aml risk assessment methodology template

AML KYC Risk Rating Assessment Template, Methodology, Rating Matrix – Download Template

AML Risk Assessment Template and Sample Rating Matrix | Downloadable Template & Raw Data

When onboarding new customers, and throughout the relationship with each customer, financial institutions are required by regulators to perform anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) risk assessments to determine a customer’s overall money laundering risk.

Firms must comply with the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulations ( Anti-Money Laundering rules ). The purpose of these rules is to help detect and report suspicious activity including money laundering, terrorist financing, securities fraud, and market manipulation.

When conducting due diligence on new or existing customers, firms normally use a risk assessment template and matrix, similar to the ones presented in the sections below, to determine the overall risk of the client.

Click here to let me know if you have any questions regarding this publication |  Ogbe Airiodion (Senior AML/KYC/Compliance Consultant ).

Risk Rating Calculation Models

Risk assessment templates used by financial institution firms are either in Excel, in a third-party platform, or built into and managed within an internal tool.

These risk assessment templates/matrices have detailed risk scoring logic and formulas that calculate the overall risk score for a client.

Key Assessment Factors

The theory supporting risk assessment tools and templates is based on the concept that a client’s risk AML profile can be measured by applying data-driven and risk-based calculations on risk categories identified by financial experts and the regulatory community. 

To determine a customer’s overall risk rating, a select list of variables is assessed, and each one is rated as low, medium, or high risk. (Some firms only have low and high-risk classification – no medium risk).

Note that risk factors and scores for clients may vary by a financial institution, jurisdiction, and customer segment as different types of customers will have different types of risks associated with them.

For example, a customer’s country of domicile or business registration might be rated low if the customer is domiciled in a low-risk country (e.g., the U.S.) or rated high if the customer is located in a high-risk country (e.g., Colombia or Cuba).

Free Money Management Tool

(Personal & Business)

Sign-up Today - Free.

Start Managing Your Finances. Don't Wait

Sample Risk Assessment Template

Click here to download the below KYC CDD Risk Rating Calculation Table in Excel so you can use it for your purposes. Please note that the below-average score rating is just a simple average.

CDD Risk Score Calculation (Sample)

Applying Weights to Your Risk Calculations

Please note that we have not weighted any of the risk factors higher than the others. It is up to you and your firm (based on your firm’s risk appetite) to determine the weights to apply to each of these risk components.

Firms often assign higher weight factors to a customer’s source of wealth, country of residency, purpose of account, industry, etc.

Below is an example:

Risk Rating Scores – Tables & Raw Data

For risk scores used by financial firms across the industry, see the below tables. Click here to download the raw data: Risk Rating Scores for Assigning CDD Risk Ratings

Risk Rating Scores – Country of Incorporation

Risk Rating Scores – Country of Operation

Risk Rating Scores – Country of Government

Source of Wealth

Click here ( Risk Rating Scores for Assigning CDD Risk Ratings ) to download the full data for all the risk rating factors listed in the below table:

Click here to let me know if you have any questions: Contact Ogbe Airiodion | Sr AML/KYC Compliance Consultant

AdvisoryHQ (AHQ) Disclaimer:

Reasonable efforts have been made by AdvisoryHQ to present accurate information, however all info is presented without warranty. Review AdvisoryHQ’s Terms  for details. Also review each firm’s site for the most updated data, rates and info.

Note: Firms and products, including the one(s) reviewed above, may be AdvisoryHQ's affiliates. Click to view AdvisoryHQ's advertiser disclosures .

For the Public

FINRA Data provides non-commercial use of data, specifically the ability to save data views and create and manage a Bond Watchlist.

For Industry Professionals

Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks.

For Member Firms

FINRA GATEWAY

Firm compliance professionals can access filings and requests, run reports and submit support tickets.

For Case Participants

Arbitration and mediation case participants and FINRA neutrals can view case information and submit documents through this Dispute Resolution Portal.

Need Help? | Check System Status

Log In to other FINRA systems

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Template for Small Firms

FINRA provides a template for small firms to assist them in fulfilling their responsibilities to establish the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance program required by the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and its implementing regulations and FINRA Rule 3310 . The template provides text examples, instructions, relevant rules and websites and other resources that are useful for developing an AML plan for a small firm.

Firms should also note that they may access all of the guidance FINRA has provided regarding FINRA Rule 3310 at the  Anti-Money Laundering main page.

Changes to the AML Template Updated July 18, 2018

The template has been updated to reflect member firms’ obligations under FINRA Rule 3310 in light of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s (FinCEN) final rule on Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions (CDD Rule). 

Additional changes include updated rule cites and resources, with hyperlinks directly to the cited material and additional guidance issued since the template was last updated.

Changes to the AML Template Updated September 8, 2020

The template has been updated to reflect recent guidance, including the red flags described in Regulatory Notice 19-18 (May 2019).

• Need Assistance? Con tact our support team
• Verify Certificates

• Anti-Financial Crime
• Anti-Money Laundering
• Fraud & Investigations
• Risk Management
• Certified Money Laundering Prevention Professional (CMLP)
• Certified Anti-Financial Crime Professional (CFCP)
• Certified Audit and Investigations Professional (CAIP)
• Certifications
• Online Courses
• Expert Webinars
• Learning Paths
• Completion Certificates
• Global Community
• Live Tutoring
• Resource Hub
• Interactive LMS
• Jobs by FCA

Unlocking Success: The Art of AML Risk Assessment Methodology

Understanding AML Risk Assessment

In the realm of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance, conducting a comprehensive and effective AML risk assessment is crucial. This section will delve into the importance of AML risk assessment, highlight the limitations of traditional assessment methods, and explore the benefits of adopting a risk-based approach to AML.

Importance of AML Risk Assessment

The importance of AML risk assessment cannot be overstated. It serves as the foundation for a robust AML compliance program, enabling financial institutions and organizations to identify, assess, and mitigate the risks associated with money laundering and terrorist financing activities. By conducting a thorough risk assessment, institutions can gain a clear understanding of their vulnerabilities, develop appropriate internal controls, and implement risk mitigation strategies.

Traditional AML risk assessment methods have proven to be inadequate in identifying risks, as evidenced by recent high-profile financial crime cases. To address this, a more holistic and dynamic approach is necessary. AML risk assessment should focus on customer behavior, patterns, and interactions rather than relying solely on static data. This approach allows institutions to identify and respond to emerging risks in a timely manner, ensuring the effectiveness of their AML compliance efforts.

Limitations of Traditional AML Risk Assessment Methods

Traditional AML risk assessment methods often suffer from limitations that hinder their effectiveness. These methods tend to rely heavily on historical data and pre-defined risk factors, which may not adequately capture the ever-changing nature of money laundering and terrorist financing activities. Additionally, the static nature of these assessments makes it challenging to identify new and emerging risks.

To overcome these limitations, institutions should adopt a more dynamic and data-driven approach to AML risk assessment. By leveraging technology and data analytics, institutions can gain deeper insights into customer behavior and transaction patterns, enabling them to identify suspicious activities more accurately and efficiently.

Benefits of a Risk-Based Approach to AML

A risk-based approach to AML is a proactive and targeted approach that allocates resources based on the level of risk exposure. This approach allows institutions to focus their efforts and resources on areas that pose the highest risk, ensuring a more efficient use of resources and a more effective risk mitigation strategy. By adopting a risk-based approach, institutions can identify and prioritize the highest-risk customers, transactions, and geographic regions, enabling them to implement appropriate internal controls and monitoring systems.

Moreover, a risk-based approach enables institutions to tailor their AML compliance program to their specific risk profile, ensuring that the necessary measures are in place to address the identified risks effectively. This approach not only enhances the institution’s ability to detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing activities but also helps to maintain regulatory compliance.

In conclusion, understanding the importance of AML risk assessment, recognizing the limitations of traditional methods, and embracing a risk-based approach are crucial steps for institutions seeking to combat money laundering and terrorist financing effectively. By leveraging technology, adopting a dynamic approach, and allocating resources based on risk exposure, institutions can enhance their AML compliance efforts and contribute to a safer financial system.

Evolving Regulatory Landscape

As the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing intensifies, the regulatory landscape for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) continues to evolve. Compliance professionals must stay up-to-date with the global AML regulatory bodies, key directives, and the role of organizations like the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

Global AML Regulatory Bodies

One of the key international organizations dedicated to preventing money laundering and terrorism financing is the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). With 37 member jurisdictions, the FATF plays a crucial role in establishing global AML compliance standards. They release updated AML/CFT (Combating the Financing of Terrorism) recommendations regularly, providing guidance to member countries on implementing effective AML measures.

Key AML Directives and Regulations

In addition to global regulatory bodies, various countries and regions have enacted their own AML directives and regulations. For example, the European Union released the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD) in 2018, which went into effect in January 2020. This directive aims to strengthen the EU’s AML framework and enhance transparency in financial transactions. The European Union also introduced the Sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (6AMLD) in late 2018, which went into effect in June 2021. This directive focuses on preventing money laundering and terrorism financing globally ( Flagright ).

Role of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is a key player in enforcing AML regulations in the United States. FinCEN operates under the guidance of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), which focuses on anti-money laundering and other financial crimes. FinCEN works closely with financial institutions to detect and prevent illicit financial activities. Non-compliance with the BSA can result in severe penalties, including imprisonment and fines of up to $250,000 ( Flagright ).

Staying informed about global AML regulatory bodies, key directives, and the role of organizations such as FinCEN is essential for compliance professionals. By understanding the regulatory landscape, organizations can develop robust AML risk assessment methodologies and ensure compliance with relevant AML regulations.

Red Flags for Suspicious Activity

In the realm of anti-money laundering (AML) risk assessment, identifying red flags for suspicious activity is crucial for financial institutions and other entities to detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing activities. Red flags serve as indicators that warrant further investigation. In this section, we will explore red flags in customer behavior, documentation and information, as well as transactions and sources of funds.

Red Flags in Customer Behavior

One of the key red flags indicating suspicious activity is when clients exhibit secrecy or evasiveness about key details such as identity, source of money, beneficial owner, or payment method choice. Clients withholding such information may be attempting to hide their identity or the source of funds. Financial institutions should be vigilant when clients display these behaviors, as they could be potential indicators of illicit activities.

Red Flags in Documentation and Information

Another red flag to watch out for is the presentation of fake documents, avoidance of personal contact, refusal to provide necessary information, and the use of unverifiable email addresses. These behaviors could indicate attempts to conceal connections to terrorist activities or the source of funds ( Sanction Scanner ). Financial institutions must exercise due diligence in verifying the authenticity of documents and information provided by clients to ensure compliance with AML regulations.

