- Adjusts sentence structure for readability.
QuillBot
Free Version:
- Free with limited functionality.
- Basic paraphrasing and readability improvement.
- Basic paraphrasing.
Premium Version:
- Subscription-based.
- Advanced users needing comprehensive writing tools.
- - Unlimited paraphrasing.
- Grammar check and thesaurus.
Here is how to use Humanize.AI with Quillbot to bypass AI detection and improve the quality of the content that AI generates.
Getting started with Humanize.AI
Step 1: Open the Website
Get to the Humanize.AI official website.
Step 2: Paste the Text
Paste your AI-generated content onto the text box that appears on the Humanize.AI landing page.
Step 3: Select Settings
Select the level of humanization you intend to. Most of the time, basic adjustments versus more intense changes which will make the text sound natural can be chosen.
Step 4: Process the Text:
Click the button to start humanization. The tool will then work on tweaking the sentence structures, word choice, and general tone.
Step 5: Review and Copy
Using QuillBot
Step 1: Access to the Website:
Open the QuillBot website.
Step 2: Choose a Mode:
QuillBot has different modes, such as Standard, Fluency, Formal, Creative, etc. Choose the mode that best suites your content requirement.
For basic paraphrasing, the Standard mode usually works fine. If you need more advanced changes, use either Creative or Formal modes.
Step 3: Input Text:
Paste your AI content in the text box.
Step 4: Paraphrase:
Click the "Paraphrase" button. QuillBot will then process the text to give a rephrased version.
If you are using the Free Version, you might have very few options. To make more profound changes to advanced attributes that include even a grammar check, switch over to the Premium Version.
Step 5: Replace Synonyms and Tone:
QuillBot has an adjustment for synonyms, too, that helps adjust the result even better. You can choose synonyms one by one and alter according to how you want it to appear and sound.
Step 6: Read and Refine:
Finally, paraphrase and read the output cautiously. Check that the content still conveys your message and the tone is per your target.
You are able to further polish the text by running it through the QuillBot grammar checker.
Step 7: Copy and Use:
Finally, when satisfied with the paraphrased content, you may copy and use it at will. The Premium Version offers direct download choices for the text, too.
For Basic Paraphrasing and Readability Improvement:
Humanize AI: Ideal for users who need a quick and straightforward tool to make AI-generated text less detectable without requiring advanced features.
QuillBot Free Version: Suitable for those who need basic paraphrasing and don’t require extensive rewriting capabilities.
For Advanced Paraphrasing and Comprehensive Writing Assistance:
QuillBot Premium Version: Recommended for users who require unlimited paraphrasing capabilities and additional tools like grammar checks. This version is particularly useful for those who need robust features to create high-quality, human-like text.
Even after using humanizer AI tools to get past detection, your text may need further refinement to be not only undetectable but also polished and clear. Here are the essential tips for improving your content:
1.1 proofread for grammar and clarity:.
Even if your text passes through AI detection, it is also important to correct further any remaining grammar mistakes or awkward phrasing. For this, WPS Office's AI tools do an excellent job, having several useful features:
Spell Check: WPS Office does support a lot of file types, for example,.pdf and .docx. It helps one catch and correct errors in whatever format. This tool scans your text for spelling mistakes and allows you to make corrections with a few clicks.
WPS AI Chatbot: It doesn't just correct grammatical errors alone; besides that, it explains to its user why he or she would have fallen into a certain grammar error and, therefore, goes further into assisting the person to avoid such mistakes in the future. This is important in learning how to better write.
WPS Parallel Translate: This shall be expounded further later, but in essence, the feature puts depth and variety into your text, maximizing its quality without flagging the AI detectors.
While proofreading, ensure that your tone and style are uniform throughout the content. Such consistency lining improves readability, making the text seem far more natural.
The more complex the sentences, the more they should be broken down into easily digestible ones. This improves readability and reduces the possibility of your text being flagged as AI.
Be sure to use nuanced language. Add idioms, cultural references, and under- and overtones. Introduce small imperfections. A small mistake makes your content less suspiciously perfect. Always use active voice; it is more engaging and doesn't sound like AI at all. Excessive jargon should be avoided. Basic language helps circumvent detections.
Be Unpredictable: Try to jumble the structure of your sentences. Include unique ideas in your content, and keep it nimble.
Casual Style: Engage in a conversational style so that the content sounds human.
