1986).
Time constraints and staff availability may make it difficult for all those involved in a problem to meet. In such cases an adaptation of brainstorming - where a blank piece of paper is given to those involved and each writes down four solutions to the problem - may be the answer. A similar technique is the collective notebook, where people are asked to record their thoughts and ideas about a problem for a specified period.
An alternative is where one person writes down a list of solutions in order of priority, which is then added to by others. This helps to prioritise the ideas generated. All these methods produce data that can then be analysed by the problem-solver.
When the problem affects people in different geographical areas, solutions can be generated by obtaining the opinion of experts through the use of a questionnaire, which is known as the Delphi technique (McKenna, 1994).
When an apparently insurmountable problem presents itself, it is often useful to divide it into smaller pieces. This is known as convergent thinking. Using divergent thinking - where you consider a problem in different ways to expand your view - may also help.
A final alternative is the stepladder technique, which is time-consuming but effective if the issue is stirring up strong feelings. This requires the people involved in the problem to be organised into groups. First, two people try to solve the problem, then a third member is drawn in, to whom the solution reached by the first two is presented. All three then try to agree a solution. More people are added to the group, if necessary, in a similar way, until there is agreement of all involved. Provided the individuals are motivated to solve the problem, this technique creates ownership and commitment to implementing the agreed solution.
Analytical thinking, which follows a logical process of eliminating ideas, will enable you to narrow the range down to one feasible solution.
Although someone has to make the ultimate decision on which solution to implement, there are advantages to group decision-making: a greater number of possible solutions are generated and conflicts are resolved, resulting in decisions being reached through rational discussion.
This does, however, require the group to be functioning well or the individuals involved may feel inhibited in contributing to the decision-making. One individual may dominate the group or competition between individuals may result in the need to win taking precedence over deciding on an agreed practical solution.
As nursing becomes less bureaucratic individuals are being encouraged to put forward their own ideas, but social pressures to conform may inhibit the group. We do not solve problems and make decisions in isolation, but are influenced by the environment in which we work and the role we fulfil in that environment. If group members lack commitment and/or motivation, they may accept the first solution and pay little attention to other solutions offered.
There are three types of decision-making environments: certain, risk and uncertain. The certain environment, where we have sufficient information to allow us to select the best solution, is the most comfortable within which to make a decision, but it is the least often encountered.
We usually encounter the risk environment, where we lack complete certainty about the outcomes of various courses of action.
Finally, the uncertain environment is the least comfortable within which to make decisions as we are almost forced to do this blind. We are unable to forecast the possible outcomes of alternative courses of action and, therefore, have to rely heavily on creative intuition and the educated guess.
Taking this into consideration, you should not contemplate making a decision until you have all the information needed. Before you make your decision, remind yourself of the objective, reassess the priorities, consider the options and weigh up the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each solution.
An alternative is to use the method that Thomas Edison used to solve the problem of the electric light bulb. Simply focus on your problem as you drift off to sleep, and when you wake up your subconscious mind will have presented you with the answer. But bear in mind that this is not a scientific way of solving problems - your subconscious can be unreliable.
If you are not sure about your decision, test the solution out on others who do not own the problem but may have encountered a similar dilemma. Once you have made your choice stick to it, or you may find it difficult to implement because those involved will never be sure which solution is current. They will also be reluctant to become involved in any future decision-making because of your uncertainty.
The next step is to ensure that all the people involved know what decision has been made. Where possible, brief the group and follow this up with written communication to ensure everyone knows what is expected of them. You may need to sell the decision to some, especially if they were not involved in the decision-making process or the solution chosen is not theirs.
Finally, to ensure the solution is implemented, check that the people involved know who is to do what, by when and that it has happened. Review the results of implementing your solution (see Box) and praise and thank all those involved.
- Part 1 of this series was published in last week’s issue: Wheeler, J. (2001) How to delegate your way to a better working life. Nursing Times; 97: 36, 34-35.
Next week. Part three: a step-by-step guide to effective report writing.
Related articles
As we announce the winner of the Nursing Times Christmas Competition for 2017, we…
In December, Nursing Times invited readers to nominate a nurse who makes a real…
As nurses, no matter what our field of practice, we always work…
Nurses from the hospital trusts that treated the victims of this year’s…
Sign in or Register a new account to join the discussion.
As a leader, how do you approach challenges in your organization? Do you see them as problems to be solved, or puzzles to be pieced together? In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, this distinction could be the key to unlocking innovation and thriving in uncertain times.
The shift from problem-solving to puzzle-solving isn’t just a change in terminology – it’s a fundamental shift in mindset that can transform how your team tackles complex issues. Let’s explore why this matters and how you can implement it in your organization.
1. holistic perspective.
Puzzle-solving encourages leaders to step back and consider all possible pieces before jumping to solutions. This holistic view is crucial when dealing with the multifaceted challenges presented to the modern leader.
