report along with
answers of purpose
established in stage
1 and recommendation regarding
purpose.
You have studied earlier that the financial statements of an organisation are used for reporting the financial position of the company for public use. The financial statement analysis are categorised majorly into two parts:
Let us now study about these components in detail as follows:
You have studied earlier that the traditional financial statements of an organisation are used for reporting the financial position of the company for public use. Whenever an investor intends to compare the financial statements of two organisations, there is a need for a common scale in order to match the two distinct businesses for investment purposes.
As organisations are different in size, growth, etc. comparing the traditional financial statements might lead to misleading interpretations affecting the investors.
For example, A Ltd. has liabilities worth ₹10, 00,000 while B Ltd. has liabilities worth ₹100, 00,000. Does this information from their balance sheets imply that A Ltd. is less risky than B Ltd.?
In reality, it depends in part on the size of the companies, their asset size, the industries that the two companies belong to, etc. This led to the use of common size analysis for decision-making purposes. Common size analysis is a popular method of financial statement analysis, which makes use of common size financial statements.
These financial statements display all items as percentages of a common base figure. Each item in the financial statement is reported in the form of a percentage. This percentage is arrived at by using a base figure. For example, every item on the income statement of an organisation is reported as a percentage of sales.
There are three reasons to use common-size analysis:
The most widely used common size analysis methods are as follows:
Vertical common size analysis.
Although both methods are similar considering that the figures in financial statements are converted to percentages however, they differ in the base used to compute the percentages. Let us discuss the two methods in detail in the subsequent sections.
Horizontal common-size analysis uses one type of financial statement at a time. However, instead of using only a year’s financial statement, horizontal common analysis makes use of the same type of financial statement over several consecutive years.
Usually, three years of information is used for horizontal analyses, although it is common to extend the evaluation for measuring long-term trends in the organisation’s performance.
For instance, if an organisation performs a horizontal analysis on its income statement, it would use the income statements for 2011, 2012 and 2013. The figures in each succeeding period are expressed as a percentage of the amount in the baseline year, with the baseline amount being listed as 100%.
Consider the following illustration:
Income statement information of Dell Inc. as ended March, 2013 is as follows:
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|
Revenue | 61,494 | 62,071 | 56,940 |
Cost of goods sold | 50,098 | 48,260 | 44,754 |
Gross profit | 11,396 | 13,811 | 13,811 |
Operating expenses | 7,963 | 9,380 | 9,174 |
Operating income | 3,433 | 4,431 | 3,012 |
Interest expenses | (83) | (191) | (171) |
Income Before income tax | 3,350 | 4,240 | 2,841 |
Income tax provision | 715 | 748 | 469 |
Net income | 2,635 | 3,492 | 2,372 |
Assuming 2011 is the base year, 2012 and 2013 revenues will be calculated as follows, respectively:
Thus, the horizontal analysis of Dell’s Income Statement would be as follows:
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | 61,494 | 100% | 62,071 | 101% | 56,940 | 93% |
Cost of goods sold | 50,098 | 100% | 48,260 | 96% | 44,754 | 89% |
Gross profit | 11,396 | 100% | 13,811 | 121% | 12,186 | 107% |
Operating expenses | 7,963 | 100% | 9,380 | 118% | 9,174 | 115% |
Operating income | 3,433 | 100% | 4,431 | 129% | 3,012 | 88% |
Interest expenses | (83) | 100% | (191) | 230% | (171) | 206% |
Income Before income tax | 3,350 | 100% | 4,240 | 127% | 2,841 | 85% |
Income tax provision | 715 | 100% | 748 | 105% | 469 | 66% |
Net income | 2,635 | 100% | 3,492 | 133% | 2,372 | 90% |
This analysis shows that the percentages of revenue for 2012 and 2013 first increased and later decreased the 100% benchmark of 2011. The financial statement user would interpret this as an increase and later decrease in Dell Inc.’s sales performance.
Revenue for 2013 may be misleading at first glance, however, further analysis reveals that the decrease in 2013 represents only 7% fall compared to the 100% benchmark of revenue in 2011. In reality, the COGS in 2013 have come down by 11% compared to the benchmark COGS in 2011. Thus, the company is in a better position in managing its resources.
Another type of common size analysis is the vertical analysis method. Vertical analysis refers to the proportional analysis of a financial statement, where each item on a financial statement is recorded as a percentage of another item.
This implies that each item on the income statement of an organisation is recorded as a percentage of the gross sales. On the other hand, each item on the balance sheet of an organisation is recorded as a percentage of the total assets.
For example, if the cost of goods sold has consistently been recorded as 40% of sales in the past four years for an organisation, a percentage of 48% in the fifth year would raise an alarm for further analysis. Moreover, vertical analysis is helpful for timeline analysis.
An example of vertical analysis of an income statement as follows:
Particulars | Amount (₹) | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Sales | 10,00,000 | 100% |
Cost of goods sold | 4,00,000 | 40% |
Gross margin | 6,00,000 | 60% |
Salaries and wages | 2,50,000 | 25% |
Office rent | 50,000 | 5% |
Supplies | 10,000 | 1% |
Utilities | 20,000 | 2% |
Other expenses | 90,000 | 9% |
Total expenses | 4,20,000 | 42% |
Net profit | 1,80,000 | 18% |
Vertical analysis of a balance sheet uses the common base as the total assets of an organisation. However, for a deeper analysis, users tend to use the total of all liabilities as the base for calculating line item liabilities in a balance sheet and the total of all equity accounts as base when calculating all equity line item percentages.