Personal Storytelling: Weaving in personal anecdotes makes the content relatable and it will not trigger the alarm.
By following these steps, you will then have created content that is undetectable and of high quality.
These are the translated texts that just do the trick when one is stuck for ideas or in dire need of an essay boost in depth. From my experience, I can confidently say it is worthwhile to take advantage of parallel translation in WPS Office. Not just some ordinary translation tool, it is so resourceful that inaccuracy and user-friendliness cannot be compared with other tools.
Why WPS Office?
Parallel Translation: WPS allows one to open the original text alongside the translated version. This makes it much easier to understand and adapt content in languages you're not familiar with. This feature is remarkably accurate in capturing subtleties that other tools often miss.
User-Friendly Interface: The operating surface is intuitive, thus helping you to translate, read, and edit texts easily. Working on any documents—from English to Chinese or Spanish, WPS has got it covered.
Maximize Your Content with Summarizer and Chat PDF
Apart from the translation function, WPS Office has a Summarizer that condenses long documents into key points; this is very good for when you want to understand quickly the gist of translated content or get inspiration from original texts.
Another such useful tool is the Chat PDF, which enables a user to discuss the content in a PDF document by asking questions to create ideas or clarify complex information. Whether you are translating or creating from scratch, Chat PDF opens the doors to deeper insights.
How to Use WPS Office’s Parallel Translation and More
Step 1: Open your document: Open WPS Office and open the document you would like to translate.
Step 2: Activate Parallel Translation: After choosing for the translation tab, click on "Parallel Translation." This will have the original text appear next to the translated version.
Step 3: Summarize Key Points: Use the Summarizer to reduce your document to main ideas.
Step 4: Engage with PDFs: Engage the PDF chat while working on an assignment, asking questions or diving deep.
By incorporating these features, you can effortlessly amplify your humanized or original content, ensuring it’s rich in detail and free of AI detection flags. With WPS Office, not only can you translate with precision, but you can also refine and expand your ideas, making it a superior choice for creating high-quality, undetectable text.
First and foremost, make sure that the goals are very clear and the prompts provided are detailed. After developing the content, proofread it for grammar and clarity. Proper editing with tools like WPS Office improves the quality of writing; later, polish it so that it remains engaging to the audiences.
1. Use natural, nuanced language away from over-polished text.
2. Add minor imperfections to make it feel human.
3. Lean into active voice and avoid excessive jargon.
4. Integrate surprising elements or personal anecdotes.
5. Keep the writing interesting by mixing the structure of your sentences.
In this article, I told you how to effectively bypass Ai detectors when creating smooth content. I have applied the importance of working with well-crafted Ai text at the beginning, including the use of tools like Humanize Ai and Quillbot to avoid detection. I have also outlined how the superior grammar and style features in WPS Office will enhance your text. Following these points can guarantee undetectable content that is professionally done.
15 years of office industry experience, tech lover and copywriter. Follow me for product reviews, comparisons, and recommendations for new apps and software.
(Mis)Uses of Technology
Can the fear of students using generative AI and the rise of questionable AI “checker” tools create a culture devoid of creativity? It’s a topic that is curiously one worth delving into a bit more deeply, in part because of something that happened this weekend.
Earlier this year, we had a post by Alan Kyle about California bill SB 942 . That bill would require AI companies to offer a free AI detection tool, despite the fact that such tools are notoriously unreliable and prone to nonsense. As Kyle wrote, the bill takes a “nerd harder” approach to regulating technology its backers don’t understand.
SB 942 has continued to move forward just passed in the California Assembly. It’s now on Governor Newsom’s desk to potentially sign.
I was thinking about that this weekend after a situation at home. One of my kids* has an English homework assignment. They had to read Kurt Vonnegut’s famous short story, Harrison Bergeron , and write a short essay about it. Since I do a fair bit of writing, my kid asked me to review the essay and see if I had any pointers. I gave a few general suggestions on how to think about improving the flow of the piece, as it read very much like a standard first draft: a bit stilted. My kid went off to work on a rewrite.
If you’re unfamiliar with the story of Harrison Bergeron, it’s about a society that seeks to enforce “equality” by placing “handicaps” on anyone who excels at anything to bring them down to the least common denominator (e.g., ugly masks for pretty people, having to carry around extra weights for strong people). One of the morals to that story is on the perils of seeking to force equality in a manner that limits excellence and creativity.