The Japanese business philosophy kaizen sees problems or challenges as a crucial step in the cycle of improvement. Puzzle-solvers adopt this frame of mind and see difficulty as an opportunity for growth and improvement.
Puzzle-solving thrives on diverse perspectives. By bringing together varied viewpoints, you can uncover pieces of the puzzle you didn’t even know were missing.
Puzzle-solving doesn’t just shift us into an opportunity mindset – it also fosters a culture of continuous learning and adaptation. As you piece together each new puzzle, you and your team grow in knowledge and capability.
Let me share a personal experience that illustrates the power of this approach. During an organizational development event, our team faced the challenge of reducing a contract closure process from several weeks to just two days – a goal that initially seemed impossible.
Instead of being overwhelmed, we reframed the challenge by asking, “What must be true to achieve a two-day turnaround?” This shift in perspective allowed us to rethink the entire process and innovate a solution that met the ambitious target.
By approaching the challenge as a puzzle rather than a problem, we identified aspects of the process we hadn’t previously considered. We brought together team members from different departments, each offering unique insights. This diversity of perspective, combined with a willingness to question our assumptions, led to a breakthrough that transformed our operations.
1. reframe challenges as growth opportunities.
Train your team to see “red” on a scorecard not as a failure, but as an area ripe for improvement and personal growth. This simple reframing can dramatically change how your team approaches challenges.
Before jumping into solution mode, ask, “What information or perspectives might we be overlooking?” This critical thinking approach can reveal crucial insights and areas for development.
Bring together people from different functions, backgrounds, and thinking styles to enrich your problem-solving process and foster mutual growth.
Use generative AI tools to access a wealth of existing knowledge and frameworks. This can provide you with an unprecedented number of lenses through which to examine a challenge and grow your understanding.
Foster an environment where asking questions, seeking out new viewpoints, and continuous learning are encouraged and rewarded.
Growth is the only guarantee that tomorrow will be better. John C. Maxwell
As we navigate the technological complexities of the modern era – including generative AI – the ability to shift from problem-solving to puzzle-solving will be a critical skill for leaders. This approach not only helps us tackle immediate challenges more effectively, but also reinforces our organization’s ability to adapt and innovate in the face of rapid technological change.
Remember, the goal isn’t just to solve the problem at hand, but to build a culture and mindset that thrives on complexity and change. By viewing challenges as puzzles and embracing diverse perspectives – both human and AI-generated – you’ll be better equipped to lead your team through the ever-changing landscape of modern business.
What challenge are you currently facing that could benefit from a puzzle-solving approach? How might reframing this challenge and seeking out diverse perspectives lead to innovative solutions?
Take some time this week to practice puzzle-solving with your team. Start by reframing a current challenge as an opportunity, then brainstorm what pieces might be missing from your current understanding. You might be surprised at the innovative solutions that emerge.
Gain practical insights and discover real-world examples of how tools like AI can support your leadership development journey. Subscribe to the Maxwell Leadership blog for more content from AI researcher Daniel Englebretson and other professionals championing transformation in today’s marketplace.
Daniel Englebretson is an AI researcher, innovator, and entrepreneur. He is also the founder and CEO of Elynox, the co-founder and managing partner of ShiftHX, and an adjunct professor of artificial intelligence and communications at Wake Forest University and Elon University. Daniel is committed to empowering and enabling others with the skills and mindset shifts required to create opportunities to collaborate more effectively with AI.
Be the first to comment on "solving puzzles, not problems: 5 strategies for growth in the age of change", leave a reply.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Post Comment
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Nurses can implement the original nursing process to guide patient care for problem solving in nursing. These steps include: Assessment. Use critical thinking skills to brainstorm and gather information. Diagnosis. Identify the problem and any triggers or obstacles. Planning. Collaborate to formulate the desired outcome based on proven methods ...
Professionalism and Leadership: Leaders in nursing build vital relationships and collaborate with various health care teams on sensitive topics. Using critical thinking skills allows those in nursing leadership roles to analyze decisions impacting the organization. They then clearly explain the rationale in a manner that encourages staff support.
Nursing leadership is critical in facilitating and improving nurse performance, which is essential for providing quality care and ensuring patient safety. ... problem-solving ability, nursing informatics competencies), 7 communication skills and confidence, 8 commitment, 9 quality of work life, 10 job stress, 11 and motivation 12 can ...
Problem-solving in nursing is the vital foundation that makes up a nurse's clinical judgment and critical thinking skills. Having a strong problem-solving skillset is pertinent to possessing the ability and means to provide safe, quality care to a variety of patients. Nurses must rely on their clinical judgment and critical thinking skills to ...