This has been illustrated in the following example:
Particulars | Amount (₹) | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Cash | 1,00,000 | 10% |
Accounts receivable | 2,50,000 | 25% |
Inventory | 1,50,000 | 15% |
Total current assets | 2,00,000 | 20% |
Fixed assets | 3,00,000 | 30% |
Total assets | 10,00,000 | 100% |
Accounts payable | 1,00,000 | 10% |
Accrued liabilities | 70,000 | 7% |
Total current liabilities | 2,00,000 | 20% |
Notes payable | 30,000 | 3% |
Total liabilities | 2,00,000 | 20% |
Capital stock | 1,00,000 | 10% |
Retained earnings | 1,50,000 | 15% |
Total equity | 1,50,000 | 15% |
Total liabilities and equity | 10,00,000 | 100% |
From the above analysis it can be interpreted that:
Comparative financial statements are those statements which provide all the desired financial information for two or more financial years. This statement is use to compare results of current financial statement with previous accounting period of the firm or with that of the competitors.
Under this method, the components of financial statement (i.e. Balance sheet and Income statement) are used for comparative purposes and all the items are presented in terms of figures and as well as in percentage.
Comparative statements determines any increase, decrease and percentage change in the corresponding amount of two or more than two years and this analysis is used by various stakeholders such as, managers, investors, creditors, analyst, etc. It reflects organisation’s ability to deal with solvency, liquidity, profitability related issues.
The methods used under the comparative statements are as follows:
Comparative Income Statement shows the financial performance of the firm in comparison of prior period data of the firm or of competitors. It provides information regarding expenses and income of the firm for two or more than two years.
It also provides the information about various changes in absolute figure and in the form of percentage. It provides a view of business performance over a time and supports financial manager in decision making practices.
Comparative Income Statement of Infosys for year ended March 31, 2017 is as follows:
Parameter | MAR’17 (₹ Cr.) | MAR’16 (₹ Cr.) | Change % |
---|---|---|---|
Operating Income | 59,289.00 | 53,983.00 | 9.83% |
Less: Inter divisional transfers | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Less: Excise | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Net Sales | 59,289.00 | 53,983.00 | 9.83% |
Expenditure: | |||
Stock Adjustments | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Raw Materials Consumed | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Power & Fuel Cost | 180.00 | 179.00 | 0.56% |
Employee Cost | 30,944.00 | 28,207.00 | 9.70% |
Cost of Software developments | 6,044.00 | 5,466.00 | 10.57% |
Operating Expenses | 399.00 | 221.00 | 80.54% |
General and Administration Expenses | 3,884.00 | 3,666.00 | 5.95% |
Selling and Marketing Expenses | 276.00 | 229.00 | 20.52% |
Miscellaneous Expenses | 355.00 | 351.00 | 1.14% |
Expenses Capitalised | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Total Expenditure | 42,082.00 | 38,319.00 | 9.82% |
PBIDT (Excl OI) | 17,207.00 | 15,664.00 | 9.85% |
Other Income | 3,062.00 | 3,051.00 | 0.36% |
Operating Profit | 20,269.00 | 18,715.00 | 8.30% |
Interest | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
PBDT | 20,269.00 | 18,715.00 | 8.30% |
Depreciation | 1,331.00 | 1,115.00 | 19.37% |
Profit Before Taxation & Exceptional Items | 18,938.00 | 17,600.00 | 7.60% |
Exceptional Income / Expenses | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Profit Before Tax | 18,938.00 | 17,600.00 | 7.60% |
Provision for Tax | 5,120.00 | 4,907.00 | 4.34% |
PAT | 13,818.00 | 12,693.00 | 8.86% |
Extraordinary Items | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Adj to Profit After Tax | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Profit Balance B/F | 44,698.00 | 40,065.00 | 11.56% |
Appropriations | 58,516.00 | 52,758.00 | 10.91% |
Equity Dividend | 515.00 | 485.00 | 6.19% |
Earnings Per Share | 60.18 | 55.28 | 8.86% |
Book Value | 295.72 | 266.00 | 11.17% |
Comparative Balance Sheet shows the current financial position of the firm in comparison to prior period data. Comparative balance sheet records all the items of balance sheet side by side under relevant head of three main components (i.e. Assets, Liabilities and Share capital) of balance sheet.
Generally it is presented at the end of financial year for the past 3 years data. While some firms like financial institutions use other versions which shows all the data at the month end or at the quarter end. However, in both versions it provides a clear picture of firm’s financial position to the analyst.