Later in the day, the kid came by with their school-issued Chromebook, which has Grammarly Pro pre-installed. The students are encouraged to use it to improve their writing. One thing that the tool has is an “AI Checker” in which it tries to determine if the submitted text was written by AI.
This is similar to “plagiarism checkers” that have been around for a few decades. In fact, Grammarly’s “check” covers both AI and plagiarism (or so it says). Those systems have always had problems, especially around false positives. And it seems that the AI checkers are (unsurprisingly) worse**.
It turns out that Grammarly only just introduced this feature a few weeks ago . Thankfully, Grammarly’s announcement states pretty clearly that AI detection is pretty iffy:
AI detectors are an emerging—and inexact—technology. When an AI detector definitively states whether the analyzed content contains AI, it’s not acting responsibly. No AI detector can conclusively determine whether AI was used to produce text. The accuracy of these tools can vary based on the algorithms used and the text analyzed.
Anyway, the kid wanted to show me that when the word “devoid” was used, the AI-checker suggested that the essay was “18% AI written.” It’s a bit unclear even what that 18% means. Is it a “probability this essay was written by AI” or “percentage of the essay we think may have been written by AI”? But, magically, when the word “devoid” was changed to “without” the AI score dropped to 0%.
In Grammarly’s announcement, it claims that because these tools are so flaky, it “does things differently” than other AI checker tools. Namely, it says that its own tool is more transparent:
Grammarly’s AI detection shows users what part of their text, if any, appears to have been AI-generated, and we provide guidance on interpreting the results. This percentage may not answer “why” text has been flagged. However, it allows the writer to appropriately attribute sources, rewrite content, and mitigate the risk of being incorrectly accused of AI plagiarism. This approach is similar to our plagiarism detection capabilities, which help writers identify and revise potential plagiarism, ensuring the originality and authenticity of their work.
I can tell you that this is not true. After the kid continued to work on the essay and reached a point where they thought it was in good shape, the AI checker said it was 17% AI, but gave no indication of what might be AI-generated or why.
Now, to be clear, the essay can still be turned in. There is no indication that the teacher is relying on, or even using, the AI checker. When I mentioned all this on Bluesky, other teachers told me they know to basically ignore any score under 60% as a likely false positive. But my kid is reasonably flustered that if the AI checker is suggesting the essay sounds like AI wrote it, that it might mean there’s a problem with the essay.
At that point, the hunt began to figure out what could possibly be causing the 17% score. The immediate target was more advanced vocabulary (the issue that had already been identified with “devoid.”)
The essay did use the word “delve,” which has now become something of a punchline as showing up in every AI-generated work . There’s even a study showing the massive spike in the use of the word in PubMed publications:
Even crazier is the use of both “delve” and “underscore.” However, my kid’s essay did not use “underscore.”
The main theory I’ve seen is that the reason “delve” is so popular in AI works is that some of the training and data commonly used in AI systems was done in Nigeria and Kenya, where the word “delve” is more common. This has resulted in some arguments online, such as when online pontificator Paul Graham tweeted out how receiving an email with “delve” in it indicated it was written by ChatGPT, leading a bunch of Nigerians to call him out by mocking him , and highlighting that other cultures use language differently than he might.
Either way, the “delve” in my kid’s essay was not written by AI. But, just to be safe, the word was replaced. As were some other words. It made no difference. The AI checker still said 17%.
At one point, we looked at a slightly oddly worded sentence and tested removing it. The score went up to 20%. At that point, the kid just started removing each sentence, one at a time, to see what changed the score. Nothing actually seemed to do it, and despite Grammarly’s promise of transparency and clarity, no further information was provided.
All of this struck me as quite a series of lessons. First, it points out the absolute stupidity of bills like SB 942 which will only increase, rather than decrease, this kind of AI dousing rod woo woo divination.
But, the bigger lesson has to do with AI and schools. I know that many educators are terrified of generative AI tools these days. Plenty of educators talk about how they know kids today are turning in essays generated by ChatGPT. Sometimes it’s obvious, and sometimes less so. And many are not sure what to do about it.
I’ve seen a few creative ideas (and forgive me for not remembering where I saw these) such as having the students create a prompt to get ChatGPT to write an essay related to a class topic. Then, the real homework is having the student edit and correct the ChatGPT output. The students are then told to hand in the prompt, the original ChatGPT essay, and also their corrections.