Red Flags in Transactions and Sources of Funds

Unusual transaction patterns can also raise red flags for suspicious activity. Financial institutions should be wary of transactions involving parties from high-risk countries with no apparent commercial reason, multiple transactions between parties in a short time, or transactions involving individuals below the legal age. These could indicate potential money laundering or terrorist financing activities. Additionally, suspicious indicators related to the source of funds include inconsistent economic profiles, unexplained cash collateral, unverified sources of high-risk funds, and the presence of multiple or foreign bank accounts. These red flags should prompt further investigation to ensure compliance and mitigate the risk of money laundering.

By being aware of these red flags, financial institutions and other entities can enhance their AML risk assessment processes and implement appropriate measures to detect and prevent suspicious activities. It is essential to establish robust systems and procedures to promptly identify and address any red flags that may arise. Regular training and awareness programs can also help employees recognize and report potential red flags for suspicious activity, fostering a strong culture of compliance and risk management.

Enhancing AML Risk Assessment with Technology

With the ever-evolving landscape of financial crimes, leveraging technology has become crucial in enhancing Anti-Money Laundering (AML) risk assessment processes. By incorporating advanced tools and techniques, financial institutions can improve the accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness of their AML risk assessment methodologies. This section explores the role of technology in AML risk assessment, the benefits of leveraging data analytics and machine learning, and the advantages of automation in AML/CFT (Combating the Financing of Terrorism) processes.

Role of Technology in AML Risk Assessment

Technology plays a pivotal role in modern AML risk assessment methodologies. It enables financial institutions to streamline and strengthen their compliance efforts by automating various aspects of the AML process. Advanced algorithms and artificial intelligence are deployed to analyze vast amounts of data, allowing for the identification of potential risks and suspicious activities that might otherwise go unnoticed. By leveraging technology, institutions can create dynamic risk profiles of customers and entities, enabling them to prioritize high-risk accounts and transactions for focused investigations ( Financial Crime Academy ).

Leveraging Data Analytics and Machine Learning

Data analytics and machine learning have revolutionized the way AML risk assessments are conducted. By integrating big data analytics into AML/CFT efforts, financial institutions can uncover hidden patterns and trends in large datasets, aiding in the identification of complex money laundering networks, terrorist financing channels, and emerging risks. These technologies enable institutions to detect unusual transactional patterns, flagging potentially suspicious activities for further investigation. By utilizing machine learning algorithms, systems can learn from historical data and adapt to evolving risk landscapes, enhancing the effectiveness of risk assessments.

Benefits of Automation in AML/CFT Processes

Automation has transformed AML/CFT processes, resulting in increased efficiency and effectiveness. By automating customer onboarding, enhanced due diligence, and transaction monitoring, financial institutions can streamline their operations, reduce manual errors, and allocate more resources to investigating genuine risks. Automated reporting tools ensure timely and accurate submissions to regulatory authorities, enhancing transparency and regulatory compliance. Real-time transaction monitoring facilitated by automation enables swift identification and response to potential AML/CFT risks, preventing illicit transactions from going unnoticed. These advancements in automation significantly enhance financial security and help institutions stay ahead of evolving risks ( LinkedIn ).

By embracing technology in AML risk assessment methodologies, financial institutions can better combat money laundering and terrorist financing activities. The integration of advanced tools and techniques allows for more accurate risk profiling, efficient allocation of compliance efforts, and timely detection of suspicious activities. Through the use of data analytics, machine learning, and automation, financial institutions can strengthen their AML/CFT processes, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and promoting a safer financial ecosystem.

Implementing an Effective AML Risk Assessment Framework

To effectively combat money laundering and terrorist financing, financial institutions must implement a robust AML risk assessment framework. This framework enables the detection, evaluation, and mitigation of risks associated with these illicit activities, allowing institutions to allocate resources, implement appropriate controls, and prioritize efforts to manage and mitigate these risks ( FinScan ).

Components of AML Risk Assessment

An effective AML risk assessment framework consists of several key components. These components work together to create a comprehensive system for identifying, assessing, and managing risks related to money laundering and terrorist financing.

Risk Identification : The first step in AML risk assessment is the identification of potential risks. This involves analyzing internal and external factors that may contribute to money laundering or terrorist financing activities. Factors such as customer profiles, transaction patterns, geographic locations, and the nature of products and services offered are considered during this process.

Risk Assessment : Once risks are identified, they need to be assessed to determine their likelihood and potential impact. This assessment helps institutions allocate resources effectively and prioritize efforts to manage and mitigate risks. Risk assessment involves evaluating the adequacy of existing controls and determining the residual risk that remains after implementing these controls.

Risk Mitigation : After assessing risks, institutions must develop and implement strategies to mitigate them. This may involve enhancing customer due diligence procedures, implementing transaction monitoring systems, conducting staff training programs, and establishing robust internal policies and procedures to address identified risks.

Ongoing Monitoring and Review : AML risk assessment is not a one-time exercise. Institutions must continuously monitor and review their risk assessments to ensure they remain effective and aligned with changing regulatory requirements and emerging risks. Regular reviews help identify gaps, update risk profiles, and enhance risk management strategies.

Developing a Risk-Based Approach

A risk-based approach is crucial in AML risk assessment. This approach involves prioritizing resources and efforts based on the level of risk posed by customers, transactions, and geographic locations. By focusing on higher-risk areas, institutions can allocate resources effectively and implement appropriate controls to manage these risks.

To develop a risk-based approach, financial institutions should:

• Establish risk thresholds and criteria for customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and enhanced due diligence measures.
• Implement systems and processes to identify and categorize customers based on their risk profiles.
• Regularly review and update risk assessment methodologies to adapt to changing risks and regulatory requirements.
• Foster a culture of risk awareness and compliance throughout the organization.

By adopting a risk-based approach, institutions can better allocate resources, enhance compliance efforts, and effectively manage AML risks.

Challenges and Considerations in AML Risk Management

Implementing an effective AML risk assessment framework is not without its challenges. Financial institutions must carefully consider and address these challenges to ensure compliance and better manage financial and reputational risks.

Some key challenges and considerations in AML risk management include:

Regulatory Compliance : Institutions must ensure that their risk assessment framework aligns with regulatory requirements and guidelines issued by global AML regulatory bodies. Regular revisions and continuous improvement are necessary to keep up with evolving regulations.

Data Quality and Integration : Accurate and reliable data is essential for effective risk assessment. Institutions should ensure the quality and integrity of data used in their risk assessment processes. Integration of data from multiple sources and systems is important to obtain a comprehensive view of the risks.

Advanced Technology Solutions : Leveraging technology solutions, such as AML risk assessment software and AI-supported AML solutions, can significantly enhance risk management efforts. Financial institutions should explore technological advancements to improve accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness in AML risk assessment and compliance.

Staff Training and Awareness : Institutions should invest in training programs to enhance staff knowledge and awareness of AML risks and regulatory requirements. Regular training sessions and updates on emerging risks and typologies help build a strong compliance culture.

By addressing these challenges and considerations, financial institutions can implement an effective AML risk assessment framework that aligns with regulatory expectations and helps mitigate financial crimes associated with money laundering and terrorist financing.

Role of AML Risk Assessment in Compliance

AML risk assessment plays a critical role in ensuring compliance with anti-money laundering regulations and mitigating the risks associated with money laundering and terrorist financing. This section explores the requirements for AML risk assessment, the need for regular updates and maintenance, and the importance of independent testing and compliance programs.

BSA/AML Risk Assessment Requirements

In the United States, the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), enforced by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), focuses on anti-money laundering and other financial crimes. Non-compliance with BSA/AML requirements can result in severe penalties, including imprisonment and fines of up to $250,000 ( Flagright ).

To comply with BSA/AML regulations, financial institutions are required to develop a well-developed BSA/AML risk assessment. This risk assessment assists banks in identifying money laundering and terrorist financing risks, and in developing appropriate internal controls. It enables better application of risk management processes and supports compliance with regulatory requirements ( FFIEC ).

Updating and Maintaining AML Risk Assessment

While banks are not required to update the BSA/AML risk assessment on a continuous or specified periodic basis, regular updates are necessary to reflect changes in products, services, customers, and geographic locations. It is crucial to ensure that the risk assessment accurately reflects the risks associated with money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities.

The risk assessment should consider all relevant risk categories, including products, services, customers, and geographic locations. By analyzing information related to these risk categories, banks can determine their ML/TF (money laundering/terrorist financing) and other illicit financial activity risks. This helps in developing effective risk mitigation strategies and complying with regulatory expectations.

Independent Testing and Compliance Programs

To ensure the effectiveness of the AML risk assessment process, financial institutions should establish robust compliance programs. These programs should be based on the institution’s risk profile and address the assessed risks. Risk-based monitoring systems should be implemented to detect and report suspicious activities. Additionally, independent testing should be conducted to review the BSA/AML risk assessment in place and evaluate the adequacy of the compliance program.

Independent testing involves an objective assessment of the AML risk assessment methodology, internal controls, policies, procedures, and processes. It helps to identify any gaps or weaknesses in the risk assessment and compliance program. By conducting regular independent testing, financial institutions can ensure that their AML risk assessment remains effective and aligned with regulatory requirements.

In conclusion, AML risk assessment is a fundamental component of compliance with anti-money laundering regulations. Financial institutions must adhere to BSA/AML risk assessment requirements and update the risk assessment regularly to reflect changes in their risk profiles. Implementing independent testing and maintaining robust compliance programs are crucial for ensuring the effectiveness of the AML risk assessment process and overall regulatory compliance.

AML Risk Assessment Methodology

In the realm of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance, having a robust and effective risk assessment methodology is crucial. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) plays a significant role in the development and implementation of the AML/CFT (Combating the Financing of Terrorism) risk assessment methodology. This methodology provides a systematic approach to identify, assess, and understand the money laundering and terrorism financing risks faced by countries ( IMF ).

Role of IMF in AML/CFT Risk Assessment

The IMF has developed a comprehensive set of tools to enable its surveillance function to evaluate vulnerabilities to macroeconomic and financial shocks in member countries. These tools have been integrated into the AML/CFT risk assessment methodology, allowing for a more coherent analysis of vulnerabilities. The IMF also conducts technical assistance missions to help countries implement this methodology and build their capacity in undertaking risk assessments and managing AML/CFT processes at the national level ( IMF ).

Dynamic Approach to Risk Assessment Methodology

The evolving nature of risks related to money laundering and terrorism financing requires a dynamic approach to the implementation of the AML/CFT risk assessment methodology. National authorities must adapt their methodologies to changes in risks and vulnerabilities to effectively combat these illicit activities. Regular updates and capacity building are necessary to ensure the methodology remains effective in identifying and mitigating money laundering and terrorism financing risks ( IMF ).