Comparative Balance Sheet of Infosys for year ended March 31, 2017 is as follows:
Parameter | MAR’17 (₹ Cr.) | MAR’16 (₹ Cr.) | YoY %Change |
---|---|---|---|
Equity and Liabilities | |||
Share Capital | 1,148.00 | 1,148.00 | 0.00% |
Share Warrants & Outstanding | |||
Total Reserves | 66,749.00 | 59,925.00 | 11.39% |
Shareholder’s Funds | 68,017.00 | 61,082.00 | 11.35% |
Long-Term Borrowings | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Secured Loans | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Unsecured Loans | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Deferred Tax Assets / Liabilities | -346.00 | -405.00 | -14.57% |
Other Long Term Liabilities | 82.00 | 62.00 | 32.26% |
Long Term Trade Payables | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Long Term Provisions | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Total Non-Current Liabilities | -264.00 | -343.00 | -23.03% |
Current Liabilities | |||
Trade Payables | 269.00 | 623.00 | -56.82% |
Other Current Liabilities | 7,405.00 | 7,225.00 | 2.49% |
Short Term Borrowings | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Short Term Provisions | 4,112.00 | 3,740.00 | 9.95% |
Total Current Liabilities | 11,786.00 | 11,588.00 | 1.71% |
Total Liabilities | 79,539.00 | 72,327.00 | 9.97% |
Assets | |||
Non-Current Assets | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Gross Block | 16,240.00 | 14,739.00 | 10.18% |
Less: Accumulated Depreciation | 7,635.00 | 6,491.00 | 17.62% |
Less: Impairment of Assets | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Net Block | 8,605.00 | 8,248.00 | 4.33% |
Lease Adjustment A/c | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Capital Work in Progress | 1,247.00 | 934.00 | 33.51% |
Intangible assets under development | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Pre-operative Expenses pending | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Assets in transit | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Non Current Investments | 15,334.00 | 11,076.00 | 38.44% |
Long Term Loans & Advances | 6,237.00 | 5,550.00 | 12.38% |
Other Non Current Assets | 434.00 | 422.00 | 2.84% |
Total Non-Current Assets | 31,857.00 | 26,230.00 | 21.45% |
Current Assets Loans & Advances | |||
Currents Investments | 9,643.00 | 2.00 | 482050.00% |
Inventories | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Sundry Debtors | 10,960.00 | 9,798.00 | 11.86% |
Cash and Bank | 19,153.00 | 29,176.00 | -34.35% |
Other Current Assets | 4,443.00 | 3,735.00 | 18.96% |
Short Term Loans and Advances | 3,483.00 | 3,386.00 | 2.86% |
Total Current Assets | 47,682.00 | 46,097.00 | 3.44% |
Net Current Assets (Including Current Investments) | 35,896.00 | 34,509.00 | 4.02% |
Total Current Assets Excluding Current Investments | 38,039.00 | 46,095.00 | -17.48% |
Miscellaneous Expenses not written off | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Total Assets | 79,539.00 | 72,327.00 | 9.97% |
Contingent Liabilities | 1,902.00 | 188.00 | 911.70% |
Total Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Book Value | 295.72 | 266.00 | 11.17% |
Adjusted Book Value | 295.72 | 266.00 | 11.17% |
Financial Accounting
( Click on Topic to Read )
Corporate Finance
Management Accounting
Target costing: definition, features, objectives, process, advantages, what is contract costing definition, types, features, procedure, management accountant, standard costing and variance analysis, what is process costing features, types, advantages & limitations, process, what is cost control definition, features, process, advantages, disadvantages, what is cost sheet components, advantages, treatment and adjustments, what is absorption costing advantage, limitation, standard costing: definition, features, types, advantages, disadvantages, what is marginal costing definition, features, advantages, limitations, what is joint cost methods: average cost, physical quantity, survey, sales revenue, management accounting and developed costing systems, leave a reply cancel reply.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
We’ve spent the time in finding, so you can spend your time in learning
Mastering financial statements: how to read and analyze them.
Schedule a FREE consultation with a formation and compliance expert today 📞
Have you ever stared at a financial statement and felt puzzled? You’re not alone!
For many, these documents can seem like a daunting puzzle filled with numbers, jargon, and cryptic abbreviations.
But what if we told you that mastering financial statements could be your ticket to making informed decisions—whether you’re managing your finances, evaluating investments, or navigating business strategies?
In this blog, we’ll demystify the world of balance sheets, income statements, and cash flow reports.
We’ll equip you with the essential skills needed to read between the lines of these crucial documents and uncover insights that can shape your financial future.
Get ready to transform confusion into confidence with doola , as we provide you with practical tips and financial tools that will have you analyzing financial statements like a pro in no time!
Financial statements are essential documents that provide a snapshot of a company’s financial performance and position.
There are three main types of financial statements: the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.
These three financial statements are interconnected and provide a complete picture of a company’s financial performance and position.
The balance sheet , or the statement of financial position, summarises a company’s assets, liabilities, and equity at a specific time. Assets include cash, inventory, equipment, etc.
Liabilities represent debts or obligations to be paid off, and equity represents the value left by shareholders after deducting liabilities from assets.
The balance sheet follows the basic accounting equation: Assets = Liabilities + Shareholders’ Equity. This means all assets must equal the liabilities and equity on the balance sheet.
The income statement shows a company’s revenue and expenses for generating that revenue during a specific period.
It starts with sales or revenue at the top and then subtracts various expenses, such as cost of goods sold (COGS), operating expenses , taxes, interest expense, etc., to arrive at net income or profit.
Net income is an essential number on the income statement, indicating whether a company made a profit or incurred losses during a period.
The cash flow statement tracks all cash inflows and outflows within an organization during a particular period.
It can be divided into three sections: operating activities (cash flows from day-to-day operations), investing activities (cash flows related to buying or selling long-term assets), and financing activities (cash flows associated with raising capital).
The cash flow statement helps investors understand how effectively a company manages its cash resources by showing where it gets and how it uses it.
Financial ratios are essential for understanding and analyzing a company’s financial statements. They provide valuable insights into how well it can cover its debts, or how much profit it’s earning.
In simple terms, financial ratios are mathematical calculations that compare different figures from a company’s financial statements to assess its performance. These figures include revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, and equity.
By examining the relationships between these numbers, we can better understand how well the company manages its resources and generates profits.
Various financial ratios can be used to evaluate different aspects of a company’s operations and, when combined, paint a more comprehensive picture.
The balance sheet is a key financial statement that every business owner and investor should be familiar with. It tells you how much business assets you have and how much money you owe in liabilities.
Assets can include cash, accounts receivable, equipment, inventory, or investments. Liabilities include accounts payable, accrued expenses, and long-term debt such as mortgages and other loans.