A similar idea was to have the students write their own essay and then also have ChatGPT write an essay on the same prompt. Then, the students had to hand in both essays, along with a short explanation of why they thought their own essay was better.
In other words, there are some ways of approaching this, and as time goes on, I expect we’ll hear of more.
But, simply inserting a sketchy “AI checker” in the process seems likely to do more harm than good. Even if the teacher isn’t guaranteed to be using the tool, just the fact that it’s there creates a challenge for my kid who doesn’t want to risk it. And it’s teaching them to diminish their own writing skills in order to convince the AI-checker that the writing was done by a human.
And that seems, ironically, quite like the lesson of what “Harrison Bergeron” was supposed to teach us to avoid. Vonnegut was showing us why trying to stifle creativity is bad. Now my kid feels the need to stifle their own creativity just to avoid being accused of being a machine.
I’m not against AI as a tool. I’ve talked about how I use it here as a tool to help edit my (human) writing, to challenge me, and to push me to be a better (human) writer, even as those tools tend to be awful writers themselves. But I fear that with there being such a fear about “AI writing,” the end result might actually make people write less with the creativity of humans, and more to simply avoid being called out as a machine.
* In case you’re wondering, I checked first to make sure they were okay with me writing about this before telling this story and have kept details to a minimum to protect their privacy.
** After reading through a draft of this piece, kid suggested we should run this through an AI checker as well, and it tells me (falsely) that 3.7% of this article appears to be written by AI (it specifically calls out my description of Harrison Bergeron as well as my description of plagiarism checkers as likely written by AI).
Filed Under: ai , ai checker , generative ai , grammar , school , writing Companies: grammarly
https://techxplore.com/news/2023-08-bots-captcha-humans.html
It is really getting much harder “To Tell Computers and Humans Apart”.
And now it is becomming the opposite of trying to stop bots and allow humans.
Both suggestions could still be completed 100% by AI without any understanding of the material. The only two viable solutions I’ve seen are a) have the work done entirely in class, or b) conduct an oral exam where the student defends the essay. Both of these have significant challenges.
My kids were in school when the district mandated the use of turnitin.com. late 90s early 2000s, biggest IP issue was really “stealing music”.
That company’s proposition was to store everything written by students and cross check it, looking for plagerized, or paid for material.
I hit the roof because my kid’s work and all other student’s work is owned by them, and they are minors, so can not agree to a contract to assign the work for unconpensated use by anyone else.
A lawyer friend (nog IP lawyer ) offered that perhaps student homework is a work for hire, so is already assigned to the teacher/school/district.
Anyway I went to the school board meeting and told them what they were doing was abusive, non compensatory, confiscative… Against the 13 Amendment!
Anyway, I asked, wtf is wrong with asking the teachers to do their jobs! They know the kids, they have fine honed senses and experience, they are really good at detecting plagiarism.
The board sure got an earful from me, and no other parents were at all concerned.
I didn’t move the needle.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now . Want one? Register here
Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter
What's this.
Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »
A weekly news podcast from Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw
Read the latest posts:
Become an Insider!
12:14 | (3) |
10:55 | (12) |
10:50 | (0) |
09:35 | (26) |
05:30 | (17) |
20:14 | (15) |
15:04 | (28) |
13:44 | (24) |
12:08 | (22) |
10:57 | (31) |
This feature is only available to registered users. You can register here or sign in to use it.
Three predictions for how ai will reshape academia.
Jozef Gherman is the CEO & Founder of Undetectable AI: StealthGPT .
The current state of artificial intelligence in academia is in constant flux. Each university will inevitably be somewhat defined by its AI policy, but certain trends are bound to sweep academia at large.
With a background in generative AI, I can see the wave of superior chatbots and new technologies coming toward higher education, the universities attempting to protect student learning and the next generation surfing that wave with impeccable competency.
I want to speculate on the near future that builds upon a present where AI tools with large language models like ChatGPT can write essays, AI detectors like Turnitin can spot the watermarks of AI writing and AI tools with natural language processing aim to bypass those detectors by making text more human-like.
As much as the use of AI threatens student development by depriving them of learning outcomes like attaining critical thinking faculties and a sense of real-world consequences, tech developers still want the next generation of students to be fully functional human beings. The three parties—tech, faculty and students—must work together to make a future that benefits everyone using AI technology.