Nurse leaders perceive their role as a problem-solver, which is a necessary step in advocacy. 27 Problem-solving is a process that contains the elements of decision-making and critical thinking. 28. The theory that emerged from the core categories explicitly focused on the central phenomenon of LHV in the nursing work environment.
1.1. Rational. Healthcare systems are globally facing a crisis, with nurse shortage being a perennial issue. Nurses have the highest patient interaction, making nurse leaders central catalysts in positively influencing patient safety culture to reach safer patient outcomes [].At the same time, negative nursing work environments cultivate dissatisfied nurses who are likely to suffer from ...
mentorship. delegation. open-mindedness. forward-thinking. accessibility. Another valuable quality in leadership is being proactive in problem-solving. Good leaders handle issues as they arrive. They are capable of "putting out fires," and that's important. Yet, great leaders anticipate problems before they come to a head.
perpetrated by nursing leadership, physicians, or peers. and emotional abuse perpetrated by newly licensed nurses. Data have shown that those most vulnerable to violent, disruptive, and intimating behaviors include ... "Nurse leaders address LHV affecting their staff members by solving problems, creating a safe work environment, and reducing ...
Transformational leadership in nursing plays a significant role in promoting a positive, collaborative work environment. Through guidance, mentorship, and motivation, nurse leaders can inspire their teams to feel valued and respected. This increased empowerment leads to greater nurse retention and improved patient satisfaction and outcomes.
Practitioners and organizational leaders alike have declared that collaboration is a key strategy for improving problem solving and achieving innovation in health care. ... (ANCC, 2010). Some of these Forces include quality of nursing leadership, management style, quality of care, autonomous nursing care, nurses as teachers, interprofessional ...
With the increasing complexity of health care, we need adaptive leadership approaches which critically analyze the complex problem-solving required within an ever-changing health context. Adaptive leadership brings together people from different fields and levels of experience to work through the "wicked problems" (those problems that do ...
Nurses have numerous avenues to enhance their leadership skills and prepare for greater responsibilities in their roles. Each of these pathways contributes to the development of nurse leadership skills. 1. Recognize Essential Nurse Leader Competencies. Professionals must exhibit the following nurse leader skills to effectively embrace greater ...
Standards. Guidance and Supporting Information. Good leadership means better care. Good leadership means better care. "Show me the environment and I will tell you the kind of leadership in that place. If staff are smiling and welcoming it's because the leader is smiling and welcoming. Staff follow the leader as role model, and the leader ...
Now in its Sixth Edition, this foremost leadership and management text incorporates application with theory and emphasizes critical thinking, problem solving, and decision making. More than 225 case studies and learning exercises promote critical thinking and interactive discussion. Case studies cover a variety of settings, including acute care, ambulatory care, long-term care, and community ...
Critical thinking in nursing is invaluable for safe, effective, patient-centered care. You can successfully navigate challenges in the ever-changing health care environment by continually developing and applying these skills. Images sourced from Getty Images. Critical thinking in nursing is essential to providing high-quality patient care.
Explore the challenges of nursing leadership, from effective communication and resource management to providing quality care under pressure. Login; Nursing Degrees. ... This diversity can be a great source of innovative thinking and problem-solving, but it can also create misunderstandings and conflicts. Dealing With Conflicts.
6. Safety on the Job. Hazards abound in both nursing and nurse management. Many of these are built into working in a clinical environment; even when using personal protective equipment, nurses risk being exposed to a variety of illnesses. This issue has only been enhanced by the Covid pandemic, with nurses dying from exposure at alarming rates.
4-Stars from Doody's Review Service The best-selling leadership and management text available for nursing education programs, Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing: Theory and Application, 11th Edition, combines the latest evidence-based content and a proven experiential approach to prepare students for success as they join today's professional nursing workforce.
Such findings support the present study's indication that nurses' communication is a basic means of solving nursing problems, with both actions being interrelated. ... The effects of self-efficacy and self-directed learning readiness to self-leadership of nursing student. J. Digit. Converg. 2016; 14:309-318. doi: 10.14400/JDC.2016.14.3.309.
To solve a problem you need to generate solutions. However, the obvious solution may not necessarily be the best. To generate solutions, a mixture of creative and analytical thinking is needed (Bransford, 1993). Creativity is about escaping from preconceived ideas that block the way to finding an innovative solution to a problem.
The shift from problem-solving to puzzle-solving isn't just a change in terminology - it's a fundamental shift in mindset that can transform how your team tackles complex issues. Let's explore why this matters and how you can implement it in your organization. Why Puzzle-Solving Matters for Modern Leaders 1. HOLISTIC PERSPECTIVE
It's important that Black nurses are visible and involved in healthcare management and leadership because their leadership can help improve health outcomes for Black patients. Given Black Americans continue to be three times more likely than white Americans to contract COVID-19, representation in the health workforce is especially critical during and through the pandemic.