Let’s look at each balance sheet’s components, starting with assets. It includes all the value you have on hand, such as cash and the amount in the business bank account.
Some of it is less liquid, like equipment or inventory, and accounts receivable or payments you’re due to receive.
Assets are usually listed in order of liquidity – meaning how quickly they can be converted into cash. Cash is typically listed first, followed by short-term and long-term investments such as property or equipment.
Liabilities are the money you have to subtract from your assets. It gives you a rough idea of how much value your business has to work with.
It typically involves monthly payments to vendors or contractors, which could be considered a short-term liability.
Liabilities are also listed in order of due date: current liabilities (due within one year) are followed by long-term liabilities (due after one year). Long-term liabilities, like business loan debt, last longer.
Lastly, equity is the money you have put into the business.
It includes retained earnings (profits reinvested back into the company), drawing (the money you pay yourself), common stock (the value of shares issued to shareholders), and any other capital contributions made by owners.
Now that we understand how a balance sheet is structured, let’s discuss how to analyze it effectively.
One way to do this is by calculating financial ratios using numbers from both sides of the balance sheet.
To gain deeper insights into a company’s financial position, it is crucial to analyze the balance sheet using various financial ratios, such as the current, quick, and debt-to-equity ratios.
The current ratio measures a company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations with its current assets. A high current ratio indicates the company has enough liquid assets to cover its short-term debts.
It measures your liquidity to determine how easily your current assets can be converted to cash to cover your short-term liabilities.
To calculate the current ratio, divide the total current assets by the total current liabilities.
Here is the current ratio of Barney’s Barn:
Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
Current Ratio = 33,000 / 11,000 = 3
Ratio = 3:1
Ideally, a current ratio of 2:1 or higher is healthy, showing that the company can quickly pay off its short-term debts.
The quick ratio, also known as the acid-test ratio, measures a company’s ability to meet its debt obligations with its most liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents).
Unlike the current ratio, which includes all current assets in its calculation, this ratio only considers highly liquid assets that can be converted into cash quickly.
To calculate the quick ratio, divide total liquid assets (current assets – inventory) by total current liabilities.
For example, the current asset value of Barney’s Barn is $24,000 (excluding equipment value)
So, the Quick Ratio = 24,000 / 11,000 = 2.18
Ratio = 2.18:1
A quick ratio of 1:1 or higher indicates that the company has enough liquid resources to cover its immediate debts without relying on inventory sales.
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio compares a company’s long-term debt with its shareholders’ equity. It shows how much of a company’s financing comes from borrowing money versus equity.
To calculate the D/E ratio, divide total liabilities or debt by shareholders’ equity. It only includes long-term debt, such as bank loans, not short-term liabilities, like accounts payable.
So, the debt-to-equity ratio of Barney’s Barn = 10,000 / 25,000 = 0.4
Ratio = 0.4:1
A high D/E ratio indicates that most of the company’s financing comes from debt, making it riskier for investors.
A lower D/E ratio is generally considered favourable, meaning the company has more funding through capital investment rather than borrowing.
The income statement, also known as the profit and loss statement, reflects a company’s revenues, expenses, and profits for a financial reporting period. It shows how much revenue a company generated and how much it has spent on expenses during that period.
It is crucial to know the different components of an income statement to better understand how to read and analyze it. The first is the revenue or sales section, which shows the total money generated from selling goods or services.
After revenue comes the cost of goods sold (COGS) section. This section includes all direct costs associated with purchasing goods the company sells.
The difference between revenue and COGS gives the gross profit margin.
General expenses include recurring costs to keep the business running. It may include rent, which will be the same month to month, while others, like utilities and office supplies, may fluctuate.
The next is operating earnings or EBITDA (Expenses Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization).
It equals the total amount you can take home after subtracting expenses from revenue, excluding taxes.
Income tax expense is the estimated income tax paid or owed during the reporting period, which is part of the IT in EBITDA.
The last part of an income statement is net income or net profit, which is calculated by subtracting all expenses from gross profit margin.
Net Income represents the bottom line for a business’ operations after all other sources of revenue have been accounted for.
The income statement is divided into three main sections: gross profit, operating profit, and net profit.
Each component can be further analyzed using various financial ratios to gain valuable insights into a company’s profitability.
The gross profit margin is calculated by dividing the gross profit (revenue minus cost of goods sold) by total revenue. This ratio indicates how much profit a company generates from its sales after deducting the COGS.
It will tell you how much money your business makes per dollar earned. You can improve this ratio by lowering your COGS (reducing the wholesale cost of goods and services) or raising prices.
Here is the calculation of Barney’s Barn’s gross profit margin:
Gross Profit Margin = (Sales Revenue – COGS) / Sales Revenue
Gross Profit Margin = (9,000 – 4,000) / 9,000 = 0.55, or 55%
So, Barney’s gross profit margin is 55%, meaning he keeps $0.55 of every dollar he earns as gross profit.
The operating profit margin measures how much operating earnings (revenue minus all expenses except interest and taxes) are generated for every dollar of sales.
While it is similar to gross profit margin, it also takes general expenses into account.
For Barney’s Barn, the calculation will be:
Operating Profit Margin = Operating Earnings (EBITDA) / Sales Revenue
Operating Profit Margin = 2,750 / 9,000 = 0.31, or 31%
A higher operating margin implies the company has better control over its costs and can generate more profits. Since COGS and general expenses are something you can control, you should focus on the operating profit margin to earn more profit.
The net profit margin reflects the net income (operating income minus taxes) earned for every dollar of revenue generated. This ratio considers all expenses incurred by the business, including taxes.