Mega millions jackpot hits $740 million—here’s how much a winner could take home after taxes, saw the eclipse, aurora and perseids now see a fourth rare sky event.
Here are three predictions for how AI will reshape academia for each of these groups.
If generative AI poses a problem for professors demanding their students’ learning experiences come without any caveats, students should expect in-class assignments to take the place of take-home assignments. These in-class assignments might take the form of long-answer worksheets or full essays asked to be started and finished in class.
While this approach prevents students from using AI to write their essays and ensures they are not engaging in AI plagiarism, it is also important to consider that this forces students to write and think in an environment that might not be conducive to their best work. Deep learning often requires isolation and environmental control by learners. So, the classroom might be the right place to hear a lecture, but unless professors are offering personalized learning experiences for individual students, a whole classroom of students writing the same long-from answers at once might not produce the learning outcomes professors are trying to create.
Some progressive campuses might see a different direction to take their students. Cornell is one such case with a very future-forward approach to embracing AI technology. The university has accepted the use of generative AI in written assignments and the consequences of putting all-out bans on the use of AI. Their AI ethics statement also addresses more political concerns, such as whether students are unwitting contributors to climate change and big data. I expect universities like Cornell to be the first wave of campuses to realize my second prediction.
While academia may be facing some challenges in adapting to the new technological era, I believe that AI will ultimately have a positive impact on student learning and overall human intelligence. One of the ways artificial intelligence will likely benefit both students and faculty alike is by augmenting curriculums for personalized learning experiences that are versatile enough to tailor to each class and update according to relevant developments.
The burden on professors to continuously update curriculums is oftentimes too great for them to keep up with the rest of the job’s demands. The amount of personalization employed by a professor may vary, but if they want, artificial intelligence has the power to customize a curriculum down to the individual student, removing any implicit bias that might get in between a student and their learning experience. If a professor is tasked to teach a classroom of international students who are not native-English speakers, the AI can help update the curriculum to make sure no learner is left behind.
AI-powered curriculums can evolve in real time with our changing world and a class’s changing demands. If a student’s personal development as a human being is the highest priority, AI tools can be used by professors to make sure their teaching can keep up with their changing fields so the next generation is prepared for the real world they will be entering.
A key worry professors have is passing students who have used AI tools to write their papers and then having them leave the classroom without any real-world competency in their field.
There was once a time in academia when elocution and memorization were so valued that to test if individual students knew their class material, they would have to memorize the text and pass an oral test in front of their class. It may seem antiquated, but what is old can become new again.
By requiring students to prove what they know in oral tests, whether just for the professor or in front of the entire class, there is no way they can utilize AI tools to aid them. Oral tests that require memorization don’t care what sort of AI systems are put in place to automate a student’s work. When speaking alone in front of a class, no AI assistant can help you. You can only rely on your own knowledge and the effort you put into acquiring it. Since many professors want students to learn the material without cheating, oral testing is one method of measuring who’s truly learned anything.
With student dependency on AI growing, tech leaders should consider ways AI can build a user’s self-reliance. For some tech leaders, this might include developing AI systems that generate problem-solving processes rather than direct answers or features that allow students to customize their user experience to their education level. Personalization can expand beyond curricula. Imagine what role AI can play in personalizing a student’s campus experience and then their life experience entering an increasingly competitive world.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
COMMENTS
Scribbr's AI Detector accurately detects texts generated by the most popular tools, like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot. It also offers advanced features, such as differentiation between human-written, AI-generated, and AI-refined content and paragraph-level feedback for more detailed analysis of your writing.
QuillBot's AI Detector tool can tell you how much of your text is likely AI-generated or AI-refined. It can also distinguish between ethical and unethical uses of AI writing tools, and provide feedback on your content quality.
This tool helps you decide if an essay or other text is written by a human or by AI. It uses color-coding, analysis, and tips to show the word choice and uniqueness of the text.
Detect if a text is human or AI-generated with over 99% accuracy. Paste text or select a file and get results for perplexity, sentence length, and diversity scores.
Transparent, responsible AI use without all the guesswork: Grammarly's AI content detector and writing assistant assess your work for you, so you know exactly where to refine and polish to make sure it's authentically yours. Detect AI-generated content from Grammarly and other tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Claude in seconds.