Updating and Adapting to Changing Risks

Countries implementing the AML/CFT risk assessment methodology must continuously update their approaches and tools to address the changing nature of risks. This includes staying informed about new money laundering and terrorism financing techniques, emerging technologies, and evolving regulatory frameworks. Regular updates to the risk assessment methodology, along with ongoing capacity building, are essential to ensure its effectiveness in combating illicit activities.

By adopting the AML/CFT risk assessment methodology, countries can develop a more targeted and tailored approach to combating money laundering and terrorism financing. This methodology provides a structured framework for identifying and understanding the unique risks faced by each country, enabling the development of effective strategies and measures to mitigate those risks. With the guidance and support of organizations like the IMF, countries can enhance their AML/CFT efforts and contribute to the global fight against financial crime.

Technology Solutions for AML Compliance

In the ever-evolving landscape of AML compliance, technology plays a crucial role in bolstering efforts to combat money laundering and financial crimes. Various AI-supported solutions and software are available to help organizations enhance their AML compliance measures. Let’s explore some of these technology solutions for AML compliance.

AI-Supported AML Solutions

AI-supported AML solutions have revolutionized the way financial institutions approach compliance. These solutions leverage advanced algorithms and artificial intelligence to streamline processes such as onboarding, customer due diligence, and transaction monitoring. By automating these tasks, AI-supported AML solutions reduce manual errors and free up resources for investigating genuine risks, thereby enhancing financial security.

Transaction Monitoring Software

Transaction monitoring software is a legal requirement for businesses under AML obligations. It enables organizations to detect high-risk and suspicious activities associated with financial transactions. With real-time monitoring capabilities, transaction monitoring software allows businesses to identify potential money laundering or illicit activities promptly. Additionally, organizations can customize search options and apply advanced search parameters to minimize false positives. Transaction monitoring software plays a crucial role in preventing financial crimes and ensuring compliance.

AML Transaction Screening Tools

AML transaction screening tools are essential for businesses in verifying the sender and receiver of financial transactions. These tools enable organizations to instantly check for any adverse media or negative news associated with individuals or entities involved in the transactions. By including news related to financial crimes such as money laundering, terrorist financing, and corruption, AML transaction screening tools aid institutions in identifying and mitigating risks. These tools employ advanced algorithms and artificial intelligence to customize search options and minimize false positives, enhancing the effectiveness of AML compliance.

Adverse Media Screening

Adverse media screening is a crucial component of KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML processes. By searching for negative media news related to individuals or entities, adverse media screening helps businesses identify and protect themselves from risks. It includes news on various financial crimes, such as money laundering, terrorist financing, corruption, and arms trafficking. Adverse media screening adds an extra layer of control in the customer onboarding process, in addition to sanctions and politically exposed person (PEP) scans. By leveraging global coverage of adverse media data, organizations can strengthen their AML compliance measures and mitigate potential risks.

By adopting AI-supported AML solutions, transaction monitoring software, AML transaction screening tools, and adverse media screening, organizations can enhance their AML compliance efforts. These technology solutions improve efficiency, streamline processes, and enable organizations to allocate resources effectively to combat money laundering and financial crimes. Moreover, technology-driven advancements in AML compliance contribute to a more secure and transparent financial system.

Best Practices for AML Risk Assessment

When it comes to AML (Anti-Money Laundering) risk assessment, following best practices is crucial for financial institutions to effectively identify and mitigate potential risks associated with money laundering and terrorist financing. Here are some key best practices to consider:

Risk Identification in AML

The first step in AML risk assessment is the identification of risks. This involves assessing whether the customer poses a higher level of risk, checking if they are a politically exposed person (PEP), and determining if they are associated with people on a recognized sanctions list or negative publicity. By conducting thorough due diligence and implementing robust KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures, financial institutions can better understand the risk profile of their customers and tailor their AML measures accordingly.

Assessing Risk Associated with Services

Financial institutions should also assess the risk associated with the services they provide. This involves considering if the services fall into higher-risk sectors and looking out for red flags in the customer’s behavior, such as consistent patterns in the type of services required ( Skillcast ). By conducting a thorough analysis of the services offered and closely monitoring customer behavior, institutions can identify potential risks and take appropriate measures to mitigate them.

Considering Geographical Location

Geographical location is an important factor in AML risk assessment, as certain jurisdictions pose a higher ML/TF (Money Laundering/Terrorist Financing) risk level than others. Financial institutions should consider the risk associated with different jurisdictions and ensure that they have adequate measures in place to address the specific risks associated with each location ( Skillcast ). By staying informed about global AML regulations and conducting country-specific risk assessments, institutions can enhance their understanding of regional risks and implement targeted preventive measures.

Evaluating Type of Transactions

AML risk assessment should also take into account the type of transactions involved. This includes cash transactions, wire transfers, and transactions involving cryptocurrencies or non-fungible tokens (NFTs). It is important to understand the source of funds and assess any transactions involving payments to unrelated third parties. By evaluating the nature and complexity of transactions, financial institutions can identify potential red flags and implement appropriate measures to detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing activities.

By following these best practices, financial institutions can enhance their AML risk assessment processes and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. It is important to regularly update and maintain the AML risk assessment framework to adapt to changing risks and regulatory expectations. Leveraging technology solutions, such as AI-supported AML solutions and transaction monitoring software, can also aid in streamlining the risk assessment process and enhancing the overall effectiveness of AML compliance ( FinScan ). By adopting a risk-based approach and implementing best practices, financial institutions can better safeguard themselves against financial crimes and contribute to a more secure financial system.

To effectively combat money laundering and terrorist financing, financial institutions must employ robust AML risk assessment methodology . This methodology serves as a foundation for identifying, assessing, and mitigating the risks associated with financial crimes. By implementing a structured approach, institutions can allocate resources efficiently and prioritize their efforts to combat illicit activities.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) plays a crucial role in promoting effective AML/CFT risk assessment practices worldwide. It provides guidance and support to member countries in developing and implementing risk assessment frameworks. The IMF emphasizes the need for a comprehensive and dynamic approach to risk assessment that takes into account evolving risks and changing regulatory landscapes.

A dynamic approach to AML risk assessment methodology involves regular updates and adaptations to address emerging risks. This methodology recognizes that money laundering and terrorist financing techniques are constantly evolving, requiring financial institutions to stay vigilant and proactive in their risk assessment practices. By regularly reviewing and updating their risk assessment frameworks, institutions can effectively identify and respond to new and emerging risks.

Financial institutions must continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their risk assessment methodologies to ensure they remain relevant and aligned with changing risks. This includes staying informed about evolving typologies, regulatory developments, and industry best practices. By proactively adapting their risk assessment methodologies, institutions can enhance their ability to detect and prevent financial crimes.

Technology solutions play a vital role in supporting the implementation of effective AML risk assessment methodologies. Financial institutions can leverage various AI-supported AML solutions, such as transaction monitoring software and AML transaction screening tools, to enhance their risk assessment capabilities. Additionally, adverse media screening tools can help identify potential risks associated with customers or entities by monitoring news sources, watchlists, and other relevant data.

In conclusion, an effective AML risk assessment methodology is crucial for financial institutions to identify, assess, and mitigate the risks associated with money laundering and terrorist financing. By adopting a dynamic approach and leveraging technology solutions, institutions can enhance their ability to combat financial crimes and maintain compliance with regulatory requirements. Regular updates, adaptations, and a proactive mindset are essential to stay ahead of evolving risks in the ever-changing landscape of financial crimes.

Defending Against Financial Crimes: Crafting Robust AML Policies

The Ultimate Weapon: Real Estate Money Laundering Legislation Revealed

AML/CTF Risk Factors For CDD/KYC

Stay Ahead of Financial Crime: Implementing an AML Compliance Program

The Hidden Rewards: Exploring AML Technology Job Salaries

Stay Ahead of the Game: Streamlining Your OFAC Screening Process

Privacy overview.

Sign up to our newsletter and get our Ultimate AML Compliance Guide sent to your inbox

How to Conduct an AML Risk Assessment

All UK businesses have a responsibility to prevent money laundering and other forms of financial crime.

Risk assessments are a key component of any firm's anti-money laundering (AML) tool kit, and can help businesses to measure the likelihood that they will inadvertently support or engage in criminal behaviour.

The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017) made it a legal requirement for UK businesses in the regulated sector to adopt a risk based approach to their anti-money laundering efforts. This not only helps reduce the damage done by money laundering to the UK economy but gives companies flexibility in how they design and deploy their anti-money laundering procedures; as such risk assessments can vary between companies and sectors.

This guide explains what risk assessments are, and how any business can apply them to combat money laundering while meeting their regulatory compliance obligations.

What is an AML Risk Assessment?

A money laundering risk assessment is a process that analyses a business's risk of exposure to financial crime. The process aims to identify which aspects of the business put it at risk of exposure to money laundering or terrorist financing. It achieves this by monitoring and assessing known vulnerabilities, also commonly referred to as Key Risk Indicators (KRIs). 

Anti-money laundering risk assessments form part of the required risk based approach . They should form part of, and tie into, a company’s overarching strategy to avoid facilitating the laundering of illicit funds.

There are two types of risk assessments required as part of a risk based approach. These are a companywide risk assessment and risk assessments of individual transactions.

A company-wide risk assessment is a floor to ceiling review of a business to identify what external risks of money laundering they face and where in their business is at risk of being exploited by criminals seeking to launder illicit funds. Once this is done it is used as the foundation for a company to design their risk assessment and anti-money laundering processes.

After identifying and highlighting the money laundering risks their company is facing, directors then must design an appropriate risk assessment procedure to ensure they identify any potential transaction that is part of a money laundering scheme.

Why are AML Risk Assessments Required

Certain businesses are required to conduct anti-money laundering risk assessments under Regulation 18 of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017).

On a practical level, a risk assessment could help a business to:

• use a risk-based approach to identifying and preventing money laundering.
• understand the risks associated with various business relationships and commercial activities.
• create policies, procedures, and controls that actively reduce the risk of financial crime.
• make more informed decisions about employees and clients.
• identify transactions and relationships that involve an at-risk or sanctioned country.
• Evaluate risk reduction measures.

Ultimately, an AML checks risk assessment can help businesses to reduce the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing. These measures are an essential part of any anti-money laundering compliance program, and can help organisations to stay on the right side of the law

Money Laundering Risk Indicators

Businesses can conduct a money laundering risk assessment by monitoring key risk indicators. International authorities generally apply five primary categories of risk indicator that businesses should assess:

• The size, nature, and complexity of a business.
• The type of customer involved (e.g. B2B or B2C).
• The types of products and services involved in a transaction.
• The methods used to onboard new customers and communicate with existing ones.
• Geographical factors

By assessing these individual factors, businesses can allocate a risk rating to a transaction or customer relationship. Ratings of low, medium, and high can be used when applying a simple risk range, whereas more advanced risk ranges extend to very low and very high ratings.