Here is the calculation of Barney’s Barn’s net profit margin:
Net Profit Margin = Net Income / Sales Revenue
Net Profit Margin = 1,850 / 9,000 = 0.21, or 21%
So, for every dollar Barney earns, he keeps $0.21. A higher net profit margin indicates strong profitability, but a lower net profit margin could mean the company is not generating enough profits to cover its expenses and taxes.
The cash flow statement is an indispensable tool for companies following the accrual method of accounting. It provides a clearer picture of a company’s financial health by adjusting for non-cash items and tracking actual cash inflows and outflows.
In the accrual method, you may raise an invoice of $1,000 and record that as accounts receivable under asset. However, you don’t have the money on hand yet.
So, a cash flow statement reverses those transactions where you don’t have cash on hand.
Below are the key components of cash flow statements:
Analyzing a cash flow statement with financial ratios tells you how much cash you have on hand to cover liabilities. It also tells you how much cash you earned during the month. Here are three formulas to help you do that.
The current liability coverage ratio measures a company’s ability to meet its short-term financial obligations using its current assets. It compares the current cash flow against the debt you need to pay in the near future.
First, you must calculate your current average liability. You can do that by adding all your current liabilities at the beginning and end of an accounting period and dividing by 2. For example, Barney’s total current liabilities are $1,000 at the beginning of March and $900 at the end.
So, his current average liability is = (1,000 + 900) / 2 = $950.
Now, we can calculate his current average liability ratio using the formula below:
Current Average Liability Ratio = Net Cash from Operating Activities / Average Current Liabilities
Current Average Liability Ratio = 200 / 950 = 0.21, or 21%
A ratio lower than 1:1 indicates that the company will not have enough liquid assets to cover its debts in the near future.
The cash flow coverage ratio measures a company’s ability to generate enough operating cash flow to cover its interest expenses and long-term debt payments. It is calculated by dividing the net cash flow by total debt (interest + principal).
This ratio takes into account all debt, both long-term and short-term.
Therefore, the ratio is calculated for the year rather than a month. So, you can add up the monthly operating cash flow for the year to get her annual cash flow.
Since we only have a statement of one month in which the cash flow from operations was exactly $700, we can assume the total cash flow for the year is $8,400 ($700*12).
So, the calculation for Barney’s Barn will look like this:
Cash Flow Coverage Ratio = Net Cash Flow from Operations / Total Debt
8,400 / 6,200 = 1.35
A cash flow coverage ratio above 1.0 indicates that a company generates ample operating cash flows to cover its debt obligations.
The cash flow margin ratio is a critical metric for understanding a company’s financial strength and stability. It tells you how much cash you earned for every dollar in sales for a reporting period.
So, if Barney made $1,200 in net sales for March, his cash flow margin ratio would look like this:
Cash Flow Margin = Net Cash from Operating Activities / Net Sales
700 / 1,200 = 0.58, or 58%.
By following these tips, you will be on your way to mastering financial statements and gaining valuable insights into a company’s financial health. If you are unsure, consult an expert in financial statements to guide you through the process.
Mastering financial statements may seem like a daunting task at first, but with the right tools and support from doola , it becomes much more manageable.
Get started with doola Bookkeeping , a comprehensive software that automates your financial record-keeping and simplifies reporting.
Our team of Certified Public Accountants are well-versed in all aspects of financial reporting and analysis, allowing us to provide valuable insights and guidance.
Book a consultation to find out how we can help you harness the power of understanding financial statements for your business.
Free e-book
A beginner-friendly guide on the basics of LLCs. Learn about formation, banking, and taxes.
Schedule a FREE consultation with a US CPA today 📞
Turn your dream idea into your dream business.
A beginner-friendly guide on the basics of LLCs. Learn about formation, banking, and taxes. Get ready to turn your dream idea into your dream US business.
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. Learn more.
The methods used in analysis of financial statements are as follows: 1. Comparative Financial Statements 2. Common-Size Statements 3. Trend Ratios 4. Ratio Analysis.
Comparative financial statements are statements of financial position of a business designed to provide time perspective to the consideration of various elements of financial position embodied in such statements.
Comparative financial statements reveal the following:
I. Absolute data (money values or rupee amounts)
ADVERTISEMENTS:
II. Increase or reduction in absolute data in terms of money values
III. Increase or reduction in absolute data in terms of percentages
IV. Comparison in terms of ratios
V. Percentage of totals
Financial statements of two or more firms can also be compared for drawing inferences. This is called ‘interfirm comparison’.
I. Comparative Income Statement:
A comparative income statement shows the absolute figures for two or more periods and the absolute change from one period to another. Since the figures are shown side by side, the user can quickly understand the operational performance of the firm in different periods and draw conclusions.
II. Comparative Balance Sheet:
Balance sheets as on two or more different dates are used for comparing the assets, liabilities and the net worth of the company. Comparative balance sheet is useful for studying the trends of an undertaking.
Advantages:
The comparative financial statements are useful for analysis of the following:
a. Comparative statements indicate trends in sales, cost of production, profits etc. and help the analyst to evaluate the performance of the company.
b. Comparative statements can also be used to compare the performance of the firm with the average performance of the industry or interfirm comparison. This helps in identification of the weaknesses of the firm and remedial measures can be taken accordingly.
Disadvantages:
The comparative financial statements suffers from the following weaknesses:
i. Interfirm comparison can be misleading if the firms are not identical in size and age and when they follow different accounting procedures with regard to depreciation, inventory valuation etc.
ii. Inter-period comparison may also be misleading, if the period has witnessed changes in accounting policies, inflation, recession etc.