Learn how to use an AI content detector tool to identify and rewrite AI-generated text for your essays. Find out the benefits, features, and steps of this service and get online help from experts.
SciSpace's AI detector is a free tool that can detect AI-generated text in scholarly content, such as essays, papers, and PDFs. It can also identify the specific AI tool used, such as GPT-4, ChatGPT, or Jasper, and provide a detailed analysis report.
Essay Ai Detector (Free & Score By Line) Essay Ai Detector is an AI-powered detector and checker that locates AI text in your content, helping to neutralize it. Utilizing the latest technology with no word limit, Essay Ai Detector efficiently identifies and addresses AI-generated text, ensuring authenticity and trustworthiness in your content.
Scribbr AI Detector: Identify AI-generated content, like ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini, with leading AI Checker software.
Covered by >100 media outlets, GPTZero is the most advanced AI detector for ChatGPT, GPT-4, Gemini. Check up to 50000 characters for AI plagiarism in seconds.
Isgen is an advanced AI detector that can identify AI-generated content across over 80 languages with high accuracy. It provides detailed insights, reports, and features to help you ensure authenticity and improve your content quality.
Get advanced AI-powered essay checks: AI essay detection, plagiarism, and grammar. Our paper checker ensures error-free writing.
The most comprehensive AI Detector available capable of checking for ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude & other AI models in 30 languages. Try it for free!
Who Is AI Detector for? It is vital to know what content has been written by AI or humans, whether you're looking at a blog post, browsing the Internet, or reading a college essay. Our free ChatGPT detector can help you to check any type of text.
Turnitin's AI detector can identify when AI writing tools such as ChatGPT or AI paraphrasing tools may have been used in submitted work. Learn how Turnitin's AI detector is specialized, trusted, integrated and effective for academic integrity.
AHelp offers a free AI detector tool that can analyze written content and detect if it is created by ChatGPT, GPT-4, Bard, or other AI platforms. It claims to have high accuracy and low false positive rate, and to help students and teachers protect academic integrity.
WriteHuman offers a tool to detect and humanize AI-generated content with accuracy and speed. Learn how to use the AI detector, interpret the human score, and bypass AI detection with the built-in humanizer feature.
Compare the best AI detectors of 2024, both free and premium, and find out how Scribbr outperforms other tools in accuracy and reliability.
Check student essays as you do today Our AI essay detector complements our similarity checking workflow and is integrated with your LMS, providing a seamless, familiar experience.
Utilize our AI-powered essay and paper checker for precise analysis and correction. Enhance your writing with our efficient AI essay and paper checker tool. Try now for accurate results!
AI Detectors: Comparing the Top Tools. Now, let's take a closer look at three popular AI detection tools: GPTZero, Originality.ai, and CoGrader. First, let's compare the three. I ran a series of experiments to test their accuracy and reliability, using five different iterations of the same essay: 100% AI-generated essay from GPT-4
testing ai detection on successful mba essays at harvard & stanford Originality.ai's score on all 12 actual MBA essays as well as the two generated by ChatGPT4 According to Originality.ai, "False positives are painful when they occur, and we are working hard to continually improve and release even better models that drive down our false ...
Kipper AI ensures students can make use of the tools available to them, bypassing AI detectors and allowing access to the full potential of AI. DISCLAIMER: No part of the story was written by The ...
For example, a student might use ChatGPT -- an AI tool that uses large language model learning and a conversational question and answer format to provide query results -- to write a short essay ...
The big picture: Commercial AI text detection tools — even those claiming high accuracy — still have some big flaws. Catch up quick: After the release of ChatGPT, teachers quickly realized that the plagiarism detection software they'd used before failed to work on student submissions that were generated by an AI system.
Learn to outwit AI detectors to still develop well-regarded, human-like text with my expert guidance in developing super-strong content, using humanizer tools, and fine-tuning grammar. ... These are the translated texts that just do the trick when one is stuck for ideas or in dire need of an essay boost in depth. From my experience, I can ...
After the kid continued to work on the essay and reached a point where they thought it was in good shape, the AI checker said it was 17% AI, but gave no indication of what might be AI-generated or ...
I want to speculate on the near future that builds upon a present where AI tools with large language models like ChatGPT can write essays, AI detectors like Turnitin can spot the watermarks of AI ...