How to do a Company-wide risk assessment

  The first step of this assessment is for directors and employees to work together to identify how their business could be used to facilitate money laundering and how likely this is to happen. It is important to note that UK regulation requires that staff have sufficient training to be able to spot these risks. There is no set way that this assessment has to be carried out but it must review every aspect of the business. Once this has been done sufficient procedures should be designed and put in place to negate these risks.

It important that this process be well documented; as a company may be asked to prove it is compliant with UK anti-money laundering regulations , especially if it has been implicated in a money laundering scheme.

Things to consider in a companywide risk assessment are:

• The risks posed to their industry
• The risks posed by their business structure
• The risks posed by their products and/or services
• The risks posed by their business processes
• The risks posed by the geographical areas they operate in
• The risks posed by their distribution and payment channels. E.g. cash over the counter, bank transfers etc
• The risks posed by their customer base

This process should be reviewed every 12 to 18 months, or if a business undergoes any significant changes, and any necessary changes to internal procedures made.

How to perform an Anti-Money Laundering risk assessment

An anti-money laundering risk assessment’s purpose is to gauge if a transaction, and any individual involved in it, is possibly involved in money laundering and if any anti-money laundering checks need to be carried out or even if the transaction should not be performed at all.

The companywide risk assessment will have highlighted the greatest areas of risk and in these cases thorough anti-money laundering checks should be performed as a matter of course. Risk assessments should still be applied to transactions that were decided to be low risk in the companywide risk assessment.

A risk assessment is largely based on intuition and knowledge of how criminals exploit the private sector to launder money as well as proscribed business processes. It is therefore imperative, and a company’s responsibility, that the staff performing these assessments have the adequate training and tools to perform them.

There are some general key risk drivers that should be considered in each risk assessment:

• Clients seeking undue anonymity or secrecy and not willingly revealing their identity
• Clients acting through a third party
• A third party not being transparent about who they are acting on behalf of or who the ultimate beneficiary is
• Clients introduced to you by a third party, as you do not know the due diligence that has taken place
• Clients you have not obtained via the methods usual to the business
• Clients involved with cash based businesses
• Clients from abroad, especially from countries with low regulatory standards, high corruption or sanctions
• Clients from outside the usual customer base
• Clients involved in emerging sectors or who’s business has recently pivoted
• Clients with, or operating for an individual with, high net worth
• Clients wanting to deal in cash
• Clients with a criminal history
• Politically exposed clients
• Large transactions
• One off transactions

If the risk assessment finds any of these key risk drivers, any other risk drivers specific to a business as found in its companywide risk assessment or has any concerns then the company’s anti-money laundering check procedures should be followed.

Regardless of whether a risk is found or not, the findings of and methods applied in the risk assessment should be recorded.

Assessing High-Risk Activities

Businesses must pay particular attention to any high-risk activities when conducting a risk assessment. Each year, the UK government publishes a National Risk Assessment (NRA) that outlines the latest trends in money laundering and terrorist financing. This can help when prioritising certain activities as part of a risk-based approach to compliance.

In the UK's 2020 NRA, the following activities were identified as high-risk:

• conveyancing
• client account services
• trust and company formation
• financial technology services
• cash-related services
• the use of crypto assets and virtual money

Businesses should carefully consider whether their compliance framework does enough to identify and address these risks.

At the same time, organisations must pay close attention to the warning signs of money laundering and adjust their policies, controls, and procedures accordingly. This is especially true when dealing with customers and transactions that involve jurisdictions classified as high-risk by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

Risk Assessment during Customer Onboarding

A risk assessment can form a substantial part of the customer onboarding process. This opportunity should be used to conduct thorough due diligence before forming closer ties with an individual or organisation.

As part of an onboarding risk assessment, customers should be vetted for money laundering and terrorist financing risk factors. This process should include screening for adverse media, sanctions, and politically exposed persons (PEPs).

In addition to the above, businesses ought to be cautious when dealing with customers that perform actions that are at odds with their profile. This might happen if a customer suddenly attempts to enter into a high-value transaction, pay via a previously unrelated entity, or engage in a transaction that makes no commercial sense.

If a risk assessment flags any of these factors it may be necessary to ask further questions of a potential customer, or even to file a suspicious activity report (SAR).

Improve Your Approach to Risk Assessments with Red Flag Alert

Risk assessments are essential for businesses that need to comply with anti-money laundering regulations. Not only can they help to protect the economy from the threat of financial crime, but they can also prevent financial and reputational damage to the organisations involved.

Red Flag Alert can improve your risk assessment process by providing your business with fast access to reliable data on over 6.5 million businesses. With over 100,000 updates every day, users can trust this data to vet potential customers and verify any claims they make. Credit check any company and conduct AML checks  efficiently with one easy-to-use platform.

To discuss how Red Flag Alert can help to streamline your approach to risk assessments, get a free trial today

or see our guide on how to perform an AML risk assessment. 

Related Articles

How automating decisions can revolutionise your business practices

Phoenix Companies and Phoenixing: Are they legal?

What is transaction monitoring?

Importance of Ultimate Beneficial Owner Data To Real Estate Agents

Stay informed

Sign up to receive expert insights direct to your inbox.

• BSA/AML Manual
• BSA/AML Risk Assessment

BSA/AML RISK ASSESSMENT EXAMINATION PROCEDURES

Objective. Determine the adequacy of the bank’s BSA/AML risk assessment process, and determine whether the bank has adequately identified the ML/TF and other illicit financial activity risks within its banking operations.

• Determine whether the bank has identified ML/TF and other illicit financial activity risks associated with the products, services, customers, and geographic locations unique to the bank.
• Determine whether the bank has analyzed, and assessed the ML/TF and other illicit financial activity risks within the products, services, customers, and geographic locations unique to the bank.
• Determine whether the bank has a process for updating its BSA/AML risk assessment as necessary to reflect changes in the bank’s products, services, customers, and geographic locations and to remain an accurate reflection of its ML/TF and other illicit financial activity risks.
• If the bank has not developed a BSA/AML risk assessment, or if the BSA/AML risk assessment is inadequate, complete a BSA/AML risk assessment for the bank.
• Document and discuss with the bank any findings related to the BSA/AML risk assessment process.

Table of Contents

• Introduction
• Scoping and Planning
• Assessing the BSA/AML Compliance Program
• Developing Conclusions and Finalizing the Exam
• Assessing Compliance with BSA Regulatory Requirements
• Office of Foreign Assets Control
• Program Structures
• Risks Associated with Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

BSA/AML Risk Assessment Template

Identify and document the bank's aml risk factors.

Determine risk appetite and tolerance

Developing risk rating methodology, design and implement a risk assessment framework, identify all relevant sources of data for risk assessment, collect necessary data and information for risk assessment, analyze the collected data and information, identify potential risks and vulnerabilities, approval: risk analysis results.

• Identify and document the bank's AML risk factors Will be submitted
• Determine risk appetite and tolerance Will be submitted
• Developing risk rating methodology Will be submitted
• Design and implement a risk assessment framework Will be submitted
• Identify all relevant sources of data for risk assessment Will be submitted
• Collect necessary data and information for risk assessment Will be submitted
• Analyze the collected data and information Will be submitted
• Identify potential risks and vulnerabilities Will be submitted

Rate the potential risks and vulnerabilities

Develop strategies and measures to mitigate identified risks, implement measures to control and reduce the risks, monitor and track implementation of risk mitigation measures.

• 1 Not Started
• 2 In Progress
• 3 Completed

Evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented measures

Approval: effectiveness evaluation results.

• Rate the potential risks and vulnerabilities Will be submitted
• Develop strategies and measures to mitigate identified risks Will be submitted
• Implement measures to control and reduce the risks Will be submitted
• Monitor and track implementation of risk mitigation measures Will be submitted
• Evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented measures Will be submitted

Document the results of risk assessment and mitigation

Present findings and recommendations to the management, approval: management.

• Present findings and recommendations to the management Will be submitted

Review and update the BSA/AML Risk Assessment Template if necessary

Take control of your workflows today., more templates like this.

6 Steps for Completing an AML Risk Assessment

Anti-money laundering risk assessments are crucial for preventing financial crimes and remaining compliant with regulations. This comprehensive guide will review the basics of an AML risk assessment by answering the following questions: What is an AML risk assessment? Why should you complete one? What steps are involved?

What is an AML Risk Assessment?

Money laundering occurs when criminals try to make illicit funds appear to come from a legitimate source. Technology has made it easier for perpetrators to engage in money laundering, so it is more important now than ever that businesses implement a system to detect and prevent it.

That’s where the anti-money laundering risk assessment comes in. This analytical process allows organizations to determine the likelihood that a customer is involved with money laundering or terrorist financing. By gauging the risk level of each client, they can perform the appropriate due diligence and minimize involvement in a money-laundering scheme.

Once you complete the AML risk assessment, you can rate your clients as low, medium, or high risk. This information will determine the best way to monitor transactions, validate identities, and file suspicious activity reports.

Key Risk Indicators

To determine which clients are most likely to be involved with money laundering or other illicit activities, the assessment model looks at key risk indicators – or KRIs. KRIs refer to known vulnerabilities or aspects of a business that might attract criminals and money launderers.

There are five primary KRIs that all businesses should consider as part of their AML process:

• Types of Customers
• Nature, Complexity, and Size of the Business
• Products and Services Offered
• Geographical Risks
• Process for Onboarding Clients and Engaging with Existing Customers

Each of these KRIs includes several risk drivers that influence how relevant they are to your organization. If the drivers increase the risk, then the rating will be higher – and vice versa. As such, the AML assessment will need to include a risk range so that you can take appropriate action.

Why Complete an AML Risk Assessment?

No law specifically states you must conduct an AML risk evaluation, but other applicable regulations make it the only way to comply. For instance, the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) requires that companies take steps to mitigate the risk of money laundering at the individual level.

OFAC, the Office of Foreign Assets Control, requires businesses to implement a risk management program. This program must include Sanctions Screenings and PEP screenings - and other analyses - to identify and mitigate risks associated with money laundering and terrorist financing. (Also see FinCEN, the Financial Crime Enforcement Network and other relevant regulatory bodies for your industry and market).

Likewise, your Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) might want to review your risk assessment process to determine whether your organization is putting in the appropriate effort to catch and prevent money laundering.

Simply put, an AML risk assessment is the first step to follow regulatory mandates and prevent financial crimes so that you can avoid hefty fines and penalties – and reputational damage – associated with non-compliance.

Aside from compliance, there are other compelling reasons to perform AML risk assessments. Understanding the risk level associated with each client and transaction allows you to build appropriate processes and procedures to protect your business and its reputation. It also empowers your staff to act when they see something that is suspicious and gives them a roadmap of what steps they should take to address it.

In other words, you need to complete AML risk assessments to comply with the regulations and to protect your organization and staff from the threat of money laundering and other financial crimes.