From the following particulars pertaining to ABC Ltd. you are required to prepare a comparative Income Statement and interpret the changes:
ISBN: 978-1-394-26869-6
September 2024
Tage C. Tracy
Learn how to read, understand, analyze, and interpret different types of financial reports
In the newly revised and updated 10th Edition of How to Read a Financial Report, seasoned accounting, financial, and business consultant Tage C. Tracy guides readers through reading, understanding, analyzing, and interpreting various types of financial reports, including cash flow, financial condition, and profit performance reports. This book also reveals the various connections between different financial metrics, reports, and statements, discusses changes in accounting and finance reporting rules, current practices, and recent trends, and explains how financial information can be manipulated, such as through inclusion or omission of certain KPIs.
This bestselling guide uses jargon-simplified and easy-to-understand language to make the information accessible to all, regardless of finance or accounting background. Updates to the 10th Edition include:
An essential all-in-one guide on the art of reading a financial report and avoiding common pitfalls and misconceptions, How to Read a Financial Report earns a well deserved spot on the bookshelves of all business leaders and investors who want to be able to read and understand financial reports and statements like a professional.
Over the past 30+ years, Tage C. Tracy has operated a financial consulting firm focused on offering CFO/executive-level support and planning services to private companies on a fractional basis, working primarily with startups, rapid growth companies, strategic exits and acquisitions, and turnarounds and challenged environments.
Asking the better questions that unlock new answers to the working world's most complex issues. UK
AI insights
Sustainability in business
EY Center of Board Matters
Technology leaders' agenda
EY podcasts
EY webcasts
EY helps clients create long-term value for all stakeholders. Enabled by data and technology, our services and solutions provide trust through assurance and help clients transform, grow and operate.
EY.ai - A unifying platform
Strategy, transaction and transformation consulting
Technology transformation
Tax function operations
Climate change and sustainability services
EY Ecosystems
EY Nexus: business transformation platform
Discover how EY insights and services are helping to reframe the future of your industry.
How Microsoft built a new mobility model for cross-border talent
13 May 2024 EY Global
Private equity
How GenAI is empowering talent at a PE-backed consumer brand
08 May 2024 EY Global
Strategy and Transactions
How carve-outs positioned an automotive giant for future growth
11 Apr 2024 EY Global
We bring together extraordinary people, like you, to build a better working world.
Experienced careers
Student careers
Technology careers
Belonging at EY
EY-Parthenon careers
At EY, our purpose is building a better working world. The insights and services we provide help to create long-term value for clients, people and society, and to build trust in the capital markets.
Press release
Scotland forecast revised upwards with GDP highest since pandemic
14 Aug 2024 EY UK
Two consecutive years of growth in new car registrations
05 Aug 2024 James White
UK economy had a strong start to 2024 with more GDP growth to come
23 Jul 2024 Rob Joyce
No results have been found
Recent Searches
How can you adapt your IPO strategy in a dynamic market?
The EY Global IPO Trends Q2 2024 covers the news and insights on the global, area and regional IPO markets for the first half of 2024. Learn more.
How can the moments that threaten your transformation define its success?
Leaders that put humans at the center to navigate turning points are 12 times more likely to significantly improve transformation performance. Learn More.
Artificial Intelligence
EY.ai - a unifying platform
Select your location
Financial statement close process assessment
With the insights gained from the EY financial statement close process assessment, you can move forward with more confidence in your close process. The financial report helps you understand whether, where and why mistakes are made or bottlenecks happen or extra effort is expended. It can also point you toward improvements in reliability, accuracy, speed and cycle time, and efficiency needed by the company you’re running today, or the one you expect to run tomorrow. Based on the assessment, our financial information findings can help you:
Your EY audit teams can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate your financial statement close process. We conduct the following five-step assessment and report our findings and recommendations back to you:
1. Benchmark analysis
Using an independent, high-quality database of metrics, our teams can evaluate your company’s financial statement close process performance against leading practices.
2. Maturity assessment
Our maturity assessment tool allows you to self-assess the current performance for each of the key finance sub-processes (i.e., process and policy, reporting and management performance, organization, data, people and technology) as compared to leading practices and determine the expected future state.
3. Detailed review of the financial statement close process activities
For each key sub-process, our teams assess the quality of procedures in place and the execution timing and velocity; investigate risks and controls in place; and provide you with gap analyses, insights and recommendations. We can also review your current close process and identify issues that slow the process down. As a result, we can provide you with findings and recommendation that can help you spend less time producing financial reporting and achieve a more robust and well-documented process.
4. Review of dashboards, KPIs and monthly reporting packages
Our team assesses the quality and relevance of your dashboards, KPIs and monthly reporting packages. We review objectives, processes, computations and frequencies. Based on our review, we can provide improvement recommendations for your KPIs to harmonize with the other materials and for your dashboards and monthly reporting packages to increase their relevance and effectiveness.
5. Findings and recommendations report
This financial report includes all results of the diagnostic and also outlines findings and recommendations to help you build a more effective finance function.
Delivering enhanced value to your business
Our latest thinking.
The Board Imperative: Champion CROs to boost risk governance and growth
Boards can bolster resilience, seize new opportunities and create long-term value by collaborating with and further empowering their CRO. Learn more.
EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Financial and esg analysis of the beer sector pre- and post-covid-19 in italy and spain, 1. introduction, 2. literature review, 3.1. financial ratios, 3.2. web communication of non-financial environmental, social, and governance indicators, 5. discussion, 6. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
x | x | x /x | x /x | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Company 1 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 1 |
Company 2 | 81 | 243 | 1/3 | 3 |
Company 3 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 1/3 |
Arithmetic average of the accounting figures | 39 | 91 | ||
Geometric average of the accounting figures | 27 | 27 | ||
Geometric average of ratios | 1 | 1 | ||
Ratio between geometric averages | 1 | 1 | ||
Arithmetic average of ratios | 1.44444 | 1.44444 | ||
Ratio between arithmetic averages | 0.42857 | 2.33333 |
Spain | Italy | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
x | 0.2501 | 0.2241 | 0.1943 | 0.1485 | 0.2027 | 0.1978 |
x | 0.1527 | 0.1470 | 0.1361 | 0.1697 | 0.1878 | 0.1950 |
x | 0.1113 | 0.1057 | 0.0971 | 0.1164 | 0.1082 | 0.1229 |
x | 0.2436 | 0.2500 | 0.2817 | 0.2805 | 0.2349 | 0.2404 |
x | 0.2423 | 0.2732 | 0.2909 | 0.2849 | 0.2664 | 0.2439 |
Spain | Italy | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
s. t. Solvency | 1.3716 | 1.3902 | 1.4022 | 1.4586 | 1.7351 | 1.5870 |
Current liabilities over assets | 0.2764 | 0.2849 | 0.2937 | 0.3657 | 0.2772 | 0.3129 |
Margin | 0.0053 | −0.0929 | −0.0326 | −0.0159 | −0.1344 | −0.0146 |
Current-asset turnover | 1.5947 | 1.7006 | 2.0698 | 1.6524 | 1.2508 | 1.2327 |
Turnover | 0.6046 | 0.6736 | 0.8525 | 0.8814 | 0.6016 | 0.6120 |
ROA | 0.0032 | −0.0626 | −0.0278 | −0.0140 | −0.0809 | −0.0089 |
Asset structure | 0.6209 | 0.6039 | 0.5881 | 0.4666 | 0.5191 | 0.5035 |
Cluster | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
n | 99 | 102 | 84 |
s. t. Solvency | 1.8026 | 2.0164 | 0.8996 |
Current liabilities over assets | 0.1705 | 0.3238 | 0.5045 |
Margin | −0.0595 | 0.0435 | −0.1578 |
Current-asset turnover | 1.9095 | 1.6861 | 0.9125 |
Turnover | 0.5869 | 1.1008 | 0.4141 |
ROA | −0.0349 | 0.0479 | −0.0654 |
Asset structure | 0.6926 | 0.3471 | 0.5462 |
Italy | Spain | |
---|---|---|
1. Energy consumption | 14% | 25% |
2. Water consumption | 7% | 27% |
3. Polluting emissions | 6% | 25% |
4. Waste generation | 7% | 25% |
5. Waste management | 11% | 30% |
6. Waste reuse | 13% | 30% |
7. Employees | 3% | 23% |
8. Employee gender diversity | 3% | 18% |
9. Employment stability | 0% | 3% |
10. Absenteeism | 1% | 14% |
11. Employee turnover | 0% | 10% |
12. Net job creation | 0% | 7% |
13. Seniority | 0% | 10% |
14. Employee training | 1% | 18% |
15. Customer payment cycles | 0% | 11% |
16. Supplier payment cycles | 0% | 0% |
17. Members of the board of directors | 3% | 14% |
18. Independent board members | 0% | 0% |
19. Board members with CSR responsibility | 1% | 3% |
20. Executive commission | 3% | 14% |
21. Audit committee | 0% | 0% |
22. Board of directors’ appointments | 1% | 7% |
23. Board of directors’ meetings | 0% | 7% |
24. Remuneration of the board members | 1% | 0% |
25. Gender diversity in the board members | 0% | 3% |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Arimany-Serrat, N.; Sgorla, A.F. Financial and ESG Analysis of the Beer Sector Pre- and Post-COVID-19 in Italy and Spain. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177412
Arimany-Serrat N, Sgorla AF. Financial and ESG Analysis of the Beer Sector Pre- and Post-COVID-19 in Italy and Spain. Sustainability . 2024; 16(17):7412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177412
Arimany-Serrat, Núria, and Andrey Felipe Sgorla. 2024. "Financial and ESG Analysis of the Beer Sector Pre- and Post-COVID-19 in Italy and Spain" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177412
Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
IMAGES
COMMENTS
In this free guide, we will break down the most important types and techniques of financial statement analysis. This guide is designed to be useful for both beginners and advanced finance professionals, with the main topics covering: (1) the income statement, (2) the balance sheet, (3) the cash flow statement, and (4) rates of return. 1.
Moreover, these methods provide a summary of data that helps to analyze and interpret financial data. Table of Contents. Methods of Financial Statement Analysis. Ratio Analysis. DuPont Analysis. Horizontal Analysis. Vertical Analysis. Comparative Financial Statements. Trend Analysis.
Financial statement analysis is the process of reviewing and evaluating a company's financial statements (such as the balance sheet or profit and loss statement), thereby gaining an understanding ...
Financial statement analysis is one of the most fundamental practices in financial research and analysis. In layman's terms, it is the process of analyzing financial statements so that decision-makers have access to the right data. Financial statement analysis is also used to take the pulse of a business. Since statements center on a company ...
To analyse your company's financial statements, choose a set period and follow these steps. 1. Gather your business's financial statements. Gather your business's financial statements, including your cash flow, balance sheet and income (or profit and loss) statements. MYOB accounting software will generate these based on the transactions and ...
Financial statement analysis involves examining a company's financial performance using three primary statements: the income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement. The Income Statement The income statement is a snapshot of a company's profitability over a specific period, typically a quarter or a year.