The 6 Steps of an AML Risk Assessment

1.  document the risk assessment process.

The first step for conducting an anti-money laundering risk assessment is to create documentation about the key risk indicators and how they relate to your business. This documentation is the foundation of the risk-based approach, as it outlines the support for the analysis of risks you are going to perform.  

At a minimum your documentation should address the following KRIs:

• Types of Customers (Customer Due Diligence)
• Transactions

Products and Services

As you analyze each of these key risk indicators, take note of areas that might be extra susceptible to money laundering. Identifying these high-risk areas – and documenting them – is the first step to conducting a successful AML risk assessment.   ‍

2.  Ensure Adequate Staff is Dedicated to AML

After you have documented the key risk indicators and gained an understanding of the areas you should focus on, you must address the issue of staffing.

Having adequate compliance staff is essential to the success of any AML program. Ensure that you have the appropriate number of staff available and that they have adequate training. The chief compliance officer will manage the training program and determine the qualifications the staff should have.

3.  Identify Risks

Step three will build on the initial documentation that you prepared, as it involves identifying the inherent and residual AML and CFT risks your organization is exposed to (AML customer risk assessment methodology.

Inherent risk refers to those factors that affect your organization when you have not taken any steps to mitigate them. Think about it this way – the inherent risks are present just because your organization exists and conducts a certain type of business.

These factors should be evaluated before you implement any internal controls or mitigation so that you can gauge the effectiveness of your efforts later.

Residual risks, on the other hand, are what is left after you have taken steps to mitigate the inherent risks. Another way to view residual risks is as the gaps in your controls where there is still a chance that money laundering or other financial crimes could occur.

A bank, for example, has inherent risks associated with international transactions. However, they may use automated software to analyze these activities, check for OFAC Sanctions violations, and validate the legitimacy of the transaction. While the inherent risk is not eliminated, those efforts reduce it significantly – and what is left over is the residual risk.

When you review residual risks, you must decide whether the remaining threat level is acceptable or if you need to implement additional controls to reduce them further. We can break this analysis down into three categories:

• Weak Mitigating Controls: Weak controls are not very effective or only minimally reduce the risk. It is likely that the control involves a manual process and is not sufficient to address the concern.
• Adequate Mitigating Controls: Adequate mitigating controls do just enough to address the risk. They may be missing some components and still allow for some gaps, but they may be sufficient for certain KRIs.
• Strong Mitigating Controls: A strong control covers the entire risk associated with a transaction or activity. There are no gaps or additional measures needed to eliminate the threat.

4.  Classify the Risks You Identified

The next step is to classify the risk level for each of the KRIs you identified.

Most organizations will use a sliding scale of 1 to 3, with 1 representing a low inherent risk and 3 indicating a high inherent risk. The goal is to implement controls that can lower the risk scores down from 3 to 1.

Using the example from above, international wire transfers would be considered high inherent risk, or a 3. However, the automated system used to monitor and validate those transactions is classified as a strong mitigating control, which would lower it to a 1.

If the control was weak, it wouldn’t adjust the risk score. When there is an adequate control in place, it might reduce it from a 3 to a 2. Your AML process should evaluate these factors over time to see if the risks are increasing, decreasing, or stable.

5.  Review Each of the Risk Factors

Now that you have identified the KRIs and classified them as low, medium, or high, you must review each of them in greater detail. Consider the following questions as you conduct your analysis of the risk factors:

Analyzing your geographical risk involves looking at the footprint of your organization. Consider the areas where you conduct business, the size of those populations, and the people that live there.

Do you operate in areas where there are high rates of financial crime or drug trafficking? Are you constantly submitting suspicious activity reports in one region? Do you have a presence on a border that poses a higher risk than others?

Answering these questions can help you focus on areas that need more attention. Activities in higher-risk geographies will require you to increase your controls and due diligence measures. On the other hand, regions that do not pose as large of a threat may not need as strict monitoring measures.

Customer Base

There are many factors to consider regarding your customer base and the types of individuals and entities you interact with. Some individuals and entities will have a higher inherent risk, such as the following:

• Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs)
• Non-Resident Aliens
• Professional Service Providers
• Cash-Intensive Businesses
• Businesses Involved with Virtual Currencies

Assessing the risk level of each client is an essential part of the onboarding and know your customer process. At this stage, you should complete a sanction screening to confirm that the individual is not on an OFAC or any other Sanctions Lists.

Likewise, you must conduct a PEP screening to determine whether the client is a government official or a similar person that has a higher-level risk for corruption and illegal activities. If you identify clients that fall into this category, you will need to apply enhanced due diligence measures.

The products and services you offer will also contain inherent and residual risks. The better you understand and analyze these risks, the more successful your AML assessment will be. Here are some examples of high-risk offerings:

• ATM and Cash Services
• Loan Portfolios
• Online Account Opening and Access
• Remote Deposits
• Foreign Correspondent Accounts

Not only should you review the risk associated with these types of products and services, but you should also review how many clients use them. Determining whether the volume is increasing or decreasing can help you implement appropriate controls.

Transaction Review

An AML risk assessment also involves a review of the volume, frequency, and types of transactions that your business engages in. Consider some of the following:

• How many currency transaction reports and SARs are filed each year?
• What is the volume of loan transactions and private ATM customers?
• How does the number of international wires compare to domestic ones?

Certain transactions must be verified for OFAC compliance, like ACH and wire transfers. Ensure that you have clear policies and procedures for addressing them.

6.  Conduct Regular Audits

The AML risk assessment process does not stop after the steps we just described – it is a continuous process. As such, the last step is to conduct regular audits and reviews to ensure the program remains healthy and effective.

Update your policies and procedures as needed and ensure that the appointed compliance officer reviews them to keep them aligned with regulatory changes. This, along with a strong culture of compliance, can minimize the risk that your organization will be involved with money laundering.

Simplify your AML Screening Process with sanctions.io

sanctions.io is a highly reliable and cost-effective solution for AML and sanctions screening. AI-powered and with an enterprise-grade API with 99.99% uptime are reasons why customers globally trust us with their trade compliance and AML screening needs . To learn more about how our sanctions, PEP, and criminal watchlist screening service can support your organization's compliance program:

Book a free Discovery Call .

We also encourage you to take advantage of our free 7-day trial (no credit card is required).

Subscribe to our Newsletter right now and never miss again any new Articles, Guides and more useful content for your AML and Sanctions compilance.

ACAMS Risk Assessment TM

A global software solution for assessing your financial institution’s money laundering risk

ACAMS Risk Assessment TM is a SaaS solution providing financial institutions worldwide with a comprehensive and automated means of measuring, understanding, and explaining their money laundering risk.

Navigating regulatory complexity.

Based on a methodology developed by renowned anti-money laundering (AML) subject matter experts, ACAMS Risk Assessment™ responds to global authoritative standards and assists financial institutions of all sizes in meeting their AML risk assessment requirements. From community banks and credit unions to global financial institutions, investment and security firms, and MSBs – including those offering virtual asset products and services – our software solution ensures comprehensive coverage and peace of mind.

Our AML risk assessment SaaS solution objectively and consistently responds to the guidance of authoritative and regulatory bodies worldwide, giving institutions confidence that incorporating ACAMS Risk Assessment™ into their internal processes facilitates a robust  AML risk management program that is up to par with the latest guidance and global best practices.

Our risk-based methodology supports institutions in validating scoring decisions, features user input fields for narratives on internal AML controls, and helps institutions measure the effectiveness of their internal preventative and detective controls. Methodology is mapped against best practices and guidance from global authoritative sources, allowing for objectivity in an institution’s anti-money laundering risk assessment framework.

The multi-user platform helps identify money laundering risks within and across lines of business and assists in mitigating risk by helping financial institutions fill gaps in their AML controls.

Presentation-ready reports, from dynamic graphics to executive summaries and detailed narratives, deliver a comprehensive money laundering risk profile to examiners, board members, and other stakeholders.

Comprehensive, Automated Risk-Based Scoring

A web-based software solution, ACAMS Risk Assessment™ allows for timely and seamless updates to help your institution keep up with ever-changing regulatory requirements.

Our AML risk assessment solution automates cumbersome manual processes to give you time to focus on what matters most: understanding and mitigating your institution's money laundering risk.

Enterprise-wide risk assessments facilitated across multiple business lines, locations, and varied criteria.

Flexible, residual risk scoring supports institutions of all sizes, from community banks to global financial institutions, to support decision making and action plans.

From comprehensive reports to concise summaries, clearly convey your institution’s risk with dynamic graphic features like tables, pie charts, and other visual aids.

A Holistic View Across Multiple Areas of Risk Via a Variety of Risk Assessments

Identifies risk in products, customer types, and geographies that are mapped to global AML authoritative standards and facilitates an evaluation of the effectiveness of your organization’s control program.

Covers a wide range of suspicious activities, including structuring, fraud, terrorist financing, money laundering, tax evasion, insider trading, and other financial crimes.

Provides global best practices for building a robust sanctions program framework. Measures the quantity of sanctions risk across an organization’s customer base, international transactions, e-banking products, and other related areas.

Anti-Money Laundering Risk Assessment FAQs

Please note, the content included in these FAQs is for general information purposes only, and it is neither legal nor business advice. You should consult your own legal and business advisors for advice that applies to your particular situation.

A key component of an AML risk assessment is to facilitate the effectiveness of an institution’s AML framework by identifying inherent risks across the main areas of risk, assessing the institution’s internal preventative and detective controls, and highlighting any gaps in controls that need to be addressed. This process ultimately helps financial institutions arrive at a residual risk identification that addresses their own risk appetite, ensuring that the AML risk assessment is risk-based.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council describes an AML risk assessment example as “the identification of specific risk categories (e.g., products, services, customers, and geographic locations) … and an analysis of the information identified to better assess the risks within these specific risk categories” (source: FFIEC BSA/AML Manual ).

The FATF explains that risk assessment enables a financial institution to “understand how, and to what extent, it is vulnerable to money laundering/terrorist financing”, and helps it to “determine the level of AML/CFT resources necessary to mitigate that risk” (source: FATF Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach, The Banking Sector ).

Organizations may complete risk assessments manually, or by using AML risk assessment software tools and systems. Using technology, such as ACAMS Risk Assessment™, can help financial institutions to ensure their AML risk management and risk assessment processes and methodologies are objective, and that they respond to the guidance of global authoritative sources and financial institution supervisors.

Effective AML risk assessments are an important factor in a financial institution’s ability to meet its regulatory obligations.

ACAMS Risk Assessment™ assists financial institutions of all sizes in meeting their AML risk assessment requirements. From community banks and credit unions to global financial institutions, investment and security firms, and MSBs – including those offering virtual asset products and services. Furthermore, our software solution ensures comprehensive coverage and peace of mind through a platform that is flexible and scalable, including but not limited to the ability for institutions to customize to their own proprietary controls and change scoring to support risk-based decision making.

Assessing the effectiveness of an institution’s suspicious activity risk control framework goes beyond the identification and suspicious activity reporting of a wide range of financial crimes , such as fraud, structuring, terrorist financing, money laundering, tax evasion, and many others. Included in building a strong framework is a suspicious activity risk assessment that identifies these risks, and measures the effectiveness of applicable preventative and detective controls which financial institutions worldwide need to address. Suspicious activity risk assessments may be completed manually or can be automated with the help of tools like ACAMS Risk Assessment™.

Assessing the effectiveness of an institution’s sanctions program includes the measurement of the sanctions risks it is exposed to and the evaluation of its risk controls.

The frequency that a sanctions program risk assessment needs to be completed and its level of comprehensiveness depends on the risk profile of the institution, and how that risk profile changes over time.

ACAMS Risk Assessment™ automates the sanctions risk assessment process and draws on best practices to help financial institutions worldwide build a sound sanctions compliance program.

An AML risk assessment helps identify an institution’s inherent risk and assesses the effectiveness of its preventative and detective controls to arrive at a residual risk that is unique to each institution.

FATF recommends considering the following factors when assessing inherent money laundering risk:

• The nature, scale, diversity, and complexity of the business
• Target markets
• The number of customers already identified as high-risk
• The jurisdictions the bank is exposed to (through its own activities and those of its customers)
• Distribution channels
• Internal audit and regulatory findings
• The volume and size of transactions

(Source: FATF Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach, The Banking Sector )

The AML controls and factors that should be assessed include (but are not limited to):

• Management oversight and accountability
• Policies and procedures
• KYC, CDD, and EDD controls
• Detection and SAR filing
• Monitoring, systems, and operations
• Employee training
• Independent testing and oversight

The risk-based approach (RBA) requires financial institutions to proactively identify and seek out risks associated with illicit activities in order to find ways to control and mitigate those risks. The RBA is promoted by international organizations, including the Wolfsberg Group and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

According to the FATF , risk assessment should “form the basis of a bank’s RBA”. A robust risk assessment helps financial institutions to promptly and accurately identify money laundering risks and vulnerabilities and apply appropriate controls to mitigate those risks or identify unacceptable risks to avoid.

Explore Our Live or Virtual Demo Experience

Experience the ACAMS Risk Assessment™ SaaS solution at an upcoming Assembly conference .

You can also schedule a virtual demo for your organization.

Fill out the form below to request a consultation. This will include a demo of the ACAMS Risk Assessment™ SaaS solution, where we can discuss how our software can benefit your financial institution. Following your request, one of our dedicated ACAMS Risk Assessment™ team members will contact you to schedule your personalized demonstration.

Request a Demo

Product demos of our AML risk assessment tool are open to financial institutions worldwide. To request a demo, please fill out the form below and an ACAMS Risk Assessment™ representative will contact you. You may also reach us directly via email at [email protected] .

By submitting this form, I provide my signature, expressly consenting to calls, emails and/or texts regarding my training options from ACAMS and its affiliates and contractors using an automated dialing system to the number and email address provided. I further consent to the use of my personal information submitted herein as set forth in ACAMS’ Privacy Policy, subject to my rights under applicable law. I understand my consent is not required to enroll at ACAMS, and that I can withdraw my consent at any time. You can unsubscribe at any time or change the way in which we contact you by visiting our Communication Preference Center .

High Contrast

• Asia Pacific
• Latin America
• North America
• Afghanistan
• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• Cayman Islands
• Channel Islands
• Czech Republic
• Dominican Republic
• El Salvador
• Equatorial Guinea
• Hong Kong SAR, China
• Ireland (Republic of)
• Ivory Coast
• Macedonia (Republic of North)
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• Philippines
• Puerto Rico
• Sao Tome & Principe
• Saudi Arabia
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• United Kingdom
• News releases
• RSM in the news

• AI, analytics and cloud services
• Audit and assurance
• Business operations and strategy
• Business tax
• Consulting services
• Family office services
• Financial consulting
• Global business services
• Managed services
• Mergers and acquisitions
• Private client
• Professional Services+
• Risk, fraud and cybersecurity
• See all services and capabilities

Strategic technology alliances

• Sage Intacct
• CorporateSight
• FamilySight
• PartnerSight

Featured topics

• 2024 economy and business opportunity
• CrowdStrike incident
• Generative AI
• Middle market economics
• Environmental, social and governance
• Supply chain

Real Economy publications

• The Real Economy
• The Real Economy Industry Outlooks
• RSM US Middle Market Business Index
• The Real Economy Blog
• Construction
• Consumer goods
• Financial services
• Food and beverage
• Health care
• Life sciences
• Manufacturing
• Nonprofit and education
• Private equity
• Professional services
• Real estate
• Technology companies
• See all industry insights
• Business strategy and operations
• Family office
• Financial management
• Private client services
• Financial reporting resources
• Tax regulatory resources

Platform user insights and resources

• RSM Technology Blog
• Middle market focus
• Our global approach
• Our strategy
• RSM alumni connection
• RSM Impact report
• RSM Classic experience

Experience RSM

• Your career at RSM
• Student opportunities
• Experienced professionals
• Executive careers
• Life at RSM
• Rewards and benefits

Spotlight on culture

Work with us.

• Careers in assurance
• Careers in consulting
• Careers in operations
• Careers in tax
• Our team in India
• Our team in El Salvador
• Apply for open roles

Popular Searches

Asset Management

Health Care

Partnersite

Your Recently Viewed Pages

Lorem ipsum

Dolor sit amet

Consectetur adipising

BSA/AML and OFAC risk assessment: Best practices for financial organizations

Developing an effective strategy for bsa/aml and ofac compliance.

Several questions can keep risk leaders at financial institutions up at night. Do we know where our organization may be at risk? Do we have controls in place to mitigate these risks? Is our risk assessment up to date? However, developing an effective strategy for risk assessments for regulations like the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)/Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) can help alleviate these common concerns.

Although having a risk assessment is not a legal requirement, regulators expect financial organizations to have one documented. The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) manual provides general guidance on developing and updating a BSA/AML and OFAC risk assessment for financial organizations. Appendix J of the FFIEC online manual includes a Quantity of Risk Matrix and Appendix M includes a Quantity of Risk Matrix—OFAC Procedures. Both appendices provide a baseline for assessing BSA/AML and OFAC risks.

By performing a risk assessment, your financial services organization can gather a holistic view of where your risks lie for your customers, products, services and geographical presence. It also allows you to identify any control gaps that may put institutions at risk of regulatory exposures leading to monetary fines.

Since risk assessments are specific to each organization, no two risk assessments will be exactly alike; however, the approach to conducting them should be similar. Below are some best practices to be mindful of when developing or enhancing a risk assessment:

• Complete a thorough review to confirm that all customer types, products, services and geographical locations are included in the risk assessment. If specific risk areas are not applicable, institutions should still include them as a line item in the risk assessment and state why they are not applicable.
• Inherent risks—the level of risk present without consideration of the effectiveness of existing controls. Qualitative and quantitative data are used to determine the level of risk.
• Residual risks—the level of risk remaining after considering the effectiveness of existing controls.
• A majority of risk assessments do a good job of including mitigating controls; however, the part that is frequently left out is determining the effectiveness of the mitigating controls that are in place. Determining the effectiveness of the mitigating controls is critical in understanding the residual risk for each risk area. Standard ratings are strong, adequate or inadequate. Again, the definitions for each rating are to be determined by your organization.
• Once the inherent risk rating and the control effectiveness rating are determined, the residual risk can be calculated for each risk area. The residual risk rating should not be determined by the individual(s) completing the risk assessment, and a methodology should be in place to limit the subjectivity of the process. Below is a residual risk rating matrix, commonly used for calculating the residual risk rating. As you can see, the inherent risk and effectiveness of the mitigating controls drive the residual risk rating.  

Residual risk matrix

• A methodology should be in place to determine the overall risk of the organization. Common overall risk ratings are low, moderate or high, and the threshold band (i.e., low risk is 0-2.5, moderate risk is 2.6-5, etc.) is determined by your organization.
• When completing the risk assessment, keep the BSA/AML and OFAC risks separate. It is best to have two separate risks assessments that are tailored to the specific risks and controls. It is not uncommon for your overall BSA/AML and OFAC risks to be different. Again, it will depend on the customer base, products/services and geographical presence.
• The FFIEC online manual states that the risk assessment should be updated when there is a change in customers, products, services or geographic locations. Outside of that, the manual does not provide specific timelines for when organizations should update their risk assessments. However, it is a best practice to update your risk assessment every 12-18 months. When the updates are made, the compliance team should inform the board of directors, so they know where current BSA/AML and OFAC risks exist.

A common misconception regarding risk assessments is that they only apply to traditional banking entities when, in reality, they apply to all non-traditional financial institutions, such as, but not limited to, broker-dealers, auto-lenders and fintech companies. With the continuous development of technology, the risk profile of organizations is constantly changing. Understanding the risk profile for non-traditional financial institutions is even more important because of the unique customers, products, services and geographical presence they may have. The risk assessment is the most important and critical point of understanding the risks and controls that are in place and helps drive the next steps for the future state of the organization.

For more information on developing and enhancing BSA/AML risk assessments, contact RSM’s AML and Regulatory Compliance practice.

RSM contributors

Related solutions

Subscribe to risk bulletin, our cybersecurity, risk and fraud professionals provide regular insights and regulatory compliance updates to help your organization manage risk. .

THE POWER OF BEING UNDERSTOOD

ASSURANCE | TAX | CONSULTING

• Technologies
• RSM US client portals
• Cybersecurity

RSM US LLP is a limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients, but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmus.com/about for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International.

© 2024 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.

• Terms of Use
• Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information (California)

What we solve for

Who we work with, a comprehensive framework for aml risk assessment.

In today’s data-driven world, financial institutions have unprecedented access to vast amounts of information about their customers and transaction activities. However, effectively using this data landscape to assess financial crime risk poses a significant challenge.

Many organizations grapple with poor data quality and struggle to build a risk scoring model that accurately evaluates the risk of financial crime within each business relationship. While the promise of data science and artificial intelligence (AI) hold immense potential for the future, financial institutions still rely on rules-based models that aggregate data from multiple sources to derive a risk rating. These models require regular fine tuning to gauge their efficacy in evaluating financial crime risk.

In this article, we explore the essential relationship between data quality and risk scoring models, introducing a framework that bolsters the accuracy of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) risk evaluation. Leveraging 20+ years of experience in AML consulting and technology, we present actionable insights, industry best practices, and advanced methodologies to help organizations unlock the full potential of their risk assessment.