Basic financial statement analysis—as presented in this reading—provides a foundation that enables the analyst to better understand other information gathered from research beyond the financial reports. This reading is organized as follows: Section 2 discusses the scope of financial statement analysis. ... methods, and estimates—and ...
Financial statement analysis is a method or process involving specific techniques for evaluating risks, performance, valuation, financial health, and future prospects of an organization. [ 1] It is used by a variety of stakeholders, such as credit and equity investors, the government, the public, and decision-makers within the organization.
Financial analysis is the process of evaluating businesses, projects, budgets and other finance-related entities to determine their performance and suitability. Typically, financial analysis is ...
Summary. Financial analysis techniques, including common-size financial statements and ratio analysis, are useful in summarizing financial reporting data and evaluating the performance and financial position of a company. The results of financial analysis techniques provide important inputs into security valuation.
Common examples of analyzing growth include: Year-over-year ( YoY) Regression analysis. Bottom-up analysis (starting with individual drivers of revenue in the business) Top-down analysis (starting with market size and market share) Other forecasting methods. Image: CFI's Budgeting and Forecasting Course.
There are four primary financial statements: Balance sheet. Income statement. mentStatement of cash flowsExhibit 21-1 presents the basic structure of each of these statements and t. e relation-ships between them. The balance sheet presents an organiz. tion's financi.
The analysis of financial statements is a procedure of studying a company's financial reports for decision-making purposes. This technique is used by many stakeholders, including credit and equity investors, the government, the general public, and internal decision-makers. Stakeholders also have various interests, and they prefer to use various ...
Types of financial statement analysis. 1. Horizontal analysis. This type involves comparing financial data across multiple periods to identify trends and changes in essential line items. As you delve into horizontal analysis, you can uncover shifts in revenue, expenses, and other financial metrics over time.
There are two key methods for analyzing financial statements. The first method is the use of horizontal and vertical analysis. Horizontal analysis is the comparison of financial information over a series of reporting periods, while vertical analysis is the proportional analysis of a financial statement, where each line item on a financial ...
There are generally six steps to developing an effective analysis of financial statements. 1. Identify the industry economic characteristics. First, determine a value chain analysis for the industry—the chain of activities involved in the creation, manufacture and distribution of the firm's products and/or services.
High dependency on accuracy of financial statements: A financial statement analysis can be inaccurate and in fact can even be manipulated if the base financial statements are inaccurate. Change in accounting policies: Any change in accounting methodology or presentation can result in erroneous results, hampering the efficacy of inter-period or ...
Summary. The essence of the financial statement analysis of a company is the usage of different methods of emphasizing the comparative and relative importance of the data, presented in the financial report of a company in order to evaluate company's performance and position. These methods include horizontal and vertical analysis, calculation ...
Financial Statement Analysis is a method of reviewing and analyzing a company's accounting reports (financial statements) in order to gauge its past, present or projected future performance. This process of reviewing the financial statements allows for better economic decision making. Globally, publicly listed companies are required by law to ...
Financial statement analysis is the process an individual goes through to analyze a company's various financial documents in order to make an informed decision about that business. ... Typically, professionals will follow one of two common methods to analyze a company's financial statements: Vertical and horizontal analysis, and ratio ...
Financial Statement Analysis: 3 Ways to Analyze Financial Information. Written by MasterClass. Last updated: May 12, 2022 • 5 min read. Learn how to conduct a financial statement analysis to make informed decisions about your company or a potential investment opportunity. A financial analysis is a critical method for assessing a company's ...
Common size analysis is a popular method of financial statement analysis, which makes use of common size financial statements. These financial statements display all items as percentages of a common base figure. Each item in the financial statement is reported in the form of a percentage. This percentage is arrived at by using a base figure.
Methods of Financial Statement Analysis. There are several techniques used by analysts to develop a fair understanding of a company's financial performance over a period. The three most commonly practised methods of financial analysis are - horizontal analysis, vertical analysis, and ratio and trend analysis. ...
There are three main types of financial statements: the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. These three financial statements are interconnected and provide a complete picture of a company's financial performance and position. 1. Balance Sheet. The balance sheet, or the statement of financial position, summarises a ...
The methods used in analysis of financial statements are as follows: 1. Comparative Financial Statements 2. Common-Size Statements 3. Trend Ratios 4. Ratio Analysis. Method # 1. Comparative Financial Statements: Comparative financial statements are statements of financial position of a business designed to provide time perspective to the consideration of various elements of financial position ...
New material on loans, debt, and using financial reports and statements to understand performance. The connection of capital including debt and equity to the income statements and cash flow statements. Expanded financial analysis tools and ratios that provide a deeper understanding of a company's financial performance and strength.
Your EY audit teams can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate your financial statement close process. We conduct the following five-step assessment and report our findings and recommendations back to you: ... Benchmark analysis. Using an independent, high-quality database of metrics, our teams can evaluate your ...
The Best's Special Report, "IFRS 17 — Economic View Adds Complexity to Reinsurers' Financial Statements," is part of AM Best's look at the global reinsurance industry ahead of the Rendez-Vous de Septembre in Monte Carlo. Other reports, including AM Best's ranking of the top reinsurance groups and in-depth looks at the insurance ...
The analysis of accounting ratios based on compositional data (hereafter CoDa) presents a unitary methodology whose validity of results has already been extensively corroborated [11,12,13,14] and that allows for a sectoral financial statement analysis to be performed reliably with any statistical method.
A high-fidelity finite element model is proposed for the complete simulation of the time-harmonic acoustic propagation in wind instruments. The challenge is to meet the extremely high accuracy required by professional musicians, in a complex domain, for all fingerings and over a wide frequency range, within an affordable computational time.