Identifying and mitigating AML risks

AML risk assessment is a thorough, systematic process designed to detect, evaluate, and mitigate the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing linked to a business relationship. This involves identifying and examining crucial risk factors to understand the AML risk exposure of financial institutions. This allows them to pinpoint customers with a higher money laundering risk and implement appropriate, risk-based strategies for preventing money laundering. Assessing customer risk is a fundamental component of a financial institution’s overall AML risk evaluation.

By implementing an effective AML risk assessment framework, financial institutions can proactively identify and assess the likelihood and potential impact of financial crimes within their operations. This enables them to allocate resources, implement proper controls, and prioritize their efforts to effectively manage and mitigate the risks related to money laundering and terrorist financing.

Central to the customer AML risk assessment is a risk model that calculates a risk score, or a risk rating, such as high, medium, or low. This risk score or rating provides the AML Officer and the business line with a clear image of the risks the customer relationship and activities pose to the institution.

The importance of AML risk assessment

An AML risk assessment enables organizations to adopt a risk-based approach to combat financial crime and meet regulatory expectations. Through thorough assessments, organizations demonstrate their commitment to compliance while efficiently allocating resources and applying enhanced scrutiny to high-risk customers. This strategic approach not only ensures regulatory compliance but also strengthens the organization’s ability to detect and prevent financial crime, safeguarding the integrity of the financial system.

Challenges associated with an AML risk management program

Establishing and supporting an effective AML risk management program comes with various challenges that can affect its success. These challenges need careful consideration and proactive measures to ensure compliance and better manage financial and reputational risks. Key challenges associated with effective AML risk management programs include:

Data quality : AML risk assessment is dependent on accurate and comprehensive customer and transaction data. Inadequate, inconsistent, or inaccurate data can impede the effectiveness of risk assessments.

Infrequent data updates : Regular updates of customer information, such as occupation, industry, and address and externally sourced information such as adverse media are vital to supporting accurate risk assessments and avoiding reliance on obsolete data.

Data integration challenges : Integrating data from various internal and external sources, such as customer databases and transaction records, can be challenging due to differences in formats, systems, and data quality issues.

Risk scoring models : Risk scoring models must be robust, well-designed, fully documented, and regularly validated and refined to ensure full and effective risk assessments.

Real-time risk detection : The ability to refresh risk profiles in real time based on continuous monitoring activities, including analyzing transactions, screening against watchlists, and assessing changes to customer attributes, is pivotal for dynamic AML risk assessment.

Resource limitations : Comprehensive risk assessments demand competent personnel, a robust technological infrastructure, and access to reliable data sources. These requirements can be challenging to resource constrained organizations.

Developing a framework to implement an effective AML risk assessment program

To set up an effective AML risk assessment program, financial institutions should adhere to a structured framework. This framework can enhance an institution’s risk assessment capabilities and help align it with regulatory requirements. It is important to remember that AML risk assessment is an iterative process necessitating regular revisions and continuous improvement.

Develop the risk assessment framework and method : Outline the risk assessment’s scope, goals, and methodology. Determine the assessment frequency, responsible personnel, and available resources. Ensure compliance with regulatory mandates and industry-leading practices. For help, contact our FinScan AML consulting team.

Identify risk factors : Identify the relevant risk factors that apply to your institution, considering aspects like the nature of your business, customer demographics, products/services, delivery channels, geographic locations, transaction monitoring alerts, and watchlist screening results.

Collect and evaluate data : Gather relevant data from internal and external sources. This may include customer information, transaction data, external risk indicators, typologies, industry reports, regulatory guidance, and intelligence sources. Ensure data quality and completeness for accurate risk assessment.

Assess inherent risk : Evaluate each identified risk factor to determine its inherent risk level. Consider the probability and potential impact of money laundering and terrorist financing activities associated with each factor. Use historical data, industry trends, typologies, and regulatory guidance to define the best level of risk assessment.

Build a risk model : Develop a risk scoring method to quantify the identified risks. Assign risk scores or ratings to each risk factor based on its significance, likelihood, and potential impact. This aids in prioritizing risks and allocating resources effectively. Include both qualitative and quantitative factors in the scoring process.

Mitigate and control risks : Identify and implement suitable risk mitigation measures for each risk profile. These might include enhanced customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, staff training, internal controls, and governance practices. Implement controls that are proportional to the risk level and comply with regulatory requirements.

Monitor and review : Continuously monitor and review the effectiveness of risk mitigation measures and the overall risk assessment framework. Regularly update risk assessments to accommodate changes in the institution’s risk profile, regulatory landscape, emerging risks, and industry best practices. Maintain a feedback loop to improve the risk assessment process over time.

Report : Generate reports for management, regulators, and internal stakeholders to communicate risk exposure, mitigation actions, and the effectiveness of the AML program.

Related Posts

Effective Sanctions Screening: Step by Step

Effective Politically Exposed Person (PEP) Screening: Step by Step

What is an AML Risk Assessment? [With Examples]

Find out what processes you need to perform an AML risk assessment and the key risk factors you should consider when assessing your company and its clients to stay AML-compliant.

August 31, 2024

At first glance, most clients show typical behavior and present a normal risk level. However, in practice, risk factors like the customer’s location, type, transaction patterns, or industry can elevate the risk or, more importantly, change over time. That’s why it’s clear — you need to understand certain nuances if you want to build an effective anti-money laundering (AML) strategy that works. For that, we have the AML risk assessment process, which helps companies understand unique customer profiles first-hand while identifying risks that could potentially lead to money laundering. 

AML risk assessment is crucial for using a risk-based approach and documenting each client’s risk level through an optimized and compliant AML workflow. Despite everyone knowing the importance of AML compliance, risk assessments raise questions, leaving this complex topic a common discussion in the “non-compliance” section. Of course, navigating different AML requirements across various jurisdictions doesn’t help, either. 

So, what does it really mean for a company to address and mitigate potential risks? How do AML risk assessment requirements differ for corporate and individual clients? What kind of due diligence measures are required for this process? We answer these and other questions below. 

What is an AML Risk Assessment?

An AML risk assessment is a process designed to determine the likelihood of a customer using the company’s products, services, or the platform itself for money laundering and other criminal activities, such as terrorism financing and tax evasion. In other words, this process measures the risk of each client as a way to minimize chances of being involved in any fraudulent schemes. 

Any company involved in financial transactions should use AML risk assessment to comply with AML laws and regulations, as well as ensure a secure environment by:

• Identifying different types of money laundering risks.
• Assessing the level of exposure to such risks.
• Implementing effective measures to manage these risks. 
• Evaluating and enhancing these measures to improve AML risk management. 

Companies use AML risk assessment to understand how different types of risks are related. Since there’s no one-size-fits-all approach to risk management, risk factors differ based on the company’s industry. However, common risks that need to be assessed are service risk, customer risk, geographic risk, transaction risk, and product risk.

Who Sets Out AML Regulations?

It depends on the country, however, there are several standards that work like a unified AML approach globally. For example, a known regulatory watchdog, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), is one of the key players that sets standards for countries to develop and update their AML laws, such as its 40 recommendations . 

Other AML compliance requirements worldwide include:

• 🇺🇸 The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)
• 🇪🇺 Anti-Money Laundering Directives (AMLDs)
• 🇬🇧 The Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) 
• 🇨🇦The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act

Related : AML Automation — Streamlined Compliance 101 for Businesses

What are the Key Compliance Processes of an AML Risk Assessment?

Many regulated entities are required to have AML programs in place, which are often based on the five key pillars of AML .

Naturally, a proper AML risk assessment can be broken down into different measures, which your businesses should consider: 

• Identity verification . Verifying customer identity during the onboarding process and throughout the whole business relationship to comply with customer identification program (CIP) and Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements. 
• Customer due diligence (CDD) . Selecting simplified due diligence (SDD) measures for low-risk customers and using enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk clients. 
• AML screening . Conducting screening of different AML databases, such as global watchlists, adverse media , as well as politically exposed persons (PEPs) and sanctions screening.
• Transaction monitoring . Tracking and screening client transactions, including keeping data records for reporting suspicious transactions. 
• Testing and auditing . Checking, auditing and updating all AML processes in order to keep up with changing regulations.

Related: What is an AML Compliance Program?

What is the Difference Between AML Risk Assessment and Customer Risk Assessment?

The main difference is that the business undergoes a company-wide risk assessment (in this case, an AML risk assessment) while individual clients are specifically obliged to go through a customer risk assessment. Customer risk assessments evaluate their risk of involvement in money laundering and they are a key component of the general firm-wide AML risk assessment , guiding how you evaluate the risk associated with each customer. 

Customer risk assessments include the mentioned processes, such as KYC, CDD, AML screening, and transaction monitoring. Analyzing this information is essential for identifying potential risks and implementing a risk-based approach. Through an internal company’s risk assessment, you can better understand your money laundering risks and then finalize your profile through an AML risk assessment in order to address the identified risks. 

What are the Main Risk Factors to Consider When Performing an AML Risk Assessment?

There are different types of money laundering risks, which require you to establish clear policies and procedures to make the AML risk assessment clear and efficient. Some financial institutions share templates on this matter, but you should generally focus on tailoring this process based on your specific risk profiles. 

The common risk factors that can help you indicate money laundering when conducting risk assessments include:

• The types of customers (for example, B2C or B2B) you target based on the kind of industry you operate in. 
• The size and complexity of your business , including factors like how many employees and customers you have and what jurisdictions (perhaps, high-risk) you operate in. 
• The channels you use for distributing your products or services, including KYC processes for your third-party vendors/suppliers. 
• The size of the transactions that you handle, as larger transactions tend to be used for evading reporting requirements. 
• The results of your most recent AML audit , which should be taken into account when conducting your risk assessment.  

In practice, this can be a lengthy process, especially if some of the AML processes aren’t automated through some sort of AML software . There are other complications, especially when it comes to the factor that regulations and requirements change. For example, companies can now accept crypto payments instead of standard transactions, increasing the money laundering risk. Additionally, large-scale corporations have many partners, providers, and suppliers, which should all be assessed since some might have operations in high-risk countries and be based overseas where the money laundering risk is higher. 

3 Tips to Perform an AML Risk Assessment

Like with any AML process, you need to know all the processes and strategies that can be used to properly identify the risks within your business. This also means understanding the level of risk when it comes to all clients and their transactions. 

Here are the key steps that are vital when performing an AML risk assessment:

1. Identify Risk Indicators

You should support your risk analysis by documenting the main risks, including how they relate to your business (the overall thought process). In general, this starts with identifying the type of clients you work with. For example, PEPs are considered to be higher-risk, as well as professional service providers, who should be verified and screened to ensure that  these individuals or entities are not on any sanction lists . 

For corporate clients, Business Verification is required. This includes determining beneficial ownership and who are the people that control or benefit from the company’s business activities. Multiple individuals can share beneficial ownership, and cross-checking such information with records from government agencies and other official databases is a must to ensure accuracy. Some shell companies can only exist on paper and can hide a client’s true identity. Assessing your delivery channels and whether the items are delivered remotely, in person, or through another party is important. 

Additional risk indicators you should consider in your AML risk assessment:

• Clients seeking anonymity.
• Clients acting through a third party.
• Clients involved in cash-based businesses.
• Clients outside your typical customer base.
• Clients with high net worth or acting for high-net-worth individuals.

Additionally, you should identify higher-risk countries and regions . For example, if a client is registered abroad and chooses your services over those closer to them, it could be a red flag. Also, when conducting an AML risk assessment, it’s crucial to consider countries with high corruption and money laundering rates as well as screen and monitor all the transactions that your company handles , focusing on certain red flags and the types of transactions, like cross-border transactions, loan transactions, etc. 

2. Assess High-Risk Activities 

Based on current trends in money laundering and terrorist financing, you should examine high-risk activities during an AML risk assessment. This helps prioritize high-risk activities and follow the risk-based approach. You can evaluate each identified risk factor to determine its risk level , considering the likelihood of money laundering or other financial crime linked to each factor. 

In practice, this can be done by using a risk scoring system (from low to high risk) and collecting relevant data from both internal and external sources, such as customer onboarding data, transaction records, industry reports, and other external risk indicators. You should also assess whether your AML compliance framework works effectively to address these risks.

For example, the use of crypto assets and virtual currencies , as well as trusts or financial technology services are also considered to be higher-risk activities. This is especially important when dealing with transactions or customers involving high-risk jurisdictions. For this reason, you should be aware of the money laundering warning signs and adjust your controls accordingly over time. 

3. Use Automated AML Solutions

If you made it this far, you probably understand now how complex risk management is. Without any sort of automation in AML compliance, collecting, verifying and monitoring documentation is a lengthy process, not to mention keeping up with risk profile changes due to sanctions lists updates, PEP status changes, etc. 

Automated solutions, like iDenfy’s AML screening and monitoring services, including our new automated customer risk assessment solution , help streamline your AML risk assessment and the overall compliance program to effectively ensure that all controls match the risk level and meet regulatory requirements. This is vital when you need to update risk assessments to reflect changes in your company’s risk profile and keep a compliant reporting and monitoring system in place. 

Learn more about different ways of automating your AML risk assessment, or get started right away. 

Frequently asked questions

Why are AML Risk Assessments Required?

For regulated companies, such as banks or fintechs, an AML risk assessment is not just an internal control, but a legal requirement to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes . This process is also a part of the risk-based approach to AML. 

What is an Inherent Risk in an AML Risk Assessment?

Inherent risk is an AML risk a company faces based on the level of exposure to money laundering activities (if no mitigation processes are in place). These risks occur due to several factors, such as the company’s products, services, clients, geographic reach, or processes. Inherent risks help determine the next steps for implementing controls and risk mitigation, which are categorized into three levels: weak, adequate, and strong.

Are Risk Assessments a Part of Customer Onboarding?

Yes, since risk assessments are part of the due diligence process, which is mandatory for regulated entities and is performed before starting a business relationship with both a new individual and an organization. So, in other words, at this stage, all customers need to be evaluated for money laundering and terrorist financing risks. 

How Often Should You Update Your AML Risk Assessment?

Compliance specialists recommend updating your risk management practices and making changes to your AML risk assessment at least once a year. Regularly reviewing all AML procedures helps ensure that your business is compliant with AML laws and that all risk profiles are accurate and up-to-date, as there can be changes in your relationship with a client.

Gabija’s a consistent writer for the blog and the first ever in-house copywriter at iDenfy, who joined the startup in 2021. With a background in journalism, she was always keen on technology. From employer branding posts to product updates, she covers all things related to the startup and its innovations.

Read more articles

August 30, 2024

What is a Transaction Dispute? [Challenges for Merchants]

Understand the key reasons a cardholder might initiate a transaction dispute, how these disputes are connected to chargebacks, the strategies merchants can use to manage high costs, and effective methods to prevent friendly fraud.

August 28, 2024

Best Age Verification Software Providers of 2024

Choose the right age verification vendor to prevent against under-aged users

August 27, 2024

What is a Sanctions List?

Learn all about sanctions compliance, starting from defining a sanctions list and ending with automated AML solutions for effective sanctions screening and risk management.

Save costs by onboarding more verified users

Join hundreds of businesses that successfully integrated iDenfy in their processes and saved money on failed verifications.

All iDenfy’s products are protected with the number one cyber insurance package and the Technology Errors & Omissions insurance.

• FATF Presidency
• Mandate of the FATF
• Outcomes of meetings
• Ministerial Declarations
• History of the FATF
• FATF Secretariat
• Job opportunities

Find out about the world, a region, or a country

FATF Member Countries

• Hong Kong, China
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• Russian Federation *
• Saudi Arabia
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• United Kingdom
• United States

* membership suspended on 24 February 2023 

FATF Global Network 

• Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG)
• Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF)
• Eurasian Group (EAG)
• Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG)
• Action Group against Money Laundering in Central Africa (GABAC)
• Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT)
• Inter Governmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA)
• Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF)
• Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures (MONEYVAL)
• FATF Global Network

High-Risk and Other Monitored Jurisdictions 

• Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - June 2024
• High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2024

Browse our publications, including reports, guidance and statements  

• Publications

Recent statements

Current or recent public consultations

• Public consultation on FATF Money Laundering National Risk Assessment Guidance Update
• Public Consultation on Recommendation 16 on Payment Transparency
• Public Consultation on the FATF Best Practice Paper to Combat the Abuse of Non Profit Organisations

Key documents

• The FATF Recommendations
• Consolidated assessment ratings
• FATF Methodology

Explore the FATF's areas of work:

• Mitigating Unintended Consequences

Methods and Trends

• FATF Recommendations
• Mutual Evaluations
• High-risk and other monitored jurisdictions
• Financial inclusion and NPO issues
• Terrorist Financing
• Proliferation financing
• Beneficial Ownership
• Asset recovery
• Digitalisation
• Virtual Assets
• Environmental Crime
• Assessments

National money laundering and terrorist financing risk assessment

Publication details, national ml/tf risk assessment.

Understanding the money laundering and terrorist financing risks is an essential part of developing and implementing a national anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime.

A risk assessment allows countries to identify, assess and understand its money laundering and terrorist financing risks. Once these risks are properly understood, countries can apply AML/CFT measures that correspond to the level of risk, in other words: the risk-based approach (RBA).  The risk-based approach, which is central to the FATF Recommendations, enables countries to prioritise their resources and allocate them efficiently. 

The FATF has developed guidance which will assist countries in the conduct of risk assessment at the country or national level.  The principles described in this guidance are also relevant to more focussed risk assessments, for example of a particular financial sector.    

The guidance is structured as follows: 

Section 1. Purpose, scope and status of the guidance

Section 2 . General principles that should be taken into account when conducting ML/TF risk assessments 

Section 3. Planning and organisation of a national-level money laundering / terrorist financing risk assessment

Section 4. The three main stages involved in the risk assessment process

Section 5. Outcome of the risk assessment

Annexes to this document contain additional information relating to money laundering / terrorist financing risk assessments.  In addition to the annexes contained in the report itself, the IMF and the World Bank provided the following. 

• National ML/TF Risk Assessment - IMF Annex
• National ML/TF Risk Assessment - World Bank Annex

Money laundering and terrorist financing risks

• Private Sector
• Information for students and academia
• Fraud Warning
• Frequently Asked Questions
• FATF Glossary
• FATF Training and Support Activities

Restricted access for FATF delegates only

Terms & conditions | Privacy Policy |  Sitemap  

© fatf-gafi 2024. All rights reserved

The global body for professional accountants

• Search jobs
• Find an accountant
• Technical activities
• Help & support

Can't find your location/region listed? Please visit our global website instead

• Middle East
• Cayman Islands
• Trinidad & Tobago
• Virgin Islands (British)
• United Kingdom
• Czech Republic
• United Arab Emirates
• Saudi Arabia
• State of Palestine
• Syrian Arab Republic
• South Africa
• Africa (other)
• Hong Kong SAR of China
• New Zealand
• Discover ACCA qualifications and ACCA levels
• How to become ACCA qualified | ACCA
• Expand your career pathways with ACCA
• Benefits of pursuing an ACCA qualification | ACCA
• Explore success stories, guides & accounting news | ACCA
• Apply to become an ACCA student
• Why choose to study ACCA?
• ACCA accountancy qualifications
• Getting started with ACCA
• ACCA Learning
• Register your interest in ACCA
• Learn why you should hire ACCA members
• Why train your staff with ACCA?
• Recruit finance staff
• Train and develop finance talent
• Approved Employer programme
• Employer support
• Resources to help your organisation stay one step ahead
• Support for Approved Learning Partners
• Becoming an ACCA Approved Learning Partner
• Tutor support
• Computer-Based Exam (CBE) centres
• Content providers
• Registered Learning Partner
• Exemption accreditation
• University partnerships
• Find tuition
• Virtual classroom support for learning partners
• Find CPD resources
• Your membership
• Member networks
• AB magazine
• Sectors and industries
• Regulation and standards
• Advocacy and mentoring
• Council, elections and AGM
• Tuition and study options
• Study support resources
• Practical experience
• Our ethics modules
• Student Accountant
• Regulation and standards for students
• Your 2024 subscription
• Completing your EPSM
• Completing your PER
• Apply for membership
• Skills webinars
• Finding a great supervisor
• Choosing the right objectives for you
• Regularly recording your PER
• The next phase of your journey
• Your future once qualified
• Mentoring and networks
• Advance e-magazine
• Affiliate video support
• About policy and insights at ACCA
• Meet the team
• Global economics
• Professional accountants - the future
• Supporting the global profession
• Download the insights app

Can't find your location listed? Please visit our global website instead

• Anti-money laundering firm-wide risk assessment
• Technical activities and advice

Updated August 2024

Under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017), it is a legal requirement for every accountancy firm to have a documented firm-wide risk assessment. ACCA has created a template with some hints and tips to aid members and their clients in completing a firm-wide risk assessment.

Technical factsheet: AML firm-wide risk assessment (updated August 2024)

Download WORD 59KB

Advertisement

• ACCA Careers
• ACCA Career Navigator
• ACCA Learning Community

Useful links

• Make a payment
• ACCA-X online courses
• ACCA Rulebook
• Work for us

Most popular

• Professional insights
• ACCA Qualification
• Member events and CPD
• Supporting Ukraine
• Past exam papers

Connect with us

Planned system updates.

• Accessibility
• Legal policies
• Data protection & cookies
• Advertising

Explore our job categories below.

Please note